Connect with us

Politics

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, ‘the Churchill of our time’: Reporter’s Notebook

Published

on

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, ‘the Churchill of our time’: Reporter’s Notebook

NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy needs MiG-29s. He needs shoulder-mounted, surface-to-air missiles. He needs NATO to impose a no-fly zone. However Zelenskyy already has one other weapon.

And he’s utilizing it.

“He has understood the ability of communications,” stated Senate Overseas Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez, D-N.J. “It’s a further device in his arsenal as he tries to combat off Russia.”

Political commentators dubbed President Reagan “the Nice Communicator.” Like Reagan, Zelenskyy has a background within the performing arts. He was a standup comic earlier than working for president. However Reagan by no means needed to get out a message whereas a warmonger pummeled his nation.

Advertisement

RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES

Benefit, Zelenskyy.

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy
(Getty Photos/AP)

RUSSIA ACCUSES WEST OF ‘RUSSOPHOBIA,’ THREATEN TO ‘PUT IN PLACE’ ITS ENEMIES

Zelenskyy has a knack for stagecraft. He is aware of his viewers. Zelenskyy speaks to the group in essentially the most private of phrases.

Advertisement

Zelenskyy started his distant tackle to the Canadian Parliament by referring on a number of events to his buddy “Justin” – Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Zelenskyy spoke particularly about what would occur if there have been an assault in Vancouver or if bombs destroyed the CN Tower in Toronto.

In wartime, that is “stratcom.” Successful the messaging struggle. And whereas the Ukrainian navy is supposedly no match for Russia, Zelenskyy is no less than prevailing on the knowledge entrance.

Zelenskyy continued his marketing campaign on Wednesday.

The Ukrainian chief delivered some of the impassioned speeches offered to Congress in many years. A dire plea to lawmakers, jacked into the Congressional Auditorium by video hyperlink on an enormous, 40-foot display, buttressed by 4 American flags.

Zelenskyy’s message was so simple as the olive inexperienced T-shirt he wore.

Advertisement

Zelenskyy’s getup solely enhanced his picture because the chief of a nation beneath siege who might need to sprint out the door any minute to fireplace off a couple of mortar rounds.

Apparel doesn’t matter in struggle. However phrases do.

“Within the darkest time for our nation, for the entire [of] Europe, I name on you to do extra,” implored Zelenskyy.

Zelenskyy painted an image in language, steeping his tackle in American icons like Mount Rushmore and invoking Martin Luther King.

“I would like your assist,” beseeched Zelenskyy, “Which suggests precisely the identical [way] you are feeling once you hear the phrases, ‘I’ve a dream.’”

Advertisement

Zelenskyy might have painted his canvass with verbiage. However he additionally leaned on a brief, disturbing video which confirmed the horrors of struggle. Zelenskyy confirmed this placing video in the midst of his speech. A “play inside a play.” It will punctuate Zelenskyy’s message and underscore the carnage. Maimed our bodies. Docs frantically pumping chest compressions on a wounded physique. Droplets of blood splattered throughout a hospital flooring. Lifeless kids mendacity on concrete, lined with coats they’d put on to recess. Staff slinging a corpse right into a burial ditch as casually as they’d toss out a bag of trash.

“I see no sense in life if it can’t cease deaths,” stated Zelenskyy.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks to the U.S. Congress by video to plead for support as his country is besieged by Russian forces, at the Capitol in Washington.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks to the U.S. Congress by video to plead for assist as his nation is besieged by Russian forces, on the Capitol in Washington.
(AP Picture/J. Scott Applewhite, Pool)

BIDEN’S SLOW RESPONSE TO ZELENSKYY ‘HAS COST UKRAINIAN LIVES,’ TOP REPUBLICAN ON HOUSE INTEL PANEL SAYS

Zelenskyy’s presentation might have been essentially the most important speech delivered to Congress by a wartime, international chief since British Prime Minister Winston Churchill spoke to Congress, simply after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

The UK declared struggle on Nazi Germany in September 1939. So the U.Okay. had been at struggle for greater than two years previous to the USA getting into the fray in December 1941 after the Japanese hit Pearl Harbor.

Advertisement

Home and Senate members convene most Joint Conferences of Congress within the Home chamber. However Congress elected to welcome Churchill within the smaller Senate chamber. Churchill would ship his oratory on the day after Christmas. It was thought that some lawmakers would have already deserted Washington for the vacations. There’s nothing worse for a Joint Assembly of Congress that includes a international dignitary than empty seats. However the Senate chamber swelled with attendees. Lawmakers occupied all 96 Senate desks (there have been solely 48 states then). Cupboard secretaries and Supreme Court docket justices crowded into the room.

The Senate added klieg lights so officers may movie the tackle. Two microphones apiece from NBC, CBS and MBS (the Mutual Broadcasting System) sprang out of the Senate flooring like sunflowers in entrance of the dais.

Like Zelenskyy, Churchill had a activity at hand. He wanted to clarify to the USA what they had been in for now that it joined the World Battle II fray. Pearl Harbor pushed the U.S. into the battle. However Churchill knew that the UK and democracy may solely survive if the U.S. was absolutely dedicated to the trigger.

The speech was traditional Churchill. Stark. Spare. And, most significantly, inspirational.

“The forces organized towards us are monumental. They’re bitter. They’re ruthless,” noticed Churchill.

Advertisement

Churchill warned that U.S. would wish a year-and-a-half earlier than they may start to see progress. Churchill was additionally cautious. He warned these in attendance that “many disappointments and unsightly surprises await us.”

However Churchill additionally admonished those that would problem the UK and United States.

“What sort of a folks do they suppose we’re? Is it potential that they don’t notice that we will by no means stop to persevere towards them till they’ve been taught a lesson which they and the world will always remember?,” requested Churchill.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stands alongside other government officials in a video posted to social media Friday vowing to defend the country from a Russian invasion. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stands alongside different authorities officers in a video posted to social media Friday vowing to defend the nation from a Russian invasion. 
(Armed Forces of Ukraine)

WHITE HOUSE STANDS FIRM ON OPPOSITION TO NO-FLY ZONE OVER URAINE DESPITE ZELENSKYY PLEA

He questioned if “depraved males” didn’t know “they are going to be referred to as to horrible account if they can not beat down by power of arms the folks they’ve assailed.”

Advertisement

Churchill returned for one more speech to a Joint Assembly of Congress in 1943.

The parallels between Zelenskyy’s remarks and what unfolded on Capitol Hill eight many years in the past wasn’t misplaced on Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, the highest Republican on the Home Overseas Affairs Committee.

McCaul characterised Zelenskyy as “the Churchill of our instances” throughout an look on Fox Information.

After which McCaul virtually echoed Churchill.

“Historical past will decide this second and can ask the query, ‘What did you do to cease this?’”

Advertisement

That query now faces Congress. And, the reply Zelenskyy hopes to search out lies inside the partitions of the Home and Senate.

After contemplating Churchill’s 1941 speech, there’s a purpose why Zelenskyy invoked America’s entry into World Battle II and different cataclysmic occasions.

“Bear in mind Pearl Harbor. The horrible morning of September eleventh,” stated Zelenskyy, shifting the eye of lawmakers to essentially the most brazen assaults on American soil.

Zelenskyy then requested the U.S. and NATO to impose a no-fly zone.

“We’re asking for a reply to this terror from the entire world. Is that this loads to ask for?” queried Zelenskyy.

Advertisement
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy attends a joint press conference with his counterparts from Lithuania and Poland following their talks in Kyiv on Feb. 23, 2022.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy attends a joint press convention together with his counterparts from Lithuania and Poland following their talks in Kyiv on Feb. 23, 2022.
(SERGEI SUPINSKY/AFP by way of Getty Photos)

NATO SAYS ‘WE COULD HAVE DONE EVEN MORE’ IN LEAD-UP TO RUSSIAN INVASION, BUT REJECT NO-FLY ZONE PLEAS

However Congress isn’t prepared for that.

“President Zelenskyy appeared to have offered an either-or state of affairs. He indicated in his remarks that he helps the institution of a no-fly zone. However didn’t point out any different,” stated Home Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

“Europe has to steer on the no-fly zone,” stated Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. “We don’t need to make this a mano a mano, Russia versus U.S. factor. I feel there’s much more that we will do to assist management with out placing American planes within the air.”

Zelenskyy isn’t the primary Ukrainian chief to attraction to Congress. Former Ukrainian chief Petro Poroshenko spoke to a Joint Assembly of Congress in September 2014, simply months after Russia annexed Crimea.

Advertisement

Poroshenko’s remarks proved prophetic.

“Are we on the eve of the brand new Chilly Battle? Is the opportunity of the brand new horrible, unimaginable European struggle there? Is what till lately seen then, unthinkable, now turning into a actuality? Sadly, at this time, the reply to all of those query is sure,” stated Poroshenko.

Poroshenko was attempting to goad lawmakers into motion eight years in the past. The identical with Zelenskyy. And to a point, this was the identical problem going through Churchill in 1941.

“Churchill had been attempting to attraction to Individuals for the earlier two years. However the USA was divided between isolationists and internationalists, particularly in Congress,” stated former Senate historian Don Ritchie. “They couldn’t resolve they usually weren’t going to get into the struggle except they had been thrust into the struggle.”

Advertisement

Pearl Harbor supplied the thrust for the U.S. to enter World Battle II.

And to this point, Zelenskyy’s pleas aren’t sufficient for the U.S. to get extra concerned.

Politics

Video: How Trump Could Justify His Immigration Crackdown

Published

on

Video: How Trump Could Justify His Immigration Crackdown

President-elect Donald Trump is likely to justify his plans to seal off the border with Mexico by citing a public health emergency from immigrants bringing disease into the United States. Now he just has to find one. New York Times White House Correspondent, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, explains.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump to be sentenced in New York criminal trial

Published

on

Trump to be sentenced in New York criminal trial

President-elect Trump is expected to be sentenced Friday after being found guilty on charges of falsifying business records stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s years-long investigation. 

The president-elect is expected to attend his sentencing virtually, after fighting to block the process all the way up to the United States Supreme Court this week. 

Judge Juan Merchan set Trump’s sentencing for Jan. 10—just ten days before he is set to be sworn in as the 47th President of the United States. 

TRUMP FILES MOTION TO STAY ‘UNLAWFUL SENTENCING’ IN NEW YORK CASE

Merchan, though, said he will not sentence the president-elect to prison. 

Advertisement

From left to right: Judge Juan Merchan, former President Donald Trump, and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. (Getty Images, AP Images)

Merchan wrote in his decision that he is not likely to “impose any sentence of incarceration,” but rather a sentence of an “unconditional discharge,” which means there would be no punishment imposed. 

Trump filed an appeal to block sentencing from moving forward with the New York State Court of Appeals. That court rejected his request. 

Trump also filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that it “immediately order a stay of pending criminal proceedings in the Supreme Court of New York County, New York, pending the final resolution of President Trump’s interlocutory appeal raising questions of Presidential immunity, including in this Court if necessary.” 

“The Court should also enter, if necessary, a temporary administrative stay while it considers this stay application,” Trump’s filing requested. 

Advertisement
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg walks in the hallways of Manhattan Supreme Court

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg arrives at Daniel Penny’s trial following a lunch break at the Manhattan Supreme Criminal Court building in New York City on Monday, December 2, 2024. (Julia Bonavita/Fox News Digital)

TRUMP FILES EMERGENCY PETITION TO SUPREME COURT TO PREVENT SENTENCING IN NY V. TRUMP

Trump’s attorneys also argued that New York prosecutors erroneously admitted extensive evidence relating to official presidential acts during trial, ignoring the high court’s ruling on presidential immunity. 

The Supreme Court denied Trump’s emergency petition to block his sentencing from taking place on Friday, Jan. 10.

The Supreme Court, earlier this year, ruled that presidents are immune from prosecution related to official presidential acts. 

But New York prosecutors argued that the high court “lacks jurisdiction” over the case. 

Advertisement
JD Vance, Tom Cotton, John Barrasso, Donald Trump, Shelley Moore Capito, John Thune

Trump has previously explained a strategic component to his one-bill reconciliation approach. (Getty Images)

They also argued that the evidence they presented in the trial last year concerned “unofficial conduct that is not subject to any immunity.” 

 

Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. He pleaded not guilty to those charges. After a six-week-long, unprecedented trial for a former president and presidential candidate, a New York jury found the now-president-elect guilty on all counts. 

Trump has maintained his innocence in the case and repeatedly railed against it as an example of “lawfare” promoted by Democrats in an effort to hurt his election efforts ahead of November. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Column: Trump shoots his mouth off as L.A. burns. His claims about fire hydrants don’t hold water

Published

on

Column: Trump shoots his mouth off as L.A. burns. His claims about fire hydrants don’t hold water

OK, I admit it. I’m biased. I hate it when an opportunistic politician capitalizes on other people’s miseries and tries to score political points.

I’m especially biased when it’s a president-elect who shoots off his mouth without regard for facts and blames a governor for fire hydrants running dry.

Not that Democrat Gavin Newsom is a perfect governor. But his California water policies had no more to do with Pacific Palisades hydrants drying up during a firestorm than did Republican Donald Trump’s turning on sprinklers at his golf course.

News reporters shouldn’t allow personal biases to seep into their stories, as Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong has reminded us. Reporters have long strived to not do so and mostly succeeded. But I’m not a reporter. I’m a columnist who analyzes and opines. And yes, I’m biased — but on issues, not politics.

It has always been my view that liberals, moderates and conservatives all have good and bad ideas. Neither party has a monopoly on truth and justice — except in relating to Trump.

Advertisement

I wanted to give Trump the benefit of the doubt and watch whether he really intended — as promised — to be a president for all Americans. But the guy just can’t help himself.

When Trump blamed Newsom for water hydrants going dry as Pacific Palisades burned, it wasn’t something people should dismiss as just another Trumpism.

Here was a president-elect mouthing off and showing his ignorance in a barrage of vindictiveness and insensitivity as thousands of people fled for their lives and hundreds of homes blazed into ashes.

Yes, I’m biased against anyone who’s that uncivil, especially when he disrespects facts or — worse — is a pathological liar.

So, let’s recap what Trump did.

Advertisement

As scores of hydrants went dry while fire crews battled flames in Pacific Palisades, the president-elect instinctively went on social media to point the finger at his left coast political adversary, the Democrat he tastelessly derides as Gov. “Newscum.”

“Governor Gavin Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water from excess rain and snow melt from the north to flow daily into many parts of California, including the parts that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way,” Trump asserted.

“He wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt … but didn’t care about the people of California. Now the ultimate price is being paid.

“I will demand that this incompetent governor allow beautiful, clean, fresh water to flow into California. He is the blame for this. On top of it all, no water for fire hydrants, not firefighting planes. A true disaster.”

True drivel, putting it politely.

Advertisement

First, what was this so-called water restoration declaration?

“There’s no such document,” responded Izzy Gardon, Newsom’s communications director. “That is pure fiction.”

Trump probably was referring to his policy differences with Newsom on water exports from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to farmlands in the San Joaquin Valley. In his first presidency, Trump wanted to drain more fresh water from the delta for irrigation in the valley. But both Govs. Jerry Brown and Newsom took a more centrist approach, striving for a balance between farms and fish.

Second, it’s not the demise of the tiny smelt — the Republicans’ favorite target — that’s so concerning to many conservationists. It’s the rapid decline of iconic salmon that previously provided world-class recreational angling in the delta and fed a healthy commercial fishery on the coast. Salmon fishing seasons have been closed recently to save what’s left of the fish.

Third, despite Trump’s claptrap, plenty of fresh delta water is being pumped south to fill fire hydrants and the tanks of firefighting aircraft. Hundreds of millions of gallons of water flow daily down the California Aqueduct. Major Southland reservoirs are at historically high levels. Anyway, much of L.A.’s water doesn’t even come from the Delta. It flows from the Owens Valley and the Colorado River.

Advertisement

Fourth, the hydrants went dry simply because there were too many fires to fight, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power explained. Storage tanks went dry.

“We pushed the system to the extreme,” Janisse Quinones, DWP chief executive and chief engineer, said. “Four times the normal demand was seen for 15 hours straight.”

Yes, I’m biased against politicians who make up stuff.

But you’ve got to listen to Trump because he could follow through on what he’s bellowing about.

For example, Trump vowed during the presidential campaign to deny Newsom federal money to fight wildfires unless the governor diverted more water to farms.

Advertisement

That apparently wasn’t an idle threat.

Trump initially refused to approve federal wildfire aid in 2018 until a staffer pointed out that Orange County, a beneficiary, was home to many voters who supported him, Politico reported. And in 2020, the Federal Emergency Management Agency rejected an aid request during several California wildfires until Republicans appealed to Trump.

So, what’s Trump going to be like when he actually becomes president again and is wielding real power, not just running off at the mouth?

Will he try to annex Greenland? Seize the Panama Canal? When a reporter asked him whether he’d commit to not using “military or economic coercion” to achieve these goals, he immediately answered: “No.”

Will he keep calling Canada our “51st state?”

Advertisement

Yep. I’m biased against such immature and dangerous political leaders.

Continue Reading

Trending