Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont man charged in the murder of missing Bradford man – VTDigger

Published

on

Vermont man charged in the murder of missing Bradford man – VTDigger


A Vermont State Police cruiser seen in Burlington on Thursday, Jan. 23. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

A Bradford man in Vermont State Police custody is accused of killing Corey Crooker, who was first reported missing in January, according to state police.

James D. Nickles Jr., 42, is facing charges of second-degree murder, unauthorized burial or removal of a dead body and providing false information to police, according to state police spokesperson Adam Silverman. A judge found probable cause for the charges Friday, and the Vermont State Police obtained an arrest warrant for Nickles.

Crooker was last seen by family members on Jan. 9 and last heard from five days later.

Vermont State Police initially deemed Crooker’s disappearance “not suspicious” but later obtained evidence that the circumstances of the case were “criminal in nature.”

Advertisement

Nickles had been in federal custody on firearms charges arising from the investigation into Crooker’s disappearance when he was charged with his killing, according to state police.

According to reporting by NBC5, Nickles, while in custody, allegedly confessed to shooting Crooker on Jan. 14 during an argument over drugs.

Nickles later disposed of the body by burning it in a fire pit, NBC5 reported. Police found evidence at the scene but could not positively identify the remains at that time, the outlet reported.

The agency this week also arrested Lisa Akey of Bradford in connection with Crooker’s death. Akey has been charged with being an accessory after the fact, obstruction of justice and providing false information to a police officer, according to state police.

Advertisement





Source link

Vermont

Vermont high school sports scores, results, stats for Monday, Dec. 22

Published

on

Vermont high school sports scores, results, stats for Monday, Dec. 22


The 2025-2026 Vermont high school winter season has begun. See below for scores, schedules and game details (statistical leaders, game notes) from basketball, hockey, gymnastics, wrestling, Nordic/Alpine skiing and other winter sports.

TO REPORT SCORES

Coaches or team representatives are asked to report results ASAP after games by emailing sports@burlingtonfreepress.com. Please submit with a name/contact number.

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.

Advertisement

Contact Judith Altneu at JAltneu@usatodayco.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter: @Judith_Altneu.

SUNDAY’S H.S. GAME

Girls hockey

Saranac-Lake Placid 5, Burlington/Colchester 1

S/LP: Emma Clark 2G. Kayla Harvey 1G. Emii Colby 1G, 1A. Addison Colby 1G. Stephanie Killbourne-Hill 2A. Lyndsee Reardon 1A. Harper Strack 1A. Allison LaHart 34 saves.

B/C: Austen Fisher 1G. Taylor Davidson 1A. Logan Jewett 30 saves.

MONDAY’S H.S. GAMES

Girls basketball 

Games at 7 p.m. unless noted

Advertisement

Lyndon at Lake Region, 6 p.m.

BFA-St. Albans at North Country, 6:30 p.m. 

Mount Abraham at Fair Haven

Thetford at Hazen

Burlington at Milton

Advertisement

Spaulding at Harwood

Lamoille at U-32

Montpelier at Peoples

Randolph at Oxbow

Boys basketball

Games at 7 p.m. unless noted

Advertisement

U-32 at Mount Mansfield

Middlebury at South Burlington

Girls hockey

Middlebury at Burlington/Colchester, 4:20 p.m.

Essex at Rice, 5:25 p.m. 

Boys hockey

Burlington at Champlain Valley, 5:15 p.m.

Advertisement

Missisquoi at Essex, 5:30 p.m.

Colchester at Rice, 7:30 p.m.

Middlebury at South Burlington, 7:40 p.m.

Spaulding at St. Johnsbury, 6 p.m.

Stowe at Harwood, 5 p.m.

Advertisement

TUESDAY’S H.S. GAMES

Girls basketball 

Games at 7 p.m. unless noted

Harwood at Lake Region

Enosburg at Middlebury

Missisquoi at BFA-Fairfax

Vergennes at Williamstown

Advertisement

Richford at Stowe

Essex at Colchester

Winooski at Twinfield/Cabot

Danville at Sharon, 8 p.m. 

Mount Mansfield tournament

Advertisement

Rutland vs. South Burlington, 5:30 p.m.

Mount Anthony vs. Mount Mansfield, 7:30 p.m. 

Boys basketball

Games at 7 p.m. unless noted

Burr and Burton at Rice

Spaulding at Hartford

Advertisement

Woodstock at Randolph

Mount Abraham at Harwood

Enosburg at Hazen

Stowe at Milton

Rutland at Burlington

Advertisement

Colchester at Montpelier

Lyndon at Lake Region

Essex at Lamoille

Twinfield at Danville

Missisquoi at BFA-St. Albans, 7:30 p.m.

Advertisement

(Subject to change)





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

All gifts matched to keep Vermonters warm and informed – VTDigger

Published

on

All gifts matched to keep Vermonters warm and informed – VTDigger


Dear Readers,

There are just days left in our Warmth Support Program partnership, and right now, your gift can do double duty for Vermont.

Until midnight on Dec. 25, every donation is matched dollar for dollar and helps provide two days of emergency heat to a Vermont household in need through the Warmth Support Program of Vermont’s Community Action Agencies.

Local news helps Vermonters understand what’s changing on the local, state and federal level — and how to respond. VTDigger delivers daily and investigative news that you can rely on year round. This work takes resources, and it’s powered directly by our readers.

Advertisement

At the same time, thousands of households in Vermont are struggling to afford basic heat right now. The community-funded Warmth Support Program of Vermont’s Community Action Agencies fills critical gaps when other fuel assistance isn’t available. Funds go directly to fuel suppliers to prevent shutoffs and keep families from running out of heat.

If you’re able, please make a gift that’s meaningful to you before midnight on Dec. 25 and it will be matched! Plus it will warm homes.

Thank you for helping connect Vermonters to the information and resources we need to look out for one another this season.

Sincerely,

Advertisement
” data-medium-file=”https://i0.wp.com/vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Libbie-Sparadeo-Headshot.jpeg?ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Libbie-Sparadeo-Headshot.jpeg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i0.wp.com/vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Libbie-Sparadeo-Headshot.jpeg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-540487″ style=”width:150px”/>

Libbie Sparadeo

Director of Membership and Engagement, VTDigger


P.S. If you or someone you know needs heat assistance, you can learn more about the Warmth Support Program and find contact information here.


The donation to the Warmth Support Program of Vermont’s Community Action Agencies is generously underwritten by our partnership sponsor, Vermont Gas, so that 100% of your gift to VTDiggers supports our newsroom.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Nine Vermont dams were removed in 2025. There are many more to go.  – VTDigger

Published

on

Nine Vermont dams were removed in 2025. There are many more to go.  – VTDigger


The landscape before and soon after the removal of Newport’s Sleeper Pond Dam in Oct. 2025. Photo courtesy of the Missisquoi River Basin Association

There are at least 140 dams in the Winooski River watershed, according to Michele Braun, executive director of the Friends of the Winooski River. Three of those dams help with flood control. Fifteen provide hydropower. A “handful” contribute to local recreation. 

But the rest? They “aren’t doing anything but causing trouble,” Braun said. 

“The great majority of those dams serve no purpose and are a public safety hazard, as well as bad for the river health and fish,” she said. 

Advertisement

Braun helped lead an effort to remove two dams in Barre City and Barre Town this year, part of a decades-long effort to get rid of derelict or harmful dams along Vermont’s waterways. According to the Vermont Natural Resources Council, local and regional organizations removed nine dams this year, the most in a single year, reconnecting 125 miles of river. 

More than 80 dams have been removed since the 1980s, some of which were more than a century old, said Karina Dailey, science and restoration director for the council, who also chairs the Vermont Dam Task Force. 

There are plenty more to go. Vermont’s dam safety program and local watershed partners have identified 47 dams that would be good candidates for removal, along with 27 active projects at different stages of preparation for removal and 12 projects that have stalled, according to a task force report. 

Dam removals have gained urgency in recent years as Vermont communities have been battered by repeat floods. An increasing body of research shows that some dams can worsen flooding. Five dams failed during flooding in 2023, sustaining heavy damage, according to state investigators. 

Advertisement

Removing dams can also benefit the local ecosystem, improve water quality and improve recreational opportunities for swimmers and boaters, according to the task force’s website. 

But dam removals can be a long and arduous process. The first challenge, Dailey said, is getting the dam owners on board. Many of the dams pegged for potential removal are privately owned, and the landowners have no obligation to participate in the process. 

Braun said that one of the dams her organization removed this year was owned by Trow and Holden Co. Initially, the owners expressed an emotional attachment to the dam, which was built in the 1800s and powered a factory that manufactured tools for the granite industry. Braun won them over by showing how getting rid of the dam would lower the flood elevation behind their building and make the river more predictable in the future. 

Dailey said the “silver lining” of the 2023 flood is that landowners are now “connecting the dots between the flood hazard in their yard of owning this dam, and not wanting to be liable for impacting downstream infrastructure or communities.” 

A historic photo of the Trow & Holden Brooklyn Street Dam. Photo courtesy of Friends of the Winooski River

She gave the example of a dam failure in Williamstown that caused “quite a lot of damage.”

Advertisement

 “The landowner had to do an emergency breach to stabilize the project because we couldn’t remove it fast enough to get all the funding and the permits,” she said. The task force is hoping to get the dam removed sometime next summer. 

Dam removals tend to be more complex than other infrastructure projects, requiring specialized construction companies and a variety of permits, Braun said. The state also sets a hard stop: All river projects have to be finished by October. 

Although removal projects can benefit the local flora and fauna, they can also cause short-term upheaval to animal habitats and vegetation. Lindsey Wight, executive director of the Missisquoi River Basin Association, said that the crew removing the Sleeper Pond Dam in Newport had to carefully relocate snapping turtles.

An excavator works to remove the Trow & Holden Dam in Sept. 2025. Photo courtesy of Friends of the Winooski River

“We got to dive into the muck and get a couple of turtles and bring them up Mud Creek a little bit farther to just sort of keep them out of the way,” she said. 

Greg Russ, restoration director of the White River Partnership, said the organization had to plan their use of heavy equipment around the local bat roosting season when they removed the Farnham Bros. dam in Tunbridge. The crew also had an archeologist on site throughout the project documenting any details uncovered about the roughly 100-year-old dam for future researchers. 

Advertisement

Dailey said she was glad to see so many projects move forward this year despite the chaotic situation at the federal level. The federal government froze funding specifically for dam removal that had already been committed in February, and for a while the task force thought those projects might not happen at all. 

Although the funding has since been restored, lining up grants and loans for new projects is an ongoing challenge, Dailey said. At the Army Corps of Engineers, one of the most important Vermont staffers took a federal buyout and hasn’t been replaced, she said. Cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency have left it short-staffed, slowing down approval for a dam removal in Northfield. 

“The money supposedly is still there and hasn’t gone away, and the project will still move forward,” Dailey said. “But there’s just not enough staff to review it to keep it moving along.” 

She said she expects the Trump administration’s actions will affect funding for years down the line, impacting the possibility of future projects. 

In the meantime, the waterways that had dams removed this year will slowly change as they adapt to the new shape of the landscape. 

Advertisement

“Really the first five years is where the river is sort of just creating its natural channel, and it meanders a lot,” Dailey said. 

“You watch a rain event, and the river just starts moving and meandering more and more,” she said. “And that’s really exciting, because that’s what rivers do, how rivers function.”

Braun noted one immediate benefit of the Trow & Holden dam removal. At the kickoff meeting for the removal, her team spotted a dozen trout swimming right up behind the dam. 

“We were all so excited to see them, because soon they would be able to be connected to the rest of the river system,” she said. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending