Connect with us

Politics

Democrats Find Their Inflation Villains: Vladimir Putin and Big Oil

Published

on

Democrats Find Their Inflation Villains: Vladimir Putin and Big Oil

Democrats have a brand new technique for coping with the political impression of excessive gasoline costs: Blame it on Putin and Large Oil.

That’s the one-two punch that President Biden delivered from the White Home on Tuesday as he introduced a ban on imports of Russian vitality.

First, there was the jab on the Russian president, Vladimir Putin: “Defending freedom goes to price,” Biden stated, whereas promising to ease the ache. “I’m going to do all the things I can to attenuate Putin’s value hike right here at house.”

After which a second jab at oil firms: “Russia’s aggression is costing us all,” Biden stated. “And it’s no time for profiteering or value gouging.”

Later, fielding a pair of shouted questions from Mike Memoli of NBC Information, as he boarded Air Drive One in Texas, Biden gave extra succinct solutions:

Advertisement

Memoli: Mr. President, do you have got a message for the American folks on fuel costs?

Biden: They’re going to go up.

Memoli: What are you able to do about it?

Biden: Can’t do a lot proper now. Russia is accountable.

Is that this going to work? We requested a few dozen pollsters, political strategists and opinion specialists, and received some fascinating solutions. They break down into roughly three camps:

  • Democratic strategists are pleased with the brand new message and optimistic that it’s going to at the very least stabilize their ballot numbers and assist their candidates.

    “Each combat wants a villain, and proper now, there’s no higher one than Putin,” stated Jefrey Pollock, a Democratic political marketing consultant and pollster.

    Advertisement

    Privately, they are saying that linking fuel costs to Putin and oil firms is the White Home’s most suitable choice, although it’s exhausting to inform what is going to resonate in November.

  • Impartial pollsters and analysts usually say that voters do appear keen to make sacrifices to assist Ukraine and punish Russia, however are much less doubtless to reply to Democrats’ assaults on Large Oil.

    “It issues how lengthy wouldn’t it be in impact, how a lot the rise could be and whether or not that step could be seen as being profitable,” stated Dina Smeltz, who research public opinion as a senior fellow on the Chicago Council on International Affairs.

    “It’s a possible sport changer, which he badly wants on inflation,” stated Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist School Institute for Public Opinion. “However he has to hammer away every day with Dems chiming in and keep on message. ‘Putin and populism’ on daily basis, and with a Democrat supporting refrain.”

  • Republicans are assured that inflation and fuel costs are their ticket again to energy, and scoff at Democrats’ newest try to redirect voters’ frustration away from Biden.

    “​​It might be one factor if fuel costs have been all of a sudden excessive on account of this disaster and the Biden administration may clearly level to the Ukraine state of affairs as a driver,” stated Kristen Soltis Anderson, a companion at Echelon Insights, a Republican polling agency. “The problem they are going to face is that voters have been involved about price of residing for a while now.”

Anderson has some extent there: Democrats have struggled for months to fend off Republican assaults about excessive fuel costs, which had been rising since April 2020 — effectively earlier than the conflict in Ukraine. On Wednesday, the typical value of fuel was $4.25 a gallon throughout the US, in line with AAA.

Advertisement

“Excessive fuel costs are usually fairly damaging for shopper sentiment, as a result of they’re so salient, and within the brief run, many individuals can’t actually change the quantity of driving they should do,” stated Carola Binder, an economist at Haverford School in Pennsylvania.

Gasoline costs are intently tied with inflation, which is growing at a tempo not seen in 4 many years.

Meaning it is perhaps tougher for Democrats accountable the conflict in Ukraine for, say, the rising costs of bacon or used automobiles.

The consensus of many of the pollsters and analysts we spoke with was that providing voters a goal for his or her anger — Putin and his unprovoked conflict in Ukraine — was good politics.

“People have been a bit misplaced as to who accountable for inflation, understanding that a lot of it has been the results of provide chain woes and labor shortages,” stated Pollock, the Democratic marketing consultant.

Advertisement

Putin and Russia get awful approval scores in the US, famous Daniel Cox, a senior fellow in polling and public opinion on the American Enterprise Institute.

And that was earlier than the conflict, which has seized the general public’s consideration with searing reviews of atrocities by Russian forces and a gentle circulate of tales depicting Ukrainians as heroic freedom fighters standing as much as a vicious foe.

As Binder put it, “Reducing off imports of Russian vitality is so morally essential that individuals will really feel a bit higher about paying the upper value on the pump.”

Advertisement

Jonathan Kirshner, a political scientist at Boston College, stated individuals are viscerally affected by what they’re seeing within the information and on social media. “We have now pictures of a conflict with mass struggling and with clear good guys and unhealthy guys,” he stated.

A couple of latest public surveys recommend they’re proper:

  • A brand new Wall Road Journal ballot discovered that 79 % of People supported barring imports of Russian oil, even when the ban would elevate vitality costs, with 13 % in opposition to. Intriguingly, 77 % of Republicans additionally backed the oil ban, in contrast with 88 % of Democrats.

  • Quinnipiac College discovered comparable outcomes, with 71 % of People for the ban even when it raised costs, versus 22 % in opposition to. Breaking the outcomes down by occasion, 82 % of Democrats and 66 % of Republicans backed the ban.

  • Morning Seek the advice of’s most up-to-date ballot discovered that 49 % of U.S. voters supported sanctions on Russia’s oil and fuel exports no matter prices, with 28 % in favor of such a ban provided that it didn’t enhance costs.

But we additionally heard a couple of notes of warning. Voters are paying shut consideration to the conflict in Ukraine — for now.

Advertisement

Jason McMann, the pinnacle of geopolitical threat evaluation at Morning Seek the advice of, stated his staff was shocked to see 90 % of voters specific concern concerning the battle. But when the conflict drags on and voters paying larger costs don’t understand that their sacrifice is price it, a number of pollsters stated, the White Home’s Putin price-hike message may backfire.

Republicans will even have their say, and voters will likely be listening to competing messages.

“Gasoline costs started rising sharply greater than a 12 months in the past,” stated Michael McAdams, a spokesman for the marketing campaign arm of Home Republicans. “Voters aren’t going to consider Democrats’ determined try to shift blame for the disastrous outcomes of their conflict on American vitality.”

Mary Snow, a polling analyst at Quinnipiac College, pointed to a Feb. 16 ballot indicating that inflation ranked because the “most pressing problem dealing with the nation” amongst Republicans and independents — once more, effectively earlier than the invasion of Ukraine.

For that purpose, she stated, “blaming Vladimir Putin solely for larger gasoline costs may very well be a tough promote.”

Advertisement
  • Republicans who earlier this 12 months have been vocally opposed the US confronting Russia have modified their tune for the reason that invasion of Ukraine, Jonathan Weisman reviews. The New York Occasions continues its reside protection of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

  • Disney’s chief govt publicly opposed the anti-L.G.B.T.Q. laws in Florida that activists have known as the “Don’t Say Homosexual” invoice. Brooks Barnes reviews.

  • Democrats deserted efforts to incorporate a $15.6 billion emergency Covid response bundle in a broader $1.5 trillion spending invoice, Emily Cochrane reviews.

Thanks for studying. We’ll see you tomorrow.

— Blake & Leah

Is there something you assume we’re lacking? Something you need to see extra of? We’d love to listen to from you. E mail us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Homan taking death threats against him ‘more seriously’ after Trump officials targeted with violent threats

Published

on

Homan taking death threats against him ‘more seriously’ after Trump officials targeted with violent threats

Incoming Trump border czar Tom Homan reacted to news of death threats against Trump nominees on Wednesday and said he now takes the death threats he has previously received seriously. 

“I have not taken this serious up to this point,” Homan told Fox News anchor Gillian Turner on “The Story” on Wednesday, referring to previous death threats made against him and his family. 

“Now that I know what’s happened in the last 24 hours. I will take it a little more serious. But look, I’ve been dealing with this. When I was the ICE director in the first administration, I had numerous death threats. I had a security detail with me all the time. Even after I retired, death threats continued and even after I retired as the ICE Director. I had U.S. Marshals protection for a long time to protect me and my family.”

Homan explained that what “doesn’t help” the situation is the “negative press” around Trump. 

HARRIS NEVER LED TRUMP, INTERNAL POLLS SHOWED — BUT DNC OFFICIALS WERE KEPT IN THE DARK

Advertisement

President Elect Donald Trump, left, and new appointed Tom Homan, right (Getty)

“I’m not in the cabinet, but, you know, I’ve read numerous hit pieces. I mean, you know, I’m a racist and, you know, I’m the father of family separation, all this other stuff. So the hate media doesn’t help at all because there are some nuts out there. They’ll take advantage. So that doesn’t help.”

Homan’s comments come shortly after Fox News Digital first reported that nearly a dozen of President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees and other appointees tapped for the incoming administration were targeted Tuesday night with “violent, unAmerican threats to their lives and those who live with them,” prompting a “swift” law enforcement response.

ARMED FELON ARRESTED FOR THREATENING TO KILL TRUMP ATTENDED RALLY WEEKS AFTER BUTLER ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

Donald Trump in a blue suit and red tie pumps his fist in the air and looks up

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he arrives to speak at a campaign event at Nassau Coliseum, Wednesday, Sept.18, 2024, in Uniondale, N.Y. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

The “attacks ranged from bomb threats to ‘swatting,’” according to Trump-Vance transition spokeswoman and incoming White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

Advertisement

“Last night and this morning, several of President Trump’s Cabinet nominees and administration appointees were targeted in violent, unAmerican threats to their lives and those who live with them,” she told Fox News Digital on Wednesday. “In response, law enforcement acted quickly to ensure the safety of those who were targeted. President Trump and the entire Transition team are grateful for their swift action.” 

Sources told Fox News Digital that John Ratcliffe, the nominee to be CIA director, Pete Hegseth, the nominee for secretary of defense, and Rep. Elise Stefanik, the nominee for UN ambassador, were among those targeted. Brooke Rollins, who Trump has tapped to be secretary of agriculture, and Lee Zeldin, Trump’s nominee to be EPA administrator, separately revealed they were also targeted. 

Threats were also made against Trump’s Labor Secretary nominee, GOP Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, and former Trump attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz’s family. 

Trump holds fist

Republican candidate Donald Trump is seen with blood on his face surrounded by secret service agents as he is taken off the stage at a campaign event at Butler Farm Show Inc. in Butler, Pennsylvania, July 13, 2024.  Rebecca Droke/AFP via Getty Images (Rebecca Droke/AFP via Getty Images)

Homan told Fox News that he is “not going to be intimidated by these people” and “I’m not going to let them silence me.”

Advertisement

“What I’ve learned today I’ll start taking a little more serious.”

Homan added that he believes “we need to have a strong response once we find out is behind all this.”

“It’s illegal to threaten someone’s life. And we need to follow through with that.”

The threats on Tuesday night came mere months after Trump survived two assassination attempts.

Fox News Digital’s Brooke Singman contributed to this report

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrat Derek Tran ousts Republican Michelle Steel in competitive Orange County House race

Published

on

Democrat Derek Tran ousts Republican Michelle Steel in competitive Orange County House race

In a major victory for Democrats, first-time candidate Derek Tran defeated Republican Rep. Michelle Steel in a hotly contested Orange County congressional race that became one of the most expensive in the country.

Tran will be the first Vietnamese American to represent a district that is home to Little Saigon and the largest population of people of Vietnamese descent outside of Vietnam.

The race was the third-to-last to be called in the country. As Orange County and Los Angeles County counted mail ballots, Steel’s margin of victory shrank to 58 votes before Tran took the lead 11 days after the election. Tran was leading by 613 votes when Steel conceded Wednesday.

Tran was born in the U.S. to Vietnamese refugee parents. He said his father fled Vietnam after the fall of Saigon, but his boat capsized, killing his wife and children. Tran’s father returned to Vietnam, where he met and married Tran’s mother, and the couple later immigrated to the United States.

“Only in America can you go from refugees fleeing with nothing but the clothes on your back to becoming a member of Congress in just one generation,” Tran said in a post on X.

Advertisement

“This victory is a testament to the spirit and resilience of our community,” he said. “My parents came to this country to escape oppression and pursue the American Dream, and their story reflects the journey of so many here in Southern California.”

In a statement Wednesday, Steel thanked her volunteers, staff and family for their work on her campaign, saying: “Everything is God’s will and, like all journeys, this one is ending for a new one to begin.” Steel filed paperwork Monday to seek re-election in 2026.

The 45th District was among the country’s most competitive races, critical to both parties as they battled to control the House of Representatives.

With Steel’s loss, Republicans hold 219 seats in the House, barely above the 218-seat threshold needed to control the chamber.

Two races have yet to be called. A recount is underway in Iowa’s 1st Congressional District, where a Republican incumbent is leading her Democrat challenger by fewer than 800 votes. And in California’s agricultural San Joaquin Valley, Democrat Adam Gray holds a slender lead over GOP Rep. John Duarte, but the race remains too close to call.

Advertisement

Steel and Tran both focused heavily on outreach to Asian American voters, who make up a plurality of the district. The district cuts a C-shaped swath through 17 cities in Orange County and Los Angeles County, including Garden Grove, Westminster, Fountain Valley, Buena Park and Cerritos.

Born to South Korean parents and raised in Japan, Steel broke barriers in 2020 when she became one of three Korean American women elected to the House. She leaned on anti-communist messaging to reach out to older voters who fled Vietnam after the fall of Saigon in 1975.

Tran also focused on Vietnamese American voters and Vietnamese-language media, hoping that voters would leave their loyalty to the Republican Party in order to support a representative who shared their background.

Steel became a prime target for Democrats because, although she is a Republican, voters in the 45th District supported President Biden in 2020. The two-term congresswoman is a formidable fundraiser with deep ties to the Orange County GOP, including through her husband, Shawn Steel, the former chairman of the California Republican Party.

The Republican establishment and outside groups, including the cryptocurrency lobby and Elon Musk’s super PAC, spent heavily to defend Steel.

Advertisement

In a sign of the seat’s importance to Democrats, Gov. Gavin Newsom, former President Clinton and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) all joined Tran on the campaign trail in the weeks before the election.

The race was marked by allegations of “red baiting” after the Steel campaign sent Vietnamese-language mailers to households in Little Saigon that showed Tran next to the hammer-and-sickle emblem of the Chinese Communist Party and Mao Zedong.

Steel’s campaign said that the Tran campaign had been running Vietnamese-language ads on Facebook that accused Steel’s husband of “selling access” to the Chinese Communist Party and that said Steel could not be trusted to stand up to China.

Tran’s win is a key victory for Democrats, who fought to flip five highly competitive seats held by Republicans in California — more than any other state. Republicans were pushing to flip a district in coastal Orange County represented by Rep. Katie Porter (D-Irvine).

Democrat Dave Min beat Republican Scott Baugh in the costly contest for Porter’s seat and Democrat George Whitesides flipped the district represented by Republican Rep. Mike Garcia in L.A. County’s Antelope Valley.

Advertisement

In the agricultural Central Valley, Republican Rep. David Valadao easily won reelection over Democrat Rudy Salas. The race in the San Joaquin Valley between Gray, the Democrat, and Rep. Duarte, who won two years ago by 564 votes, remained too close to be called.

Continue Reading

Politics

Mississippi runoff election for state Supreme Court justice is too close to call

Published

on

Mississippi runoff election for state Supreme Court justice is too close to call

A runoff election for the state Supreme Court in Mississippi is too close to call between state Sen. Jenifer Branning and incumbent Justice Jim Kitchens as of Wednesday morning. 

Although Mississippi judicial candidates run without party labels, Branning had the endorsement of the Republican Party, while Kitchens had several Democratic Party donors but did not receive an endorsement from the party. 

Branning, who has been a state senator since 2016, led Kitchens by 2,678 votes out of 120,610 votes counted as of Wednesday morning. Kitchens is seeking a third term and is the more senior of the court’s two presiding justices, putting him next in line to serve as chief justice. Her lead had been 518 just after midnight Wednesday.

Mississippi state Sen. Jenifer Branning and Justice Jim Kitchens. (Lauren Witte/Clarion Ledger / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images | Barbara Gauntt/Clarion Ledger / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images)

NEWS ANCHOR DROPPED AFTER SOCIAL MEDIA POST TELLING TRUMP-HATERS SUPPORTING HARRIS: ‘STAY HOME, DON’T VOTE’

Advertisement

Around midnight Wednesday, The Associated Press estimated there were more than 11,000 votes still to be counted. In the Nov. 5 election, 7% of votes were counted after election night.

Branning had a substantial lead in the first round of voting with 42% compared to Kitchens’ 36%. Three other candidates split the rest.

The victor will likely be decided by absentee ballots that are allowed to be counted for five days following an election in Mississippi, as well as the affidavit ballots, according to the Clarion Ledger.

Voter turnout typically decreases between general elections and runoffs, and campaigns said turnout was especially challenging two days before Thanksgiving. The Magnolia State voted emphatically for President-elect Donald Trump, who garnered 61.6% of the vote compared to Vice President Harris’ 37.3%.

Branning and Kitchens faced off in District 1, also known as the Central District, which stretches from the Delta region through the Jackson metro area and over to the Alabama border.

Advertisement
Mississippi Supreme Court justices

Mississippi Supreme Court justices including Justice Jim Kitchens, seated at right, fourth from top, listen to arguments on July 6, 2023 in Jackson, Mississippi. (Photo/Rogelio V. Solis)

Branning calls herself a “constitutional conservative” and says she opposes “liberal, activists judges” and “the radical left.” The Mississippi GOP said she was the “proven conservative,” and that was why they endorsed her. 

EX-NY TIMES REPORTER ISSUES WARNING ON LIBERAL MEDIA, REVEALS WHY SHE HAD TO LEAVE

She has not previously held a judicial office but served as a special prosecutor in Neshoba County and as a staff attorney in the Mississippi Secretary of State’s Division of Business Services and Regulations, per the Clarion Ledger.

Branning voted against changing the state flag to remove the Confederate battle emblem and supported mandatory and increased minimum sentences for crime, according to Mississippi Today.

Kitchens has been practicing law for 41 years and has been on the Mississippi Supreme Court since 2008, and prior to that, he also served as a district attorney, according to the outlet.

Advertisement
Trump Harris

The Magnolia State voted emphatically for President-elect Donald Trump, who garnered 61.6% of the vote compared to Vice President Kamala Harris’ 37.3%. (Getty Images)

He is endorsed by the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Action Fund, which calls itself “a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond.” Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., also backed Kitchens.

In September, Kitchens sided with a man on death row for a murder conviction in which a key witness recanted her testimony. In 2018, Kitchens dissented in a pair of death row cases dealing with the use of the drug midazolam in state executions.

Elsewhere, in the state’s other runoff election, Amy St. Pe’ won an open seat on the Mississippi Court of Appeals. She will succeed Judge Joel Smith, who did not seek re-election to the 10-member Court of Appeals. The district is in the southeastern corner of the state, including the Gulf Coast.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending