Connect with us

Florida

3 questions from Florida State, ACC lawsuit court case in Tallahassee

Published

on

3 questions from Florida State, ACC lawsuit court case in Tallahassee


Florida State and the Atlantic Coast Conference returned to a Tallahassee courtroom Wednesday to help answer an obvious but crucial question in their half-a-billion-dollar dueling lawsuits.

How long should those dueling cases keep playing out in both Florida and North Carolina?

The ACC’s argument before Florida’s First District Court of Appeal: FSU’s lawsuit in Leon County should be on hold while the ACC’s lawsuit proceeds in North Carolina. FSU, naturally, disagreed.

The three-judge panel did not issue a ruling during the session, which lasted less than an hour.

Advertisement

There were, however, three interesting broad questions that surfaced.

Does this dispute belong in Florida or North Carolina?

The ACC’s counsel, Alan Lawson, said the choice is clear. The dispute involves a contract from North Carolina with a North Carolina-based organization made up of schools from multiple states who all come to North Carolina for their common enterprise.

“You have to be wearing garnet-and-gold-colored lenses to come up with Tallahassee as the answer for the most natural place for that contract dispute,” Lawson said.

FSU’s outside counsel, Elliot H. Scherker, had another option: sovereign immunity, which gives some legal protections to state entities like FSU. Does it make sense for a court in another state to rule on the sovereign immunity of a Florida entity? The ACC could have sued — and still could sue — FSU in a Florida court.

Who’s the real plaintiff?

Because the plaintiff is the one filing a suit — not being sued — it’s usually the party that was wronged and gets to pick the venue. Both sides claim that role is theirs.

Advertisement

The ACC, Lawson said, is the only party seeking damages in the dispute, which is a point in his conference’s favor. The league has also argued that FSU breached its contracts by preparing to challenge the ACC’s grant of rights and related documents. That would also make the conference a proper plaintiff.

Scherker put it differently. The dispute centers on who owns the broadcast rights to FSU home games if/when the Seminoles leave the ACC. Those broadcast rights, Scherker said, are “quintessentially Florida property” involving a state entity. FSU is trying to stop the ACC from taking and using that property.

“That, to me, is a natural plaintiff if there ever was one,” Scherker said.

What happens if courts in different states make conflicting rulings?

That’s a question that has lingered over previous hearings and was raised multiple times Wednesday. The answers remain unsatisfying.

Florida State’s counsel said he didn’t “have an answer to that speculative possibility” but that precedents allow for it. Courts can consider exceptional circumstances when weighing whether to pause a case. The possibility of differing rulings, Scherker said, “doesn’t trump exceptional circumstances in a given case.”

Advertisement

The answer from the ACC’s attorney was … more litigation. After all the appeals and judgments are issued, Lawson said there will be “additional litigation in which we find out which judgment isn’t worth the paper that it’s written on.”

Stay updated on Tampa Bay’s sports scene

Subscribe to our free Sports Today newsletter

We’ll send you news and analysis on the Bucs, Lightning, Rays and Florida’s college football teams every day.

You’re all signed up!

Want more of our free, weekly newsletters in your inbox? Let’s get started.

Advertisement

Explore all your options

• • •

Sign up for the Sports Today newsletter to get daily updates on the Bucs, Rays, Lightning and college football across Florida.

Never miss out on the latest with your favorite Tampa Bay sports teams. Follow our coverage on Instagram, X and Facebook.





Source link

Advertisement

Florida

Flying taxis? They could be coming to Florida by the end of the year

Published

on

Flying taxis? They could be coming to Florida by the end of the year



Hate driving in Florida traffic? A flying taxi can elevate that problem. Electric aircrafts could used in Florida’s skies in 2026.

Tired of the constant traffic and congestion clogging Florida’s roads?

Advertisement

In the words of the great Dr. Emmett Brown (Back to the Future fame), “Roads? Where we’re going we don’t need roads.”

Florida is on its way to be the nation’s first state to offer commercial Advanced Air Mobility (AAM). Essentially, that means state officials are paving the (air)way for passengers to take flight taxis, including electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft (eVTOL), from one city to another in record time.

The country’s first aerial test site should be operational within the first part of 2026. It’s at Florida Department of Transportation’s SunTrax testing facility in Polk Couty between Tampa and Orlando along the almost-always congested Interstate-4.

“Florida is at the forefront of emerging flight technology, leading the nation in bringing highways to the skies with Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), an entirely new mode of transportation,” according to a press release from the Florida Department of Transportation. “FDOT’s strategic investments in infrastructure to support AAM will help us become the first state with commercial AAM services.”

When will flight taxis be available in Florida?

Sometime in early 2026, the new Florida AAM Headquarters at the SunTrax Campus will be operational. By the end of the year, it will be fully activated and ready to deploy profitable commercial services for passenger travel.

Advertisement

Air taxi company Archer Aviation announced in Dec. 2025 that it will provide flights between Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood and Miami international airports possibly as early as this year.

The company also plans to pick up and drop off passengers at the Boca Raton Airport, the Witham Field airport in Stuart, Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport, Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport and Miami Executive Airport.

Phase one of Florida air taxis: Four sections of the state

  • Part A: I-4 corridor, Orlando to Tampa, Orlando to the Space Coast, Orlando to Suntrax and Tampa to Suntrax.
  • Part B: Port St. Lucie to Miami
  • Part C: Tampa to Naples/Miami to Key West
  • Part D: Pensacola to Tallahassee

Phase two of Florida air taxis: Four more sections

  • Part A: Daytona Beach to Jacksonville
  • Part B: Sebring out east and west
  • Part C: Orlando to Lake City/Tampa to Tallahassee
  • Part D: Jacksonville to Tallahassee

What Florida airports are interested in commercial flight taxis

  • Boca Raton Airport (BCT)
  • Daytona Beach International Airport (DAB)
  • Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport (FLL)
  • Lakeland Linder International Airport (LAL)
  • Miami Executive Airport (TMB)
  • Miami International Airport (MIA)
  • Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport (OPF)
  • Orlando Executive Airport (ORL)
  • Orlando International Airport (MCO)
  • Palm Beach International Airport (PBI)
  • Peter O Knight Airport (TPF)
  • Sebring Regional Airport (SEF)
  • Tallahassee International Airport (TLH)
  • Tampa International Airport (TPA)
  • Vero Beach Regional Airport (VRB)

Michelle Spitzeris a journalist for The USA TODAY NETWORK-FLORIDA. As the network’s Rapid Response reporter, she covers Florida’s breaking news. You can get all of Florida’s best content directly in your inbox each weekday day by signing up for the free newsletter, Florida TODAY, at https://floridatoday.com/newsletters.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Florida

Officials withheld evidence on Florida’s ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ funding, environmental groups say

Published

on

Officials withheld evidence on Florida’s ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ funding, environmental groups say


ORLANDO, Fla. — Federal and state officials withheld evidence that the Department of Homeland Security had agreed to reimburse Florida for some of the costs of constructing an immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as “Alligator Alcatraz,” according to environmental groups suing to shut down the facility.

The Everglades facility remains open, still holding detainees, because an appellate court in early September relied on arguments by Florida and the Trump administration that the state hadn’t yet applied for federal reimbursement, and therefore wasn’t required to follow federal environmental law.

The new evidence — emails and documents obtained through a public records request — shows that officials had discussed federal reimbursement in June, and that the Federal Emergency Management Agency confirmed in early August that it had received from state officials a grant application. Florida was notified in late September that FEMA had approved $608 million in federal funding to support the center’s construction and operation.

“We now know that the federal and state government had records confirming that they closely partnered on this facility from the beginning but failed to disclose them to the district court,” said Tania Galloni, one of the attorneys for the environmental groups.

Advertisement

An appellate panel in Atlanta put a temporary hold on a lower court judge’s ruling that would have closed the state-built facility. The new evidence should now be considered as the judges decide the facility’s permanent fate, Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity, said in court papers on Wednesday.

A federal judge in Miami in mid-August ordered the facility to wind down operations over two months because officials had failed to do a review of the detention center’s environmental impact according to federal law. That judge concluded that a reimbursement decision already had been made.

The Florida Department of Emergency Management, which led the efforts to build the Everglades facility, didn’t respond to an emailed inquiry on Thursday.

Florida has led other states in constructing facilities to support President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. Besides the Everglades facility, which received its first detainees in July, Florida has opened an immigration detention center in northeast Florida and is looking at opening a third facility in the Florida Panhandle.

The environmental lawsuit is one of three federal court challenges to the Everglades facility. In the others, detainees said Florida agencies and private contractors hired by the state have no authority to operate the center under federal law. They’re also seeking a ruling ensuring access to confidential communications with their attorneys.

Advertisement

___

Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @mikeysid.bsky.social



Source link

Continue Reading

Florida

Florida lawmaker files hands-free driving bill ahead of 2026 legislative session

Published

on

Florida lawmaker files hands-free driving bill ahead of 2026 legislative session


Florida lawmakers are once again trying to crack down on distracted driving, this time with a proposal that goes further than the state’s current law.

Senate Bill 1152, filed ahead of the upcoming legislative session, would make it illegal for drivers to hold a phone while operating a motor vehicle. Drivers could still use GPS, make phone calls, or use navigation apps, but only through hands-free technology such as Bluetooth or built-in vehicle systems.

Advertisement

That restriction would apply even when a vehicle is stopped at a red light or in traffic. The bill defines “handheld” use broadly, including holding a phone in one or both hands or bracing it against the body.

Supporters say Florida’s existing law, which primarily targets texting while driving, doesn’t fully address the many ways drivers use their phones behind the wheel and can be difficult for law enforcement to enforce consistently.

Advertisement

The bill also includes privacy protections. Law enforcement officers would not be allowed to search or confiscate a driver’s phone without a warrant.

State officials say distracted driving remains a serious and persistent problem across Florida.

By the numbers:

Advertisement

The most recent available data for a single year shows nearly 300 people were killed and more than 2,200 others suffered serious injuries in crashes involving distracted drivers in 2024. A crash happens in Florida about every 44 seconds, and roughly one in seven crashes involves a distracted driver, according to state data.

Advocates point to other states with hands-free laws, saying those states have seen declines in deadly crashes after similar measures were adopted.

Advertisement

READ: Trump calls for ban on Wall Street buying single-family homes, citing affordability concerns

What’s next:

The bill will be taken up during the 2026 legislative session, which begins Tuesday, Jan. 13. It must pass committee hearings and full votes in both chambers before going to the governor.

Advertisement

If approved, the law would take effect Oct. 1, 2026.

The Source: This story is based on the filed text of Senate Bill 1152 and data from the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

Advertisement
FloridaPolitics



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending