Connect with us

Politics

Biden’s $1.9-trillion relief plan: Major victory gets mixed one-year reviews

Published

on

Biden’s .9-trillion relief plan: Major victory gets mixed one-year reviews

It’s not typically {that a} president will get all the pieces he asks for, however that’s what occurred.

President Biden needed $1.9 trillion to assist the nation climb out of the coronavirus disaster final 12 months, and Democrats in Congress delivered.

The American Rescue Plan was filled with rental help, tax rebates, direct funds and cash to distribute the COVID-19 vaccines that had simply turn into obtainable. Lower than two months after Biden took workplace, it was a hopeful signal that he might fulfill his marketing campaign promise to get Washington’s often-lumbering equipment working once more.

Advertisement

“Thank God you probably did it,” Biden informed Home Democrats throughout a caucus retreat Friday in Philadelphia. “Few items of laws, no hyperbole, in American historical past have carried out extra to elevate this nation out of a disaster than what you probably did.”

However the laws’s legacy is extra sophisticated than it initially appeared. Relying on who’s telling the story, it’s both Biden’s first success or a lure that he set for himself.

It might nicely show to have been a little bit of each.

Friday was the anniversary of Biden’s signing of the American Rescue Plan, and the second anniversary of the World Well being Group’s declaration that COVID-19 had turn into a world pandemic. Wanting again, administration officers defend the reduction bundle as a obligatory step to insulate the financial system and promote a nationwide rebound, and so they level to traditionally low unemployment now as proof of their success.

“ how resilient and equitable the restoration has been within the face of Delta, Omicron and now army battle in Europe, that technique already seems to be smart,” stated Gene Sperling, a Biden advisor tapped to supervise the laws’s implementation.

Advertisement

A fraction of the invoice’s spending was dedicated to instantly combating the pandemic, together with buying pictures and coverings, supporting testing and vaccination websites, and treating these contaminated with the virus that has killed greater than 959,000 folks within the U.S.

The remaining was meant to backstop state and native governments, ease the ache of job losses and pump cash into pocketbooks.

Critics say the latter set of insurance policies has pushed up costs by fueling shopper demand at a time when provide chains couldn’t sustain, sapping momentum from Democratic efforts to enact generational adjustments reminiscent of expanded teaching programs, backed baby care and monetary incentives for preventing local weather change.

“The gamble was it might create successful that might make folks wish to do extra,” stated Jason Furman, a Harvard College professor and former prime financial advisor to President Obama. “However it contributed to inflation that made folks wish to do much less.”

“In some methods, that’s the most important consequence,” he added. “It was a raffle, and so they misplaced that gamble, and it damage.”

Advertisement

Inflation hit 7.9% during the last 12 months — the very best in 4 many years — and Furman estimated the rescue plan was chargeable for about 2.5 proportion factors.

Michael Pressure, director of financial coverage research on the conservative American Enterprise Institute, pegs the determine at 3 proportion factors.

“We actually didn’t want one other stimulus. The financial system was already rising quickly,” Pressure stated, noting that President Trump had signed two measures totaling $3.1 trillion earlier than Biden took workplace.

Administration officers reject these inflation estimates, pointing to a examine from the San Francisco Federal Reserve Financial institution that stated the rescue plan contributed to lower than 1 proportion level of the rise.

“The stark actuality is that there are larger costs and provide chain shocks in nearly each main financial system on the planet,” Sperling stated.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, inflation was the paramount cause cited when Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) killed Democratic desires of utilizing their unified management of Washington to enormously increase the social security internet. Biden’s arguments that his agenda, referred to as “Construct Again Higher,” would restrict somewhat than enhance costs didn’t stick.

The failure of that laws sank efforts to increase the month-to-month baby tax credit score funds that started with the rescue plan. An estimated $93 billion was despatched to 40 million households with 65 million kids final 12 months.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) stated she had no regrets about any inflation that the laws may need brought on, describing it as a “consequence that we’ve got to work by means of.”

“There’s no query that the American Rescue Plan put cash in folks’s pockets, stored companies open, bought pictures in arms and did the type of issues that our financial system would wish if it was going to recuperate,” stated Jayapal, who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Biden remains to be making an attempt to get his aspirations again on monitor. Emilie Simons, a spokeswoman for the White Home, stated the president “continues to work with Congress on his agenda to decrease kitchen desk prices for American households — by addressing prescription drug costs, baby care, vitality prices, and extra.”

Advertisement

One 12 months after the American Rescue Plan was signed, the federal authorities has spent down practically all of its direct COVID-19 help, which boosted provide of at-home assessments, supplied free virus remedy for the uninsured and paid for vaccine doses despatched abroad to assist forestall the emergence of extra harmful variants.

The a whole lot of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} spent on tv advertisements, promotions and incentives drove up vaccination charges on the margins, however proved to be no match for rampant misinformation and partisanship surrounding the lifesaving pictures. The U.S. vaccination price for adults stands at 75% — nicely under different massive superior economies.

The White Home requested Congress this month for an extra $22.5 billion to proceed preventing the pandemic, together with cash for antibody remedies, a preventative remedy for the immunocompromised and to fund testing websites.

“We want this cash,” White Home Press Secretary Jen Psaki stated Thursday. “With out extra sources from Congress, the outcomes are dire.”

Lawmakers initially diminished the request, then dropped it utterly within the closing compromise government-wide spending invoice due to disputes over methods to pay for the recent expenditures. That leaves the White Home with the problem of reviving the proposal in a separate piece of laws that might have an uphill battle in a narrowly divided Senate.

Advertisement

The Omicron wave is quickly receding, however greater than 1,100 folks within the U.S. are nonetheless dying every day from the virus. The overwhelming majority will not be vaccinated or boosted.

Though the pandemic has lasted for much longer than Individuals hoped, the U.S. is way nearer to its pre-pandemic regular: masks mandates are on their approach out throughout the nation, practically all faculties are open for in-person studying, and places of work are starting to refill with employees as soon as once more.

As with the COVID-19 funds, a lot of the remainder of the cash from the rescue plan has already flowed out the federal authorities’s door, based on administration officers.

Greater than 170 million direct funds to people, referred to as Financial Impression Funds, price at the least $400 billion, have been distributed. The typical quantity was $2,300.

Colleges obtained $122 billion in reduction funding, with extra {dollars} being directed towards homeless college students and youngsters with disabilities. Almost $40 billion has been supplied to high schools and universities.

Advertisement

A further $39 billion was supplied to assist child-care companies. Greater than 150,000 suppliers who serve greater than 5 million kids have gotten cash.

Greater than $245 billion has been distributed to state, native, territory and tribal governments. One other $105 billion is scheduled to be distributed in Could.

This pool of {dollars} for state and native governments has turn into among the many extra controversial points of the rescue plan, with some critics arguing that it was pointless as a result of state governments finally noticed double-digit progress in tax income.

Heidi Sheirholz, who leads the liberal Financial Coverage Institute, stated the laws is “a core cause we’re in such an extremely robust restoration proper now.”

“I’m not saying it was good,” she stated. “However it made it so households didn’t want to enter austerity.”

Advertisement

The rescue plan additionally supplied practically half of the funding for a $46.5-billion emergency rental help program, which started slowly as state and native officers struggled to launch a brand new system from scratch.

Nonetheless, this system picked up steam final summer time, and greater than $25 billion has been distributed in 4.1 million funds. Treasury officers estimate that 80% of the cash went to low-income tenants. The remainder of the cash is anticipated to be spent by the center of this 12 months.

Sperling pointed to the rental help program for instance of how the rescue plan pays dividends into the longer term as a result of evictions are the type of setbacks that may derail American households for years.

“Stopping deeper harms goes to pay critical advantages, not simply when it comes to the longer-term financial system but in addition primary human well-being and dignity,” he stated.

Related Press writers Farnoush Amiri in Philadelphia, Michael Casey in Boston and Fatima Hussein in Philadelphia contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Politics

What is Evacuation Day? The forgotten holiday that predates Thanksgiving

Published

on

What is Evacuation Day? The forgotten holiday that predates Thanksgiving

When President Abraham Lincoln first proclaimed Thanksgiving a national holiday, little did he know he was spelling the beginning of the end to the prominence of the original patriotic celebration held during the last week of November: Evacuation Day.

In November 1863, Lincoln issued an order thanking God for harvest blessings, and by the 1940s, Congress had declared the 11th month of the calendar year’s fourth Thursday to be Thanksgiving Day.

That commemoration, though, combined with the gradual move toward détente with what is now the U.S.’ strongest ally – Great Britain – displaced the day Americans celebrated the last of the Redcoats fleeing their land.

Following the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia in 1776, New York City, just 99 miles to the northeast, remained a British stronghold until the end of the Revolutionary War.

Captured Continentals were held aboard prison ships in New York Harbor and British political activity in the West was anchored in the Big Apple, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Advertisement

GEORGE WASHINGTON’S SACRED TRADITION

Gen. George Washington parades through Lower Manhattan on Evacuation Day on Nov. 25, 1783 (Library of Congress lithograph via Getty)

However, that all came crashing down on the crown after the Treaty of Paris was signed, and new “Americans” eagerly saw the British out of their hard-won home on Nov. 25, 1783.

In their haste to flee the U.S., the British took time to grease flagpoles that still flew the Union Jack. One prominent post was at Bennett Park – on present-day West 183 Street near the northern tip of Manhattan.

Undeterred, Sgt. John van Arsdale, a Revolution veteran, cobbled together cleats that allowed him to climb the slick pole and tear down the then-enemy flag. Van Arsdale replaced it with the Stars and Stripes – and without today’s skyscrapers in the way, the change of colors at the island’s highest point could be seen farther downtown.

Advertisement

In the harbor, a final blast from a British warship aimed for Staten Island, but missed a crowd that had assembled to watch the 6,000-man military begin its journey back across the Atlantic to King George III.

SYLVESTER STALLONE CALLS TRUMP ‘THE SECOND GEORGE WASHINGTON’

John_van_arsdale_evacuation_day_nyc

John Van Arsdale replaces the Union Jack with the American flag as the British evacuate New York on Nov. 25, 1783. (Getty)

Later that day, future President George Washington and New York Gov. George Clinton – who had negotiated “evacuation” with England’s Canadian Gov. Sir Guy Carleton – led a military march down Broadway through throngs of revelers to what would today be the Wall Street financial district at the other end of Manhattan.

Clinton hosted Washington for dinner and a “Farewell Toast” at nearby Fraunces’ Tavern, which houses a museum dedicated to the original U.S. holiday. Samuel Fraunces, who owned the watering hole, provided food and reportedly intelligence to the Continental Army.

Washington convened at Fraunces’ just over a week later to announce his leave from the Army, surrounded by Clinton and other top Revolutionary figures like German-born Gen. Friedrich von Steuben – whom New York’s Oktoberfest-styled parade officially honors.

Advertisement

“With a heart full of love and gratitude, I now take leave of you. I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy, as your former ones have been glorious and honorable,” Washington said.

Before Lincoln – and later Congress – normalized Thanksgiving as the mass family affair it has become, Evacuation Day was more prominent than both its successor and Independence Day, according to several sources, including Untapped New York.

Nov. 25 was a school holiday in the 19th century and people re-created van Arsdale’s climb up the Bennett Park flagpole. Formal dinners were held at the Plaza Hotel and other upscale institutions for many years, according to the outlet.

An official parade reminiscent of today’s Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade was held every year in New York until the 1910s.

Advertisement
Fraunces_Tavern_NY

Fraunces’ Tavern, at Pearl and Broad Streets in New York City. (Getty)

As diplomatic relations with the United Kingdom warmed heading into the 20th century and the U.S. alliance with London during the World Wars proved crucial, celebrating Evacuation Day became less and less prominent.

Into the 2010s, however, commemorative flag-raisings have been sporadically held at Bowling Green, the southern endpoint of Broadway. On the original Evacuation Day, Washington’s dinner at Fraunces Tavern was preceded by the new U.S. Army marching down the iconic avenue to formally take back New York.

Thirteen toasts – marking the number of United States – were raised at Fraunces, each one spelling out the new government’s hope for the new nation or giving thanks to those who helped it come to be. 

An aide to Washington wrote them down for posterity, and the Sons of the American Revolution recite them at an annual dinner, according to the tavern’s museum site.

“To the United States of America,” the first toast went. The second honored King Louis XVI, whose French Army was crucial in America’s victory.

Advertisement

“To the vindicators of the rights of mankind in every quarter of the globe,” read another. “May a close union of the states guard the temple they have erected to liberty.”

The 13th offered a warning to any other country that might ever seek to invade the new U.S.:

“May the remembrance of this day be a lesson to princes.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Why Donald Trump still could not conquer Orange County

Published

on

Why Donald Trump still could not conquer Orange County

Donald Trump posted notable gains in Orange County during the November election, but it was not enough to win the increasingly purple county that has become a suburban battleground between Republicans and Democrats — and a reflection of the demographic political realignment unfolding across the nation.

Kamala Harris won Orange County, but by a much tighter margin than either Hillary Clinton in 2016 or Joe Biden in 2020. When it comes to presidential politics, Orange County has backed Democrats since 2016, with increasingly blue areas such as Santa Ana, Anaheim and Irvine besting more red areas such as Huntington Beach and south Orange County.

But experts say the 2024 results offer some warning signs for Democrats.

“What the early numbers indicate is that Donald Trump made inroads with minority voters including probably substantial gains with Latino and Asian voters,” said Jeff Corless, a former strategist for Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer. “What we’re hearing is that he made those same kinds of gains in other communities similar to Orange County across the country. He also made gains with traditional suburban voters, which he struggled with in 2020.”

Paul Mitchell, a Democratic data specialist, said Trump probably did better in the county because of lower Democratic turnout this year compared with 2020, as well as voters being familiar — and potentially comfortable — with Trump because of their experience during his prior tenure.

Advertisement

“It may also be Trump has been normalized, in an odd way,” Mitchell said. “He’s been in our political eyesight for the last decade now. Maybe voters like the economy better under Trump.”

In 2016, Clinton received roughly 100,000 more votes in Orange County than Trump, making her the first Democrat county voters selected for the presidency in 80 years. In 2020, Biden fared even better, besting Trump by more than 137,500 votes. Now, Harris has edged out Trump, but the margin of victory is on trend to be much tighter than seen in past elections.

Votes in Orange County are still being counted and final numbers aren’t required to be certified by the county until Dec. 5 and by the state until Dec. 13. But it’s clear, experts say, that Trump harnessed the disillusionment felt by voters who are unhappy with the direction of the country and the economic pains that have beset many living in the suburbs.

“People in the press and people like me still so often take Trump literally, whereas voters lived through this once and the apocalypse didn’t happen and they liked the economy better,” said Rob Stutzman, a veteran GOP strategist and Trump critic who previously advised former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

He noted that Trump’s improved performance in Orange County was not an outlier.

“He did better — look at how he did in New York, on the Eastern Seaboard, in Massachusetts,” Stutzman said. “There are red dots that never existed the last few decades.”

Advertisement

Still, there were some bright spots for Democrats, notably being able to hold on to a congressional seat that became open because Rep. Katie Porter of Irvine pursued an unsuccessful Senate bid, and flipping the 45th Congressional District. In that race, first-time candidate Derek Tran defeated Republican Rep. Michelle Steel of Seal Beach in a hotly contested race that became one of the most expensive in the country.

A UC Irvine poll released last year conveyed discord among Orange County voters, particularly Republicans and those who choose not to identify with a political party, who said despite their optimism about Orange County and somewhat about California, they did not have a good feeling about the future of America.

“The [election] results are much more a statement about people’s dissatisfaction with the current national administration than some grand statement about Trump or Republicans,” said Jon Gould, dean of the university’s School of Social Ecology.

“This is not a sign that Orange County is suddenly a red county,” Gould said. “This is exactly what it means to be a purple county.”

Michele Monda, a Republican who lives in the deep-blue city of Laguna Beach, voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 with her son and grandchildren in mind. The high housing costs and general lack of affordability have made it a challenge for middle-class couples, like her son and daughter-in-law, to build a life in many parts of California, including Orange County.

Advertisement

“Who is looking out for them?” Monda said. “They’re barely getting by, and quite honestly, the Democrats don’t seem to care. While I know Trump is a billionaire, I think he understands the needs of a middle-class person.”

Economics and Trump’s stance on immigration were the two main drivers that motivated her to vote for him. While she’s not always a fan of Trump’s behavior, she loves his policies. It’s not surprising, she said, that others in Orange County were swayed to his side as well.

“I think people have had enough of the Democrat party line, enough of the economy, enough of the whole platform. The things they espouse they just don’t work,” Monda said. “I think people in California are waking up.”

Trump’s improvement in the county has generated excitement among California Republicans who for years have tried to strengthen its hold on Orange County as Democratic voter registration grew and elections became more competitive.

For decades, Orange County was a conservative stronghold — the birthplace of former President Nixon, the cradle of Ronald Reagan’s ascent to the governor’s mansion and then the White House, and, for decades, a virtual synonym for the Republican Party of California.

Advertisement

The county’s shift over the last decade from deeply red to a more politically and demographically diverse region has fascinated the public for years.

“Orange County is a battleground,” said Jon Fleischman, a Republican campaign strategist and former executive director of the California GOP.

Trump’s popularity boost among Latinos and Asian Americans seen nationally could very well also be at play in swing counties such as Orange County. Republicans in the county for years have sought to attract Latinos and Asian Americans to their party with mixed success, and Trump’s performance could signal gains among these voter blocs, as well as Black Americans. He also won back some suburban women who turned against the Republican Party during his 2016 campaign and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn federal protection for abortion access in 2022.

Democrats leaned heavily into messaging about the loss of reproductive rights during this year’s campaign, in television ads and during their convention when they nominated Harris. However, Stutzman contended that the argument failed to resonate with suburban women in affluent areas such as Orange County as much as Democrats expected it to.

“Most women in America still have access — an overwhelming majority have access to abortion,” he said. “I just don’t know if there’s a connection, any real existential threat that their rights are being further eroded than they have been.”

Though Harris won the majority of votes across deep-blue California, Trump was on track to win Butte, Stanislaus, Fresno, Inyo, San Bernardino and Riverside counties, all areas that Biden carried in 2020. Trump also gained ground in Silicon Valley and Los Angeles County compared with 2016 and 2020.

“In order for Trump to win Orange County, he had to make inroads with minority voters, and he did that through issues that mattered to them and the struggles they’re facing,” Corless said.

Democrats’ ability to register voters in Orange County has also slowed.

Between October 2022 and October 2024, the Democratic Party in Orange County grew by just over 3,100 voters. At the same time, the Republican Party’s numbers swelled by 31,000 people, according to data from the California secretary of state.

Advertisement

In the years that the GOP voter registration waned, the number of nonparty-preference voters grew. Many longtime Republicans in Orange County, irritated by Trump’s outlandish speaking style and policy positions, branded themselves as “Never Trumpers.” But Republicans in Orange County have made a concerted effort this cycle to reregister former GOP voters and push early voting and mail ballots, a recognition of how much Trump’s opposition to such efforts harmed the party in 2020.

“When Trump was first elected, he was not everybody’s favorite flavor of ice cream, and I think you saw a lot of Republicans who decided to become independent,” Fleischman said. “I think as people have decided that they’re OK with Trump, they’ve been coming back to the party.”

The Republican Party of Orange County went as far as hosting a ballot collection day on Oct. 11 in which Republican Party offices served as designated ballot-drop locations. The move, it said at the time, makes voting more accessible while “maintaining the highest level election integrity.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

Published

on

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that Texas has the right to build a razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration into the Lone Star State. 

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the ruling on X, saying President Biden was “wrong to cut our razor wire.” 

“We continue adding more razor wire border barrier,” the Republican leader wrote. 

Wednesday’s 2-1 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals clears the way for Texas to pursue a lawsuit accusing the Biden administration of trespassing without having to remove the fencing.

TRUMP SAYS MEXICO WILL STOP FLOW OF MIGRANTS AFTER SPEAKING WITH MEXICAN PRESIDENT FOLLOWING TARIFF THREATS

Advertisement

It also reversed a federal judge’s November 2023 refusal to grant a preliminary injunction to Texas as the state resisted federal efforts to remove fencing along the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Eagle Pass, Texas.

U.S. Border Patrol agents cut an opening through razor wire after immigrant families crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee during the president-elect’s first term, wrote for Wednesday’s majority that Texas was trying only to safeguard its own property, not “regulate” U.S. Border Patrol, and was likely to succeed in its trespass claims.

LIBERAL NANTUCKET REELS FROM MIGRANT CRIME WAVE AS BIDEN SPENDS THANKSGIVING IN RICH FRIEND’S MANSION

Duncan said the federal government waived its sovereign immunity and rejected its concerns that a ruling by Texas would impede the enforcement of immigration law and undermine the government’s relationship with Mexico.

Advertisement
TEXAS BORDER RAZOR WIRE

A Venezuelan immigrant asks Texas National Guard troops to let his family pass through razor wire after they crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

He said the public interest “supports clear protections for property rights from government intrusion and control” and ensuring that federal immigration law enforcement does not “unnecessarily intrude into the rights of countless property owners.”

Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton called the ruling a “huge win for Texas.” 

“The Biden Administration has been enjoined from damaging, destroying, or otherwise interfering with Texas’s border fencing,” Paxton wrote in a post on X. “We sued immediately when the federal government was observed destroying fences to let illegal aliens enter, and we’ve fought every step of the way for Texas sovereignty and security.”

Texas border

Migrants attempt to cross the southern border in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, in February. (David Peinado/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The White House has been locked in legal battles with Texas and other states that have tried to deter illegal immigration. 

In May, the full 5th Circuit heard arguments in a separate case between Texas and the White House over whether the state can keep a 1,000-foot floating barrier on the Rio Grande.

Advertisement

The appeals court is also reviewing a judge’s order blocking a Texas law that would allow state officials to arrest, prosecute and order the removal of people in the country illegally.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending