Alabama
Lawsuit challenges timing of new law disqualifying more felons from voting on Nov. 5
Robert Crowley is a U.S. Army veteran, and volunteer with the Paralyzed Veterans of America and Mid-South chapter representative.
He’s described in a lawsuit as a devoted father, grandfather and great-grandfather. But 27 years ago in 1997, he was convicted of attempted murder. Though he’s a registered voter in Alabama, his ability to vote on Nov. 5 is in doubt because of a new Alabama law that could disqualify him and many others from voting.
It’s also a new law that is confusing and unconstitutional, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Montgomery County Circuit Court that challenges the law – which was HB100 in the Alabama Legislature this spring – before absentee voting begins in September.
“Every American should be able to exercise their freedom to vote, regardless of whether they have a past felony conviction,” said Blair Bowie, director of the Campaign Legal Center’s Restore Your Vote program.
CLC, along with Montgomery attorney J. Mitch McGuire, filed the lawsuit that seeks to block HB100 from being implemented.
“HB100 makes an already confusing voting rights restoration process in Alabama even harder to navigate,” Bowie said.
Expanding Moral turpitude
Rep. Adline Clark, D-Mobile
The intent of HB100, sponsored by Democratic Rep. Adline Clark of Mobile, was to protect election workers by adding crimes against election workers and other election officials to a list of disqualifying felonies that can strip someone’s ability to vote.
But before the bill’s passage, lawmakers amended it to add six more felonies as crimes of moral turpitude – a designation that means those convicted are disqualified from voting.
Four additional categories of felonies for “inchoate” crimes, such as attempted crimes and conspiracies, were also added to the list.
According to the lawsuit, HB100 “effectively adds over 120 new disenfranchising state convictions to the list of felonies involving moral turpitude. Before HB100, that list included only approximately 40 disenfranchising state felonies.”
“More Alabamians with prior felony convictions have been able to vote since 2017,” Bowie said, referring to the year that state lawmakers adopted the Felony Voter Disqualification Act that defined the more than 40 crimes – including murder, rape, assault, sexual abuse – as crimes of moral turpitude.
The lawsuit’s two plaintiffs – Crowley and JaiGregory Clarke, a community organizer in Jefferson County – have attempted murder convictions and would be disqualified from voting under the new law.
Questionable timing
The biggest question raised in the lawsuit is whether HB100, signed by Gov. Kay Ivey on May 16, violates the Alabama Constitution because of its timing.
Voters in 2022 overwhelmingly adopted a constitutional amendment that says laws affecting elections cannot change within six months of an election. But HB100 includes an implementation date of Oct. 1, which is less than 35 days before the Nov. 5 election.
The lawsuit argues there is confusion and no direction from state officials about the law’s enforcement. Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen hasn’t provided direction on the new law, the lawsuit argues, other than providing a statement to AL.com’s Mike Cason in late May, that says the new law doesn’t take effect until Nov. 6.
“Preventing confusion around such crucial, unanswered questions in the months preceding a general election is precisely why approximately 80 percent of Alabama voters passed Amendment 4, enshrining in the Alabama Constitution a prohibition on election bills taking effect within six months of a general election,” the lawsuit states.
Allen’s office declined comment, referring statements to the Alabama Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office did not respond to a request to comment.
Othni Lathram, director of the Legislative Services Agency, said while he cannot comment on how the Secretary of State’s Office is implementing the new law, his agency’s analysis while lawmakers were considering the bill earlier this year included an acknowledgement of the new constitutional amendment. The analysis simply says the legislation, while effective Oct. 1, would not impact who votes in November because of the 2022 constitutional amendment.
The timing of the new law – if it takes effect on Oct. 1 — would also prevent Alabamians like Clarke and Crowley from getting their voting rights restored through the Certificate of Eligibility to Vote – or CERV – process through the Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Parole (ABPP), the lawsuit states.
The CERV process allows felons who lose their voting rights and who have completed their sentence, paid all fines, court costs and restitution – and who do not have a pending felony charge – to seek the restoration of their ability to vote.
But the ABPP has 44 days to respond to CERV applications, meaning they are not required to consider a CERV to the newly disqualified voters under the law that takes effect on Oct. 1 until Nov. 14 – nine days after the Nov. 5 election.
Legislative procedure
The lawsuit challenges a piece of legislation that was, during the waning days of the legislative session in early May, was viewed as a rare piece of bipartisan election-related legislation.
Its passage was through an unusual process. The bill was resurrected during the last week of the session after it was seemingly defeated by a 4-4-3 vote during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on April 24, which is a rarity during a legislative session. The concerns from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee during the April meeting focused on levying harsh punishments on angry voters engaged in verbal spats with poll workers. The original intent of HB100 was to respond to a rise in threats to poll workers and election officials in other parts of the country – not necessarily in Alabama –since the 2020 presidential election.
The legislation, though, sailed to passage with Allen pushing for it after it was amended on the Alabama House floor to include the additional crimes to the list those disqualifying felons from voting. Rep. Jim Hill, R-Moody, proposed the amendment to add to the list of moral turpitude crimes. He said he supported the idea after he was asked to sponsor the amendment by Allen.
Clarke, the sponsor of HB100, told AL.com Thursday she will let the courts decide the merits of the case.
The League of Women Voters, in late May, expressed concerns about adding additional crimes to those disqualifying voters from elections in Alabama, arguing that the state was encouraging the legacy of Jim Crow. Allen, though, said he felt HB100 – as amended – is a strong crime deterrent.
“I’m not disqualifying anyone from voting as it relates to HB100,” he said to AL.com in May. “It’s the criminals who disqualify themselves when they break the law and wreak havoc on our communities.”
Alabama has a long history of disenfranchising voters for crimes of moral turpitude, going back to the Alabama Constitution of 1901, which was aimed at keeping Blacks and poor whites from voting.
For years, there was no definition moral turpitude, giving county boards of registrars and political appointees discretion over which people convicted of crimes could be disqualified from voting. Voters convicted of misdemeanors and felonies could get disqualified in past years.
In 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Alabama’s disenfranchisement of voters for misdemeanors. Alabama voters approved a new constitutional amendment in 1996 disqualifying votes who committed felonies involving moral turpitude, but there was no definition behind that term.
More than 21 years later in 2017, lawmakers approved the Felony Voter Disqualification Act to define moral turpitude.
Alabama
Is Tommy Tuberville an Alabama resident? GOP candidate challenges status
Watch AL governor candidate Tommy Tuberville speak on election night
See Tommy Tuberville speak on election night in Alabama
The Alabama Republican Party will hold a hearing on June 14 on a challenge questioning whether U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville meets the state’s constitutional residency requirement to run for governor.
The challenge comes from former GOP primary candidate Ken McFeeters, who argues Tuberville has not been a resident of Alabama long enough under state law.
McFeeters said he was notified Monday that the Alabama GOP steering committee will take up his residency at an upcoming hearing.
He has filed multiple challenges and a lawsuit contesting Tuberville’s eligibility, all focused on whether the senator meets Alabama’s seven-year residency requirement for governor.
Alabama Constitutional Residency Requirement for Governor
Under the Alabama Constitution, candidates for governor must be at least 30 years old, U.S. citizens for at least 10 years and residents of the state for at least seven years immediately before the election.
The dispute centers on whether Tuberville has maintained continuous Alabama residency under that standard.
Tommy Tuberville’s Campaign response
Tuberville, a former Auburn University football coach who moved to Alabama in 1999, has said he meets all eligibility requirements.
His campaign has released redacted federal tax returns covering multiple years in response to McFeeters’ claims.
Campaign chair Jordan Doufexis said the evidence will show Tuberville has long met the state’s residency threshold.
“We will submit a comprehensive response… demonstrating that he is a resident citizen of Alabama,” Doufexis said, adding the campaign is confident in its legal position.
Questions about Florida ties and past records
Tuberville’s residency has faced scrutiny for years, including reports citing ties outside Alabama.
Those reports have referenced a Florida driver’s license that remained active until 2023 and voting activity in Florida in 2018. Tuberville has pointed to Alabama property records and a homestead exemption tied to his family as evidence of residency.
McFeeters has also cited travel and expense records he says show Tuberville frequently traveled outside Alabama during the period in question.
The Alabama GOP previously rejected McFeeters’ residency challenge in February, allowing Tuberville to remain on the ballot.
Tuberville went on to win the Republican primary on May 19 with about 85% of the vote, easily defeating McFeeters and other challengers.
What happens if Tuberville is found ineligible?
If the committee were to rule against Tuberville, McFeeters could potentially become the Republican nominee for governor in the November general election.
He would then face Democratic nominee Doug Jones.
Jennifer Lindahl is a Breaking and Trending Reporter in Alabama for USA TODAY’s Deep South Connect Team. Connect with her on X @jenn_lindahl and email at jlindahl@usatodayco.com.
Alabama
In Alabama Primary Elections, Incumbent Utility Regulators Feel the Squeeze of High Energy Prices – Inside Climate News
MONTGOMERY, Ala.—For some incumbents, politics have turned sour in sweet home Alabama. In the May 26 primary election for two seats on the Public Service Commission, the state’s utility regulator, voters rejected one incumbent and sent another to a runoff.
The electoral shakeup comes as Alabamians are increasingly concerned about economic issues, including utility prices. Polling released earlier this year showed that 80 percent of Alabamians cite economic concerns as the top issue state leaders should address.
Now, Alabama politicians have gotten their first sense of voters’ attitudes this election cycle, and the message for incumbents charged with regulating utilities is one of frustration.
Commissioner Jeremy Oden, a Republican who has served on the body since 2012, lost his bid for re-election to Matt Gentry, who currently serves as sheriff of Cullman County, 75 percent to 25 percent.
Gentry will go on to face Democrat James O. Gordon in the November general election.
Another Republican incumbent on the PSC, Chris Beeker, also failed to garner the most votes from primary voters. Jim Zeigler, a perennial candidate who served on the body from 1975 to 1979, earned the most votes with 45 percent to Beeker’s 25. Because no candidate earned the majority of votes, Beeker will face Zeigler in a primary runoff election on June 16. The winner will face Democrat Sheila McNeil in November.
Electricity prices, in particular, have become a hot button issue across the country ahead of this year’s elections, including in Alabama, where power-hungry data center projects have begun to spring up across the state. In neighboring Georgia, utility cost increases and data center development became a major discussion in its own Public Service Commission elections, races that led to major Republican-to-Democrat flips and garnered headlines nationwide.
Read More
In the Wake of Georgia’s Blue Wave, Alabama Changed Its Utility Regulation Elections. This Black Democrat Is Suing.
By Lee Hedgepeth
Fear of a similar outcome in deep red Alabama has left some politicians nervous. During this year’s legislative session, lawmakers were forced to pull a bill that would have ended Public Service Commission elections altogether after significant public outcry.
In its place, the majority GOP legislature passed a major restructuring of the regulatory body that inflates its membership from three to seven members and consolidates significant regulatory power in a newly created secretary of energy to be appointed by the governor. The new law makes it more difficult to initiate a formal rate case, effectively barring such a hearing before 2029 and subsequently requiring the approval of the secretary of energy or five of seven commission members to do so.
Alabamians have good reason for concern over energy prices. An Inside Climate News analysis showed that Alabama Power customers paid the highest average residential bills among the 100 largest investor-owned utilities in the United States. Experts have pointed to the “regulatory capture” of bodies like the Public Service Commission as one reason for those high rates.
All of the successful candidates in this year’s PSC primaries have cited high utility bills as a reason for reform.
In the race for the Place 1 seat, Gentry’s 50-point primary victory over Oden came in the wake of Gentry’s pledge to call for the first formal public rate hearing overseeing Alabama Power’s electricity price increases since 1982. James Gordon, his Democratic opponent, has gone further, calling for regular formal rate hearings, an immediate 25 percent reduction in bills and consideration of a cap on the company’s annual profits.
In the bid for Place 2, Zeigler and Beeker will battle it out in the lead-up to their June runoff. Beeker is relatively new to the commission, having been appointed to the body in 2024 to serve the remaining term of his father, also Chris, a three-term incumbent, who resigned citing health concerns.
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Donate Now
Zeigler’s campaign has focused on pairing opposition to both large data center projects needed to power AI and solar farms for renewable electricity to harness local political passions, though his campaign’s website landing page features an AI-generated image as its background.
“They can ruin your community, consume water and drive your electric bills up. No one in Montgomery is overseeing this,” Zeigler said of data centers in a campaign video.
Beeker has taken a more traditional Alabama politics approach, nationalizing the issues and attacking what he labels “woke” left policies he claims without evidence are driving energy prices up.
Appearing in an ad holding his rifle on a farm, Beeker said he’ll fight for Alabama.
“As your public service commissioner, I’m again standing with President Trump against woke liberal environmentalists who are trying to kill Alabama jobs,” Beeker said.
As commissioner, Beeker has not yet called for a formal rate hearing on Alabama Power’s electricity prices.
McNeil, the Democrat in the race, did not face a primary challenger and has now begun her general election campaign in earnest. Her message? Power bills must come down.
“This is one of the most important positions on the ballot because it affects 1.5 million Alabamians,” McNeil said of the PSC races at a candidate forum earlier this month. “Utility rates are too high. They are some of the highest in the country. Something has got to be done because what has been going on for the last 20 years got us to where we are today.”
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
Alabama
Alabama raises income guidelines for WIC program
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WSFA) – Alabama has expanded income eligibility for the Women, Infants and Children nutrition program, known as WIC, meaning more families may qualify.
WIC serves people who are pregnant, postpartum or breastfeeding, as well as parents or guardians of children younger than 5. Applications are handled through local county health departments and WIC clinics.
WIC provides food benefits for each eligible family member, including a monthly cash-value benefit that can be used for fruits and vegetables. Each child receives $26 a month, pregnant and postpartum participants receive $48 a month, and breastfeeding participants receive $52 a month. Other approved foods include whole-grain bread and cereal, milk, cheese, yogurt, eggs, peanut butter, beans, canned fish and infant foods.
Participants can also receive nutrition education, breastfeeding support and health care referrals. Alabama’s WIC program issues benefits electronically.
| Family Size | Annual Income | Weekly Income |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | $40,034 | $770 |
| 3 | $50,542 | $972 |
| 4 | $61,050 | $1,175 |
| 5 | $71,558 | $1,377 |
| 6 | $82,066 | $1,579 |
Under the 2026 federal poverty guidelines, WIC is open to households with incomes up to 185% of the federal poverty level. Participants also must meet nutrition-risk requirements. Families already receiving Medicaid, SNAP or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families generally meet the income guidelines for WIC, though others may qualify as well.
Each unborn infant counts as one in the family size. For additional household sizes, see the Alabama Department of Public Health’s WIC information page.
Not reading this story on the WSFA News App? Get news alerts FASTER and FREE in the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store!
Copyright 2026 WSFA. All rights reserved.
-
Movie Reviews4 minutes ago
Movie Review: Paul Rudd and Nick Jonas hit the right notes in ‘Power Ballad’
-
World8 minutes ago
Trump Says Iran Has Agreed to Not Have a Nuclear Weapon
-
News19 minutes agoHow Each House Member Voted on the Iran War Powers Resolution
-
Lifestyle56 minutes agoFirings at CBS’ ’60 Minutes’ reflect the fight for media control in the age of Trump
-
Technology1 hour agoMicrosoft Is Pulling the Plug on Publisher This Fall. These 8 Alternatives Prove You Don't Need It
-
World1 hour agoTrump expands Cuba sanctions beyond US companies in major crackdown on foreign enablers
-
Politics1 hour agoBessent flips script on Dem senator with reminder about his son’s past ties to Epstein
-
Health1 hour agoNew ways to prevent flu revealed in ‘accidental’ lab breakthrough, study finds





