Austin, TX

2024 NCAA DI men's golf championships: Schedule, how to watch

Published

2 years ago

May 13, 2024

2024 NCAA DI men's golf championships: Schedule, how to watch

The 2024 NCAA DI men’s golf championship began with selections on Wednesday, May 1. The championship concludes March 24-29 in Carlsbad, California.

Click or tap here to see every team and individual qualifier.

2024 DI men’s golf championships schedule

Selection show for regional teams and individuals

Wednesday, May 1 | 2 p.m. ET | Golf Channel

Regionals

Monday, May 13-Wednesday, May 15
- The University of Texas Golf Club | Austin, TX (Texas, host)
- University Club | Baton Rouge, LA (LSU, host)
- UNC Finley Golf Course | Chapel Hill, NC (UNC, host)
- The Farms Golf Club | Rancho Santa Fe, CA (San Diego, host)
- Stanford Golf Course | Stanford, CA (Stanford, host)
- Birck Boilermaker Golf Complex | West Lafayette, IN (Purdue, host)

National championships

Friday, May 24-Wednesday, May 29
- Omni La Costa Resort & Spa | Carlsbad, CA

How the championship works

Six 54-hole regional tournaments will be conducted to determine the 30 qualifying teams and six individuals (not on those qualifying teams) who will compete in the finals. Thirteen teams and 10 individuals (not on those teams) will compete at each of three regionals while the other three regionals will have 14 teams and five individuals (not on those teams). The low five teams and the low individual not on those teams will advance to the finals.

All 30 teams and six individuals will complete 54 holes of stroke play. Following 54 holes of competition, the top 15 teams along with the top nine individuals not on an advancing team will advance for one additional day of stroke play to determine the top eight teams for match-play competition and the 72-hole stroke-play individual champion. The top eight teams after 72 holes of play will be placed into a bracket thereafter.

The 2024 national championships will be hosted by the University of Texas at Austin and held at Omni La Costa Resort & Spa.

In team match-play competition, a total of five points will be available with one point being awarded for each individual match. Winning teams will advance to the semifinals and subsequently, the finals. The first team to win three points within the team match will advance, or in the case of the final match, be declared the national champion.

⛳️ Where Masters winners played golf in college

2024 DI men’s golf championships selections

West Lafayette Regional

Hosted by Purdue | Birck Boilermaker Golf Complex

Teams (seeded in the following order):
1. Vanderbilt
2.   Arizona
3.   Florida
4.   New Mexico
5.   Purdue
6.   San Diego State [Mountain West Conference]
7.   Mississippi State
8.   Indiana
9. College of Charleston [Coastal Athletic Association]
10. Stetson
11. Colorado State
12. Southern Illinois [Missouri Valley Conference]
13. Tennessee Tech [Ohio Valley Conference]

Individuals (seeded in the following order):
1. Caleb VanArragon, Valparaiso
2.   Hunter Thomson, Michigan
3.   Cameron Huss, Wisconsin
4.   Barend Botha, Toledo
5.   Valentin Peugnet, Illinois State
6.   Owen Stamper, Middle Tennessee
7.   Alex McCulla, Illinois State
8.   Ty Gingerich, Cincinnati
9.   Luke Fuller, Western Kentucky
10. Ben Ortwein, Rider

Baton Rouge Regional

Hosted by LSU | University Club

Teams (seeded in the following order):
1.   Auburn [Southeastern Conference]
2.   Virginia
3.   Texas Tech
4.   Oregon
5.   Duke
6.   Ohio State
7.   LSU
8.   Louisville
9.   Houston
10.   South Carolina
11.   Lipscomb [ASUN Conference]
12.   Yale [The Ivy League]
13.   Loyola Maryland [Patriot League]
14.   Arkansas-Pine Bluff [Southwestern Athletic Conference]

Individuals (seeded in the following order):
1.   Alex Goff, Kentucky
2.   Max Sturdza, Florida Atlantic
3.   Niilo Maki-Petaja, Louisiana Tech
4.   Hugo Thyr, South Alabama
5.   Archie Smith, Little Rock

Chapel Hill Regional

Hosted by North Carolina | Finley Golf Club

Teams (seeded in the following order):
1. North Carolina [Atlantic Coast Conference]
2.   Alabama
3.   Georgia Tech
4.   East Tennessee State [Southern Conference]
5.   Northwestern [Big Ten Conference]
6.   Baylor
7.   VCU [Atlantic 10 Conference]
8.   LMU
9.   Long Beach State [Big West Conference]
10.   Clemson
11.   Michigan State
12.   Ball State [Mid-American Conference]
13.   Howard [Northeast Conference]

Individuals (seeded in the following order):
1. Tobias Jonsson, Mercer
2.   Walker Isley, UNCW
3.   Nick Mathews, NC State
4.   Conor Gough, Charlotte
5.   Will Davis, Davidson
6.   Spencer Oxendine, NC State
7.   Erik Johansson, Campbell
8.   Claes Borregaard, Kennesaw State
9.   Justin LaRue, Longwood
10. Fred Roberts IV, High Point

Austin Regional

Hosted by Texas | The University of Texas Golf CLub

Teams (seeded in the following order):
1.   Tennessee
2.   Arkansas
3.   Texas [Big 12 Conference]
4.   Georgia
5.   Wake Forest
6.   Notre Dame
7.   UNC Greensboro
8.   Brigham Young
9.   Utah
10.   San Jose State
11.   Grand Canyon [Western Athletic Conference]
12.   Arkansas State [Sun Belt Conference]
13.   Kansas City [The Summit League]

Individuals (seeded in the following order):
1. Gustav Frimodt, TCU
2. Luke Gutschewski, Iowa State
3.   Hunter Bott, UTSA
4.   Cooper Schultz, Kansas State
5.   Kobe Valociek, Virginia Tech
6.   Joseph Sullivan, Florida Gulf Coast
7.   Erik Jansson, Jacksonville State
8.   Justin Biwer, Colorado
9.   Alexandre Vandermoten, Jacksonville
10. Peicheng Chen, St. John’s

Stanford Regional

Hosted by Stanford | Stanford Golf Course

Teams (seeded in the following order):
1. Florida State
2.   Ole Miss
3.   Illinois
4.   Texas A&M
5.   Stanford
6.   UCLA
7.   SMU
8.   Missouri
9.   Fresno State
10.   UNLV
11.   Augusta University [Southland Conference]
12.   Liberty [Conference USA]
13.   Sacramento State [Big Sky Conference]
14.   Siena [Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference]

Individuals (seeded in the following order):
1. Enrique Dimayuga, Nevada
2.   Ben Warian, Minnesota
3.   Jakob Melin, San Francisco
4.   Cole Rueck, Boise State
5.   Joe Sykes, Idaho

Rancho Santa Fe Regional

Hosted by San Diego | The Farms Golf Club

Teams (seeded in the following order):
1. Arizona State [Pac-12 Conference]
2.   Washington
3.   Oklahoma
4.   California
5.   Oklahoma State
6.   North Florida
7.   Chattanooga
8.   South Florida [American Athletic Conference]
9.   San Diego [West Coast Conference]
10.   West Virginia
11.   Kansas
12.   Wright State [Horizon League]
13.   Seton Hall [Big East Conference]
14.   Winthrop [Big South Conference]

Individuals (seeded in the following order):
1. Mahanth Chirravuri, Pepperdine
2.   Tegan Andrews, Cal State Fullerton
3.   William Walsh, Pepperdine
4.   Brady Siravo, Pepperdine
5.   Kevin Li, Seattle University

Championship history

Florida won last year’s title as the program’s fifth overall. Check out the full championship history below:

YEAR	CHAMPION	COACH	SCORE	RUNNER-UP	SCORE	HOST OR SITE
2023	Florida	J.C. Deacon	3	Georgia Tech	1	Scottsdale, Ariz.
2022	Texas	John Fields	3	Arizona State	2
2021	Pepperdine	Michael Beard	3	Oklahoma	2	Scottsdale, Ariz.
2020	Canceled due to Covid-19	—	—	—	—	—
2019	Stanford	Conrad Ray	3	Texas	2	Fayetteville Ark.
2018	Oklahoma State	Alan Bratton	5	Alabama	0	Stillwater, Okla.
2017	Oklahoma	Ryan Hybl	3.5	Oregon	1.5	Sugar Grove, Ill.
2016	Oregon	Casey Martin	3	Texas	2	Eugene, Ore.
2015	LSU	Chuck Winstead	4	Southern California	1	Bradenton, Fla.
2014	Alabama	Jay Seawell	4	Oklahoma State	1	Hutchinson, Kan.
2013	Alabama	Jay Seawell	4	Illinois	1	Atlanta
2012	Texas	John Fields	3	Alabama	2	Pacific Palisades, Calif.
2011	Augusta State	Josh Gregory	3	Georgia	2	Oklahoma State
2010	Augusta State	Josh Gregory	3.5	Oklahoma State	1.5	Ooltewah, Tenn.
2009	Texas A&M	J.T. Higgins	3	Arkansas	2	Toledo
2008	UCLA	Derek Freeman	1,194	Stanford	1,195	Purdue
2007	Stanford	Conrad Ray	1,109	Georgia	1,121	VCU
2006	Oklahoma State	Mike McGraw	1,143	Florida	1,146	Sunriver, Ore.
2005	Georgia	Chris Haack	1,135	Georgia Tech	1,146	Owings Mills, Md.
2004	California	Steve Desimone	1,134	UCLA	1,140	Hot Springs, Va.
2003	Clemson	Larry Penley	1,191	Oklahoma State	1,193	Oklahoma State
2002	Minnesota	Brad James	1,134	Georgia Tech	1,138	Ohio State
2001	Florida	Buddy Alexander	1,126	Clemson	1,144	Duke
2000	*Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,116	Georgia Tech	1,116	Auburn
1999	Georgia	Chris Haack	1,180	Oklahoma State	1,183	Minnesota
1998	UNLV	Dwaine Knight	1,118	Clemson	1,121	New Mexico
1997	Pepperdine	John Geiberger	1,148	Wake Forest	1,151	Northwestern
1996	Arizona State	Randy Lein	1,186	UNLV	1,189	Chattanooga, Tenn.
1995	*Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,156	Stanford	1,156	Ohio State
1994	Stanford	Wally Goodwin	1,129	Texas	1,133	SMU
1993	Florida	Buddy Alexander	1,145	Georgia Tech	1,146	Kentucky
1992	Arizona	Rick LaRose	1,129	Arizona State	1,136	New Mexico
1991	Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,161	North Carolina	1,168	San Jose State
1990	Arizona State	Steve Loy	1,155	Florida	1,157	Florida
1989	Oklahoma	Gregg Grost	1,139	Texas	1,158	Oklahoma State/Oklahoma
1988	UCLA	Eddie Merrins	1,176	UTEP/Oklahoma/Oklahoma State	1,179	Southern California
1987	Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,160	Wake Forest	1,176	Ohio State
1986	Wake Forest	Jess Haddock	1,156	Oklahoma State	1,160	Wake Forest
1985	Houston	Dave Williams	1,172	Oklahoma State	1,175	Florida
1984	Houston	Dave Williams	1,145	Oklahoma State	1,146	Houston
1983	Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,161	Texas	1,168	Fresno State
1982	Houston	Dave Williams	1,141	Oklahoma State	1,151	Pinehurst
1981	BYU	Karl Tucker	1,161	Oral Roberts	1,163	Stanford
1980	Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,173	BYU	1,177	Ohio State
1979	Ohio State	James Brown	1,189	Oklahoma State	1,191	Wake Forest
1978	Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,140	Georgia	1,157	Oregon
1977	Houston	Dave Williams	1,197	Oklahoma State	1,205	Colgate
1976	Oklahoma State	Mike Holder	1,166	BYU	1,173	New Mexico
1975	Wake Forest	Jess Haddock	1,156	Oklahoma State	1,189	Ohio State
1974	Wake Forest	Jess Haddock	1,158	Florida	1,160	San Diego State
1973	Florida	Buster Bishop	1,149	Oklahoma State	1,159	Oklahoma State
1972	Texas	George Hannon	1,146	Houston	1,159	Cape Coral
1971	Texas	George Hannon	1,144	Houston	1,151	Arizona
1970	Houston	Dave Williams	1,172	Wake Forest	1,182	Ohio State
1969	Houston	Dave Williams	1,223	Wake Forest	1,232	Broadmoor
1968	Florida	Buster Bishop	1,154	Houston	1,156	New Mexico State
1967	Houston	Dave Williams	585	Florida	588	Shawnee, Pa.
1966	Houston	Dave Williams	582	San Jose State	586	Stanford
1965	Houston	Dave Williams	577	Cal State L.A.	587	Tennessee
1964	Houston	Dave Williams	580	Oklahoma State	587	Broadmoor
1963	Oklahoma State	Labron Harris	581	Houston	582	Wichita State
1962	Houston	Dave Williams	588	Oklahoma State	598	Duke
1961	Purdue	Sam Voinoff	584	Arizona State	595	Lafayette
1960	Houston	Dave Williams	603	Purdue/Oklahoma State	607	Broadmoor
1959	Houston	Dave Williams	561	Purdue	571	Oregon
1958	Houston	Dave Williams	570	Oklahoma State	582	Williams
1957	Houston	Dave Williams	602	Stanford	603	Broadmoor
1956	Houston	Dave Williams	601	North Texas/Purdue	602	Ohio State
1955	LSU	Mike Barbato	574	North Texas	583	Tennessee
1954	SMU	Graham Ross	572	North Texas	573	Houston/Rice
1953	Stanford	Charles Finger	578	North Carolina	580	Broadmoor
1952	North Texas	Fred Cobb	587	Michigan	593	Purdue
1951	North Texas	Fred Cobb	588	Ohio State	589	Ohio State
1950	North Texas	Fred Cobb	573	Purdue	577	New Mexico
1949	North Texas	Fred Cobb	590	Purdue/Texas	600	Iowa State
1948	San Jose State	Wilbur Hubbard	579	LSU	588	Stanford
1947	LSU	T.P. Heard	606	Duke	614	Michigan
1946	Stanford	Eddie Twiggs	619	Michigan	624	Princeton
1945	Ohio State	Robert Kepler	602	Northwestern	621	Ohio State
1944	Notre Dame	George Holderith	311	Minnesota	312	Inverness
1943	Yale	William Neale	614	Michigan	618	Olympia Fields
1942	LSU/Stanford	Major J. Perry Cole/Eddie Twiggs	590			Notre Dame
1941	Stanford	Eddie Twiggs	580	LSU	599	Ohio State
1940	Princeton/LSU	Walter Bourne/Major J. Perry Cole	601			Ekwanok
1939	Stanford	Eddie Twiggs	612	Northwestern/Princeton	614	Wakonda
1938	Stanford					Louisville
1937	Princeton					Oakmont
1936	Yale					North Shore
1935	Michigan					Congressional
1934	Michigan					Cleveland
1933	Yale					Buffalo
1932	Yale					Hot Springs, Va.
1931	Yale					Olympia Fields
1930	Princeton					Oakmont
1929	Princeton					Deal, N.J.
1928	Princeton					Apawamis
1927	Princeton					Garden City
1926	Yale					Merion
1925	Yale					Montclair
1924	Yale					Greenwich
1923	Princeton					Siwanoy
1922	Princeton					Garden City
1921	Dartmouth					Greenwich
1920	Princeton					Nassau
1919	Princeton					Merion
1916	Princeton					Oakmont
1915	Yale					Greenwich
1914	Princeton					Garden City
1912	Yale (fall)/ Yale (spring)					Huntingdon Valley/Ekwanko
1911	Yale					Baltusrol
1910	Yale					Essex County
1909	Yale					Apawamis
1908	Yale					Brae Burn
1907	Yale					Nassau
1906	Yale					Garden City
1905	Yale					Garden City
1904	Harvard					Myopia
1903	Harvard					Garden City
1902	Harvard (fall)/Yale (spring)					Morris County/Garden City
1901	Harvard					Atlantic City
1899	Harvard
1898	Yale (fall)/Harvard (spring)
1897	Yale					Ardsley Casino

Source link

Austin, TX

Austin Pets Alive! activates emergency response to assist shelters affected by flooding

Published

12 hours ago

July 15, 2026

Press Room

Austin Pets Alive! activates emergency response to assist shelters affected by flooding

AUSTIN (KXAN) — As flood threats continue across parts of South Central Texas, Austin Pets Alive! has activated emergency response efforts to support animal shelters affected by the inclement weather.

In a social media post, APA! wrote, “We began offering aid last night, working to secure fosters for 10 dogs in the Castroville shelter, an open-air shelter that sits at the bottom of a valley.”

APA! said the situation escalated overnight with additional shelters reporting flooding. One shelter confirmed that floodwaters reached its facility, APA! added.

Communities overwhelmed due to weather include Uvalde, Castroville and Sabinal.

The nonprofit is asking the Austin community to foster, adopt or donate to free up capacity for animals displaced by the disaster. APA! needs to clear out its facilities to assist the animals in need of shelter.

Here are ways you can help:

Adopt: APA! is offering a “Name Your Own Adoption Fee” on all animals.
Foster: The shelter is seeking foster homes for a minimum of three weeks.
Donate: Proceeds will fund vans and response teams setting up a staging and triage center at the heart of the disaster zone, along with an expanded stockpile of preventatives, PPE and additional supplies.

If you would like to donate, click here.

Source link

Austin, TX

Austin proposes more flood mitigation funding as heavy rains threaten Central Texas

Published

1 day ago

July 15, 2026

Press Room

Austin proposes more flood mitigation funding as heavy rains threaten Central Texas

AUSTIN, Texas — With heavy rain expected across parts of Central Texas this week and flooding top of mind, the city of Austin is proposing to put more money toward flood mitigation improvements in next year’s budget.

The proposal would invest in new flood infrastructure, add staff, and help move flood mitigation projects forward, according to city leaders. Austin City Councilmember Ryan Alter said the investments are aimed at keeping the city prepared for future flooding.

Residents who live near waterways say they have seen how quickly conditions can change. David Haderspeck, who lives near Shoal Creek, said the creek “fills up pretty fast” and “gets a lot higher than you’d expect.” He said he has watched the water rise dramatically after rain.

“I’ve seen it come up probably 10 to 15 feet to the ordinary high-water mark,” he said.

This week, parts of Central Texas, including the Hill Country, are expected to get heavy downpours. While Austin is not expecting the same impacts as parts of the Hill Country, leaders said the city is using this year’s budget planning to continue investing in flood safety.

Alter said the city has the expertise to address flooding risks but needs to follow through on projects.

ALSO| Central Texas urged to prepare as heavy rainfall sits in forecast over next two days

“We have the experts. We just have to put the plans into practice, and that’s what we’re doing in this budget,” he said.

Under the budget proposal, the city would provide about $134.5 million for the Drainage Utility Fund, which helps pay for flood mitigation, drainage infrastructure and watershed protection efforts.

Alter said the proposal would shift more of the funding balance toward building new infrastructure.

“What we’re going to do is shift that balance a little bit more to building new infrastructure so that when we do have large flooding events, we’ve got that infrastructure in place to keep people safe,” he said.

The proposal also adds staff and invests in both new and existing flood mitigation projects across the city.

Asked whether the proposed investments would be enough moving forward, Alter said, “I do…I think we’re doing the right thing and just making sure that our residents have the infrastructure to stay safe.”

Alter said heavy rain cannot be prevented, but the city’s goal is to have infrastructure in place to help keep people safe when it happens.

Source link

Austin, TX

Texas launches investigates LinkedIn over claims of “ghost jobs”

Published

2 days ago

July 14, 2026

Press Room

Texas launches investigates LinkedIn over claims of “ghost jobs”

article

FILE – LinkedIn logos are displayed on an iPhone and computer screen. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)

AUSTIN, Texas – The Texas Attorney General’s office has opened an investigation into LinkedIn over allegations that the professional networking platform misleads consumers with advertising and profiting from misleading or fake job listings, otherwise known as “ghost jobs.”

LinkedIn investigation

In this photo illustration a Linkedin logo seen displayed on a mobile phone. (Photo Illustration by Stanislav Kogiku/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

What we know:

Texas announced on Tuesday it has issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) seeking documents, data and internal communications related to LinkedIn’s advertising, marketing, job listing verification practices and its Premium subscription services.

The investigation centers on whether LinkedIn violated Texas’ consumer protection laws by promoting paid subscription services while allegedly failing to disclose that some job listings on the platform may not actually be representative of hiring opportunities.

What is a ‘ghost job’?

An image of a woman holding a cell phone in front of a LinkedIn logo displayed on a computer screen. On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Dig deeper:

LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft and the world’s largest professional networking platform, with more than 1 billion registered users worldwide.

A “ghost job” generally refers to a position advertised online that either is no longer available or that an employer has no immediate intention of filling. The attorney general’s office cited independent studies estimating that ghost jobs account for between one-fifth and one-third of online job postings.

Texas AG targets Premium Subscription Fees

Photographer: Mark Felix/Bloomberg via Getty Images

What they’re saying:

According to the office of the attorney general, LinkedIn does not independently verify the hiring status of most job listings on its platform. Ken Paxton’s office alleges that the company’s marketing for its Premium subscription services does not disclose that a significant number of postings could be inactive, unfilled or not reflect genuine employment opportunity.

“I will use every resource available to my office to help job-seeking Texans find and secure real employment opportunities,” Paxton said in a statement. “LinkedIn has a duty to provide the services it advertises and ensure that consumers paying for Premium subscriptions are receiving access to legitimate job postings.”

Texas officials said LinkedIn’s Premium Career and Premium Business subscriptions cost about $39.99 and $69.99 per month, respectively, and are marketed to jobseekers looking to improve their employment prospects.

What’s next:

The investigation does not include any formal allegations of wrongdoing, and no lawsuit has been filed.

The Source: Information in this article was provided by the Texas Attorney General’s Office.

TexasSocial MediaKen Paxton

Source link