Connect with us

Austin, TX

Save Our Springs Alliance lawsuit seeks to remove Austin charter amendments from ballot

Published

on

Save Our Springs Alliance lawsuit seeks to remove Austin charter amendments from ballot


Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include a new statement shared by a spokesperson of the city of Austin.

The Austin City Council violated the Texas Open Meetings Act when placing a slate of charter amendments on the Nov. 5 general election ballot, a lawsuit filed Monday claims.

The suit was filed in Travis County’s 98th District Court by attorneys representing the Save Our Springs Alliance, an environmental nonprofit; its executive director, Bill Bunch; and Joe Riddell, a former staff attorney in the Texas attorney general’s office.

It seeks to invalidate the City Council’s approval of adding the charter amendments to the ballot. As Monday is the last day to order an election, if a judge rules in favor of the group, the 13 charter amendments approved last week by the City Council would not make it onto the ballot this year.

Advertisement

The lawsuit asserts that the city’s governing body violated both the public participation requirements and the public notice requirements of the act when it authorized the election at a hearing last Wednesday because all of the proposed amendments were compressed into one agenda item, rather than each one being taken up individually. This limited the amount of time a person could speak on the amendments and did not give substantial public notice on what the amendments would change, the lawsuit claims. 

“The Austin City Council is becoming lawless, and this lawsuit is another example of their arrogant disdain for transparency. Mayor Watson and the Council majority are undermining democracy with violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act,” Bill Aleshire, a former Travis County judge and attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a news release.

Bunch has seen success in the courts in suing the Austin mayor and City Council over violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act in the past.

“Following a lengthy and robust charter amendment process that included multiple opportunities for public input, we are aware of the lawsuit that SOS filed today that challenges the August 14 charter amendment election ordinance,” read a statement shared by city of Austin spokesperson David Ochsner with the American-Statesman. “The city stands by the process used.”

Advertisement

The city charter is a comprehensive legal document of the city of Austin’s rules and regulations. The proposed charter amendments include raising the threshold of signatures needed for a recall election of a City Council member from 10% of registered voters in the council member’s district to 15%, giving the City Council the authority to appoint and remove the city attorney, and requiring that initiative elections and citizen-initiated charter elections occur in even-year November general elections.



Source link

Austin, TX

Austin Pets Alive! activates emergency response to assist shelters affected by flooding

Published

on

Austin Pets Alive! activates emergency response to assist shelters affected by flooding


AUSTIN (KXAN) — As flood threats continue across parts of South Central Texas, Austin Pets Alive! has activated emergency response efforts to support animal shelters affected by the inclement weather.

In a social media post, APA! wrote, “We began offering aid last night, working to secure fosters for 10 dogs in the Castroville shelter, an open-air shelter that sits at the bottom of a valley.” 

APA! said the situation escalated overnight with additional shelters reporting flooding. One shelter confirmed that floodwaters reached its facility, APA! added.

Communities overwhelmed due to weather include Uvalde, Castroville and Sabinal.

Advertisement

The nonprofit is asking the Austin community to foster, adopt or donate to free up capacity for animals displaced by the disaster. APA! needs to clear out its facilities to assist the animals in need of shelter. 

Here are ways you can help: 

  • Adopt: APA! is offering a “Name Your Own Adoption Fee” on all animals. 
  • Foster: The shelter is seeking foster homes for a minimum of three weeks. 
  • Donate: Proceeds will fund vans and response teams setting up a staging and triage center at the heart of the disaster zone, along with an expanded stockpile of preventatives, PPE and additional supplies.

If you would like to donate, click here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin proposes more flood mitigation funding as heavy rains threaten Central Texas

Published

on

Austin proposes more flood mitigation funding as heavy rains threaten Central Texas


With heavy rain expected across parts of Central Texas this week and flooding top of mind, the city of Austin is proposing to put more money toward flood mitigation improvements in next year’s budget.

The proposal would invest in new flood infrastructure, add staff, and help move flood mitigation projects forward, according to city leaders. Austin City Councilmember Ryan Alter said the investments are aimed at keeping the city prepared for future flooding.

Residents who live near waterways say they have seen how quickly conditions can change. David Haderspeck, who lives near Shoal Creek, said the creek “fills up pretty fast” and “gets a lot higher than you’d expect.” He said he has watched the water rise dramatically after rain.

“I’ve seen it come up probably 10 to 15 feet to the ordinary high-water mark,” he said.

Advertisement

This week, parts of Central Texas, including the Hill Country, are expected to get heavy downpours. While Austin is not expecting the same impacts as parts of the Hill Country, leaders said the city is using this year’s budget planning to continue investing in flood safety.

Alter said the city has the expertise to address flooding risks but needs to follow through on projects.

ALSO| Central Texas urged to prepare as heavy rainfall sits in forecast over next two days

“We have the experts. We just have to put the plans into practice, and that’s what we’re doing in this budget,” he said.

Under the budget proposal, the city would provide about $134.5 million for the Drainage Utility Fund, which helps pay for flood mitigation, drainage infrastructure and watershed protection efforts.

Advertisement

Alter said the proposal would shift more of the funding balance toward building new infrastructure.

“What we’re going to do is shift that balance a little bit more to building new infrastructure so that when we do have large flooding events, we’ve got that infrastructure in place to keep people safe,” he said.

The proposal also adds staff and invests in both new and existing flood mitigation projects across the city.

Asked whether the proposed investments would be enough moving forward, Alter said, “I do…I think we’re doing the right thing and just making sure that our residents have the infrastructure to stay safe.”

Alter said heavy rain cannot be prevented, but the city’s goal is to have infrastructure in place to help keep people safe when it happens.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas launches investigates LinkedIn over claims of “ghost jobs”

Published

on

Texas launches investigates LinkedIn over claims of “ghost jobs”


FILE – LinkedIn logos are displayed on an iPhone and computer screen. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)

The Texas Attorney General’s office has opened an investigation into LinkedIn over allegations that the professional networking platform misleads consumers with advertising and profiting from misleading or fake job listings, otherwise known as “ghost jobs.”

LinkedIn investigation

Advertisement

In this photo illustration a Linkedin logo seen displayed on a mobile phone. (Photo Illustration by Stanislav Kogiku/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

What we know:

Texas announced on Tuesday it has issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) seeking documents, data and internal communications related to LinkedIn’s advertising, marketing, job listing verification practices and its Premium subscription services.

Advertisement

The investigation centers on whether LinkedIn violated Texas’ consumer protection laws by promoting paid subscription services while allegedly failing to disclose that some job listings on the platform may not actually be representative of hiring opportunities.

What is a ‘ghost job’?

An image of a woman holding a cell phone in front of a LinkedIn logo displayed on a computer screen. On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft and the world’s largest professional networking platform, with more than 1 billion registered users worldwide. 

Advertisement

A “ghost job” generally refers to a position advertised online that either is no longer available or that an employer has no immediate intention of filling. The attorney general’s office cited independent studies estimating that ghost jobs account for between one-fifth and one-third of online job postings.

Texas AG targets Premium Subscription Fees

 Photographer: Mark Felix/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

According to the office of the attorney general, LinkedIn does not independently verify the hiring status of most job listings on its platform. Ken Paxton’s office alleges that the company’s marketing for its Premium subscription services does not disclose that a significant number of postings could be inactive, unfilled or not reflect genuine employment opportunity.  

“I will use every resource available to my office to help job-seeking Texans find and secure real employment opportunities,” Paxton said in a statement. “LinkedIn has a duty to provide the services it advertises and ensure that consumers paying for Premium subscriptions are receiving access to legitimate job postings.”

Advertisement

Texas officials said LinkedIn’s Premium Career and Premium Business subscriptions cost about $39.99 and $69.99 per month, respectively, and are marketed to jobseekers looking to improve their employment prospects.

What’s next:

Advertisement

The investigation does not include any formal allegations of wrongdoing, and no lawsuit has been filed.

The Source: Information in this article was provided by the Texas Attorney General’s Office.

TexasSocial MediaKen Paxton
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending