Connect with us

Georgia

Herschel Walker’s Campaign Is Over. A Georgia Residency Investigation Isn’t.

Published

on

Herschel Walker’s Campaign Is Over. A Georgia Residency Investigation Isn’t.


Pay Dirt is a weekly foray into the pigpen of political funding. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Thursday.

It’s been more than six months since one-time Republican Senate hopeful Herschel Walker conceded defeat. But it’s been even longer since the office of the Georgia secretary of state opened its investigation into questions surrounding the college football legend’s residency. And while the race is over, that investigation is not.

In emails to The Daily Beast, the office confirmed that the residency investigation, which opened on Nov. 28, 2022, is still open. The agency provided a case sheet confirming the probe, titled “Fulton county residency issue with candidate.” Two people familiar with the investigation confirmed to The Daily Beast that the office had been actively working on the case in recent months, including contacting family members.

It’s unclear why the investigation has dragged on. Residency issues are usually resolved quickly—one way or the other. For instance, the state of Georgia previously opened a voter residency investigation into Walker’s wife, Julie Blanchard, on Aug. 19, 2021. The office closed the investigation a month later, finding she hadn’t committed any violations.

Advertisement

Anthony Michael Kreis, who specializes in election law at the Georgia State University College of Law, told The Daily Beast he was “surprised” to learn that the probe was still open.

“I was always skeptical of the idea that Herschel did anything unlawful in terms of the residency issue,” Kreis said. “Residency questions are typically really easy ones, and while this was politically sketchy, I always thought it was a non-issue as a legal matter, so I’m surprised that it would take this long to close the investigation.”

Questions about Walker’s residency shadowed his campaign from the start. But those questions re-emerged in late November, a few weeks after he forced a runoff election against incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA). That’s when CNN reported that the former NFL star took a homestead tax exemption in both 2021 and 2022 for his home in Texas—a break only available for a “principal residence,” according to the state comptroller. The exemption saved him about $1,500 last year, according to CNN.

Walker—a former Dallas Cowboy who lived in the Dallas area for decades before announcing his Georgia candidacy in August 2021—had claimed the Texas exemption on the home since 2012. But all the while, he maintained one of the most recognized names in Georgia, as a University of Georgia football star in the early 1980s—even though he left school early in favor of a professional career in the U.S. Football League.

The CNN report raised legal questions in both states—tax laws in Texas, and candidate and voter residency rules in Georgia, where Walker registered to vote weeks ahead of launching his campaign. However, Kreis said, Georgia’s candidate residency requirements are fairly flexible, with a homestead claim being only one of a number of data points that officials consider.

Advertisement

“The key factor is whether the person moved to their primary residence with the intention to stay,” Kreis told The Daily Beast.

Walker and Blanchard had lived together in Texas for years, but during the race they resided in an Atlanta-area house Blanchard had owned for decades, which also doubled as the campaign’s first official address. However, The Daily Beast reported that, previously, the couple may not have personally stayed in that house at all, with Blanchard collecting between $15,000 and $50,000 in rental income on the home between 2020 and 2021, listing the asset as “Georgia residence.”

While Kreis expressed surprise at the lengthy probe, he also offered an anodyne possibility.

“Perhaps, and I think most likely, it’s because the secretary of state’s office in particular, and Fulton County more generally, have been inundated with work related to the 2020 election,” Kreis said.

“That can cut both ways, though,” he continued. “Why wouldn’t you just close it out and just get it off your desk?”

Advertisement

When told that investigators had not merely tabled the case, but had been actively working it this year, Kreis replied, “That’s almost inexplicable to me.”

He theorized that “other legal questions might arise from the complaint,” but said he didn’t know why the secretary of state would keep the file open “unless they’re digging more, waiting on information, or possibly sharing information with another agency.” Kreis noted that the Walker campaign had its share of problems, and observed that campaign finance issues—revealed in recent Daily Beast reports—could have triggered federal involvement.

According to the investigation case sheet, the inquiry stemmed from a complaint, though the complainant’s name was redacted. (The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported on Nov. 28—the day the probe opened—that a woman named Ann Gregory Roberts filed a complaint with the state attorney general and Georgia Bureau of Investigations.)

“The only other thing I can think of is that the secretary of state investigators pulled on one string and maybe unraveled something else, and given how sloppy his campaign was I wouldn’t be shocked that in the process of a routine investigation they found something else or were asked to find something else, or are possibly cooperating with the Department of Justice—that would be the more nefarious speculative angle on it,” he said.

But The Daily Beast also reported that, at the same time Blanchard was taking rental income from the Atlanta property, a company she owned also received about $50,000 in federal COVID relief loans—at Walker’s Texas address. One of Walker’s financial disclosure statements claimed that his wife’s company had also generated rental income for her, suggesting the company had a stake in the Atlanta property.

Advertisement

The Daily Beast reached out to Walker and a campaign representative for comment, but did not receive a reply.

When Fox News asked Walker about the residency issues just ahead of the runoff, Walker shrugged it off as a “desperate” attack planted by his opponent.

“Anyone in Georgia know [sic] that I’m Georgia born, Georgia bred, and when I die, I’ll be Georgia dead,” Walker said. “Everyone knows that.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Georgia

Boxer Georgia O'Connor Dead at 25 After Cancer Diagnosis and Miscarriage

Published

on

Boxer Georgia O'Connor Dead at 25 After Cancer Diagnosis and Miscarriage


Due to her delayed diagnosis, she said her cancer had spread and she also had blood clots in her lungs.

“Not one doctor took me seriously,” she continued. “Not one doctor did the scans or blood tests I begged for whilst crying on the floor in agony. Instead, they dismissed me. They gaslit me, told me it was nothing, made me feel like I was overreacting. They refused to scan me. They refused to investigate. They REFUSED to listen.”

After publicly sharing her cancer battle, O’Connor explained that she had suffered a miscarriage just before her diagnosis. However, she still chose to stay positive. 

“I’ve been pregnant with a beautiful baby, suffered a miscarriage, then got diagnosed with ‘incurable’ cancer,” she wrote on Instagram February 18 in honor of her 25th birthday. “But I still feel on top of the world!”

Advertisement

One such highlight was her wedding less than two weeks before her passing. O’Connor shared that she had married her longtime boyfriend Adriano Cardinali on May 9, posting photos of the nuptials on Instagram.

As she put it in the caption, “I married the love of my life.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Georgia

Police say Georgia Tech student's shooting death was 'targeted act'

Published

on

Police say Georgia Tech student's shooting death was 'targeted act'


Atlanta Police released surveillance footage of a possible suspect in the shooting death of a Georgia Tech student on May 18 at an off-campus apartment building. (Courtesy APD)

The shooting death of a Georgia Tech student on May 18 was a “targeted act,” according to the Atlanta Police Department.

During a Wednesday press conference, APD said the student – identified as 22-year-old Akash Banerjee by the Fulton County Medical Examiner’s Office – was shot in the head on the ninth floor of The Connector student apartments at 699 Spring St. in Midtown. He was transported to Grady Hospital, where he died on Tuesday.

“We’re at a point where we believe this was a targeted act,” APD Homicide Commander Andrew Smith said during the press conference.

APD released surveillance video showing a suspect walking down the ninth-floor hallway of the apartment building with what appears to be a gun in his pocket around 10 minutes before the shooting. Smith said the suspected shooter had been to the building previously looking for Banerjee.

Advertisement

Smith said Banerjee was shot in the ninth-floor hallway following an altercation with the suspect. The Connector has key card access, and Smith said it was unknown how the shooter gained access to the building.

Smith said investigators were still trying to determine the connection between the suspect and Banerjee, who had a “criminal history.” Smith declined to elaborate on Banerjee’s criminal record and if that might be what led to the shooting.

Advertisement

Avatar photo

Collin Kelley is the executive editor of Atlanta Intown, Georgia Voice, and the Rough Draft newsletter. He has been a journalist for nearly four decades and is also an award-winning poet and novelist.
More by Collin Kelley

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Georgia

A brain-dead woman's pregnancy raises questions about Georgia's abortion law

Published

on

A brain-dead woman's pregnancy raises questions about Georgia's abortion law


Adriana Smith remains on life-support at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta.

Brynn Anderson/AP/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Brynn Anderson/AP/AP

Adriana Smith, a 30 year-old nurse and mother, was about nine weeks pregnant in February when doctors declared her brain dead after she suffered a medical emergency.

Advertisement

But Smith’s mother, April Newkirk, told Atlanta TV station WXIA that doctors at Emory University Hospital have been keeping her organs functioning since then until the fetus can be delivered, citing Georgia’s law banning most abortions after fetal cardiac activity can be detected, or roughly six weeks into pregnancy.

Smith is now roughly 22 weeks into the pregnancy and has been on life support for more than 90 days.

“My grandson may be blind, may not be able to walk, we don’t know if he’ll live once she has him,” Newkirk told WXIA last week. “And I’m not saying we would have chose to terminate her pregnancy. What I’m saying is we should have had a choice.”

Case sparks legal questions

Democratic State Sen. Nabilah Islam Parkes wrote a letter to Georgia’s Republican Attorney General Chris Carr asking for clarity about how Georgia’s abortion law should be applied in this context.

Advertisement

“Let me be plain: this is a grotesque distortion of medical ethics and human decency,” Islam Parkes wrote. “That any law in Georgia could be interpreted to require a brain-dead woman’s body to be artificially maintained as a fetal incubator is not only medically unsound — it is inhumane.”

The law, known as the LIFE Act, was narrowly passed and signed into law by Gov. Brian Kemp in 2019, but was not in force until the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade in 2022. A legal challenge to Georgia’s abortion law is still working its way through the state courts.

“There is nothing in the LIFE Act that requires medical professionals to keep a woman on life support after brain death,” Carr’s office responded in a statement. “Removing life support is not an action ‘with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy.”

Emory Healthcare seems to have come to a different conclusion. The hospital has not addressed the attorney general’s legal opinion and has not responded to repeated requests for comment, but the health system did provide a statement to several outlets last week.

“Emory Healthcare uses consensus from clinical experts, medical literature, and legal guidance to support our providers as they make individualized treatment recommendations in compliance with Georgia’s abortion laws and all other applicable laws,” the health system wrote. “Our top priorities continue to be the safety and wellbeing of the patients we serve.”

Advertisement

Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California-Davis, says this disconnect is not uncommon in the post-Roe era, as medical providers in states with restrictive abortion laws have become more risk-averse. Running afoul of the law can carry criminal penalties in many states.

“This scenario in Georgia right now is an example of that where you have the attorney general who says, ‘No problem, go ahead,’ and you have doctors and their lawyers reading the law and saying, ‘We’re not so sure,” Ziegler says.

Ziegler also pointed to two other Black women in Georgia, Amber Thurman and Candi Miller, whose deaths drew national attention. ProPublica reported last year that a state panel ruled their deaths preventable and likely the result of doctors being slow or unwilling to provide abortion care because of Georgia’s law. Top Republicans in Georgia have disputed whether the state’s abortion law played any role.

The cases also highlighted Georgia’s maternal mortality crisis disproportionately affecting Black women.

Debate over personhood

Advertisement

In the case of Adriana Smith, Ziegler says one reason Emory may be interpreting Georgia law in this way is because of a provision in the abortion law establishing what is known as “fetal personhood.”

Fetal personhood is the idea that embryos and fetuses are people and have legal rights. In Georgia, for example, residents can claim a fetus as a dependent on state taxes.

Ziegler, author of the book Personhood, the New Civil War over Reproduction, says establishing fetal personhood has long been a goal of the anti-abortion movement.

Republican State Sen. Ed Setzler, who sponsored Georgia’s 2019 abortion law, said in a statement that he believes Emory is interpreting the law correctly.

“I think it is completely appropriate that the hospital do what they can to save the life of the child,” Setzler wrote in a statement to the AP. “I think this is an unusual circumstance, but I think it highlights the value of innocent human life. I think the hospital is acting appropriately.”

Advertisement

After the fall of Roe v. Wade, existing state personhood laws could be enforced, resulting in consequences, both intended and unintended, such as in the Georgia case. Ziegler says the debate could open up an array of new legal questions for areas like in-vitro fertilization, the census or child support.

As these cases spur more legal challenges, the issue could eventually land at the U.S. Supreme Court.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending