Related
Dallas, TX
Letters to the Editor — SMU and UMC, dumpster diving, Dallas leadership, animal fights
Negotiate on SMU control
Re: “United Methodists should have control of SMU — Issue has been settled in church’s favor since 1911,” by Cynthia B. Astle, Sunday Opinion.
Astle provides a good summary of the argument about relations between Southern Methodist University and the United Methodist Church. As a retired faculty member at SMU, former dean of SMU’s Perkins School of Theology and a United Methodist minister, I find myself on both sides of the question.
Astle is quite right to say that the relation between church and university set out in the founding documents is part of the university’s heritage and part of its commitment to past generations of supporters. If this relationship is going to be changed, it should be done by mutual negotiation, not by legal action from one side or the other.
On the other hand, the productive history of this relationship, especially in the work of Perkins School of Theology, is not dependent on specific legal arrangements. In the United States, the United Methodist Church has five theological schools that are integral parts of a church-affiliated university at Boston, Drew, Duke and Emory, as well as SMU. The legal relationships between the church and these universities vary, but at all of them the school of theology builds important connections between the university and the community. And the university provides educational resources that no theological school could offer on its own.
The future of this collaboration at SMU does not rest on the outcome of a lawsuit. It depends on both church and university moving beyond recent disputes about ownership and control to rediscover their shared interests in truth and justice.
Robin W. Lovin, Dallas
Don’t dump, donate
Re: “Stores’ trash is a treasure for the taking — Dumpster divers find perfectly good merchandise that’s been tossed,” Sunday news story.
I read this story about dumpster diving with a combination of disgust and outrage. Can someone explain why retailers aren’t donating these goods to shelters, thrift stores, the homeless, schools or some other worthy outlet? Not only are they bypassing an opportunity to help the less fortunate, they are filling our landfills with more trash, most of which is not biodegradable.
Jim Welch, Dallas/Northaven Park
Politicians the nouveau riche
Re: “Salary set for new city manager — Base pay of $450K decided by council in 13-2 vote is third highest in Texas,” Friday news story.
If you’re scraping by on a teacher’s salary or on some kind of retirement that barely pays the rent, be happy, don’t worry, even though you are paying our politicians a king’s ransom in salary. Almost a half million dollars a year for a city manager voted on by the Dallas City Council is evidence that politicians are the nouveau riche in our society.
Don Skaggs, Garland
Enforce term limits
Recently, the Neighborhood Coalition of Dallas called on city leaders to comply with the city code regarding term limits for boards and commissions. As a resident invested in our city’s future, I echo their plea: Dallas leadership must replace all termed-out appointees immediately.
This simple action would demonstrate a commitment to the city charter and save taxpayers the cost of an unnecessary and preventable lawsuit. Dallas voters approved Proposition S, allowing citizens to sue the city to enforce the charter. Along with rejecting council pay raises, this sent a clear message: Public trust in the Dallas City Council is deeply eroded.
Ignoring citizen concerns, as seen during the Forward Dallas 2.0 process, will only widen the divide. Instead, leaders should seize this opportunity to rebuild trust. By acknowledging missteps, committing to transparency and appointing representatives who genuinely reflect the will of Dallas residents, city leaders can begin repairing their relationship with the community.
This is a chance for Dallas to turn the tide and reestablish confidence in its leadership. It’s time for city leaders to rise to the occasion and demonstrate responsible governance.
Natalie LeVeck, Dallas
Support bloodsport legislation
Re: “Texas’ Bloodsport Laws Must Be Toughened — Dog and cockfighting will be curbed only if the penalties are severe,” Friday editorial.
The SPCA of Texas urges North Texans to support the efforts of Rep. Rafael Anchia, D-Dallas, who, working with Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot, recently filed House Bill 1795 to strengthen penalties for animal fighting. If passed, this law would make most animal fighting-related offenses felonies, aligning penalties for cockfighting with those for dogfighting.
The importance of this legislation is clear following the Dec. 17, 2024, animal seizure, resulting in the SPCA of Texas taking custody of 50 roosters, 43 hens, 34 adult dogs and 10 puppies from the Kaufman County property in partnership with law enforcement. The animals were found in appalling conditions, some with injuries consistent with fighting. Many dogs were unlawfully restrained without adequate shelter or water, clear violations of the Safe Outdoor Dogs Act.
While the SPCA of Texas is dedicated to evaluating, treating and caring for the animals we rescue, including these animals, stronger laws are critical to deterring and preventing such cruelty.
We call on North Texans to work with the Texas Humane Legislation Network, which makes it easy for citizens to ask their state legislators to support this legislation, and to report suspected animal abuse to law enforcement authorities.
Together, we can significantly reduce the horrors of animal fighting and cruelty. The SPCA of Texas will continue to speak for animals, but we need the community’s help to make lasting change.
Chris Luna, Dallas
President and CEO, SPCA of Texas
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com
Dallas, TX
Dallas City Council approves resolution to explore leaving Dallas City Hall
DALLAS – Dallas City Council members approved a measure to explore options for leaving Dallas City Hall while, but left the door open to staying in the iconic building.
Resolution to explore leaving City Hall passes
What we know:
The resolution approved will explore options to buy or lease a new City Hall building. It was amended to include a plan to pay for repairs to the current building that would be compared side by side to the options to leave.
Dallas City Council approved the resolution by a 9-6 vote. The vote came around 1 a.m. Thursday morning after 14 hours of debate.
Councilman Chad West told FOX 4’s Lori Brown that if the city decides to stay or leave City Hall, the resolution includes proposals to redevelop the land around the building.
“We still should be looking at redevelopment options to tie it into the convention center later on, because otherwise it just equals ghost town, which is what we have now,” West said. “And of course, if we decide to move and City Hall itself gets repurposed or demolished and something gets built there, we need to have a projected plan for what that could look like as well.”
Debate on City Hall’s future
Local perspective:
Around 100 residents spoke about their desire to keep the current Dallas City Hall, the historic structure designed by architect I.M. Pei.
“The thought of losing this land to private hands is disheartening. A paid-off asset, unfair to taxpayers, built on what is here,” Meredith Jones, a Dallas resident, said.
“The decision belongs to the people, not the city council,” David Boss, the former manager of Dallas City Hall, said.
Several questioned why the price tag for a repair is public knowledge, but the cost for a move isn’t.
“The public deserves to know the value of the land we are giving up. Dallas deserves a careful decision, not a rushed one,” resident Azael Alvarez said.
Future Mavs arena looms large
Dallas City Council went back and forth on the resolution, amending it before it finally passed. Much of the conversation revolved around the Dallas Mavericks’ potential interest in the site for a new arena.
Mayor Eric Johnson lamented that conversation revolved around the Mavs’ future and not City Hall itself.
“A conversation about a particular sports team and where you want them should never have been part of the conversation because that was not what was infront of us,” Johnson said. “I’ve never seen such vehement opposition to gathering more information.”
Councilwoman Cara Mendelsohn wore a Mavericks T-shirt to a recent hearing due to the continued conversation around them.
“We’re talking a lot about the Mavs. They’re the elephant in the room, but they’re actually not here, so let’s at least let them have a seat at the horseshoe,” Mendelsohn said on Monday.
Residents were also upset at the idea of City Hall being bulldozed to make way for a new Mavs arena.
“The Mavericks were ridiculed nationally, and still are. Worst trade in the history of the NBA,” one resident said Monday. “The decision to knock this building down without all the facts and allowing the people to make the decision is your Luka Dončić trade.”
A potential 10-digit repair cost
The backstory:
Experts who assessed Dallas City Hall said the 47-year-old building’s mechanical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems don’t meet modern standards.
It put a $906 million to $1.4 billion price tag on keeping the iconic building, which was designed by the famous Chinese architect I.M. Pei, for another 20 years.
Downtown Dallas Inc., an advocacy group for Downtown Dallas, said last week they support leaving the current City Hall site.
“We believe Dallas City Hall is no longer serving its intended purpose. The important functions that happen and must continue to be evolved and innovated within our city government are inefficient and truly stymied in that space,” said Jennifer Scripps, President and CEO of Downtown Dallas Inc. told the crowd. “Our board called a special called meeting and voted unanimously in support of pursuing options to relocate City Hall and redevelop the site. We were we feel that the opportunity is huge.”
The Source: Information in this story came from FOX 4 reporting.
Dallas, TX
Study says the real value of a $100K salary in Dallas is…less than that
How much do you earn? And how far does that paycheck really go?
In Dallas, a $100,000 salary is a figure that’s more than double the area’s individual median income, but nevertheless a useful benchmark for the region’s burgeoning business community. However — once taxes and the local cost of living is factored in — it has the effective purchasing power of around $80,000 according to a new financial report.
Consumer-focused fintech site SmartAsset worked the numbers on the country’s 69 largest cities, determining the “estimated true value of $100,000 in annual income” in each location by measuring federal, state and local taxes as well as local cost of living data, including on housing, groceries and utilities.
It used its own proprietary figures, as well as information from the Council for Community and Economic Research.
Despite recent research suggesting North Texas has lately been losing some of its famous economic advantage — a major factor behind the region’s explosive growth — Dallas actually fared relatively well in SmartAsset’s analysis. Of the 69 cities, Dallas’ effective purchasing power, of $80,103 on the $100,000 salary, tied with Nashville to rank 22nd highest.
Like many cities in the report, Dallas also actually saw a year-over-year effective salary bump, likely because of slightly lower effective tax rates and living costs that have hewed closer to the national average. In 2024, the value of a $100,000 salary in Dallas came out to $77,197.
Other large Texas cities fared even better than Dallas. El Paso, where SmartAsset calculated the effective value of the $100,000 salary at nearly $90,300, ranked third highest overall.
San Antonio, where the effective value was around $86,400, ranked eighth. Houston, where the figure was around $84,800, ranked 10th, and Austin, where the figure was $82,400, ranked 17th.
Oklahoma City topped SmartAsset’s value ranking, with an effective salary of around $91,900, and Manhattan, which the website considered as its own city, came in with the lowest value, at around $29,400.
Dallas’ relatively strong effective value score won’t necessarily translate to the good life: Another financial report, published in November by the website Upgraded Points, determined that even a single adult with no kids needs a pre-tax salary of at least $107,000 to live “comfortably” in the Metroplex.
Dallas, TX
Public frustration grows as Dallas leaders debate billion‑dollar City Hall fix or relocation
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Wisconsin4 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Maryland5 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Massachusetts3 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Florida5 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Oregon6 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling