Connect with us

Politics

Why crime is at the center of California elections this year

Published

on

Why crime is at the center of California elections this year

A bit-seen assault advert roasting state Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta as an “anticop politician” could also be only a blip within the social media universe, nevertheless it serves as a flashing neon signal warning Democrats what to anticipate in California’s election season.

“How can somebody who cares extra about criminals’ rights than victims’ rights, and is routinely at odds with regulation enforcement, function our state’s prime cop?” the advert says. “It’s time for a change.”

The criticism comes from an impartial political committee backing lawyer common candidate Anne Marie Schubert, the Republican-turned-independent district lawyer of Sacramento County. The advert additionally takes a swipe at Gov. Gavin Newsom, who faces an identical barrage from the correct in his run for reelection for promising to shut two prisons, imposing a moratorium on the demise penalty and appointing Bonta because the state’s prime cop.

Advertisement

After greater than a decade hovering close to the again burner of voter issues in California, worry over crime has risen to the fore as Republicans seize on the problem to skewer Democrats from the state Capitol to the White Home. Republicans are demanding an finish to liberal insurance policies that changed a number of the tough-on-crime legal guidelines of the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties enacted underneath GOP Govs. George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson.

The political calculus is evident. Two-thirds of registered voters in California imagine crime has risen of their neighborhoods, in accordance with a current UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Research ballot co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Instances. Simply over half of voters surveyed stated Newsom is doing a poor job on crime and public security, up 16 proportion factors from 2020.

These perceptions have largely been pushed by tv information protection of a collection of coordinated “smash and seize” thefts. Auto burglaries and stolen automobiles are additionally driving will increase in crime in main cities, in accordance with a January examine by the nonpartisan Public Coverage Institute of California.

Republican political guide David Gilliard stated crime is a matter that California Democrats “personal” after convincing voters to develop choices for the early launch of tens of 1000’s of incarcerated folks and scale back the punishment for a lot of convicted of theft and different nonviolent offenses.

Proposition 47, the 2014 voter-approved poll measure that Newsom supported, reclassified some felony drug and theft offenses as misdemeanors and raised from $400 to $950 the quantity for which theft may be prosecuted as a felony. Two years later, California voters accepted Proposition 57, a parole overhaul measure that elevated good-behavior credit, permitting prisoners to be launched earlier.

Advertisement

“When you’ve got fewer people who find themselves criminals in jail, which means there’s extra of them on the road. Meaning crime goes up. It’s a fairly straightforward equation for voters to grasp,” Gilliard stated.

Recall efforts are underway in opposition to progressive district attorneys in two of California’s most liberal counties. An effort to oust San Francisco Dist. Atty. Chesa Boudin — one San Francisco Mayor London Breed hinted she may help — shall be on the June poll. One other recall effort, focusing on L.A. County Dist. Atty. George Gascón, is turning into a pivotal dividing line within the L.A. mayor’s race.

Republicans in Sacramento are leaning on the impression of Proposition 47 to crystalize their political message.

Meeting Member Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin), who’s operating for Congress in a solidly Republican district, referred to as Proposition 47 a “failed coverage” that has inflicted “disastrous penalties” on Californians. He and greater than a dozen different Republican legislators have launched Meeting Invoice 1599 to repeal the regulation — a largely symbolic gesture in a Legislature managed by Democrats.

“I imagine Californians are fed up with this type of lawlessness,” Kiley stated. “They’re able to have a rational public security coverage once more.”

Advertisement

Some distinguished Republican leaders conveyed a special message simply seven years in the past, when tough-on-crime rhetoric started melting away in some components of the nation.

In 2014, Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and former Republican Home Speaker Newt Gingrich urged California voters to move Proposition 47. In an Orange County Register opinion article, Paul argued that America wanted to alter its prison justice system as a result of it “drains tax {dollars}, destabilizes households and, worse, isn’t making us any safer.”

That very same yr, then-Texas Gov. Rick Perry bragged about shutting down a correctional facility following the state’s use of drug courts to divert addicts into remedy.

“You need to discuss actual conservative governance. Shut prisons down. Save that cash,” Perry informed the viewers on the 2014 Conservative Political Motion Convention.

However Paul and Perry’s feedback got here at a time when crime charges had been close to report lows in lots of components of the nation, and voter issues had been targeted elsewhere.

Advertisement

Democratic guide Andrew Acosta stated as we speak’s voters are indignant a couple of multitude of points affecting their day-to-day lives — crime amongst them — and candidates from his celebration could be clever to take that significantly.

“Housing, crime — these are the problems. Then you definately sprinkle within the inflation piece,” Acosta stated. “What does this all seem like in November? I don’t know, however proper now, it might be a little bit of a poisonous brew.”

Meeting Member Al Muratsuchi (D-Rolling Hills Estates), a former prosecutor with the state Division of Justice, is supporting laws this yr to roll again provisions of Proposition 47, together with a invoice to return the edge for felony theft to $400.

“The Legislature must be aware of the desire of the folks,” Muratsuchi stated. “The Berkeley ballot clearly exhibits that increasingly Californians are more and more involved concerning the route that we’ve been heading [in], and now possibly is the time for us to take, if not a course correction, on the very least some course modification.”

Meeting Member Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), chair of the Committee on Public Security, stated he favors taking a extra measured strategy fairly than bending to the politics of the second. Any effort to roll again Proposition 47 have to be accompanied by knowledge to display why the adjustments are wanted and to indicate that they’re not “fear-based,” he stated.

Advertisement

Jones-Sawyer stated there may be widespread misunderstanding of Proposition 47, which makes it susceptible to criticism. He stated there needs to be higher collaboration between prison justice advocates and regulation enforcement, likening the 2 sides to “arguing dad and mom in a divorce.”

“After we are arguing, it turns into a battlefield. And the one individuals who endure are the folks we’re speculated to be taking good care of,” he stated.

Jones-Sawyer launched a invoice this yr to provide regulation enforcement extra energy to arrest folks concerned in organized retail and smash-and-grab theft.

Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims stated the rise in violent crime, and growing issues amongst voters, was predictable. Property crimes have turn out to be so rampant that extra companies and residents see no motive to report thefts, she stated.

“We’re being overwhelmed, as a result of criminals appear to be extra emboldened,” Mims stated. “I believe that’s due to the messages being despatched from Sacramento, sadly, and with Prop. 47.”

Advertisement

Defenders of Proposition 47 observe that, in accordance with the California Division of Justice, property crime has been on a gentle decline statewide for the reason that regulation was enacted — a minimum of by means of 2020, probably the most present figures accessible.

Roughly 30 states have elevated the edge for felony theft offenses since 2005, in accordance with the Nationwide Convention of State Legislatures. Greater than half of all states have a felony theft threshold of $1,000 or extra.

“For years, regulation enforcement in California has been telling those that Proposition 47 is contributing to a rise in crime,” stated Anne Irwin, founder and director of Good Justice California, which advocates for prison justice reform. “Regulation enforcement was spreading this misinformation even when crime in California was throughout the board at all-time historic lows.”

UC Irvine criminology professor Elliott Currie says property crime statistics are notoriously unreliable — even earlier than the passage of Proposition 47 — as a result of many incidents should not reported. He famous that in the course of the pandemic, violent crime — significantly homicide — has been on the rise throughout the nation.

“It’s going down in all totally different sorts of locations: purple states, blue states and such. You attempt to attribute that to California prison justice reforms, you’re clearly barking up the mistaken tree,” Currie stated. “It’s only a Republican speaking level in the mean time.”

Advertisement

The sharp enhance in homicides in the course of the pandemic is extra clear-cut, Currie stated. Nationwide, the homicide fee surged by practically 30% from 2019 to 2020, with California seeing a barely increased enhance, in accordance with the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and the state Division of Justice. Montana, South Dakota and Kentucky noticed a number of the largest will increase, as did New York, Pennsylvania and Illinois.

Candidates in a few of California’s divisive political races are making the rise in homicides a centerpiece of their pitch to voters this yr.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Brian Dahle, a state senator from Northern California, blamed the rise in murders on the insurance policies of “elites liberals.” Brian Marvel, president of the Peace Officers Analysis Assn. of California, stated the state’s progressive insurance policies on crime have “price us lives and created many extra victims” when he introduced his group’s endorsement of Schubert for lawyer common on Tuesday.

However Newsom and Bonta have signaled their intent to make use of worry of gun violence in a brand new line of assault on the firearms trade. The Democrats argue that gun rights advocates and gun makers have seeded the rise in violent crime by means of the proliferation of weapons throughout the nation. The 2 appeared collectively at a February information convention in Del Mar to throw their help behind laws to allow Californians to sue gun producers and distributors.

All through his first three years in workplace, Newsom has defended the progressive insurance policies on crime which were adopted over the past decade, together with bans on assault weapons and measures geared toward lowering recidivism by means of instructional alternatives and psychological well being applications.

Advertisement

“We’re not strolling again on our dedication within the state to advance complete reforms. We’re not strolling again on this state to proper the wrongs of the previous,” Newsom stated in December.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

Published

on

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that Texas has the right to build a razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration into the Lone Star State. 

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the ruling on X, saying President Biden was “wrong to cut our razor wire.” 

“We continue adding more razor wire border barrier,” the Republican leader wrote. 

Wednesday’s 2-1 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals clears the way for Texas to pursue a lawsuit accusing the Biden administration of trespassing without having to remove the fencing.

TRUMP SAYS MEXICO WILL STOP FLOW OF MIGRANTS AFTER SPEAKING WITH MEXICAN PRESIDENT FOLLOWING TARIFF THREATS

Advertisement

It also reversed a federal judge’s November 2023 refusal to grant a preliminary injunction to Texas as the state resisted federal efforts to remove fencing along the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Eagle Pass, Texas.

U.S. Border Patrol agents cut an opening through razor wire after immigrant families crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee during the president-elect’s first term, wrote for Wednesday’s majority that Texas was trying only to safeguard its own property, not “regulate” U.S. Border Patrol, and was likely to succeed in its trespass claims.

LIBERAL NANTUCKET REELS FROM MIGRANT CRIME WAVE AS BIDEN SPENDS THANKSGIVING IN RICH FRIEND’S MANSION

Duncan said the federal government waived its sovereign immunity and rejected its concerns that a ruling by Texas would impede the enforcement of immigration law and undermine the government’s relationship with Mexico.

Advertisement
TEXAS BORDER RAZOR WIRE

A Venezuelan immigrant asks Texas National Guard troops to let his family pass through razor wire after they crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

He said the public interest “supports clear protections for property rights from government intrusion and control” and ensuring that federal immigration law enforcement does not “unnecessarily intrude into the rights of countless property owners.”

Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton called the ruling a “huge win for Texas.” 

“The Biden Administration has been enjoined from damaging, destroying, or otherwise interfering with Texas’s border fencing,” Paxton wrote in a post on X. “We sued immediately when the federal government was observed destroying fences to let illegal aliens enter, and we’ve fought every step of the way for Texas sovereignty and security.”

Texas border

Migrants attempt to cross the southern border in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, in February. (David Peinado/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The White House has been locked in legal battles with Texas and other states that have tried to deter illegal immigration. 

In May, the full 5th Circuit heard arguments in a separate case between Texas and the White House over whether the state can keep a 1,000-foot floating barrier on the Rio Grande.

Advertisement

The appeals court is also reviewing a judge’s order blocking a Texas law that would allow state officials to arrest, prosecute and order the removal of people in the country illegally.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Rep. Katie Porter obtains temporary restraining order against ex-boyfriend on harassment allegations

Published

on

Rep. Katie Porter obtains temporary restraining order against ex-boyfriend on harassment allegations

U.S. Rep. Katie Porter (D-Irvine) secured a temporary restraining order Tuesday against a former boyfriend, saying in dozens of pages of court filings that he had bombarded her, as well as her family and colleagues, with hundreds of messages that she described as “persistent abuse and harassment.”

Porter, 50, alleged in a filing with Orange County Superior Court that her ex-boyfriend Julian Willis, 55, was contacting her and her family with such frequency that she had a “significant fear” for her “personal safety and emotional well-being.”

Judge Stephen T. Hicklin signed a restraining order Tuesday barring Willis from communicating with Porter and her children until a mid-December court hearing. He also barred Willis from communicating about Porter with her current and former colleagues.

In the court filing, Porter said that Willis had been hospitalized twice since late 2022 on involuntary psychiatric holds and had a history of abusing prescription painkillers and other drugs.

She said in a statement to The Times that Willis’ mental health and struggles with addiction seemed to have gotten worse since she asked him in August to move out of her Irvine home. She said she sought the court order after his threats to her family and colleagues “escalated in both their frequency and intensity.”

Advertisement

“I sincerely hope he gets the help he needs,” Porter said.

Willis declined to comment. He will have an opportunity to file a legal response to the temporary restraining order and challenge Porter’s allegations.

Porter is leaving the House of Representatives in January after losing in California’s U.S. Senate primary in March. She has been discussed as a front-runner in the 2026 governor’s race in California after Gov. Gavin Newsom is termed out, but has not said whether she will launch a campaign.

The 53-page court filing, first reported by Politico, included 22 pages of emails, text messages and other communications among Porter, family members and colleagues who had received messages from Willis, as well as messages that Willis sent to Porter’s attorney and to her political mentor Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

The filing also included messages between herself and Willis’ siblings as they discussed trying to help him during his psychiatric holds and while he was staying in a sober-living facility.

Advertisement

Porter said that since she ordered Willis to move out, he had sent her more than 1,000 text messages and emails, including texting her 82 times in one 24-hour period in September, and 55 times on Nov. 12 before she blocked his number.

Porter said in the filing that her ex-boyfriend had “already contacted at least three reporters to disseminate false and damaging information” about her and her children, which she said “poses a serious risk to [her] career and personal reputation.”

The filing includes an email that Porter said Willis sent to her attorney late Monday, in which Willis said he had visited Porter’s son at college in Iowa and told him that he would “bring the hammer down on Katie and smash her and her life into a million pieces.”

Another screenshot shows Willis telling Porter’s attorney that he would file a complaint about Porter, who has children ages 12 and 16, with child protective services.

One of Porter’s congressional staff members received a text message from Willis saying he would “punish the f—” out of him if he did not agree to “cooperate” with a New York Times reporter and Willis’ attorneys, according to a screenshot included in the court document.

Advertisement

Willis previously made the news in 2021, when he was arrested after a fight that broke out at a Porter town hall at a park in Irvine.

Times staff writer Christopher Goffard contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Homan taking death threats against him ‘more seriously’ after Trump officials targeted with violent threats

Published

on

Homan taking death threats against him ‘more seriously’ after Trump officials targeted with violent threats

Incoming Trump border czar Tom Homan reacted to news of death threats against Trump nominees on Wednesday and said he now takes the death threats he has previously received seriously. 

“I have not taken this serious up to this point,” Homan told Fox News anchor Gillian Turner on “The Story” on Wednesday, referring to previous death threats made against him and his family. 

“Now that I know what’s happened in the last 24 hours. I will take it a little more serious. But look, I’ve been dealing with this. When I was the ICE director in the first administration, I had numerous death threats. I had a security detail with me all the time. Even after I retired, death threats continued and even after I retired as the ICE Director. I had U.S. Marshals protection for a long time to protect me and my family.”

Homan explained that what “doesn’t help” the situation is the “negative press” around Trump. 

HARRIS NEVER LED TRUMP, INTERNAL POLLS SHOWED — BUT DNC OFFICIALS WERE KEPT IN THE DARK

Advertisement

President Elect Donald Trump, left, and new appointed Tom Homan, right (Getty)

“I’m not in the cabinet, but, you know, I’ve read numerous hit pieces. I mean, you know, I’m a racist and, you know, I’m the father of family separation, all this other stuff. So the hate media doesn’t help at all because there are some nuts out there. They’ll take advantage. So that doesn’t help.”

Homan’s comments come shortly after Fox News Digital first reported that nearly a dozen of President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees and other appointees tapped for the incoming administration were targeted Tuesday night with “violent, unAmerican threats to their lives and those who live with them,” prompting a “swift” law enforcement response.

ARMED FELON ARRESTED FOR THREATENING TO KILL TRUMP ATTENDED RALLY WEEKS AFTER BUTLER ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

Donald Trump in a blue suit and red tie pumps his fist in the air and looks up

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he arrives to speak at a campaign event at Nassau Coliseum, Wednesday, Sept.18, 2024, in Uniondale, N.Y. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

The “attacks ranged from bomb threats to ‘swatting,’” according to Trump-Vance transition spokeswoman and incoming White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

Advertisement

“Last night and this morning, several of President Trump’s Cabinet nominees and administration appointees were targeted in violent, unAmerican threats to their lives and those who live with them,” she told Fox News Digital on Wednesday. “In response, law enforcement acted quickly to ensure the safety of those who were targeted. President Trump and the entire Transition team are grateful for their swift action.” 

Sources told Fox News Digital that John Ratcliffe, the nominee to be CIA director, Pete Hegseth, the nominee for secretary of defense, and Rep. Elise Stefanik, the nominee for UN ambassador, were among those targeted. Brooke Rollins, who Trump has tapped to be secretary of agriculture, and Lee Zeldin, Trump’s nominee to be EPA administrator, separately revealed they were also targeted. 

Threats were also made against Trump’s Labor Secretary nominee, GOP Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, and former Trump attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz’s family. 

Trump holds fist

Republican candidate Donald Trump is seen with blood on his face surrounded by secret service agents as he is taken off the stage at a campaign event at Butler Farm Show Inc. in Butler, Pennsylvania, July 13, 2024.  Rebecca Droke/AFP via Getty Images (Rebecca Droke/AFP via Getty Images)

Homan told Fox News that he is “not going to be intimidated by these people” and “I’m not going to let them silence me.”

Advertisement

“What I’ve learned today I’ll start taking a little more serious.”

Homan added that he believes “we need to have a strong response once we find out is behind all this.”

“It’s illegal to threaten someone’s life. And we need to follow through with that.”

The threats on Tuesday night came mere months after Trump survived two assassination attempts.

Fox News Digital’s Brooke Singman contributed to this report

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending