Connect with us

Austin, TX

Better Luck Next Year? • The Austin Chronicle

Published

on

Better Luck Next Year? • The Austin Chronicle


Credit: Map via redistricting.capitol.texas.gov

Mapping Chaos

Six months into his second term as president, Donald Trump was nervous about the chances for keeping a Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives after the 2026 elections. So in July, Trump demanded that Texas Republicans discard decades of precedent and redistrict the state’s congressional districts in the middle of the decade. Texas Republicans were more than happy to deliver.

The maps redrew the districts of some of the most effective Black leaders in the country and crammed Austin’s 35th and 37th congressional districts into one, to remove either Rep. Greg Casar or Rep. Lloyd Doggett from office. To stop the redistricting, 56 Democratic House members, including Austin Reps. John Bucy, Gina Hinojosa, James Talarico, Donna Howard, and Lulu Flores, left Texas to deny Republicans the quorum necessary to finalize the gerrymander.

The Dems stayed away two weeks, long enough to educate voters nationwide about what was happening. Then they returned and were steamrolled by Republicans, who approved the redistricting plan on a party line vote. (The GOP majority twisted the knife by enacting punitive new measures to discourage future resistance from their colleagues.) A federal court blocked the gerrymandered map last month, ruling that it illegally discriminates against people of color. But the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily paused the lower court’s ruling while the legal battle rages on, allowing the map to stand for the midterm election. For now at least, Trump got exactly what he asked for. – Brant Bingamon


Aftermath of the July 4 floods in Kerr County Credit: Sarah Wolf

Unthinkable Loss

Within hours, a torrent of rain quickly overwhelmed the banks of the Guadalupe River over the Independence Day weekend. Fast-rising floodwaters and swollen rivers destroyed multiple towns and took over 135 lives, mostly in Kerr County, to become one of the most devastating natural disasters in Texas history. At Camp Mystic, an all-girls sleepaway summer camp along the Guadalupe in Hunt, 25 children and three staff members were lost in the deluge.

In those first days, the casualty count rose horrifically, and then slowed as the missing were accounted for. In the days and weeks that followed, Central Texans pitched in to aid their neighbors, first by clearing debris and searching for survivors, then by gathering resources and raising funds for those impacted. Then, Texans began to point to their lawmakers, asking what the state should have done to prevent the tragedy. In the second special legislative session, the Texas Legislature addressed some of those failings, investing in flood sirens and evacuation plans. The parents who lost their children at Camp Mystic are still in an active lawsuit against the summer camp, suing for failing to evacuate the campers, gross negligence, and wrongful death, even as the camp seeks to reopen next summer.  – Sammie Seamon

Advertisement

Credit: Getty Images

The Lege Marches Texas Farther Right …

With the GOP now even more empowered to pass legislation, no matter how overtly some bills appeared unconstitutional and aligned with far-right, Christian nationalist values, the 89th legislative session (and the two special sessions that followed) greenlit a host of bills targeting public education, the immigrant and queer communities, abortion access, and more.

A requirement to hang the Ten Commandments and dedicate prayer and Bible reading time in public school classrooms. A law that blocks Texans from using the bathroom aligned with their gender identity in public schools, universities, and any government-run building. Police must partner with ICE in 2026. A bill that takes away librarians’ authority to approve school library books, when ever-more titles containing diverse perspectives have been banned by the state. The creation of a bounty hunter system that allows a next-door neighbor to tattle on people trying to access abortion pills. While most laws went into effect Sept. 1, more became effective as recently as Dec. 4, and advocates say their effects have already begun to be felt by Texans. – Sammie Seamon


Credit: Zeke Barbaro / Getty Images (Abbott photo by John Anderson)

… and Abbott Finally Gets His School Vouchers 

For Texas students, parents, and school districts, another catastrophe in this year’s legislative session was the state’s creation of private school vouchers. The voucher bill, signed into law in May, will allow parents to take approximately $10,000 of taxpayer money per child from the state’s coffers to spend on their children’s private schooling. Applications will open in the spring.

The voucher vote was an epochal loss for public school supporters who had fought since the 1950s to stop previous versions of the measure. For the Republican leaders who championed it, particularly Gov. Greg Abbott, the vote concluded a years-long campaign to impose their will not just on the electorate, who were never hugely supportive of vouchers, but also on their fellow Republicans, particularly those from rural areas, who had crossed the aisle to vote with Democrats to keep vouchers from becoming law. 

Advocates say the program will slowly drain funds from schools that are already underfunded, hurting poor students and undermining public education in general. The state allocated $1 billion for the program in 2026, but that figure is expected to balloon to $5 billion by the beginning of the next decade. – Brant Bingamon


Credit: Getty Images

One Big Barfing Sound

If there are two traits you can count on from the Trump administration, they are stupidity and cruelty. First, the name of budget reconciliation measure HR 1 was nonsensical: The president’s lackeys have called it One Big Beautiful Bill, making it the nonsensical One Big Beautiful Bill Act when it passed because they are idiots who don’t understand how words or the legislative process work. But beyond the stupidity was the cruelty of vast spending cuts, including an estimated $155.3 million gouging of promised finances for the City of Austin alone. The list included FEMA grant to improve flood protection for power and water treatment plants, money to cap and cover stretches of the I-35 project, and an all-out attack on plans to decrease the city’s reliance on fossil fuels, plus there’s the massive local impact of cutting funds for federal agencies and programs like Medicaid and SNAP. Of course, it’s Texas’ fault: HR 1 was authored by Lubbock Republican Jodey C. Arrington. – Richard Whittaker


I-35 as seen from the 12th St. bridge Credit: Jana Birchum

Stuck in Neutral

Maybe we’re just getting older and grumpier, but we seem to encounter construction on every trip we take around town. Let’s not talk too much about the I-35 expansion, which will be a Top 10 story for the next decade or so (sigh). To make matters worse, the prospect of those caps over the highway are looking less impressive after the fed took back $100 million slated for the project (another casualty of the OBBBA). Remember the flurry of excitement when the Travis County Commissioners Court voted in October to fund a study on the feasibility of a rail line between ATX and SATX? Last we heard, that plan could be completed before the I-35 project but was counting on a big investment from the federal government. Sounds pretty unfeasible to us. Those with an even better memory will remember Project Connect’s rail plan that locals voted to fund in 2020. This year the city solicited proposals for the multibillion-dollar final design and construction contract. Fingers crossed. – James Renovitch


Council member Vanessa Fuentes (center) and other attendees react to election results during the Prop Q Election Night Party at The Brewtorium Brewery & Kitchen on November 4, 2025 Credit: John Anderson

Prop Flop

It didn’t seem particularly controversial when the Council approved a budget last August which necessitated a tax rate election. The election, dubbed Proposition Q, asked voters to raise their property taxes by an average of around $200 per year.

But Prop Q got controversial in a hurry. In October, the Statesman published a series of articles questioning spending by city leaders on lunches and travel and focusing on the city’s $1 million logo. Opponents of Prop Q threatened lawsuits against the political action campaign supporting the measure, argued that the higher taxes would worsen the city’s affordability crisis, and complained that the money generated by Prop Q would support the city’s “homeless industrial complex.” Gov. Greg Abbott kept the focus on the homeless, sending state troopers to clear out homeless camps in the weeks before the vote. Attorney General Ken Paxton threatened to sue the city’s largest provider of housing for homeless people, Foundation Communities, falsely suggesting that the group’s donations to the Prop Q PAC “might be illegal.”

In the end, Prop Q was defeated 63-37%. A revised city budget passed on Nov. 20, which reduced funding for homelessness, public safety, parks, and social services. Now, city leaders wait to see what they’re going to have to cut next year. – Brant Bingamon

Advertisement

Demonstrators outside of AISD’s headquarters Credit: Sammie Seamon

AISD Makes Unpopular School Closure Decisions

In early September, the Texas Education Agency told Austin ISD administration that 33 of its campuses had fallen into dangerous waters, receiving failing accountability scores from the state agency for low STAAR performance. The TEA also gave 24 schools turnaround plans, giving them the option to close down or totally rehire faculty and revamp curriculum. The district has also found itself in dire financial straits: With declining enrollment, a lack of state funding, and half of their budget paid out in recapture payments, they’re predicting to run out of money by next school year. If the district fails to raise student performance, the TEA could take over management of AISD, as they did Fort Worth ISD in October.

In early October, the district decided to propose school closures to save money and respond to the TEA’s requirement for turnaround plans. In the weeks that followed, students and their families protested the dismantling of their neighborhood school communities, hoisting signs and chanting outside of TEA and AISD’s headquarters. Then, three schools were taken back off the closure list, leading to accusations that the district was favoring the loudest parents (which the district denied). On Nov. 21, after hours of rigorous debate, the AISD Board of Trustees ultimately voted to close eight elementary schools, two middle schools, and International High School next school year. – Sammie Seamon


Credit: Getty Images

ICE’s Dastardly Drive to Deport 

This year has been unlike any other for a multitude of reasons, many of which can be attributed to the Trump administration’s aggressive decision-making – one of the most intense being the rollout of ICE agents across the nation, which Trump promised during his 2024 campaign. He stayed true to his word, deploying ICE agents on the very first day following his inauguration. According to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Texas currently has the most ICE detainees – 17,696 as of Nov. 28 – in the nation. 

On April 1, ICE and other federal and state agents raided an Austin suburb Airbnb, where nearly 50 people were arrested, some of whom were children. The raid came as an attempt to deport members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, the agencies involved claim, though advocates have said there has been no evidence provided that suggests any of the half a hundred individuals had any gang affiliation, but rather were targeted merely based on physical appearance. 

Whether it’s 50 potential gang members or just one immigrant, such as the Boston student who was planning to fly home to Austin to see her family for Thanksgiving, only to be arrested and deported after she arrived for her flight, ICE has been relentless in its forceful attempts at deportation throughout the year. – Joe Ellett


Credit: Zeke Barbaro / Getty Images

Water Woes (and a Win)

It’s now a well-known and troubling truth: Texas, with our projected growth and draining aquifers, is running out of water. Moreover, the move of big tech to Austin and greater Central Texas is placing even more strain on our energy grid and water resources: By 2030, data centers are projected to multiply roughly tenfold across the state, with the average center using 300,000 gallons of water a day. Texas, which is currently experiencing higher temperatures than during the Dust Bowl, will face only further water loss from evaporation and hotter soil as drought conditions worsen with climate change.

On Nov. 4, Texans voted on Prop 4, a 20-year investment in the future of our state’s water availability, one that will funnel $1 billion annually out of state sales tax revenue toward water conservation and production projects. These projects include fixing leaky pipes, wastewater reuse, seawater desalination, and produced water reuse from fracking, plus others listed in the State Water Plan. – Sammie Seamon


Credit: Getty Images

Burnt Orange Bleeds Red 

When far-right thought leader Chris Rufo urged conservatives to “lay siege” to UT at a campus talk in 2023, it was hard to imagine anyone taking him seriously. Two years later, it’s remarkable how much Rufo’s allies have accomplished. 

Last year, UT eliminated diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and restricted students’ rights of free speech and assembly. Professors and administrators left in unprecedented numbers, including the president and provost, who were replaced with allies of Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. 

Advertisement

This year, Republicans approved SB 37, which ended the longstanding practice of including professors in choosing the university’s leaders and setting policy for the school, handing that power over to the board of regents. SB 37 also created the “Office of the Ombudsman,” an overseer appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott to investigate professors accused of violating state law. 

SB 37 also gave the board of regents the power to decide which courses are taught at UT. The board is currently reviewing the content of hundreds of courses concerned in one way or another with gender and sexuality. Professors are bracing for changes in the curriculum and for the consolidation of programs like Women’s and Gender Studies, African Diaspora Studies, and other ethnic studies in the College of Liberal Arts. They’re also awaiting a decision from university leaders on the Trump compact, an offer promising federal research money in exchange for supporting Trump’s political agenda. Of the nine universities offered the deal, only UT expressed enthusiasm, demonstrating how far right the school’s leaders now lean. – Brant Bingamon

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Austin, TX

Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election

Published

on

Austin OKs .35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wants the city council to hold off on a bond measure this year to set up a better proposal in 2028.

Michael Dorman

Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system. 

Processing Content

Advertisement

The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.

“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”

A bond election would follow the rejection of a maintenance and operations property tax hike by 63% of city voters in November. In the wake of the defeat, Austin officials took steps to better manage its finances, including pursuing a citywide performance and efficiency audit of city operations.

The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year, Austin sold $796 million of GO bonds and certificates of obligation in a deal rated triple-A with stable outlooks by S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds. 

Advertisement

The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.

Construction site for Austin convention center project
Construction site for Austin’s convention center project, shown in March. The city council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds for a bigger convention center.

Rich Saskal

The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds. 

An ordinance approved in October to issue up to an initial $650 million of bonds for the project was rescinded by the council.

The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds. 

Advertisement

“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).” 

A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.

Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed their petition for a writ of mandamus, according to attorneys.

The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism. 

The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program. 

Advertisement

Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.

A groundbreaking for the project, which is aimed at improving treatment processes and protecting the Colorado River, was held in April.

The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.

A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.

City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes voters approved in November 2020 for what was then billed as a 27-mile, 31-station light-rail project estimated to cost $7.1 billion.

Advertisement

Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process to seek billions of dollars in federal grants and loans.

ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.  

“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.” 

Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations. 

“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas commission on law enforcement head testifies in Austin, creates controversy

Published

on

Texas commission on law enforcement head testifies in Austin, creates controversy


AUSTIN, Texas (KTRK) — Does the state of Texas have too many law enforcement agencies? That was a topic of discussion at a Texas House Committee meeting on May 28, which focused on police standards and policy.

It was comments from TCOLE Deputy Chief TJ Vineyard that drew the attention of unions and lobbying groups representing law enforcement across Texas.

“We’re starting to look now at encouraging the consolidation of agencies,” Vineyard said during the nearly eight-hour-long hearing.

The response was almost immediate from groups representing various aspects of law enforcement.

Advertisement

One social media post on Facebook from the Texas Law Enforcement Association proclaimed concern about the future of smaller departments across the state, despite an exchange later in the hearing between the committee chair, State Representative Cole Hefner, and TCOLE’s Executive Director, Chief Gregory Stevens.

“We’re not taking police off the street?” Hefner asked. “We’re making sure that we have qualified people that are equipped and trained.”

“One hundred percent,” Stevens said.

According to TCOLE’s own numbers, there are more than 2,700 accredited agencies and some 83,000 peace officers.

The chair asked whether 2,700 was a good or bad thing, given that Texas has more agencies than the next four largest states combined.

Advertisement

“There is a lot of duplicative coverage,” Stevens said, “overlapping coverage. When it comes to resources, it can be inefficient.”

Also speaking on the panel was Jennifer Szimanski with the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT), which also posted on social media about the hearing. While the group wouldn’t comment directly about consolidation, Szimanski told ABC13 that “consolidation is not the legislative intent for TCOLE” and that “we should be forward-looking and raising standards”.

But in a conversation with ABC13, Stevens said targeting smaller departments is not their intent. TCOLE wants every department, regardless of size, to comply with the higher standards implemented in 2023.

“Some of the things that are out there surfing out across social media and on other platforms is that TCOLE wants to shut down small agencies and let sheriff’s offices take over, and that’s absolutely not true. It couldn’t be further from what we’re doing,” Stevens said. “It doesn’t matter about the size of the agencies, and I want to be really clear on that point. TECOL is not out to shut down or to make life hard on a small municipal agency, a school district, police department, or what have you.”

But the larger conversation is not limited to the state of Texas.

Advertisement

Harris County is home to more than 60 agencies. In the last major study on overlap in 2018, Rice University’s Kinder Institute found that consolidation could help address inefficiencies. Kyle Shelton, now at the University of Minnesota, co-authored the report eight years ago.

“It’s really just an opportunity to look at how regional governments, which are often overlapping, best coordinate and collaborate on the services that they’re providing,” Shelton told ABC13.

Whether it’s Harris County or the state of Texas, the cost of funding and maintaining law enforcement agencies is getting more expensive. While consolidation may not be the answer, it is part of a conversation in which Kyle Shelton says governments should be engaging.

“It’s not a quick band-aid to pull off and say, ‘Hey, look, we fixed the budget crisis, or, you know, addressed some efficiencies here in a nice, neat three-month process,” Shelton said. “You know, it likely takes years and a lot of trust building, both with residents and the agencies.”

Texas does have more law enforcement agencies than the next four largest states combined, according to TCOLE.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 KTRK-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas Pride events 2026: Parades, festivals and more happening this June

Published

on

Texas Pride events 2026: Parades, festivals and more happening this June


Pride Month is celebrated each June. 

It marks the anniversary of the Stonewall uprising that started in late June 1969. The protests are seen as a turning point in the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement. It inspired marches across the country in the years that followed.

Advertisement

More than a dozen cities and towns across Texas are celebrating with everything from parades to festivals to concerts and more.

A Pride flag is seen held up in a crowd during preparation for a Queer March to the Texas State Capitol on April 15, 2023 in Austin, Texas.

A Pride flag is seen held up in a crowd during preparation for a Queer March to the Texas State Capitol on April 15, 2023 in Austin, Texas. (Brandon Bell / Getty Images)

Here’s a look at some of the dates and places Pride events are happening around the Lone Star State this month:

Advertisement

Austin also has a Pride celebration, but it is scheduled for Aug. 22.

The Source: Information in this story came from various sources, including official websites for events. AI was used to help assemble the list of events.

Advertisement
TexasLGBTQPrideAustinHoustonRound RockBastropSan AntonioTaylor



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending