Connect with us

Vermont

How did gay marriage become legal? How civil unions paved the way 25 years ago.

Published

on

How did gay marriage become legal? How civil unions paved the way 25 years ago.


Gay marriage, once an unpopular concept nationwide, is widely accepted in Vermont today.

“People take for granted that same-sex couples can get married nowadays,” said Bill Lippert, 75, one of Vermont’s first openly gay lawmakers. “You can reference your husband or wife casually now in conversation. But if you weren’t around 25 years ago, there isn’t always an appreciation for how hard we had to fight.”

April 26 marks the 25th anniversary of civil unions – marriage for same-sex couples in all but name – becoming state law. Although civil unions were deeply controversial even among Vermonters at the time, they served as the first pivotal step toward full marriage equality, Lippert said.  

In 2000, Vermont became the first place in the world to grant marriage-equivalent legal rights to same-sex couples. Domestic partnerships existed in some places, but those unions “usually only granted a few legal rights,” Lippert said.

Advertisement

“The eyes of the whole country and world were focused on what Vermont was doing in 2000,” said Lippert, who helped craft the civil unions bill while serving on the house judiciary committee.

Three years later Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriage, followed by Connecticut and Iowa in 2008. Vermont followed suit in 2009. Several more states legalized same-sex marriage before U.S Supreme Court finally made it nationwide law in 2015 through the Obergefell v. Hodges case.  

“One can see the direct connection between what Vermont did in 2000 with civil unions to what followed in Massachusetts and eventually with Obergefell in 2015,” Lippert said.

Life before civil unions

Prior to the creation of civil unions, gay and lesbian couples lacked “a thousand more rights” than married straight couples, Lippert said, no matter how long they had been together.

Advertisement

For instance, if one partner in a same-sex relationship was in hospital, the other partner did not automatically have the power of attorney.

“That was one of the most painful ones,” Lippert said.

Lippert recalled one particularly egregious case that happened to a lesbian couple with a child. When the partner who had given birth to the child died in a car crash, her parents fought for custody even though the two women had been raising the kid together.

“The list goes on and on,” Lippert said.

Although Vermont eventually established “second parent adoption” in 1993, there still wasn’t a “legal connection between partners,” Lippert noted.

Advertisement

“That side of the triangle was missing,” he said.

The road to civil unions: ‘The Baker Case’

In the late 90s, three lawyers and three same-sex couples decided it was time to test Vermont’s marriage laws.

In 1998, three Vermont same-sex couples applied for marriage licenses in Chittenden County. When their marriages were denied, they filed a lawsuit that became known as Baker v. Vermont, or informally ‘the Baker Case,’ after the last name of one of the plaintiffs. A Vermont Superior Court judge ruled to dismiss the case, so the plaintiffs made an appeal to the Vermont Supreme Court.

What the Vermont Supreme Court did next shocked everyone. Instead of either legalizing gay marriage or striking down the case, the justices ruled in 1999 that same-sex couples should be afforded all the same legal rights as heterosexual couples but left it up to the Vermont legislature whether to grant gay couples the ability to marry or form an equivalent union.

Advertisement

“Personally, I was shocked because I had been assured by the attorneys fighting for gay marriage that we would never have to vote on it in the legislature,” Lippert said. “Many of my colleagues were, frankly, beyond anxious – terrified – because they never wanted to deal with the issue because it was so controversial.”

At the time, some states were changing their constitutions to outlaw gay marriage. The Defense of Marriage Act also went into effect two years prior. In Vermont specifically, only 20% of residents supported gay marriage.

Gay marriage “was not a popular proposal,” Lippert recalled. “It was hotly condemned and fought against by major religious groups as an affront to their religious sacraments.” One of their main fears was that churches would be forced to marry gay couples.

‘Separate but equal’

The Vermont legislature was already in mid-session when the court dropped the issue of gay marriage in their laps. The house judicial committee, where Lippert served as vice chair, was tasked with writing the bill that would grant gay couples the right to marry or to form an equivalent union.

After listening to weeks of testimony from supporters and opponents of gay marriage, the committee voted to create a “parallel legal structure,” which they named civil unions, Lippert said.

Advertisement

“It was very disappointing for the attorneys and advocates, but it was clear that we did not have the votes to create full marriage for same-sex couples,” said Lippert, who was among the three committee members to vote for gay marriage.

Some gay marriage advocates at the time found the idea of civil unions insulting and akin to the concept of “Separate but equal.”

Some activists said civil unions were like “having to sit on the back of the bus” and refused to support the bill, Lippert said. “Others said, ‘At least we’re on the bus.’”

The lawsuit plaintiffs and their attorneys decided “it was better to pass something achievable than pass something that would fail and then get nothing,” Lippert said.

Victory uncertain

On the day house reps were scheduled to vote, Lippert and his committee members weren’t sure if they had enough support to pass civil unions in house. Some representatives wouldn’t share their plans, while others kept saying they “needed more information” before they could decide which way to vote.

Advertisement

For some representatives, a “yes” vote guaranteed they would lose their seats in either the primary or general elections later that year.

“Until the roll call, none of us knew we were going to win,” said Lippert. “It would have taken a few votes to switch and we would have lost.”

After 12 hours of debate and testimony that day, the Vermont house voted 76-69 to pass the civil unions bill.

Lippert primarily attributed the win to “courageous” gay Vermonters, loved ones and other advocates who shared personal stories throughout the bill process. Some gay people even came out publicly for the first time to throw their support behind the bill.

Lippert also thinks the “hateful phone calls and letters” legislators received made them realize why civil unions were necessary.

Advertisement

“They saw why we needed this,” Lippert said. “That if this is the level of prejudice and hatefulness that comes at me, what must it be like for gay people? The hate backfired.”

Once civil unions passed the house, it was much smoother sailing for gay advocates. The senate, which had a higher percentage of Democrats than the house, passed civil unions 19-11.

Gov. Howard Dean, who already voiced his approval of civil unions, signed the bill into law soon after – albeit behind closed doors and without fanfare.

“He said publicly that marriage for same-sex couples made him uncomfortable” but that he could back civil unions, Lippert remembered. Even still, Dean’s support was “crucial.”

Advertisement

“If he hadn’t been willing to say he would sign the bill, I don’t think we would have passed it,” Lippert said. “People wouldn’t have risked voting for it.”

The aftermath

Later that year, 17 legislators who voted for civil unions in April 2000 lost their seats to opponents who promised to help repeal the institution. Dean, who had to wear a bulletproof vest during his gubernatorial campaign, also faced an ardent anti-civil unions challenger.

“It’s hard to explain the level of controversy and some of the hatefulness directed at the governor and lawmakers,” Lippert said.

The following session, the now more conservative house managed to repeal civil unions by one vote, but the effort died in the senate.

Between 2000 and 2009, thousands of gay couples from other states and nations traveled to Vermont to enter civil unions. They wanted legal recognition of their relationship somewhere even if their home state or country wouldn’t respect it, Lippert said.

Advertisement

“At the time, I would have been happy to have settled the case in court,” Lippert said. “But looking back, I think it would have garnered greater backlash if the court had granted gay marriage or an equivalent institution directly.”

That’s what happened in Hawaii. In 1996, the Hawaiian Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to deny marriage to same-sex couples. An enormous public backlash ensued, and by 1998, Hawaiians had changed their state constitution to outlaw gay marriage.

Amending Vermont’s constitution wouldn’t have been as easy – it takes multiple years versus only one in Hawaii – but there definitely were some lawmakers who wanted to, Lippert said. Such an amendment never got off the ground, however.

“My view is civil unions was a historic step for civil marriage for same-sex couples,” Lippert said. “Saying that full marriage equality was important does not take away from civil unions moving us to marriage equality in a profound way.”

Lippert and his spouse eventually entered a civil union themselves. They then got married once Vermont legalized what Lippert now calls “full marriage equality.”  

Advertisement



Source link

Vermont

Poll: Most young Vermonters say they’re likely to leave state amid affordability concerns – VTDigger

Published

on

Poll: Most young Vermonters say they’re likely to leave state amid affordability concerns – VTDigger


University of Vermont students gather at a protest on campus in Burlington in April 2022. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Theo Wells-Spackman is a Report for America corps member who reports for VTDigger.

Nearly two-thirds of Vermonters ages 18 to 34 say they’re likely to leave the state within five years in search of adventure or a cheaper place to live, according to a poll from the University of New Hampshire.  

Overall, the poll estimated that 86% of Vermonters find the state at least somewhat unaffordable.

“The issue of affordability has been a very important thing across New England,” said UNH political science professor Andrew Smith, who runs the institution’s survey center. The poll, released Tuesday, includes response data for five New England states, excluding Maine.

Advertisement

In general, the survey found, most residents say Vermont is a good place to live — or even a great one.

Nevertheless, about 40% of Vermonters of all ages want to leave the state, according to the report from Smith’s team. Housing prices and other cost-of-living concerns are the foremost drivers of the trend, researchers found, followed by tax rates. Connecticut and Rhode Island showed similar overall rates of desired departure.

Among young people, though, Vermont’s numbers stand out.

Smith’s research found that 63% percent of Vermonters between 18 and 34 say they’re somewhat or very likely to move out of the state in the next five years. That’s a much higher rate of planned departure than in any other state surveyed. Responses varied from 28% in New Hampshire to 44% in Connecticut. 

But according to Smith, New England often sees a beneficial “boomerang effect”: former residents eventually returning to their home states, often as higher earners.

Advertisement

In a Wednesday press conference, Gov. Phil Scott said that although he hadn’t seen the poll, he wasn’t surprised by reports that many Vermonters are considering a move.

“I think there’s a lot of frustration out there,” he said. “We have a lot of work to do to make Vermont the affordable state that these folks need.”

About half of young Vermonters who said they want to move away cited the cost of living as a primary reason, while roughly as many said they were looking for a “new adventure or more excitement.” By contrast, less than a quarter of those older than 64 foresee leaving, according to the poll. 

Outmigration of young people could worsen the state’s existing workforce shortage, according to Kevin Chu, who leads the research nonprofit the Vermont Futures Project. Scott’s administration has made workforce development a priority in light of what his office called a “growing demographic crisis.”

Chu added that by design, services such as public education and healthcare are supported disproportionately by working households that tend to pay higher taxes and insurance premiums. When the base of income earners shrinks, the problem can then intensify for those bearing the brunt of rising costs, he added.

Advertisement

“There’s a demographic reality in which the economic burden is being shouldered by a small and shrinking pool of young working-age people,” Chu said.

Tuesday’s poll also indicated that Vermonters who have completed more education say they’re less likely to leave the state. For Chu, that’s likely because such households tend to earn more — and also because they tend to be older.

Julie Lowell, deputy director of the Montpelier research nonprofit Public Assets Institute, offered a grain of salt in relation to Tuesday’s report. While migration is crucial to keep track of, Vermont’s overall population turnover tends to be about 5% or less each year, she said. And although the state does have an unusual number of young people intending to leave, that age group is always the most mobile in any study, she said.

In recent years, more of Vermont’s older population has possessed more wealth to contribute to public services, Lowell added. For example, she said, her organization has found that more Vermonters aging out of the workforce has not appeared to decrease state tax revenues in recent years. 

But it’s true that many Vermonters are struggling to make ends meet, she said. The state’s lowest earners have seen low wage growth in relation to other New England states, she said, and basic needs are getting harder to cover.

Advertisement

“We’re seeing prices, in large part driven by housing and healthcare, really outpacing our increases in household incomes,” Lowell said. “Many people are feeling insecure.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont offers money to replace diesel vehicles with electric

Published

on

Vermont offers money to replace diesel vehicles with electric


Vermont officials are offering $5.9 million in funding to help replace older diesel-powered vehicles and equipment with electric alternatives across the state.

The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation is accepting applications for the funding through the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust, according to a community announcement. The program aims to reduce emissions by supporting conversions to all-electric equipment used in transportation and industry.

The new funding is open to a wide range of vehicle and equipment types, including class 4–8 trucks, school buses, transit buses, forklifts weighing more than 8,000 pounds, airport ground support equipment, freight switchers and certain marine engines.

Advertisement

Eligible applicants include federal, state, regional and municipal agencies, along with public institutions and private businesses whose vehicles operate in Vermont at least 80% of the time.

Public entities can receive up to 85% of project costs, while private businesses may qualify for up to 75%, according to the announcement.

The opportunity may be particularly relevant for farms, food producers, food hubs and distributors that rely on diesel-powered trucks or heavy equipment.

Applications are accepted on a rolling basis, with submissions due by the last day of each month until December 2026 or until funding runs out.

Advertisement

Applicants can review full details at https://dec.vermont.gov/air-quality/vw-environmental-mitigation-funds/vw-request-applications.

This story was created with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Superior Court mourns Judge Dickson Corbett – Valley News

Published

on

Vermont Superior Court mourns Judge Dickson Corbett – Valley News


THETFORD — Vermont Superior Court Judge Dickson Corbett died unexpectedly last week.

Former colleagues said Corbett was found unresponsive Thursday morning and was taken to Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, where he was pronounced deceased. Colleagues and friends said he died of natural causes.

Corbett was in his mid-40s. His death cuts short a career characterized by an intelligent, kind and community-oriented approach to the law, his colleagues said.

“His passing is a devastating loss to our communities,” Kiara Senecal, co-executive director of Orange County Restorative Justice, said in an interview. “He was doing what he was doing for the right reasons, and that truly showed up in his work.”

Advertisement

Efforts to reach Corbett’s family were unsuccessful. His wife, Megan Campbell, is also a lawyer and works in the Vermont Attorney General’s Office. They have two children, ages 16 and 13. After years living in Chelsea, a short walk from the Orange County Courthouse, they moved to Thetford around the time Corbett became a judge.

Corbett’s mild-mannered and soft-spoken demeanor was backed by a deep knowledge and understanding of the law and a commitment to public service, colleagues said.

“He was a dedicated public servant,” Will Porter, the former Orange County state’s attorney who hired Corbett as a deputy in 2013, said in an interview. Corbett “never saw the law as a means to make money,” Porter said.

A native of Pennsylvania, Corbett earned a bachelor’s degree in English at the University of North Carolina, and graduated from Vermont Law School in 2007 with juris doctor and master’s of environmental law degrees.

“I just recall that he was very active,” said Shirley Jefferson, who was then the law school’s associate dean of student affairs and diversity. He was community-oriented, and also took an interest in the school and its well-being, she said.

Advertisement

He clerked in Orange and Windsor county courts while working out his career plans, and when Porter hired him in 2013, judges had assured him that Corbett was a bright light.

He quickly proved himself to be a strong researcher, an excellent writer, a patient listener with victims and witnesses who also could build good relationships with judges, Porter said.

“He made light-strides the first year he was here,” he said.

Corbett was so capable that Porter assumed he’d quickly move on to bigger things, but instead the young deputy immersed himself in the job and stayed for a decade, taking over for Porter after he retired in 2021.

In addition to his work, Corbett served as the town moderator in Chelsea and served on the town Planning Commission before moving to Thetford.

Advertisement

Corbett’s approach to the law put politics to the side. He remained an independent, but both major parties recommended his appointments as state’s attorney and as judge.

He was eager to be a judge, mainly because he felt he could help more people in that role.

“He was a true scholar of the law, so it was natural for him to be a judge,” Orange County State’s Attorney Colin Seaman, whom Corbett hired as a deputy, said in an interview.

“He was just the most wonderful,” Michelle Donnelly, Washington County state’s attorney and a close friend of Corbett and his family, said in a phone interview. “He was so smart and had such a capacity to research and study the law, but he was also incredibly kind and compassionate. … He wanted to understand people’s stories.”

Corbett had all the makings of a jurist who would fit well on either the state Supreme Court or the federal bench, Porter said. But at the same time, he was not one to chase a title or acclaim, but wanted to find ways to be of help, Donnelly said.

Advertisement

“It was about what he could do through the work,” she said.

‘A profound loss’

Official statements about Corbett’s death stress how great a loss this is for the judiciary. He was assigned to hear cases in Windsor County and was overseeing several with a high public profile.

“I am saddened to learn of the passing of Judge Dickson Corbett,” Gov. Phil Scott, who appointed Corbett to serve as Orange County state’s attorney in 2021 and as a superior court judge in 2023, said in a statement. “I always appreciated his dedication to improving the lives of Vermonters through public service. This is an unfortunate loss for Vermont and the Judiciary, and my heart goes out to Dickson’s family, friends, and colleagues during this difficult time.”

“This is a profound loss for the judiciary and for the many people whose lives were touched by his dedicated public service,” Court Administrator Therese Corsones and Chief Judge Thomas Zonay said in a statement last Thursday.

Advertisement

A conversation with Corbett helped turn Seaman into a public servant after 20 years in private law practice. In court in Chelsea one day in early 2023, Corbett talked to him about an opening in the Orange County state’s attorney’s office. He took the job and replaced Corbett soon after, when Corbett became a judge.

“All I can say about him,” Seaman said, “he is the one who always strived to do what was right.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending