Connect with us

Delaware

Why Delaware is one of the few states that doesn’t compensate wrongfully incarcerated

Published

on

Why Delaware is one of the few states that doesn’t compensate wrongfully incarcerated


play

When Elmer Daniels left Delaware prison 39 years after a court ruled in 2018 that he was wrongfully convicted, he was turned out into the world in the middle of winter with little more than the shirt on his back, according to his attorney.

Advertisement

That’s because Delaware is one of about a dozen states that has no mechanism to compensate individuals who wrongfully spent portions of their lives locked behind bars. These are people who spent years, or in some cases, decades making no real money in prison as the world and their connections on the outside have moved on without them.

Once again this year, some Delaware lawmakers want to create a compensation program to acknowledge the unfairness of being wrongfully locked up. Senate Bill 169 is the latest effort to do that.

The bill has passed a Senate committee. It’s main sponsor, Kyra Hoffner, a Smyrna Democrat, said she is revising the bill and hopes it will be up for a vote in the Senate in the coming weeks.

How would it work?

The proposed program has been revised multiple times, but Hoffner explained how the program would work.

The bill would set up a compensation fund for individuals whose convictions were overturned and either dismissed, dropped or retried resulting in an acquittal. These situations most commonly occur when people locked up work for years to present to the court flaws in their original conviction and in some cases, new evidence pointing to their innocence.

Advertisement

In some cases, like the situation faced by Mark Purnell in recent years, the courts can overturn someone’s conviction, and prosecutors, who often have the choice of whether to retry or drop the case, will dangle freedom in front of the individual if they plea to a lesser crime.

So people who also plead no-contest after their conviction is overturned and remanded for further proceedings are also eligible to apply for compensation. Purnell’s case was ultimately dropped by prosecutors. He spent 16 years wrongfully locked up.

Released: Mark Purnell, who spent 16 years in prison due to unjust trial, suddenly released

The legislation includes protections to disqualify people convicted of other crimes tied to the overturned conviction or people who purposefully take the blame for someone else in a criminal case. People who have a conviction the court has not deemed illegitimate and who are simply pardoned would not be eligible, Hoffner said.

Advertisement

Those who qualify would be allowed to file a court petition seeking compensation. It would be up to them to make a showing to the court of their innocence, Hoffner said. This showing would be judged by what’s called a “preponderance of the evidence,” a lower standard than the ”beyond-reasonable-doubt” standard used to convict people, she said.

Prosecutors in the Delaware Department of Justice would have the opportunity to refute and present evidence in opposition to the person’s claim.

James Moreno is the executive director of the Delaware Innocence Project, a nonprofit that investigates and pursues claims of wrongful incarceration. He emphasized that it’s only fair for the state to help people when they’ve taken away their time and freedom unfairly.

“Nobody is saying let’s hand out a pot of money; there is a standard that must be met and it is about fairness,” Moreno said.  

Advertisement

How much money are we talking about?

Individuals who clear the court hurdle will be eligible to receive compensation based on their years spent wrongfully behind bars and a few other factors.

Those who served time on death row are eligible for $100,000 for each year wrongfully locked up. Those who served time off death row, which is most people who would qualify, would be eligible for $75,000 per year.

Those wrongfully put on probation or those paroled after a wrongful conviction or people wrongfully made to register as sex offenders would be eligible for $50,000 for each year in the system, Hoffner said.

The bill also includes provisions to help cover attorneys fees, reimbursement of restitution a person was wrongfully ordered to pay as well as reimbursement for “reintegrative services” like mental and physical health care costs incurred between the person’s release and their grant of compensation, Hoffner said.

Advertisement

The bill includes provisions that would tie the compensation award in the future to changes in inflation as well as timing the disbursement of payments to those who qualify. The fund would be managed by the state treasurer.

How often does this happen?

It is rare for people to have their cases overturned in Delaware. People in prison typically don’t have money so it’s not an incentivized area for private attorneys to work in. That’s the gap that the Delaware Innocence Project, a relatively new organization compared with counterparts in other states, seeks to help fill.

According to the National Registry of Exonerations, four people in Delaware have successfully overturned their convictions in the past 35 years. Those include Daniels, Isaiah McCoy, Mark Purnell and James Dollard.

Hoffner said Daniels, Purnell and Dollard would qualify under the bill’s current format.

‘Left to fend’ for themselves

When a person is imprisoned, they make little to no money, their marketable skills diminish, they fall behind current technology and lose personal connections and family foundations.

Advertisement

Then, when their conviction is overturned, they are released into a world with new technology, high basic prices to survive and, in the eyes of many potential employers, a black mark of having just recently been released from lockup.

Hoffner added that incarceration also exacerbates one’s health problems. She said the money can’t give someone back their time, but will make their life a bit easier.

“Everyone thinks life goes back to normal,” Hoffner said. “But it is a big struggle.”

Emeka Igwe, Daniels’ attorney, emphasized the difficulty of reintegrating into society after being released for so long.

“There was nothing from the state at all,” Igwe said. “He was basically left to fend for himself.”

Advertisement

Daniels released: Flawed testimony led to his conviction 39 years ago. Now, prosecutors say he can go free

The office of Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings did not comment on the proposed legislation when asked. Leadership in Delaware’s judiciary declined to comment.

The legislation is not a new push in Delaware. In 2019, a similar bill was introduced, passed through a House committee and died without House Democratic leadership bringing it up for a vote.

Lawsuits often fruitless

Supporters say another common misconception is that civil courts allow wrongfully convicted people to seek damages. Daniels’ case is an example of how that often isn’t the case.

The courts provide broad civil immunity to police and prosecutors carrying out their work administering justice.

Advertisement

Daniels sought compensation via a civil lawsuit. His rape conviction was overturned because some of the basic evidence underpinning his case was based on science that society now regards as unreliable as well as other evidence that undercut his original prosecution. After his case was remanded, prosecutors said they couldn’t label him “innocent,” but dropped the case. He was 57 when he was released from prison.

Earlier this year, a judge dismissed his lawsuit against Wilmington police after he failed to meet the high legal bar that officers knowing or willfully violated his constitutional rights.

“Courts cannot right all wrongs” was the opening line in Judge Stephanos Bibas’s opinion dismissing the lawsuit.

Igwe, Daniels’ attorney, said he is appealing the ruling. He said Daniels has acclimated to life and work outside, but is owed a debt by those that took 39 years from him.

Advertisement

“He was incarcerated in the name of the state,” Igwe said. “He should be compensated by the state.”

Jon Eldan is the founder and executive director of After Innocence, a California-based nonprofit that, among other things, advocates for such compensation programs. He said Daniels’ situation is common to people released after a wrongful conviction: The law in America often provides no route for compensation through civil courts.

“There have been several thousand cases overturned throughout the country,” Eldan said. “The majority of people don’t have a lawsuit.”

Contact Xerxes Wilson at (302) 324-2787 or xwilson@delawareonline.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Delaware

Who governs matters: Why school board elections deserve your attention 

Published

on

Who governs matters: Why school board elections deserve your attention 


School board elections are one of the highest-leverage, lowest-participation decisions in Delaware. Turnout is low. Margins are small. In some cases, candidates run without a real contest. When voters do not engage, leadership is not selected. It is decided by default. When governance is decided by default, the system performs accordingly.

It’s clear that when residents fail to vote, it can have consequences — ones that most people recognize, but rarely connect to the ballot box. It shapes whether schools are focused on clear priorities or pulled in competing directions. It determines whether resources are invested in what improves student outcomes or spread thin. Those decisions show up in real ways: in the preparedness of students, the confidence of families, and the strength of Delaware’s workforce and economy.

In 2024, fewer than 5% of eligible voters cast ballots in Delaware school board elections, even as concern about outcomes, funding, and district leadership remained high across every sector of public life. The disconnect between what communities demand and how they participate is one of the most significant, and most solvable, barriers to progress in our state.

Data from the 2026 Delaware Opportunity Outlook reinforce this disconnect. A majority of Delawareans believe school board members have a direct influence on the quality of K–12 education, yet far fewer report understanding how improvement efforts are being carried out, or how decisions are made at the local level. In other words, people believe boards matter, but are not consistently using the one mechanism they have to influence who serves and how decisions are made.

Advertisement

What governing actually requires 

A strong board member asks clear, outcome-focused questions and expects specific answers. They connect decisions to priorities, work through tradeoffs with colleagues, and ensure decisions are understood before the board moves forward. They listen for whether information reflects progress or activity, and press for clarity when it does not.

These are not intuitive responsibilities. They require preparation. School board governance is often treated as something individuals can step into without training, but these are complex roles that involve setting priorities, interpreting data, making tradeoffs, and ensuring decisions lead to results over time.

The Delaware Opportunity Outlook suggests that this is not how the role is widely understood. While Delawareans recognize that school boards influence the quality of education, far fewer identify training and professional preparation as essential. 

That gap has direct consequences. As the state advances new priorities, the effectiveness of those efforts will depend on whether local board members are prepared to implement them, monitor progress, and make results visible.

Delaware’s moment 

Delaware has established a clear direction for public education: defined priorities, a statewide literacy commitment, and a funding reform that will place significant new responsibilities on local boards. Plans set direction. Boards determine whether those plans turn into results.

Advertisement

What happens next will not be determined by those plans alone. It will be determined by how effectively school boards translate those priorities into decisions, how consistently they track progress, and whether they make results visible to the public.

Candidate evaluation

Evaluating a candidate is straightforward: Can they name a small number of district priorities and explain why those matter? Can they describe what data they would review regularly and how they would use it? Can they explain how resources should align to outcomes and what they would do if results do not improve? Candidates who can answer those questions demonstrate an understanding of the role. Those who cannot speak to governance beyond the issues that brought them to the race may find the role more demanding than they anticipated.

Make your voice heard

Voting in a school board election is one of the few places where individual participation has a direct and immediate impact on how the system performs. School board elections are decided by small numbers of voters. Your decision to engage, or not, determines who governs. Choosing not to participate is not neutrality. It is a choice, and it carries the same weight as the vote itself.

Today, a decision will be made about who governs Delaware’s schools. You can be part of that decision, or it will be made without you. Either way, the results will show up in classrooms, in communities, and in the long-term strength of this state.

Find out who is running. Evaluate them on the work the role requires, not only on the positions they hold. Vote, and encourage others to do the same.

Advertisement

For more details about voting in today’s elections, visit First State Educate’s 2026 School Board Elections page.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Delaware

Pedestrian dies after being struck by vehicle in Delaware County

Published

on

Pedestrian dies after being struck by vehicle in Delaware County


Monday, May 11, 2026 10:57AM

Pedestrian dies after being struck by vehicle in Delaware County

TRAINER BOROUGH, Pa. (WPVI) — A person has died after being hit by a vehicle in Delaware County.

It happened around 2:45 a.m. on Monday in the 4300 block of West 9th Street in Trainer Borough.

Police and fire crews were called to the Parkview Mobile Home community for reports of a pedestrian hit by a car.

Officials say the victim went into cardiac arrest immediately after the crash.

Advertisement

The investigation into the crash is ongoing.

Copyright © 2026 WPVI-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

Delaware State Police investigation shooting in Laurel – 47abc

Published

on

Delaware State Police investigation shooting in Laurel – 47abc


LAUREL, Del. — Delaware State Police are investigating a shooting in Laurel that left a 19-year-old man injured Friday afternoon and resulted in firearm charges against a Georgetown man, authorities said.

Troopers responded around 3:20 p.m. Friday to TidalHealth Nanticoke after the victim arrived at the hospital in a personal vehicle with non-life-threatening gunshot wounds, according to police. Investigators said the man had been shot in front of a residence on Portsville Road near Randall Street in Laurel.

Police said the victim was transported to the hospital in a blue Mazda 3 driven by 20-year-old Alexison Amisial of Georgetown. Troopers later located the vehicle and Amisial at First Stop Gas Station, where investigators said he was found carrying an untraceable firearm concealed in his waistband.

Amisial was taken into custody without incident and charged with carrying a concealed deadly weapon and possession of an untraceable firearm, both felonies, police said. He was arraigned in Justice of the Peace Court 3 and released on a $3,500 unsecured bond.

Advertisement

The Delaware State Police Troop 4 Criminal Investigations Unit continues to investigate the shooting. Authorities are asking anyone with information to contact Detective R. Mitchell at 302-752-3794 or Delaware Crime Stoppers at 800-847-3333.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending