Connect with us

Austin, TX

The Yogurt Shop Murders: Inside The 1991 Slaying Of Four Teenage Girls That Remains Unsolved To This Day

Published

on

The Yogurt Shop Murders: Inside The 1991 Slaying Of Four Teenage Girls That Remains Unsolved To This Day


On December 6, 1991, four girls were brutally murdered at an I Can’t Believe It’s Yogurt! shop in Austin, Texas — and the case remains unsolved to this day.

HBOThe four victims of the Austin Yogurt Shop Murders, Eliza Thomas, Amy Ayers, Sarah Harbison, and Jennifer Harbison.

Shortly before midnight on Dec. 6, 1991, a patrol officer in Austin, Texas, noticed a fire at an “I Can’t Believe It’s Yogurt!” shop. When firefighters responded, they discovered more than a fire inside — they discovered the nude bodies of four teenage girls who’d been bound and shot to death. With that, the investigation into the Austin Yogurt Shop murders began.

To this day, the mystery still hasn’t been solved. Police have still not found the killer, or killers, who murdered 17-year-old Jennifer Harbison, her sister 15-year-old Sarah Harbison, 17-year-old Eliza Thomas, and 13-year-old Amy Ayers, on that terrible December night back in 1991.

Over the years, multiple people have confessed. But even though two men were convicted in the early 2000s, those convictions were later overturned. That said, investigators have not lost hope, and are determined to use modern technology like DNA testing to finally crack the case.

Advertisement

This is everything you need to know about the Austin Yogurt Shop murders, one of the most chilling cold cases in American history.

Inside The 1991 Austin Yogurt Shop Murders

The story of the Austin Yogurt Shop murders began on Dec. 6, 1991. That evening, two girls were working at an I Can’t Believe It’s Yogurt! shop in Austin, Texas: 17-year-old Eliza Thomas and 17-year-old Jennifer Harbison. That night, Jennifer’s 15-year-old sister Sarah was in the shop, as well as Sarah’s friend, 13-year-old Amy Ayers.

Interior Of The Yogurt Shop

HBOThe interior of the yogurt shop where the girls’ bodies were found.

No one knows exactly what happened to the girls that night. But shortly before midnight, a patrol officer making his rounds noticed smoke coming from the shop. He called in the fire department, and, inside, the firefighters found the bodies of Jennifer, Sarah, Thomas, and Ayers.

The girls had been stripped, bound and gagged, and shot in the head. At least one had been sexually assaulted.

Advertisement

But though investigators suspected that the murders could be the result of a robbery gone wrong — as money was missing from the store’s cash register — much of the evidence at the scene was destroyed by fire and water.

Burned Yogurt Shop

Austin Police DepartmentFire ripped through the store, destroying much of the evidence.

Not only had the fire torn through the entire shop, destroying crucial evidence, but it had also burned the girls’ bodies beyond recognition. Store manager Reese Price, who was then 24 years old, was called in to identify her employees and found that she couldn’t.

“There wasn’t anything there to identify,” Price stated in the HBO docuseries The Yogurt Shop Murders. “Fire is very destructive. It’s not forgiving.”

Despite these challenges, investigators set out to determine who had killed the girls.

Advertisement

Constructing The Profile Of The Killer — Or Killers

Given the destruction of the scene, investigators had very little to go on. They knew that the killer or killers had used two different guns: a .380 pistol and a .22 revolver, according to the Austin Chronicle. But much of the early investigation into the Yogurt Shop Murders was guesswork.

Melted Phone In The Yogurt Shop

Austin Police DepartmentThe fire inside the yogurt shop destroyed crucial evidence after the girls were murdered.

The FBI ultimately developed a profile of the likely killer or killers, describing them as “underachievers” probably “in their late teens to early twenties” who resented “any form of discipline.” The profile suggested that the killers had committed the murders under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and that they likely had a past criminal history.

Boiling down the profile to a single word, police described their suspect as a “thug.”

I Cant Believe Its Yogurt Shop

HBOThe exterior of the yogurt shop where the four girls were killed in 1991.

Advertisement

But despite a cash reward for any information about the Austin Yogurt Shop murders, it would take years for police to make any arrests. When they did, it was because they’d circled back to some of their earliest suspects.

The Austin Police Arrest Four Men In Connection With The Yogurt Shop Murders

The first arrests in the Yogurt Shop Murders came after investigators examined one of their old leads. Just eight days after the quadruple homicide, police had arrested 16-year-old Maurice Pierce. Pierce had been caught wandering around Northcross Mall, near the I Can’t Believe It’s Yogurt! shop, carrying a .22 caliber revolver.

Pierce’s gun was the same type of weapon that had been used in the Yogurt Shop Murders. And, under questioning, Pierce claimed that he had participated in the homicides alongside three other boys: 15-year-old Forrest Welborn, 17-year-old Michael Scott, and 17-year-old Robert Springsteen IV. However, there was no evidence tying them to the crime scene and police ultimately concluded that Pierce “was lying and had just made up the whole story about the gun being used,” according to court records.

But eight years later, in 1999, police reexamined Pierce’s story. They re-interviewed Scott that September and, after a lengthy interrogation, Scott confessed to the murders and implicated the three others. Police then interrogated Springsteen, who also confessed, and claimed that he had sexually assaulted one of the girls.

Police Interrogation

Austin Police DepartmentPolice interrogated two suspects in 1999. Both confessed. And yet both convictions were eventually overturned.

Advertisement

With that, Scott, Springsteen, Welborn, and Pierce were arrested and charged with capital murder. Though charges against Welborn and Pierce were ultimately dropped due to lack of evidence, Scott and Springsteen went to trial.

Both men plead not guilty and claimed that their confessions were coerced. But they were found guilty. Springsteen was sentenced to death in 2001, and Scott was sentenced to life in prison in 2002.

But neither of the two convictions would stick.

The Case Against Scott And Springsteen Falls Apart

After Scott and Springsteen were found guilty for the Austin Yogurt Shop murders, flaws emerged in their conviction. Their separate confessions had been used against each other, but Scott and Springsteen weren’t permitted to question each other in court, a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Michael Scott And Robert Springsteen

Austin ChronicleYearbook photos of Michael Scott and Robert Springsteen.

Advertisement

What’s more, it came out that Pierce’s gun was not a definitive match to the .22 used during the quadruple homicide, and that investigators had held a gun to Scott’s head during his interrogation.

In 2006, Springsteen’s conviction was overturned. In 2007, so was Scott’s. Hoping to retry the men, investigators then turned to DNA testing, which had advanced since the 1990s. But, to their surprise, an examination of male DNA found at the scene determined that it was not a match to Scott or Springsteen — or even to Pierce or Welborn.

With that, the Austin Yogurt Murder Case went colder than ever. But investigators are still hopeful that they’ll be able to one day solve it.

Will The Austin Yogurt Murders Ever Be Solved?

If Scott and Springsteen were not involved in the murders, who killed Eliza Thomas, Amy Ayers, and Jennifer and Sarah Harbison in 1991? The case remains unsolved. But investigators haven’t given up.

Although DNA at the scene did not match the four suspects, investigators are still hopeful that it will be a match to someone, some day. Though there are no matches right now, advances in DNA technology might help solve this cold case for good in the near future.

Advertisement

Indeed, Detective Dan Jackson, who took over the case in 2022, remains optimistic that it could be solved.

“If I didn’t think I could solve it, then why get up every day?” Jackson told USA Today in 2025. “I think that with new technology, new information that we have − that I can’t go into — even since I’ve taken the case over, the ability to do more with less when it comes to forensics is light-years ahead than it was a few years ago.”

“I am confident that I will solve this,” Jackson declared.


After reading about the unsolved case of the Austin Yogurt Shop murders, go inside the stories of mysterious disappearances that remain unsolved to this day. Or, discover the story of the unsolved murders at Lumber Baron Inn.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Austin, TX

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo

Published

on

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo


Self-driving cars have become a common sight on Austin streets, but a new Texas law is adding tougher requirements for the companies behind the wheelless vehicles.

Senate Bill 2807 imposes stricter rules on autonomous vehicle companies operating in the state, including state authorization, emergency response plans for law enforcement, and a public portal where residents can verify operators and file safety complaints.

The changes come as Austin continues to track incidents involving autonomous vehicles. The city’s autonomous vehicle dashboard shows 75 incidents in 2026, including a collision, eight near misses, and seven incidents of ignoring police direction.

Attorney Drew Gibbs, a partner at Slingshot Law, said one crash involved a Waymo vehicle.

Advertisement

“There was a T-bone collision. A pretty serious T-bone collision where a Waymo just crashed into the side of my client’s vehicle,” Gibbs said.

ALSO| Waymo files voluntary software recall over flooded-lane risks on high-speed roads

KEYE

Advertisement

One of the incidents of ignoring police direction happened during the mass shooting on West Sixth Street back in March, when three people died, and 15 others were injured.

Austin Police Association President Michael Bullock said autonomous vehicles can struggle in unusual situations.

“It didn’t impede on anything in the moment, but it’s not necessarily uncommon where these vehicles don’t quite know how to deal with these one-off scenarios,” Bullock said.

The new law requires autonomous vehicle companies to be authorized by the state, to provide an emergency response plan for law enforcement, and to participate in a public-facing portal that allows the public to verify operators and submit safety complaints.

Kara Kockelman, a professor of transportation and engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, welcomed the added oversight.

Advertisement

“I’m glad that the state is taking this a bit more seriously now,” she said. “It’s important not to just let others slip in without kind of meeting those basic minimums.”

Bullock said the emergency planning requirement may not make a major difference in fast-moving situations. Asked how impactful it is to have a fully laid out emergency response plan, Bullock said, “These plans are great, but it takes time to work through all of those versus the immediacy of having someone behind the wheel.”

The four autonomous vehicle companies operating in Austin — Waymo, Zoox, AV-Ride, and Tesla — are all state-authorized.

The Texas DMV said an autonomous vehicle company can lose its authorization to operate in Texas if the agency deems the vehicles are operating in a way that endangers public safety.

Waymo was contacted for comment, but had not responded.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State

Published

on

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State


Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Tuesday she will leave the post next month.

What we know:

Advertisement

In a statement, Nelson said her resignation will be effective July 17 but did not provide a reason for the departure.

“It has been an honor to serve the people of Texas in this role,” Nelson said. “My time as Secretary came at an important moment for Texas, and I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish as an agency in under four years.”

Nelson has served in the role since 2023.

Advertisement

Among other things, the Secretary of State oversees elections and business filings in the state and serves as the chief diplomat of Texas.

View of Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, during the 80th Texas Legislature, on the floor of the Senate at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas, January 22, 2007. (John Anderson/The Austin Chronicle / Getty Images)

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott described Nelson as extraordinary.

“I am deeply grateful for her long and loyal service and outstanding leadership. She has represented our state with grace and honor across the globe, and Texas is better because of it,” Abbott said. “Cecilia and I wish her all the best in the next chapter of her distinguished career.”

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Nelson has presided over seven statewide elections during her tenure with a cumulative 27 million ballots cast and broke a record with more than 3 million active business filers.

Advertisement

Nelson also served three decades in the Texas Senate, where she remains the longest-serving Republican in state history.

The Source: Information in this story came from the Texas Secretary of State’s office.

TexasElectionPoliticsTexas Politics2026 ElectionsAustinGreg Abbott
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election

Published

on

Austin OKs .35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wants the city council to hold off on a bond measure this year to set up a better proposal in 2028.

Michael Dorman

Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system. 

Processing Content

Advertisement

The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.

“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”

A bond election would follow the rejection of a maintenance and operations property tax hike by 63% of city voters in November. In the wake of the defeat, Austin officials took steps to better manage its finances, including pursuing a citywide performance and efficiency audit of city operations.

The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year, Austin sold $796 million of GO bonds and certificates of obligation in a deal rated triple-A with stable outlooks by S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds. 

Advertisement

The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.

Construction site for Austin convention center project
Construction site for Austin’s convention center project, shown in March. The city council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds for a bigger convention center.

Rich Saskal

The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds. 

An ordinance approved in October to issue up to an initial $650 million of bonds for the project was rescinded by the council.

The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds. 

Advertisement

“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).” 

A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.

Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed their petition for a writ of mandamus, according to attorneys.

The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism. 

The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program. 

Advertisement

Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.

A groundbreaking for the project, which is aimed at improving treatment processes and protecting the Colorado River, was held in April.

The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.

A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.

City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes voters approved in November 2020 for what was then billed as a 27-mile, 31-station light-rail project estimated to cost $7.1 billion.

Advertisement

Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process to seek billions of dollars in federal grants and loans.

ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.  

“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.” 

Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations. 

“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending