Connect with us

Science

‘OK Doomer’ and the Climate Advocates Who Say It’s Not Too Late

Published

on

‘OK Doomer’ and the Climate Advocates Who Say It’s Not Too Late

Alaina Wooden is properly conscious that, planetarily talking, issues aren’t trying so nice. She’s learn the dire local weather reviews, tracked cataclysmic climate occasions and gone via various darkish nights of the soul.

She can also be a part of a rising cadre of individuals, lots of them younger, who’re combating local weather doomism, the notion that it’s too late to show issues round. They imagine that focusing solely on horrible local weather information can sow dread and paralysis, foster inaction, and turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

With the battle in Ukraine prompting a push for ramped up manufacturing of fossil fuels, they are saying it’s ever extra urgent to focus on all the nice local weather work, particularly domestically, that’s being achieved. “Individuals are virtually uninterested in listening to how dangerous it’s; the narrative wants to maneuver onto options,” mentioned Ms. Wooden, 25, a sustainability scientist who communicates a lot of her local weather messaging on TikTok, the preferred social media platform amongst younger Individuals. “The science says issues are dangerous. But it surely’s solely going to worsen the longer it takes to behave.”

Some local weather advocates consult with the stance taken by Ms. Wooden and her allies as “OK, Doomer,” a riff on “OK, Boomer,” the Gen Z rebuttal to condescension from older of us.

If consciousness concerning the local weather disaster has by no means been higher, so, too, has been a mounting sense of dread about its unfolding results, significantly among the many younger. Two-thirds of Individuals thought the federal government was doing too little to combat local weather change, based on a 2020 Pew examine, whereas a survey final 12 months of 10,000 teenagers and younger adults in 10 international locations discovered that three quarters had been scared of the long run.

Advertisement

There’s additionally rising consensus that despair and eco-anxiety are completely pure responses to the regular barrage of scary environmental information. Stalled local weather laws in Congress together with the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and its implications for the environmental disaster, has achieved little to assist.

But folks like Ms. Wooden, and her thriving neighborhood of local weather communicators, imagine that staying caught in local weather doom solely helps protect a established order reliant on consumerism and fossil fuels. By way of social media, she and her fellow “eco-creators” current various narratives that spotlight optimistic local weather information in addition to methods folks can combat the disaster of their on a regular basis lives.

Together with allaying their very own eco-anxiety, they’ve discovered a rising viewers hungry for what they must say.

In the summertime of 2021, Ms. Wooden, whose deal with is @thegarbagequeen, started creating TikTok movies debunking excessive examples of local weather doomism — amongst them that every one of humanity will perish inside a long time — and relaying information of various local weather wins: the creation of North America’s first whale sanctuary, a deliberate treaty to curb plastics air pollution, the development of an enormous wind farm off the coast of the UK.

After making that shift, she mentioned her follower depend tripled from about 100,000 to shut to 300,000 at this time. Ms. Wooden additionally helped type a TikTok group of like-minded local weather advocates referred to as Eco-Tok, and mentioned their hashtag #ecotok has greater than 200 million views.

Advertisement

Caulin Donaldson, 25, whose deal with is @trashCaulin, joined TikTok in December 2019 to chronicle his each day pilgrimage selecting up rubbish from the seashores close to his house in St. Petersburg, Florida. His quick movies had been upbeat and playful: In December he posted a “Twelve Days of Trashmas” sequence. He additionally furnished his new condo utilizing secondhand items, framing it as a scavenger hunt. By October 2020, he had 1,000,000 followers. As we speak, it’s as much as 1.4 million.

Ms. Wooden and Mr. Donaldson say their followers are taking environmental motion themselves, on-line and off.

Ms. Wooden, who lives in Tennessee, mentioned she’s helped immediate 1000’s of individuals to signal environment-related petitions and to hitch local weather strikes. “I’ve been capable of arrange in methods I by no means might think about,” she mentioned.

On TikTok, Mr. Donaldson highlights movies of his followers, who he says are largely youngsters 7 to 14, selecting up rubbish themselves, together with seaside cleanups he impressed. By portray sustainability and local weather motion as optimistic and enjoyable “slightly than this corny or lame factor adults do,” Mr. Donaldson goals to be a gateway for kids to take greater motion down the street.

“I hate when folks say one particular person can’t make a change,” Mr. Donaldson mentioned. “It takes a complete group, however it takes one particular person to begin. One particular person to encourage. One particular person to lift a voice.”

Advertisement

There’s debate over what position particular person actions play within the local weather disaster, on condition that fossil gasoline corporations, massive firms and governments are answerable for the overwhelming majority of planet-heating carbon emissions. Specializing in a person’s impression is a ineffective, guilt-inducing distraction, detractors say. They level to entrepreneurs for the oil large BP that helped popularize the notion of a person’s carbon footprint for instance of shifting blame.

But presenting the local weather disaster as too huge or intractable may cause folks to go numb and take a look at, mentioned Sarah Jaquette Ray, the chair of environmental research at California State Polytechnic College, Humboldt, and the writer of “A Subject Information to Local weather Anxiousness.” To combat the sense of powerlessness, she encourages folks to see themselves as a part of a collective groundswell of environmental teams working world wide, and to withstand happening the rabbit gap of local weather horror tales.

If folks don’t have management over geopolitical upheavals, she mentioned, they must give attention to the place they will make a distinction. “If the issue is so massive and we’re so small, which is what the doom narrative is telling us, then we have to make the issue smaller and us greater,” Dr. Ray mentioned.

She later added that the local weather disaster could be “the combat of our lives with ups and downs,” whatever the administration in energy, or whether or not specific insurance policies are applied. “It takes braveness and self-discipline to maintain cultivating neighborhood and well being proper the place you’re, particularly amid such dangerous information,” she mentioned.

Many local weather advocates say there are advantages to urgent for systemic change whereas additionally taking private steps. Particular person actions can have wider results, as was the case with the Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg, whose lonely college strikes for local weather morphed over time into a world motion.

Advertisement

“Each can coexist,” mentioned Isaias Hernandez, 25, who posts local weather justice movies on social media underneath the moniker QueerBrownVegan. “There may be massive and native adjustments on the identical time. Your enter nonetheless issues. You’re influencing somebody round you. Present and future generations can profit.”

Like many local weather advocates, Kristy Drutman went via her personal darkish interval of eco-despair. Ms. Drutman, 26, is of Filipino and Jewish descent, and for her, the disaster hit house throughout her freshman 12 months on the College of California, Berkeley. That’s when Storm Haiyan struck the Philippines, leaving 7,300 useless. Not lengthy after, as an anti-fracking activist on campus, Ms. Drutman grew to become dismayed when college and state officers didn’t appear to share her sense of urgency.

She started airing her frustration on social media underneath the deal with browngirl_green, and shortly concluded that many communities of shade, already affected by local weather change and environmental devastation, lack “the time or privilege to get misplaced on local weather doom,” she mentioned. “They must give attention to options,” she added, “as a result of their survival is actually on the road.”

Philip Aiken, 29, who hosts the podcast “simply to avoid wasting the world,” mentioned that privilege can also be baked into the angle of “it’s too late.”

“‘It’s too late’ means ‘I simply wish to be comfy for as a lot of my life as potential, as a result of I’m already comfy,’” Mr. Aiken mentioned. “‘It’s too late’ means ‘I don’t must do something, and the duty is off me, and I can proceed present nevertheless I need.’”

Advertisement

To ward of his personal sense of doom, Mr. Aiken screens his consumption of local weather information. He got here up with a metric: Focus 20 p.c on issues, and 80 p.c on options. He’s come to know that there’s a lifetime of labor forward, and concentrates on grassroots actions and affecting native change. “That work fulfills me,” he mentioned, “and retains me optimistic a couple of future wherein we are able to nonetheless survive and thrive.”

Kate Marvel, a analysis scientist on the NASA Goddard Institute for House Research and Columbia College, mentioned that even she freezes up when she encounters fear-based local weather messaging. However her personal focus is on all that people can nonetheless do. She identified the optimistic results of federal clear air and water laws and the Montreal Protocol, signed in 1987 to section out ozone-depleting chemical compounds, which helped to heal the outlet within the ozone layer, prevented hundreds of thousands of instances of pores and skin most cancers a 12 months and headed off even worse world warming.

“We’re nonetheless going through very dire threats, that’s professional,” Dr. Marvel mentioned. “However that doesn’t imply that no coverage has ever been efficient, and no progress has ever been made. And it actually doesn’t imply that progress isn’t potential.”

Or, as Mary Annaïse Heglar, a local weather essayist and co-host of the Sizzling Take podcast and publication, mentioned, “Take a look at all of the lives within the steadiness between 1.5 and 1.6 levels.” She was referring to the extra drought, warmth, flooding and damaging storms that scientists say will outcome with each fraction of a level of worldwide warming.

For Ms. Heglar, as dangerous as local weather doomism is, so is what she referred to as “hopeium” — an unfounded optimism that another person will give you a magical local weather resolution akin to a silver bullet.

Advertisement

“Beneath doomerism and hopeium is the query of ‘Are we going to win?’’” Ms. Heglar mentioned. “That’s untimely at this level. We have to ask ourselves if we’re going to attempt. We don’t know ’til we attempt if we’re going to win. Whether or not or not we do, it’ll nonetheless have been price it.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

How to protect yourself from the smoke caused by L.A. wildfires

Published

on

How to protect yourself from the smoke caused by L.A. wildfires

You don’t have to live close to a wildfire to be affected by its smoke. With severe winds fanning the fires in and around Pacific Palisades, the Pasadena foothills and Simi Valley, huge swaths of the Southland are contending with dangerous air quality.

Wildfire smoke can irritate your eyes, nose, throat and lungs. The soot may contain all kinds of dangerous pollutants, including some that may cause cancer. The tiniest particles in smoke can travel deep into your lungs or even enter your bloodstream.

Conditions like these aren’t good for anyone, but they’re particularly bad for people in vulnerable groups, including children, those with asthma or other respiratory conditions, people with heart disease and those who are pregnant.

Here’s what you should know to keep yourself safe.

Advertisement

Stay indoors

Minimize your exposure to unhealthy air by staying inside and keeping your doors and windows shut.

If you have a central heating and air conditioning system, you can keep your indoor air clean by turning it on and keeping it running. Make sure the fresh-air intake is closed so that you’re not drawing in outdoor air.

Keep your pets inside

They shouldn’t breathe the unhealthy air either.

Check your air filters

Clean filters work better than dirty ones, and high-efficiency filters work better than regular ones. The California Air Resources Board and the South Coast Air Quality Management District recommend filters with a MERV rating of 13 or higher.

You might consider using portable high-efficiency air cleaner in a room where you spend the most time. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has information about them here, and CARB has a list of certified cleaning devices here.

Advertisement

Don’t pollute your indoor air

That means no burning candles or incense. If your power is out and you need to see in the dark, you’re much better off with a flashlight or headlamp.

If you’re cold, bundle up. This is not the time to start a cozy fire in the fireplace. Don’t use a gas stove or wood-fired appliances, since these will make your indoor air quality worse, not better, the AQMD says.

The CDC also advises against vacuuming, since it can stir up dust and release fine particles into the air.

Take care when cleaning up

You don’t want your skin to come into contact with wildfire ash. That means you should wear long sleeves, pants, gloves, socks and shoes. The AQMD even wants you to wear goggles.

If you’re sweeping up ash outdoors, get a hose and mist it with water first. That will keep it from flying up in the air as you move it around. Once the ash is wet, sweep it up gently with a broom or mop. Bag it up in a plastic bag and throw it away.

Advertisement

It’s a good idea to wash your vehicles and outdoor toys if they’re covered in ash. Try not to send ashy water into storm drains. Direct the dirty water into ground areas instead, the AQMD advises.

Those with lung or heart problems should avoid clean-up activities.

Discard spoiled food…

If you lost power for a significant length of time, the food in your refrigerator or freezer may be spoiled.

Food kept in a fridge should stay safe for up to four hours if you’ve kept the door closed. If you’ve been without power for longer than that, you’ll need to toss all perishable items, including meat, poultry, fish, eggs, milk and cut fruits and vegetables. Anything with “an unusual smell, color, or texture” should be thrown out as well, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention.

Refrigerated medicines should be OK unless the power was out for more than a day. Check the label to make sure.

Advertisement

…even if it was in the freezer

Your freezer may be in better shape, especially if it’s well-stocked. Items in a full freezer may be safe for up to 48 hours if it’s been kept shut, and a half-full freezer may be OK for up to 24 hours. (The frozen items help keep each other cold, so the more the better.)

If items have remained below 40 degrees Fahrenheit (4 degrees Celsius) or you can still see ice crystals in them, they may be OK to use or refreeze, according to the federal government’s food safety website.

Ice cream and frozen yogurt should be thrown out if the power goes out for any amount of time. Meat, poultry, seafood, eggs, milk and most other dairy products need to go if they were exposed to temperatures above 40 degrees F for two hours or longer. The same goes for frozen meals, casseroles, soups, stews and cakes, pies and pastries with custard or cheese fillings.

Fruit and fruit juices that have started to thaw can be refrozen unless they’ve started to get moldy, slimy or smell like yeast. Vegetables and vegetable juices should be discarded if they’ve been above 40 degrees F for six hours or more, even if they look and smell fine.

Breakfast items like waffles and bagels can be refrozen, as can breads, rolls, muffins and other baked goods without custard fillings.

Advertisement

Consider alternative shelter

If you’ve done everything you can but your eyes are still watering, you can’t stop coughing, or you just don’t feel well, seek alternative shelter where the air quality is better.

Hold off on vigorous exercise

Doing anything that would cause you to breathe in more deeply is a bad idea right now.

Mask up outdoors

If you need to be outside for an extended time, be sure to wear a high-quality mask. A surgical mask or cloth mask won’t cut it — health authorities agree that you should reach for an N95 or P-100 respirator with a tight seal.

Are young children at greater risk of wildfire smoke?

Very young children are especially vulnerable to the effects of wildfire smoke because their lungs are still rapidly developing. And because they breathe much faster than adults, they are taking in more toxic particulate matter relative to their tiny bodies, which can trigger inflammation, coughing and wheezing.

Any kind of air pollution can be dangerous to young children, but wildfire smoke is about 10 times as toxic for children compared to air pollution from burning fossil fuels, said Dr. Lisa Patel, clinical associate professor of pediatrics at Stanford Children’s Health. Young children with preexisting respiratory problems like asthma are at even greater risk.

Advertisement

Patel advises parents to keep their young children indoors as much as possible, create a safe room in their home with an air purifier, and try to avoid using gas stoves to avoid polluting the indoor air.

Children over the age of 2 should also wear a well-fitting KN95 mask if they will be outdoors for a long period of time. Infants and toddlers younger than that don’t need to mask up because it can be a suffocation risk, Patel said.

What are the risks for pregnant people?

Pregnant people should also take extra precautions around wildfire smoke, which can cross the placenta and affect a developing fetus. Studies have found that exposure to wildfire smoke during pregnancy can increase the risk of premature birth and low birth weight. Researchers have also linked the toxic chemicals in smoke with maternal health complications including hypertension and preeclampsia.

What about other high-risk populations?

Certain chronic diseases including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other respiratory conditions can also make you particularly vulnerable to wildfire smoke. People with heart disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease should take extra care to breathe clean air, the CDC says. The tiny particles in wildfire smoke can aggravate existing health problems, and may make heart attacks or strokes more likely, CARB warns.

Get ready for the next emergency

Living in Southern California means another wildfire is coming sooner or later. To prepare for the bad air, you can:

Advertisement
  • Stock up on disposable respirators, like N95 or P-100s.
  • Have clean filters ready for your A/C system and change them out when things get smoky.
  • Know how to check the air quality where you live and work. The AQMD has an interactive map that’s updated hourly. Just type in an address and it will zoom in on the location. You can also sign up to get air quality alerts by email or on your smartphone.
  • Know where your fire extinguisher is and keep it handy.
  • If you have a heart or lung condition, keep at least five days’ worth of medication on hand.

Times staff writer Karen Garcia contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Science

Punk and Emo Fossils Are a Hot Topic in Paleontology

Published

on

Punk and Emo Fossils Are a Hot Topic in Paleontology

Mark Sutton, an Imperial College London paleontologist, is not a punk.

“I’m more of a folk and country person,” he said.

But when Dr. Sutton pieced together 3-D renderings of a tiny fossil mollusk, he was struck by the spikes that covered its wormlike body. “This is like a classic punk hairstyle, the way it’s sticking up,” he thought. He called the fossil “Punk.” Then he found a similar fossil with downward-tipped spines reminiscent of long, side-swept “emo” bangs. He nicknamed that specimen after the emotional alt-rock genre.

On Wednesday, Dr. Sutton and his colleagues published a paper in the journal Nature formally naming the creatures as the species Punk ferox and Emo vorticaudum. True to their names, these worm-mollusks are behind something of an upset (if not quite “anarchy in the U.K.”) over scientists’ understanding of the origins of one of the biggest groups of animals on Earth.

In terms of sheer number of species, mollusks are second only to arthropods (the group that contains insects, spiders and crustaceans). The better-known half of the mollusk family tree, conchiferans, contains animals like snails, clams and octopuses. “The other half is this weird and wacky group of spiny things,” Dr. Sutton said. Some animals in this branch, the aculiferans, resemble armored marine slugs, while others are “obscure, weird molluscan worms,” he said.

Advertisement

Punk and Emo, the forerunners of today’s worm-mollusks, lived on the dark seafloor amid gardens of sponges, nearly 200 million years before the first dinosaurs emerged on land. Today, their ancient seafloor is a fossil site at the border between England and Wales.

The site is littered with rounded rocky nodules that “look a bit like potatoes,” Dr. Sutton said. “And then you crack them open, and some of them have got these fossils inside. But the thing is, they don’t really look like much at first.”

While the nodules can preserve an entire animal’s body in 3-D, the cross-section that becomes visible when a nodule is cracked open can be difficult to interpret “because you’re not seeing the full anatomy,” Dr. Sutton said.

Paleontologists can use CT scans to see parts of fossils still hidden in rock, essentially taking thousands of X-rays of the fossil and then stitching those X-ray slices together into one digital 3-D image. But in these nodules, the fossilized creatures and the rock surrounding them are too similar in density to be easily differentiated by X-rays. Instead, Dr. Sutton essentially recreated this process of slicing and imaging by hand.

“We grind away a slice at a time, take a photo, repeat at 20-micron intervals or so, and basically destroy but digitize the fossil as we go,” Dr. Sutton said. At the end of the process, the original fossil nodule is “a sad-looking pile of dust,” but the thousands of images, when painstakingly digitally combined, provide a remarkable picture of the fossil animal.

Advertisement

Punk and Emo’s Hot Topic-worthy spikes set them apart from other fossils from the aculiferan branch of the mollusk family. “We don’t know much about aculiferans, and it’s unusual to find out we’ve suddenly got two,” Dr. Sutton said.

Stewart Edie, the curator of fossil bivalves at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, said that Punk and Emo’s bizarre appearances shook up a long-held understanding of how mollusks evolved. Traditionally, scientists thought that the group of mollusks containing snails, clams and cephalopods “saw all of the evolutionary action,” said Dr. Edie, who was not involved with the new discovery. “And the other major group, the aculiferans, were considerably less adventurous.” But Punk and Emo “buck that trend,” he said.

The new alt-rock aculiferans reveal the hidden diversity of their group in the distant past and raise questions about why their descendants make up such a small part of the mollusk class today. “This is really giving us an almost unprecedented window into the sorts of things that were actually around when mollusks were getting going,” Dr. Sutton said. “It’s just this little weird, unexpected, really clear view of what was going on in the early history of one of the most important groups of animals.”

Continue Reading

Science

FDA sets limits for lead in many baby foods as California disclosure law takes effect

Published

on

FDA sets limits for lead in many baby foods as California disclosure law takes effect

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration this week set maximum levels for lead in baby foods such as jarred fruits and vegetables, yogurts and dry cereal, part of an effort to cut young kids’ exposure to the toxic metal that causes developmental and neurological problems.

The agency issued final guidance that it estimated could reduce lead exposure from processed baby foods by about 20% to 30%. The limits are voluntary, not mandatory, for food manufacturers, but they allow the FDA to take enforcement action if foods exceed the levels.

It’s part of the FDA’s ongoing effort to “reduce dietary exposure to contaminants, including lead, in foods to as low as possible over time, while maintaining access to nutritious foods,” the agency said in a statement.

Consumer advocates, who have long sought limits on lead in children’s foods, welcomed the guidance first proposed two years ago, but said it didn’t go far enough.

“FDA’s actions today are a step forward and will help protect children,” said Thomas Galligan, a scientist with the Center for Science in the Public Interest. “However, the agency took too long to act and ignored important public input that could have strengthened these standards.”

Advertisement

The new limits on lead for children younger than 2 don’t cover grain-based snacks such as puffs and teething biscuits, which some research has shown contain higher levels of lead. And they don’t limit other metals such as cadmium that have been detected in baby foods.

The FDA’s announcement comes just one week after a new California law took effect that requires baby food makers selling products in California to provide a QR code on their packaging to take consumers to monthly test results for the presence in their product of four heavy metals: lead, mercury, arsenic and cadmium.

The change, required under a law passed by the California Legislature in 2023, will affect consumers nationwide. Because companies are unlikely to create separate packaging for the California market, QR codes are likely to appear on products sold across the country, and consumers everywhere will be able to view the heavy metal concentrations.

Although companies are required to start printing new packaging and publishing test results of products manufactured beginning in January, it may take time for the products to hit grocery shelves.

The law was inspired by a 2021 congressional investigation that found dangerously high levels of heavy metals in packaged foods marketed for babies and toddlers. Baby foods and their ingredients had up to 91 times the arsenic level, up to 177 times the lead level, up to 69 times the cadmium level, and up to five times the mercury level that the U.S. allows to be present in bottled or drinking water, the investigation found.

Advertisement

There’s no safe level of lead exposure for children, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The metal causes “well-documented health effects,” including brain and nervous system damage and slowed growth and development. However, lead occurs naturally in some foods and comes from pollutants in air, water and soil, which can make it impossible to eliminate entirely.

The FDA guidance sets a lead limit of 10 parts per billion for fruits, most vegetables, grain and meat mixtures, yogurts, custards and puddings and single-ingredient meats. It sets a limit of 20 parts per billion for single-ingredient root vegetables and for dry infant cereals. The guidance covers packaged processed foods sold in jars, pouches, tubs or boxes.

Jaclyn Bowen, executive director of the Clean Label Project, an organization that certifies baby foods as having low levels of toxic substances, said consumers can use the new FDA guidance in tandem with the new California law: The FDA, she said, has provided parents a “hard and fast number” to consider a benchmark when looking at the new monthly test results.

But Brian Ronholm, director of food policy for Consumer Reports, called the FDA limits “virtually meaningless because they’re based more on industry feasibility and not on what would best protect public health.” A product with a lead level of 10 parts per billion is “still too high for baby food. What we’ve heard from a lot of these manufacturers is they are testing well below that number.”

The new FDA guidance comes more than a year after lead-tainted pouches of apple cinnamon puree sickened more than 560 children in the U.S. between October 2023 and April 2024, according to the CDC.

Advertisement

The levels of lead detected in those products were more than 2,000 times higher than the FDA’s maximum. Officials stressed that the agency doesn’t need guidance to take action on foods that violate the law.

Aleccia writes for the Associated Press. Gold reports for The Times’ early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to latimes.com/earlyed.

Continue Reading

Trending