Louisiana’s vastly bold plan to rebuild a part of its coast by diverting sediment from the Mississippi River has been the topic of intense debate. A brand new research could bolster the case of these in favor.

The research appears to be like at two smaller-scale initiatives which might be in some methods predecessors to the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion, the $2 billion plan to gradual land loss erasing Louisiana’s coast. Development on that undertaking might start as early as subsequent yr, whereas the same one on the other facet of the river referred to as the Mid-Breton Diversion might comply with.

Its most important discovering is that the 2 current river diversions constructed to extend the movement of freshwater into Barataria Bay and Breton Sound to enhance public oyster grounds didn’t trigger vital land loss. The research by researchers with Louisiana State College and the U.S. Geological Survey checked out practically 20 years of land elevation info.

Whereas that will appear to be neither good nor unhealthy information for the far-larger initiatives on the way in which, it refutes an earlier research held up by opponents of the longer term diversions as proof they won’t work.

The peer-reviewed research discovered that the Davis Pond Freshwater Diversion on the west financial institution of the Mississippi River between Luling and Ama constructed 1.32 sq. miles of recent land throughout the previous 20 years, largely inside a holding basin in northern Barataria Bay the place the water is first discharged.

Operation of the Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion on the river’s east financial institution simply south of Violet over 20 years was discovered to lead to “no statistically vital” change in land space the place it empties into the northwestern portion of Breton Sound, regardless of vital erosion within the sound’s outermost wetlands brought on by Hurricanes Katrina, Gustav and Isaac.

“It’s clear from this research and others, that river reconnection can improve or, within the case of Caernarvon, haven’t any statistical impact on the land change in these methods attributable to variations in vegetation, hydroperiod (the time that soils are saturated with water), sediment supply and exterior elements together with hurricane impacts,” the research concluded.

The research was co-authored by LSU oceanography and coastal sciences professors John R. White and John W. Day Jr., and USGS geographer Brady Couvillion, and was printed within the lately issued January 2023 version of Ecological Engineering.

White and Day have been conducting analysis on Louisiana’s coastal erosion for many years. Couvillion has authored a number of research utilizing satellite tv for pc and on-the-ground information for the USGS to element the charges of coastal land loss. In a 2017 paper, he discovered the coast’s loss charge had slowed between 2010 and 2018 to a median of a soccer area each 100 minutes.

This new research’s findings straight contradict a 2019 research by completely different LSU researchers, led by coastal sciences professor Eugene Turner, that concluded each diversions prompted extra land erosion than land restoration.

The brand new paper, and Couvillion in an interview, stated Turner’s research inappropriately used USGS information from one in all Couvillion’s earlier research in figuring out loss charges for each diversions, leading to inaccurate land measurements. The older paper additionally didn’t rely land gained in Huge Mar, a failed agricultural area into which the Caernarvon diversion empties and has been constructing land, the brand new research stated.

However equally necessary, Couvillion stated, is that Turner’s paper doesn’t adequately tackle the distinction between the 2 freshwater diversions and the brand new diversion plans that will probably be designed to seize sediment to construct new land.

Advertisement

“Before everything, I feel the first problem (with the Turner paper) is that Davis Pond and Caernarvon are freshwater introduction diversions,” Couvillion stated. “They weren’t designed, nor are they operated to successfully seize and distribute sediment.”

Advertisement

The 2 freshwater diversions had been designed to ship as a lot as 10,000 cubic toes per second of freshwater taken from the higher degree of the Mississippi River because it flows by, however each have hardly ever been operated at greater than 2,000 cubic toes per second.

These two diversions had been designed to freshen water on the far ends of their potential basins to help the operation of public oyster seed beds. Whereas it was hoped each would additionally enhance the well being of wetlands and develop new land, due to federal guidelines in place on the time, allow approvals had been largely based mostly on the greenback worth of enhancements within the oyster beds being designed to outweigh the price of the diversions.

The Mid-Barataria diversion has been touted as a land-building device, and is being designed to seize as a lot sediment as potential, with an consumption construction that can attain decrease ranges of the river the place extra sediment is carried. It would ship 75,000 cubic toes per second of sediment and freshwater into the Barataria Basin close to Myrtle Grove.

The undertaking is awaiting a last determination by the Military Corps of Engineers on whether or not to problem working permits, following the discharge of a last environmental affect assertion earlier this yr.

That environmental report agreed with the undertaking’s design staff that it’ll create about 20 sq. miles of land throughout its first 50 years of operation, whereas additionally rising the lifetime of each current wetlands and new wetlands constructed by the state by dredging and pumping of sediment from the river by pipelines.

Turner, nevertheless, nonetheless says his research gives a extra correct portrayal of the 2 diversions as inflicting land loss within the two basins. He stated the brand new paper fails to match land acquire and loss from the diversions to areas with out diversions. He additionally stated the world reviewed within the new paper for Davis Pond was 15% smaller and for Caernarvon was 33% smaller than the corresponding areas in his paper.

Nonetheless, the brand new paper additionally cites comparable outcomes for land acquire within the basins of the 2 diversions between 1985 and 2016 measured by the Netherlands-based Deltares water analysis program with its Aqua Monitor, which makes use of satellite tv for pc imagery to map modifications in water protection all over the world. 

And Couvillion stated Turner’s paper was nonetheless flawed as a result of the information it used from his earlier paper was not meant for use for the evaluation of long-term developments.

The information utilized by Turner got here from satellite tv for pc imagery with a decision of 30 meters, he stated, that means every pixel or dot on the satellite tv for pc picture is 30 meters on either side, about the identical measurement as a median residential lot.

“It could be considerably like measuring the diameter of a hair with a ruler,” he stated. “It’s merely the improper device for the job.”

And wetland environments are at all times altering, that means comparisons of single views of the wetlands to find out developments might be problematical.

“If one had been to provide an estimate of coastal wetland space in Louisiana from satellite tv for pc photographs taken at present, and one other tomorrow, the estimates can be completely different,” he stated. “It’s extra applicable to offer a number of estimates of wetland space and use statistical evaluation to offer not solely a imply, or fitted, estimate of wetland space on a particular date, but in addition, and importantly, an uncertainty vary of your estimate.”

The brand new paper used estimates of wetland space at smaller than pixel sizes, based mostly on nearly 200 satellite tv for pc observations in a statistical evaluation of wetland change based mostly on pre- and post-diversion operations to provide you with each the estimated land acquire and an estimate of the uncertainty of that measurement.

Couvillion additionally disagreed with Turner’s rivalry that the diversion space modifications ought to have been in comparison with a “management” space, arguing there typically isn’t any appropriate management space for comparability, partially as a result of many different elements come into play as causes of abrasion.