Connect with us

Politics

Musk renews harsh rebuke of Dems who rejected deporting sex offenders: Vote out ‘every one’

Published

on

Musk renews harsh rebuke of Dems who rejected deporting sex offenders: Vote out ‘every one’

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Tech billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk renewed criticism of the more than 150 House Democrats who voted against deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex offenses, demanding each of the lawmakers be voted out of office. 

“There is no excuse. Please post the list of people who opposed this law and want to keep illegals who are convicted sex offenders in America,” Musk posted to his X account on Saturday referencing a September House vote. 

Advertisement

“They all need to be voted out of office. Every one of them.”

The Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act passed the House in September, after all 215 present Republicans voted in favor of the bill, and were joined by 51 Democratic colleagues. A total of 158 Democrats, however, voted against the bill. 

158 DEMS VOTE AGAINST BILL TO DEPORT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO COMMIT SEX CRIMES

President-elect Trump and Elon Musk watch the launch of a test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket on Nov. 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

The Democrats who voted against the bill came under scrutiny in September, and are facing renewed criticism on social media this month as commenters resurrect the vote ahead of President-elect Trump taking office this month. 

Advertisement

“The bill targeted rapists, pedophiles, domestic abusers, and stalkers, ensuring they couldn’t stay in the U.S. Opponents claimed it ‘demonized immigrants,’ but how does protecting convicted predators help anyone – especially their victims?” X show host Mario Nawfal posted to his account Saturday, sparking Musk to weigh in. 

“Deporting violent offenders isn’t ‘fearmongering’ – it’s basic public safety. Why would anyone vote to keep criminals who prey on women and children?” Nawfal added.

EX-BORDER CHIEF WARNS OF ‘SIGNIFICANT THREAT’ AS MIGRANT NUMBERS SKYROCKET: ‘ENTIRE SECTORS’ MISSING AGENTS

The legislation would deport illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes, and would ​​also deem illegal immigrants who admit to domestic violence or sex-related charges – or are convicted of them – to be inadmissible in the U.S., Fox Digital previously reported. The legislation is currently with the Senate, and was referred to the Judiciary Committee. 

U.S. Representatives of the 119th Congress

Representatives of the 119th Congress are sworn in during the first day of session in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 3, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Notable Democrats who voted against the legislation included Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., former California Rep. Adam Schiff, who now serves in the Senate, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Advertisement

Musk’s call for the Democrats to be voted out of Congress over the vote comes after he vowed in December to fund moderate Democratic politicians in deep blue districts, “so that the country can get rid of those who don’t represent them.”

CLYBURN BRUSHES OFF MUSK’S PLAN TO FUND MODERATES IN DEMOCRATIC DISTRICTS

Elon Musk and Trump

President-elect Trump greets Elon Musk as he arrives to attend a SpaceX Starship launch on Nov. 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Musk is also slated to serve alongside Vivek Ramaswamy to lead an upcoming presidential advisory committee, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which will work to cut excessive government spending and slash the size of the government under Trump’s second administration.

According to the office of the House clerk, the 158 Democrats who voted against the legislation are:

  1. Alma Adams, North Carolina
  2. Pete Aguilar, California
  3. Gabe Amo, Rhode Island
  4. Jake Auchincloss, Massachusetts
  5. Becca Balint, Vermont
  6. Nanette Barragán, California
  7. Joyce Beatty, Ohio
  8. Ami Bera, California
  9. Donald Beyer, Virginia
  10. Sanford D. Bishop Jr., Georgia
  11. Earl Blumenauer, Oregon
  12. Suzanne Bonamici, Oregon
  13. Lisa Blunt Rochester, Delaware
  14. Jamaal Bowman, New York
  15. Shontel Brown, Ohio
  16. Julia Brownley, California
  17. Cori Bush, Missouri
  18. Salud Carbajal, California
  19. Tony Cárdenas, California
  20. André Carson, Indiana
  21. Troy Carter, Louisiana
  22. Greg Casar, Texas
  23. Ed Case, Hawaii
  24. Sean Casten, Illinois
  25. Kathy Castor, Florida
  26. Joaquin Castro, Texas
  27. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Florida
  28. Judy Chu, California
  29. Katherine Clark, Massachusetts
  30. Yvette Clarke, New York
  31. Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri
  32. James Clyburn, South Carolina
  33. Steve Cohen, Tennessee
  34. Gerald Connolly, Virginia
  35. Luis Correa, California
  36. Jim Costa, California
  37. Jasmine Crockett, Texas
  38. Jason Crow, Colorado
  39. Danny Davis, Illinois
  40. Madeleine Dean, Pennsylvania
  41. Diana DeGette, Colorado
  42. Rosa DeLauro, Connecticut
  43. Suzan DelBene, Washington
  44. Mark DeSaulnier, California
  45. Debbie Dingell, Michigan
  46. Lloyd Doggett, Texas
  47. Veronica Escobar, Texas
  48. Anna Eshoo, California
  49. Adriano Espaillat, New York
  50. Lizzie Fletcher, Texas
  51. Bill Foster, Illinois
  52. Valerie Foushee, North Carolina
  53. Lois Frankel, Florida
  54. Maxwell Frost, Florida
  55. John Garamendi, California
  56. Jesús “Chuy” Garcia, Illinois
  57. Robert Garcia, California
  58. Sylvia Garcia, Texas
  59. Dan Goldman, New York
  60. Jimmy Gomez, California
  61. Al Green, Texas
  62. James Himes, Connecticut
  63. Steny Hoyer, Maryland
  64. Valerie Hoyle, Oregon
  65. Jared Huffman, California
  66. Glenn Ivey, Maryland
  67. Jonathan Jackson, Illinois
  68. Sara Jacobs, California
  69. Pramila Jayapal, Washington
  70. Hakeem Jeffries, New York
  71. Henry “Hank” Johnson, Georgia
  72. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, California
  73. Bill Keating, Massachusetts
  74. Robin Kelly, Illinois
  75. Ro Khanna, California
  76. Dan Kildee, Michigan
  77. Derek Kilmer, Washington
  78. Andy Kim, New Jersey
  79. Raja Krishnamoorthi, Illinois
  80. Ann Kuster, New Hampshire
  81. Greg Landsman, Ohio
  82. Rick Larsen, Washington
  83. John Larson, Connecticut
  84. Barbara Lee, California
  85. Summer Lee, Pennsylvania
  86. Teresa Leger Fernandez, New Mexico
  87. Ted Lieu, California
  88. Zoe Lofgren, California
  89. Doris Matsui, California
  90. Lucy McBath, Georgia
  91. Jennifer McClellan, Virginia
  92. Betty McCollum, Minnesota
  93. Morgan McGarvey, Kentucky
  94. James McGovern, Massachusetts
  95. Gregory Meeks, New York
  96. Rob Menendez, New Jersey
  97. Grace Meng, New York
  98. Kweisi Mfume, Maryland
  99. Gwen Moore, Wisconsin
  100. Joseph Morelle, New York
  101. Seth Moulton, Massachusetts
  102. Kevin Mullin, California
  103. Jerrold Nadler, New York
  104. Grace Napolitano, California
  105. Richard Neal, Massachusetts
  106. Joe Neguse, Colorado
  107. Donald Norcross, New Jersey
  108. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York
  109. Ilhan Omar, Minnesota
  110. Frank Pallone, New Jersey
  111. Nancy Pelosi, California
  112. Scott Peters, California
  113. Brittany Pettersen, Colorado
  114. Dean Phillips, Minnesota
  115. Chellie Pingree, Maine
  116. Mark Pocan, Wisconsin
  117. Katie Porter, California
  118. Ayanna Pressley, Massachusetts
  119. Mike Quigley, Illinois
  120. Delia Ramirez, Illinois
  121. Jamie Raskin, Maryland
  122. Deborah Ross, North Carolina
  123. Raul Ruiz, California
  124. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Maryland
  125. Linda Sánchez, California
  126. John Sarbanes, Maryland
  127. Mary Scanlon, Pennsylvania
  128. Janice Schakowsky, Illinois
  129. Adam Schiff, California
  130. Bradley Schneider, Illinois
  131. Robert “Bobby” Scott, Virginia
  132. David Scott, Georgia
  133. Terri Sewell, Alabama
  134. Brad Sherman, California
  135. Darren Soto, Florida
  136. Melanie Stansbury, New Mexico
  137. Haley Stevens, Michigan
  138. Marilyn Strickland, Washington
  139. Mark Takano, California
  140. Shri Thanedar, Michigan
  141. Mike Thompson, California
  142. Bennie Thompson, Mississippi
  143. Rashida Tlaib, Michigan
  144. Jill Tokuda, Hawaii
  145. Paul Tonko, New York
  146. Norma Torres, California
  147. Ritchie Torres, New York
  148. Lori Trahan, Massachusetts
  149. David Trone, Maryland
  150. Lauren Underwood, Illinois
  151. Juan Vargas, California
  152. Marc Veasey, Texas
  153. Nydia Velázquez, New York
  154. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Florida
  155. Maxine Waters, California
  156. Bonnie Watson Coleman, New Jersey
  157. Nikema Williams, Georgia
  158. Frederica Wilson, Florida

The Democrats who voted against the legislation came under fierce scrutiny in September from conservatives. 

“If you vote against it, you’re sexist against women,” South Carolina Republican Nancy Mace, who introduced the legislation, said in September to Fox Digital. 

Advertisement
Migrants border

Migrants attempt to cross into the U.S. from Mexico at the border Dec. 17, 2023 in Jacumba Hot Springs, California. (Nick Ut/Getty Images)

ELON MUSK AGREES WITH RON PAUL’S CALL TO ‘ELIMINATE FOREIGN AID’

“I mean, truly, because we’re talking about illegals who are here who are committing domestic violence, rape and murder on women and children – they’ve gotta go. They shouldn’t be allowed into our country.”

“158 Democrats just voted AGAINST deporting migrants for s*x offenses. This is a slap in the face to every victim and their family members. Democrats hate you and your children,” popular conservative X account Libs of TikTok posted at the time. 

Democrats who voted against the bill characterized it as xenophobic and an example of “fearmongering” against immigrants. 

“Here we are again, debating another partisan bill that fear mongers about immigrants, instead of working together to fix the immigration system,” Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said during debate on the bill.

Advertisement

“I probably shouldn’t be too surprised. Scapegoating immigrants and attempting to weaponize the crime of domestic violence is appearing to be a time-honored tradition for Republicans.”

Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report. 

Politics

Pentagon Reaches Settlement With Veterans Dismissed Over Sexuality

Published

on

Pentagon Reaches Settlement With Veterans Dismissed Over Sexuality

The Defense Department has reached a sweeping settlement with tens of thousands of people who were dismissed from military service because of their sexual identity, potentially paving the way for veterans to upgrade their discharge status and receive a range of benefits they had been denied.

The settlement, which the Pentagon agreed to late last week and was filed on Monday in Federal District Court in Northern California, must still be approved by a judge. It applies to a group of more than 30,000 veterans who received less-than-honorable discharges or whose discharge status lists their sexuality. Advocacy groups had filed a class-action civil rights lawsuit in 2023 alleging that the Pentagon had failed to remedy “ongoing discrimination” after the repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy more than a decade earlier.

Those who leave the military with less-than-honorable discharges usually do not receive all of the benefits they would have been eligible for through the Veterans Affairs Department, including health care from the V.A.’s hospitals and clinics, educational benefits and access to job networks.

While the Defense Department has taken steps under the Biden administration to upgrade discharges and restore benefits for L.G.B.T.Q. veterans, the settlement is expected to make the process much easier. It would also help former service members remove references to their sexuality from their discharge paperwork. If a federal judge approves the settlement, it will be binding by law.

When reached for comment, the Pentagon referred to the Justice Department, which declined to comment. The settlement was reported earlier on Monday by CBS News.

Advertisement

Sherrill Farrell, 63, a Navy veteran who is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, said in an interview that news of the settlement was “overwhelming.” Ms. Farrell, who is lesbian, enlisted in the Navy in 1985. She was outed by a bunkmate and kicked out of training after only 10 months as a fireman apprentice. Her dreams of following the footsteps of her father and grandfather by serving in the military were crushed, and she never applied for benefits.

“It wasn’t about the money,” Ms. Farrell said. “It was about human decency and treating people fairly, and the people that are willing to defend our country regardless of what their sexual orientation is or who they love.”

L.G.B.T.Q. service members who were open about their sexual orientation were barred from the military until 2011, when President Barack Obama repealed “don’t ask, don’t tell.” But the end of the policy did nothing to address the effects of it that tens of thousands of service members who were discharged because of their sexuality experienced.

Those whose discharges remain less than honorable are still denied full benefits. Their only option for upgrading their discharge is to petition individually, a process that can take over a year, according to the nonprofit legal services organization Legal Aid at Work, one of the groups that filed the lawsuit.

In other cases, even when a discharge is honorable, paperwork can out veterans because it refers to them or their actions as “homosexual.” It might say that they “attempted to engage in homosexual marriage,” Elizabeth Kristen, a lawyer with Legal Aid at Work, said in an interview.

Advertisement

After the class-action lawsuit was initially filed in August 2023, the Defense Department began what it called a proactive review of service members who were discharged during the era of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” That review concluded in October, and more than 800 service members who were kicked out had their discharges upgraded to honorable. It was the first time that the department had systematically reviewed discharges related to sexual identity.

But the settlement that the Pentagon agreed to on Friday would go even further, creating a streamlined process that would apply to more people in a larger time frame.

“What it says,” Ms. Kristen said of the settlement, “is that the word ‘homosexual’ being taken off your records, that should be essentially as easy as getting your name changed.”

Many veterans had no idea that there was a pathway to getting their paperwork fixed. Some, like Ms. Farrell, had felt shame and did not ask for benefits that they would have been entitled to, if not for a less-than-honorable discharge.

Ms. Farrell was openly lesbian when she enlisted, and she said she felt guilty for answering “no” to the application question “Are you homosexual?” It is the only time she recalls lying about her sexual identity, she said, because she knew her application would not have been considered if she had told the truth.

Advertisement

“I wanted to serve my country that bad,” Ms. Farrell said, choking up with emotion. “But because of my integrity and the way that I look at serving in the military, I kind of felt that they had a right to do what they did because I had lied.”

The settlement is one of several steps that the Biden administration has taken to remedy the effects of policies felt by L.G.B.T.Q. service members for decades. In June, President Biden offered clemency to some 2,000 veterans who were convicted of engaging in gay sex, which was outlawed by the military for more than 60 years, in order to address what he called a “historic wrong.”

Continue Reading

Politics

President Biden, first lady attend memorial service for Bourbon Street attack victims in New Orleans

Published

on

President Biden, first lady attend memorial service for Bourbon Street attack victims in New Orleans

President Biden and first lady Jill Biden attended a Monday memorial service for the victims of the Bourbon Street terrorist attack in New Orleans, paying their respects to the 14 victims who died.

The event, which was an interfaith prayer service, was hosted at the Cathedral-Basilica of Saint Louis, King of France, in the French Quarter. The church is located less than a mile away from the scene of the attack, where terrorist Shamsud-Din Jabbar drove a pickup truck into a crowd of celebrants on New Year’s Day.

Biden made short remarks toward the end of the service, expressing sympathy for the victims and their families.

“The shock and pain is still so very raw,” Biden, who leaves office in exactly two weeks, said. “My wife Jill and I are here to stand with you, grieve with you, pray with you, [and] let you know you are not alone — the rest of the nation is looking at you as well.”

WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT VICTIMS OF NEW ORLEANS TERRORIST ATTACK

Advertisement

US President Joe Biden (R) and first lady Jill Biden (2nd R), alongside the Governor of Louisiana Jeff Landry (2nd L) and his wife Sharon Landry (L), attend an interfaith prayer service with the families and community members impacted by the Jan. 1 truck attack in New Orleans, at the Cathedral-Basilica of Saint Louis, King of France, in New Orleans, Louisiana, on Jan. 6, 2025. (ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images)

The president also noted that he recently met two officers who were injured during the attack, and commended the first responders who saved lives amid the chaos.

“New Orleans defines strength and resilience,” Biden said. “You define it. Whether it’s in the form of this attack, from this attack or hurricanes or superstorms, this city’s people get back up. That’s the spirit of America as well.”

The service came less than a week after the terrorist attack stunned the Big Easy. Jabbar died at the scene, bringing the total number of deaths to 15 as of Jan. 6, and over 30 injuries.

Many of the decedents were in their 20s and visited New Orleans from across the U.S., including Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York and New Jersey. The youngest victim who died was 18 years old, and the oldest was 63. 

Advertisement

NEW ORLEANS TERRORIST, MAN IN LAS VEGAS CYBERTRUCK EXPLOSION SHARED MORE LINKS IN ATTACKS JUST HOURS APART

Bidens walking in church

US President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden, alongside Archbishop Gregory Aymond (R), attend an interfaith prayer service with the families and community members impacted by the Jan. 1 truck attack in New Orleans, at the Cathedral-Basilica of Saint Louis, King of France, in New Orleans, Louisiana, on Jan. 6, 2025. (ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images)

The incident is still under investigation, and federal and local officials are continuing to gather evidence about the terrorist attack. On Sunday, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) said its National Response Team had completed its investigation of Jabbar’s Airbnb in New Orleans.

Jabbar, who rented a house on Mandeville Street and left it hours before unleashing his attack, set a fire at the rental house to destroy evidence, but the fire eventually smoldered by the time authorities arrived. Accelerants that Jabbar strategically placed ended up not catching fire, allowing authorities to gather evidence.

Officials also found traces of the explosive RDX, or cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine, at the rental. The agency noted that Jabbar unknowingly foiled his plans by using an electric match to ignite explosive material that is typically set off by a detonator. 

 

Advertisement
Bidens laying flowers

US President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden lay flowers as they pay their respects to victims of the January 1 truck attack at a makeshift memorial in Bourbon Street in New Orleans, Louisiana, on Janauary 6, 2025. (ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images)

“Jabbar used explosive material better suited for a detonator, but he didn’t have access to one, so he used an electric match to set the explosives off,” the ATF’s statement explained. “Jabbar’s lack of experience and crude nature of putting the device together is the reason why he used the wrong device to set the explosives off.”

Fox News Digital’s Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Despite revenue increase, Newsom plans to pull from California's rainy day reserves

Published

on

Despite revenue increase, Newsom plans to pull from California's rainy day reserves

Gov. Gavin Newsom touted higher than expected tax revenues and a “modest surplus” in an unconventional preview of his $322.2 billion spending proposal for the upcoming fiscal year, but his office said he still plans to pull money from the state’s rainy day reserves to pay for policy priorities.

The Democratic governor delivered a selective presentation of his initial 2025-26 budget at Cal State Stanislaus on Monday that largely praised the state’s economic position under his leadership and made it difficult to understand the full scope of his spending plan. Newsom said details would be forthcoming at the end of the week.

The early, yet incomplete look at his proposal shows that Newsom’s annual spending plan has grown by $24 billion compared to the current budget enacted in July. The governor announced a projection of an extra $16.5 billion in tax revenue above his administration’s prior estimates, which the Department of Finance said is spread over three years.

“The top lines include a balanced budget, no deficits,” Newsom said.

The proposal kicks off the annual six-month process in which the governor and lawmakers negotiate a final spending plan to be approved in late June. Newsom’s presentation at a college campus in the Central Valley town of Turlock was an unusual twist on the ritual, driven by Newsom’s decision to travel to Washington, D.C., later this week for the funeral of former President Carter.

Advertisement

Because he presented the budget a few days earlier than initially planned, Monday’s rollout did not include the detailed budget document that typically accompanies the governor’s presentation.

Newsom described his proposal as making “significant commitments to accountability, transparency and results” and “maintaining fiscal discipline in a time of deep uncertainty.”

Despite the revenue increase, the cost of providing Medi-Cal coverage to seniors and more undocumented immigrants, offering pre-kindergarten to all 4-year-olds, creating a new $420-million tax break for Hollywood film studios and funding other signature Newsom policies leaves California with a spending problem.

Newsom’s office said he plans to withdraw another $7.1 billion from California’s rainy day reserves in the upcoming budget year, after declaring a fiscal emergency last year to take out $5.1 billion to balance the current budget and another $900 million from a safety-net reserve.

The decision to dip into the state’s savings account was part of an agreement made last year with lawmakers to also delay programs, cut spending and rely on the occasional accounting gimmick to solve a $46.8 billion deficit. California leaders were forced to reconcile a $31.7 billion deficit the prior year.

Advertisement

Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) said those tough decisions put California in a better financial position today.

“We look forward to taking a close look at the governor’s full proposal later this week,” McGuire said in a statement. “The major work will happen in the months ahead, when we’ll get down to brass tacks and craft a responsible and balanced budget which will help make California more livable and affordable.”

Assemblymember Carl DeMaio, a Republican elected in November to represent inland San Diego County, called the governor’s proposal “negligent” before Newsom even delivered his presentation.

“Gavin Newsom is in over his head and hopes that no one notices — but no amount of Enron-style accounting will change the alarming reality that Gavin Newsom has created a fiscal crisis,” DeMaio said in a statement, calling on his fellow lawmakers to reject the governor’s proposal.

Analysts warn that the financial outlook will worsen in the future with the potential for even greater economic upheaval under the incoming Trump administration.

Advertisement

The California Legislative Analyst’s Office in November predicted a largely balanced budget in 2025-26 with a shortage of $2 billion, while anticipating a deficit of about $20 billion in 2026-27 and an even higher shortfall by 2028-29 of about $30 billion.

The LAO reported that the California economy has been in a gradual slowdown over the last two years, with about 25% more unemployed workers overall and declining trends in consumer spending.

Newsom did not offer a deficit projection for future years and said he will share more when he presents his revised budget proposal in May.

Corrin Rankin, vice chair of the California Republican Party, criticized the governor for not doing enough to help regular Californians.

“Handing out tax breaks to Hollywood and spending on AI is great for the state’s billionaires,” Rankin said in response to Newsom’s presentation. “However, the rest of us feel like we’re drowning in growing costs and our lives haven’t been improved.”

Advertisement

Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister) agreed that the state needs to tackle cost-of-living issues.

“We also need to prepare for challenges ahead and must show restraint with spending,” Rivas said in a statement. “I am committed to working with the governor and my colleagues on a budget that protects essential services and makes life more affordable.”

The Newsom administration has said President-elect Trump’s plan for international tariffs, uncertainty around federal Medi-Cal funding and threats to withhold disaster funding increase the likelihood of even greater budget uncertainty in the years ahead.

“We really have to see what fire and fury comes from Trump in the next few weeks and really get a sense,” Newsom said.

The governor is expected to leave for the Carter funeral after he spends time with President Biden Tuesday in California to celebrate the new Chuckwalla National Monument near Joshua Tree and the Sáttítla National Monument near the Oregon border.

Advertisement

Joe Stephenshaw, director of the California Department of Finance, will formally present the budget to the Legislature and answer questions on Friday.

Newsom plans to leave the state Saturday for a vacation with his family.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending