Florida
Florida Senate committee approves proposal to set term limits for county commissioners, school board members
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Rural officials are balking at legislation that would allow voters to decide whether county commissioners should be limited to eight years in office, arguing that the restriction would quash the voices of local residents.
Florida lawmakers propose constitutional amendment to set county commission term limits, cement school board limits
The Senate Ethics and Elections Committee on Monday voted 6-2 to approve a proposal (SJR 802) that would put in the Florida Constitution eight-year term limits for county commissioners and school board members. The Legislature in 2023 approved eight-year term limits for school board members, but those limits are not in the Constitution.
Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, a Spring Hill Republican who is sponsoring the proposed constitutional amendment, told the committee that voters overwhelmingly support term limits for elected officials.
“All we’re asking is, let’s put it on the ballot. This is overwhelmingly popular. This is what the voters want,” Ingoglia said.
But two Republicans on the committee, Sen. Erin Grall of Vero Beach and Jennifer Bradley of Fleming Island, voted against Ingoglia’s proposal.
Grall unsuccessfully attempted to increase the proposed term limits from eight to 12 years. Grall said that, while she supports term limits, eight years might not be long enough for elected officials to get the “institutional knowledge” they need to be effective.
“It takes time to come up to speed,” she said, arguing that it takes “at least two, if not four years” for state lawmakers “to understand the scope” of the legislative process. “I don’t think it’s in the best interest of our constituents to lose the institutional knowledge of the person who is willing to put their name on a ballot.”
Elected officials from rural areas also argued against the restriction.
Wakulla County Commissioner Ralph Thomas called the proposed term limits “an affront to the spirit of liberty.” Imposing eight-year limits “strips away the sacred right of local determination,” Thomas told the Senate committee.
“This proposal flies in the face of principles upon which our nation and our republic were founded. The citizens of each county who live with the consequences of their leaders’ decisions should be the ones to decide what limits, if any, are best suited for their unique needs,” Thomas argued.
Chris Doolin, a lobbyist who represents the Small County Coalition, said that voters in the group’s 29 rural counties make up just a fraction of more than 14.2 million voters statewide. Local commissions have experienced a high degree of “turnover” in recent elections, according to Doolin.
In the last two election cycles, between a third and half of local officials “were replaced,” Doolin said.
“The voters know what they want,” he argued.
A similar House measure (HJR 679) has not been heard by committees.
State lawmakers, the governor and state Cabinet members have eight-year term limits. The Legislature in 2022 approved imposing 12-year term limits on school board members and the following year lowered the cap to eight years.
The proposed term limits, if approved by the Legislature, would go on the 2026 ballot and would need 60 percent approval from voters to pass. The state Constitution addresses the structure of county commissions and four-year terms for commissioners but does not place limits on terms.
Counties with charters can adopt term limits for commissioners. Currently, 12 of the state’s 20 counties with charters have adopted such restrictions, Florida Association of Counties Deputy Director of Public Policy Jeffrey Scala told the Senate panel. Four of the counties have 12-year term limits and eight have eight-year limits, according to Scala, whose group opposes the proposal.
The measure “strips voters’ ability to self govern by forcing them to vote on term limits statewide and imposing their choices on other counties,” Scala said.
But Ingoglia suggested that small counties are opposed to term limits to protect incumbents. He pointed to Brooksville, a Hernando County city located within his Senate district.
“When you look at the city commissioners on there, including the mayor, they’re all rock stars. Everyone could probably run for state House, state Senate. Might even be able to run for Congress. They’re just that good. So the question that these smaller counties have to ask is, are they really looking or have they created the environment where you have the good-old-boy system not allowing other people to run, or discouraging other people to run?” Ingoglia told The News Service of Florida after Monday’s meeting.
The Ethics and Elections Committee also on Monday gave initial approval to a proposed constitutional amendment (SJR 536) that would limit state lawmakers to serving eight years in the Florida House and eight years in the Florida Senate, for a total 16-year cap.
The issue is salient this year, after Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration tried to block state Rep. Debbie Mayfield, R-Melbourne, from running in a special election for a Senate seat. Mayfield was elected to the House in November after serving eight years in the Senate.
The Florida Supreme Court sided with Mayfield after the Division of Elections said she could not be qualified in a special election for Brevard County’s Senate District 19, which opened when Sen. Randy Fine submitted his resignation to seek a congressional seat.
The Supreme Court cleared the way for Mayfield to appear on the ballot, with a special primary election in the Senate district on April 1.
Bradley said she opposed the proposed “lifetime” cap on legislative service.
“I understand the intent is to kind of stop that ping-ponging” between the House and Senate, Bradley said. She suggested Ingoglia consider allowing legislators to return following a “required gap” in service.
“But if you serve and years later you want to come back and serve your community, I think that’s the most American thing you can do and for that reason I don’t support this lifetime ban,” she said before the committee approved the measure, which Bradley voted against.
Florida
Flying taxis? They could be coming to Florida by the end of the year
Hate driving in Florida traffic? A flying taxi can elevate that problem. Electric aircrafts could used in Florida’s skies in 2026.
Tired of the constant traffic and congestion clogging Florida’s roads?
In the words of the great Dr. Emmett Brown (Back to the Future fame), “Roads? Where we’re going we don’t need roads.”
Florida is on its way to be the nation’s first state to offer commercial Advanced Air Mobility (AAM). Essentially, that means state officials are paving the (air)way for passengers to take flight taxis, including electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft (eVTOL), from one city to another in record time.
The country’s first aerial test site should be operational within the first part of 2026. It’s at Florida Department of Transportation’s SunTrax testing facility in Polk Couty between Tampa and Orlando along the almost-always congested Interstate-4.
“Florida is at the forefront of emerging flight technology, leading the nation in bringing highways to the skies with Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), an entirely new mode of transportation,” according to a press release from the Florida Department of Transportation. “FDOT’s strategic investments in infrastructure to support AAM will help us become the first state with commercial AAM services.”
When will flight taxis be available in Florida?
Sometime in early 2026, the new Florida AAM Headquarters at the SunTrax Campus will be operational. By the end of the year, it will be fully activated and ready to deploy profitable commercial services for passenger travel.
Air taxi company Archer Aviation announced in Dec. 2025 that it will provide flights between Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood and Miami international airports possibly as early as this year.
The company also plans to pick up and drop off passengers at the Boca Raton Airport, the Witham Field airport in Stuart, Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport, Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport and Miami Executive Airport.
Phase one of Florida air taxis: Four sections of the state
- Part A: I-4 corridor, Orlando to Tampa, Orlando to the Space Coast, Orlando to Suntrax and Tampa to Suntrax.
- Part B: Port St. Lucie to Miami
- Part C: Tampa to Naples/Miami to Key West
- Part D: Pensacola to Tallahassee
Phase two of Florida air taxis: Four more sections
- Part A: Daytona Beach to Jacksonville
- Part B: Sebring out east and west
- Part C: Orlando to Lake City/Tampa to Tallahassee
- Part D: Jacksonville to Tallahassee
What Florida airports are interested in commercial flight taxis
- Boca Raton Airport (BCT)
- Daytona Beach International Airport (DAB)
- Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport (FLL)
- Lakeland Linder International Airport (LAL)
- Miami Executive Airport (TMB)
- Miami International Airport (MIA)
- Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport (OPF)
- Orlando Executive Airport (ORL)
- Orlando International Airport (MCO)
- Palm Beach International Airport (PBI)
- Peter O Knight Airport (TPF)
- Sebring Regional Airport (SEF)
- Tallahassee International Airport (TLH)
- Tampa International Airport (TPA)
- Vero Beach Regional Airport (VRB)
Michelle Spitzeris a journalist for The USA TODAY NETWORK-FLORIDA. As the network’s Rapid Response reporter, she covers Florida’s breaking news. You can get all of Florida’s best content directly in your inbox each weekday day by signing up for the free newsletter, Florida TODAY, at https://floridatoday.com/newsletters.
Florida
Officials withheld evidence on Florida’s ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ funding, environmental groups say
ORLANDO, Fla. — Federal and state officials withheld evidence that the Department of Homeland Security had agreed to reimburse Florida for some of the costs of constructing an immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as “Alligator Alcatraz,” according to environmental groups suing to shut down the facility.
The Everglades facility remains open, still holding detainees, because an appellate court in early September relied on arguments by Florida and the Trump administration that the state hadn’t yet applied for federal reimbursement, and therefore wasn’t required to follow federal environmental law.
The new evidence — emails and documents obtained through a public records request — shows that officials had discussed federal reimbursement in June, and that the Federal Emergency Management Agency confirmed in early August that it had received from state officials a grant application. Florida was notified in late September that FEMA had approved $608 million in federal funding to support the center’s construction and operation.
“We now know that the federal and state government had records confirming that they closely partnered on this facility from the beginning but failed to disclose them to the district court,” said Tania Galloni, one of the attorneys for the environmental groups.
An appellate panel in Atlanta put a temporary hold on a lower court judge’s ruling that would have closed the state-built facility. The new evidence should now be considered as the judges decide the facility’s permanent fate, Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity, said in court papers on Wednesday.
A federal judge in Miami in mid-August ordered the facility to wind down operations over two months because officials had failed to do a review of the detention center’s environmental impact according to federal law. That judge concluded that a reimbursement decision already had been made.
The Florida Department of Emergency Management, which led the efforts to build the Everglades facility, didn’t respond to an emailed inquiry on Thursday.
Florida has led other states in constructing facilities to support President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. Besides the Everglades facility, which received its first detainees in July, Florida has opened an immigration detention center in northeast Florida and is looking at opening a third facility in the Florida Panhandle.
The environmental lawsuit is one of three federal court challenges to the Everglades facility. In the others, detainees said Florida agencies and private contractors hired by the state have no authority to operate the center under federal law. They’re also seeking a ruling ensuring access to confidential communications with their attorneys.
___
Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @mikeysid.bsky.social
Florida
Florida lawmaker files hands-free driving bill ahead of 2026 legislative session
TALLAHASSEE – Florida lawmakers are once again trying to crack down on distracted driving, this time with a proposal that goes further than the state’s current law.
Senate Bill 1152, filed ahead of the upcoming legislative session, would make it illegal for drivers to hold a phone while operating a motor vehicle. Drivers could still use GPS, make phone calls, or use navigation apps, but only through hands-free technology such as Bluetooth or built-in vehicle systems.
That restriction would apply even when a vehicle is stopped at a red light or in traffic. The bill defines “handheld” use broadly, including holding a phone in one or both hands or bracing it against the body.
Supporters say Florida’s existing law, which primarily targets texting while driving, doesn’t fully address the many ways drivers use their phones behind the wheel and can be difficult for law enforcement to enforce consistently.
The bill also includes privacy protections. Law enforcement officers would not be allowed to search or confiscate a driver’s phone without a warrant.
State officials say distracted driving remains a serious and persistent problem across Florida.
By the numbers:
The most recent available data for a single year shows nearly 300 people were killed and more than 2,200 others suffered serious injuries in crashes involving distracted drivers in 2024. A crash happens in Florida about every 44 seconds, and roughly one in seven crashes involves a distracted driver, according to state data.
Advocates point to other states with hands-free laws, saying those states have seen declines in deadly crashes after similar measures were adopted.
READ: Trump calls for ban on Wall Street buying single-family homes, citing affordability concerns
What’s next:
The bill will be taken up during the 2026 legislative session, which begins Tuesday, Jan. 13. It must pass committee hearings and full votes in both chambers before going to the governor.
If approved, the law would take effect Oct. 1, 2026.
The Source: This story is based on the filed text of Senate Bill 1152 and data from the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.
-
Detroit, MI6 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology3 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Iowa3 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska2 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Nebraska3 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Entertainment2 days agoSpotify digs in on podcasts with new Hollywood studios