Dallas, TX
Identifying why the Cowboys were so bad in San Francisco
Things were supposed to be different. Although many in the national media weren’t picking the Dallas Cowboys to win against the San Francisco, and even the most ardent fans of the team were uneasy about Sunday night’s game, no one in their wildest nightmares could have imagined Dallas would drop the stinker they did on national television. Yet, they did just that. The Cowboys were dismantled by the San Francisco 49ers by a score of 42-10.
Dallas couldn’t find anything to go their way and failed to gain a modicum of traction against their longtime rival. From the opening whistle, the 49ers were better in practically every facet. You’d be hard-pressed to find anyone in the organization who fared well against the 49ers. This rout of the Cowboys merits being dissected and understanding how things went as terribly as they did. Here are the three big reasons the Cowboys lost against San Francisco.
Kyle Shanahan won the mental chess match with Dan Quinn
49ers head coach Kyle Shanahan and Dan Quinn have a history with one another. When Dan Quinn was head coach of the Atlanta Falcons, Shanahan served as the Falcons offensive coordinator. Both coaches know each other very well. On Sunday night, Shanahan had Quinn’s number and kept his unit off balance.
The 49ers are known for creating mismatches on offense for a few reasons. Their skill players have diverse talents and can play in multiple formations. Deebo Samuel and Christian McCaffrey can seamlessly change from wide receiver to running back. The ability of those players to be fluid chess pieces for Shanahan afforded him the luxury of isolating Samuel against a linebacker or McCaffrey against the Cowboys’ bigger safeties.
Quinn struggled because his star defender, Micah Parsons, was rendered invisible. Parsons’ speed and explosiveness were used against him as the 49ers sometimes left him unblocked only to run into a fullback or tight end tracking back into the backfield, or being pulled from the opposite side. Parsons, as usual, lined up in several places, but ultimately none of it mattered.
The Dallas pass rush did not impact the San Francisco passing game. Parsons is the leader of that group, but his supporting cast, DeMarcus Lawrence, Sam Williams, and the like, also failed to disrupt Brock Purdy. Purdy had a clean pocket and torched the defense for four touchdowns before taking an early exit early in the fourth quarter.
Losing the turnover battle
As cliché as it is, if you lose the turnover battle, you will lose the game. This article says it best:
In a study conducted by the Harvard Sports Analysis Collective, it was found that a team that wins the turnover margin in a game wins 69.6 percent of the time.
The Cowboys gave the ball away four times to the 49ers versus one fumble recovery that was a terrific effort by Jourdan Lewis to rip the ball from the arms of Christian McCaffrey. Besides that, the defense never came close to the football. After Tony Pollard’s fumble, Dak Prescott threw a flurry of interceptions, with each one worse than the last. The Cowboys were outmatched by the 49ers, having lost their previous three matchups.
Adding fuel to the fire is an ugly pick parade by Prescott on a national stage for every detractor to extend both arms forward and say, “See?”. Not all of the interceptions were going to impact the outcome directly. Still, Prescott unnecessarily opted to reinforce the stigma of being a turnover machine, making things go from bad to worse. For an offense that has been lackluster despite averaging 30 points per game, it’s the worst type of regression.
Coaching/lack of discipline
You can combine these two aspects because they go hand in hand. As mentioned earlier, the offense needs more potency. The Dallas rendition of the West Coast offense is designed for quick, short passes. However, it seems exclusive to that. The Cowboys aren’t driving the ball downfield with any regularity. Another concern is the route concepts that are being deployed.
On more than one occasion, multiple receivers were in the same area on a passing play. On a check-down throw to Rico Dowdle, Jalen Tolbert was just a few yards behind Dowdle. Then, on a play where Prescott was sacked leaving the pocket on a third down, the Cowboys ran a mesh concept against man coverage, and the receivers ran into each other with neither getting open. Whether the issue is the design or the execution, it matters little because neither was good enough on Sunday.
Imagine you’re coaching the Cowboys. You’re down 14 in the second half and facing a 3rd and 4 from your opponents’ 32-yard line. Do you:
a) Call a slant/flat concept with Ceedee Lamb and Jake Ferguson
b) Take a deep shot to Michael Gallup, knowing you can go for it on 4th down.
Mike McCarthy chose neither and decided to call an unsuccessful running play on third down before sending out Brandon Aubrey for a field goal. The Cowboys then allowed the 49ers to score a touchdown on the ensuing drive, trading a field goal for a touchdown.
Where the discipline was problematic was the self-inflicted mistakes that resulted in unnecessary penalties. Dallas’ inability to get off the field on third down assisted the 49ers to extend drives. Jayron Kearse committed a horrible offsides, and Donovan Wilson/Kearse were involved in another third-down penalty.
However, most of the blame must fall on McCarthy’s shoulders. He seemed reluctant to attack the 49ers’ defense despite having a healthy offensive line for the first time in two years.
His decision to end the first half without aggressively trying to get points was telling and foreshadowing of him passing up a 4th-and-4 with his team trailing by 14. Granted, Dak Prescott could have been better, but McCarthy didn’t seem to have a successful game plan.
The 49ers committed to take away CeeDee Lamb, but McCarthy never adjusted and needed a backup plan. The team traded for Brandin Cooks; once again, he was not featured in the offense. That mistake falls on the coaching staff. Something with this offense and these coaches have to change. This Texas Coast offense is looking like Texas Toast.
Dallas, TX
How Jerry Jones values HC position will be telling as Dallas Cowboys’ search ramps up
There’s only one surprising tidbit in the revelation that Jerry Jones and Deion Sanders have had a discussion about the head coaching vacancy with the Cowboys.
How was Jones able to place the call before Sanders picked up his cell to initiate contact?
Sanders gets to remind officials at the University of Colorado that he’s a hot commodity while he prods for an extension. Jones redirects the conversation from his culpability in the Cowboys’ current condition while offering fans and candidates a reminder that this is a high-profile job coaches crave.
Jones, the Cowboys owner and chief content creator, has done it again. Ryan Reynolds didn’t generate this much initial buzz for Deadpool & Wolverine.
But what happens in the coming days and weeks as the search unfolds and the idea of Jones and Sanders turns out to be more of a marriage of marketing convenience than a reality? Will the words of Hall of Fame quarterback Troy Aikman, who pointed out Monday that the job can be high-profile without being coveted, prove to be right?
The Cowboys will have no shortage of qualified candidates. There are enough veteran coaches searching for a fond farewell along with young, up-and-coming talents looking for their first big break to keep that pool stocked.
Back to Aikman’s point, there are other dynamics in play. One is the relative value Jones places on the position of head coach.
It was nearly 31 years ago in a hotel bar that Jones told reporters, “there are 500 coaches who could have won the Super Bowl with our team.‘’ A few days later the partnership between Jones and Jimmy Johnson came to an acrimonious end.
As he stood outside of the Cowboys locker room a few days ago after the loss to Washington to end the regular season, Jones was asked if he had a list of coaches ready if he moved on from Mike McCarthy. Jones again landed on that number, saying there would be “about 500 of them down there (Senior Bowl trip) that would love to be on the staff.‘’
Hyperbole? Sure. Jones rarely makes a point without one.
What you haven’t heard Jones say is there are 500 pass rushers who can do what Micah Parsons does or 500 quarterbacks who could start for the Cowboys.
Jones is willing to pay his top players big money because he believes they add rare value to the team’s potential success. He doesn’t hold coaches in the same regard. To him, their value is squeezed by the players on one side and by the management structure in place on the other.
Here’s another point. Past coaching hires have allowed Jones to sell hope to the fan base that a new voice, a new approach, will make a difference. That’s a tougher sell than ever.
Why? More than any other time, the ire of fans feels directly aimed at Jones. This past season was as much of a referendum on what Jerry and Stephen Jones didn’t do to build on a team that went 12-5 in three consecutive seasons as it was on the job done by McCarthy and his staff.
If you think that’s hyperbole, you weren’t at AT&T Stadium for the playoff game between UT and Ohio State. When Jones’ face flashed on the jumbotron as one of the celebrities in attendance, the crowd broke out in a comically loud boo.
The search for the 10th head coach in franchise history began with a call to Deion Sanders.
It will be interesting to see how it ends.
Catch David Moore and co-host Robert Wilonsky on Intentional Grounding on The Ticket (KTCK-AM 1310 and 96.7 FM) every Wednesday night at 7 o’clock through the Super Bowl.
Find more Cowboys coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.
Dallas, TX
Report reveals Mike Zimmer’s future in coaching after Cowboys part ways with Mike McCarthy
Mike McCarthy’s future has been sorted out in Dallas, and there won’t be one with the Cowboys. As for his defensive coordinator in Mike Zimmer? The question becomes a little more murky.
According to NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero, the 68-year old assistant is keeping his options open, even willing to return to the Cowboys should that be the desire of decision-makers. He could feasibly retire, or continue his coaching career elsewhere — nothing seems to be off the table.
“#Cowboys defensive coordinator Mike Zimmer tells me ‘all options are open’ on his future after Dallas and Mike McCarthy parted ways Monday,” Pelissero reported. “Zimmer and other Dallas assistants whose contracts expired are now allowed to interview elsewhere. ‘I really enjoy coaching,’ Zimmer said.”
Zimmer made a name for himself as an assistant in Dallas from 1994 until 2006. He finally got a chance to lead a franchise in 2014 with the Minnesota Vikings, where he coached until 2021. He spent two seasons with Deion Sanders at Jackson State and Colorado as an analyst until the Cowboys called upon him to return in 2024.
Meanwhile, McCarthy’s Cowboys finished the 2024 season with a 7-10 record. The last time the Cowboys had a losing record was in 2020 when they finished 6-10. That was McCarthy’s first year in Dallas, and he then led the Cowboys to three consecutive 12-5 seasons.
After the Cowboys lost to the Washington Commanders in Week 18, McCarthy said he wanted to be with the team going forward. “Absolutely. I have a lot invested here, and the Cowboys have a lot invested in me,” he said, per the Cowboys’ official website. “And then there’s a personal side to all these decisions. So, they all point in the right direction.”
McCarthy then explained why he should continue to be the Cowboys head coach. “I don’t like to talk about myself that way, but I’ll just be clear: I’m a winner. I know how to win. I’ve won a championship. I won a championship in this building,” McCarthy said. “And that’s who I am. We’ll see where it goes.”
Moving forward, multiple teams are expected to speak with Mike McCarthy about their vacancy, like the Chicago Bears and New Orleans Saints. Regardless, it didn’t work out in Dallas, and the Cowboys are moving in a different direction going forward. Whether Mike Zimmer is part of their plans remains to be seen.
Dallas, TX
Dallas was right to question University Park request for 18 acres
Why would Dallas ever hand over 18 acres of prime real estate within its city limits to University Park?
Yet that’s what University Park asked Dallas to do as part of a boundary adjustment application that would have shifted a school and church along Northwest Highway out of Dallas.
After the request hung around City Hall for about two years, Dallas City Council members rightly questioned the proposed land gift during a summer briefing of its Quality of Life, Arts & Culture committee. University Park has since withdrawn its application after being told its approval was “unlikely,” a spokesperson for the affluent city of 25,000 told us in an email.
We’re glad to hear it and support the far more reasonable approach of hammering out an agreement to address University Park’s underlying concerns. Dallas council member Gay Donnell Willis, whose District 13 includes the area, told us conversations between the two cities are active and ongoing.
The issue arose out of concerns of families at Michael M. Boone Elementary School, which opened in 2020 at 8385 Durham St. The school is within the city of Dallas and part of the Highland Park Independent School District, but about 80% of school families reside in University Park.
Willis said families have reported confusion between Dallas and University Park first responders over which city should answer calls from the school. They also had concerns over street and drainage problems around the school, as well as conflicting signage rules between the two cities and the school district.
University Park initially asked that Dallas’ boundary adjustment include only the school. But the application was amended to include Northway Christian Church because state law required the boundary in question to be contiguous to University Park, according to a city memo. HPISD also later joined the application. Both sites, plus rights of way, total about 18 acres.
“Moving a boundary of the city of Dallas is a really big deal,” Willis said. “There is a way to solve this without taking that measure.”
Council member Paul Ridley was a bit more pointed. “I just don’t like the idea that we are abandoning part of our property to an adjacent city that thinks they can service it better than we can,” he said at the committee meeting.
This isn’t just any property, either. A stone’s throw from NorthPark Center, this is some of the most valuable real estate in the city. The school and church don’t generate property tax revenue for Dallas, but a city staff memo said that if ever converted to homes, the land could generate an average of $3 million a year in tax revenue.
We are glad Dallas won’t consider moving its boundary. Doing so would encourage similar applications from other cities. Still, the Boone Elementary families are in a predicament; Dallas should help them out of it.
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com
-
Health1 week ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
Technology6 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science3 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology7 days ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
Health1 week ago
Michael J. Fox honored with Presidential Medal of Freedom for Parkinson’s research efforts
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: Millennials try to buy-in or opt-out of the “American Meltdown”
-
News7 days ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood