Connect with us

Vermont

How 1975 sparked the state Vermonters are in today – VTDigger

Published

on

How 1975 sparked the state Vermonters are in today – VTDigger


When 82-year-old George Aiken retired to his Putney home in 1975 after a lifelong political career as a state representative, speaker of the House, lieutenant governor, governor and U.S. senator, the man who chose green for the color of Vermont’s license plates and coined the term “Northeast Kingdom” dismissed all the accolades.

“The nation will survive,” the now late officeholder dryly told the Rutland Herald upon his return that Jan. 3.

But historians, knowing Aiken held boyhood memories of a turn-of-the-20th-century horseback rider hollering that President William McKinley had been assassinated, knew it was the end of an era.

And the beginning of another.

Advertisement

“My birthplace has been torn down, and there’s a $7 million marker over it — call it Route 91,” Aiken told this reporter in 1982. Harboring no ill will, he proclaimed at its Putney opening in 1961, “We’re on the verge of the greatest development Vermont has ever seen.”

A half-century after Aiken’s retirement, the slow, steady caterpillar of a state he knew has experienced a metamorphosis.

“Vermont’s national political image was that of ‘Silent Cal’ (the nickname of President Calvin Coolidge), its literature was that of Robert Frost, and its music was represented by ‘Moonlight in Vermont,’” longtime journalist Chris Graff recalled at a recent Vermont Humanities talk. “Today its political image is that of Bernie (Sanders), its literature is that of Julia Alvarez, its music is represented by Phish, Grace Potter and now by Noah Kahan.”

“It’s my belief,” Graff summed up, “that no other state has changed as much as Vermont has in these 50 years.”

For those not around in 1975, newspapers of the time chronicle how people plugged into television (“Wheel of Fortune” debuted that Jan. 6), movies (“Jaws” premiered in June to beget the “summer blockbuster”) and landline telephones (both rotary-dial models and, as New England’s then-sole provider unveiled that fall, push-button ones).

Advertisement

Few paid attention to reports that a 19-year-old named Bill Gates had just dropped out of Harvard University to join a friend in creating a seemingly sci-fi micro-computer software company they’d call “Microsoft,” or that the journal “Science” had sprung a new term in an even more headshaking piece titled “Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?”

Graff, for his part, would graduate from Middlebury College that spring, then take a $120-a-week journalism job to begin a three-decade career reporting for such statewide outlets as the Associated Press and Vermont Public Television. He remembers when, with the final sections of Interstate 91 under construction, the old adage “you can’t get there from here” was about to be put out to pasture.

“Vermont is closer to the world today than it ever has been,” Graff said. “We are still small, we’re still rural, but we’re no longer completely divorced from the rest of the country. We’re no longer at the end of the pipeline. The interstate brought Vermont closer. The internet has completed that change.”

This new year, history reveals, may be the start of another new era.

The state opened the first stretch of Interstate highway (pictured here) in Brattleboro in 1960 and completed the last link from St. Johnsbury to New Hampshire in 1982. Photo courtesy Brattleboro Historical Society

‘Watching and waiting’

Jan. 1, 1975, began with big political news: The New Year’s Day convictions of former President Richard Nixon’s onetime attorney general, chief of staff and domestic adviser for covering up the Watergate political scandal that forced their boss to resign the year before.

Advertisement

“This moves us close to the final chapter of this unhappy episode in American history,” Senate Watergate Committee Vice Chair Howard Baker was quoted on the front page of the next day’s Burlington Free Press, then Vermont’s largest paper.

The Free Press and its main competitors at the Rutland Herald and Barre-Montpelier Times Argus expanded their Monday-to-Saturday coverage 50 years ago by launching Sunday editions, all which previewed the state’s 1976 introduction of a March presidential primary.

“The presidential hopeful seen most prominently thus far in Vermont has been former Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter, whose strategy of building an early lead in the Democratic presidential race is keyed to winning in early primary states like New Hampshire, Florida and perhaps Vermont,” the Herald and Times Argus reported Nov. 2, 1975.

For its part, WCAX, the state’s largest yet once-limited television station, added a southern transmitter that year to beam into Bennington County (and, tapping cable, into Windham County in 1983). But Vermonters weren’t necessarily eager for more ways to learn how the future would unfold.

“A University of Vermont psychologist sees this nation at the beginning of a new year ‘watching and waiting, not knowing in what direction it is going,’” the Free Press reported Jan. 2, 1975. “Americans, said Dr. George W. Albee, former president of the American Psychological Association, ‘sense that the world is drifting, that things are out of control and no one knows what must be done to fix them.’”

Advertisement

Aiken’s successor in the U.S. Senate understood that sentiment.

“I find that people have very much the same concerns no matter where they live in the state of Vermont, no matter what their political affiliations are,” Patrick Leahy said in a 1974 campaign film. “They’re not satisfied with the way Congress has been acting. They feel the economy is getting out of hand and it’s hurting people.”

Leahy, then 34, was the first Vermont Democrat elected to the U.S. Senate, winning a dozen years after Philip Hoff claimed the same distinction as governor. Residents today may think of the state as a seedbed for progressive politics. But before Hoff and Leahy, it was the only one in the nation to have supported the top of every Republican ticket — Nixon included — since the Grand Old Party’s founding in 1854.

“The bond between Vermont and the Republican Party made a lot of sense at the time,” Graff said. “It was formed out of a dislike for slavery and a belief in the sanctity of the union of states. Vermonters stood firmly behind the party of Abraham Lincoln, and over the years that commitment, cemented by the Civil War, was strengthened by a belief that the Republican philosophy meshed well with small-town, rural life.”

But that loyalty changed after Watergate and the arrival of back-to-the-landers with more liberal views. Graff would move to the state capital of Montpelier to cover the GOP’s eventual loss of its legislative majority when Democrats won the House in 1986 and the Senate in 1996.

Advertisement

“We think of Vermont as now this dominant Democratic state,” the journalist said, “but that’s really pretty recent for those of us who actually have a longer perspective.”

Two men in front of a store. One man is wearing a hat and coat, raising a hand. The other man is holding newspapers. Window signs in the background.
George “Hap” Pierce refuses literature from Liberty Union Party candidate Bernie Sanders during a campaign stop in Bennington in 1976. Photo by Rob Woolmington/Bennington Banner

‘This statistic should not be surprising’

The state’s image over the past half-century has changed in other ways. Take the story of Sabra Field. In 1975, the then 40-year-old aspiring artist received a big break when the Vermont Bicentennial Commission, preparing to mark the nation’s 200th birthday the next year, selected one of her posters for exhibit in Washington, D.C.

Field, set to celebrate her 90th birthday this April, didn’t know her prints depicting red barns and blue skies would go on to become synonymous with the Green Mountain State, landing on the cover of Vermont Life magazine, an annual namesake calendar and, most famously, nearly 180 million postage stamps.

Childhood friends Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield can tell a similar tale. The two, born within four days of each other in March 1951, went their separate ways in 1975 when Greenfield met his future wife, according to the book “Ben & Jerry’s: The Inside Scoop.” They didn’t know they’d reunite two years later, split the $5 tuition for a correspondence course in ice cream making and create what’s now heralded as a “multibillion-dollar” company.

Or consider the even longer, stranger trip of Sanders. Fifty years ago, he was a thirtysomething also-ran who had lost a 1974 bid for U.S. Senate under the banner of the alternative Liberty Union Party. Leahy, his opponent, felt so unthreatened, he encouraged his son to babysit Sanders’ 4-year-old during one debate.

As Leahy wrote in his 2022 memoir: “In the thick of a campaign, it was one of those rare genuine win-wins: competitors, never enemies; just two dads coming up with a solution that, coincidentally, would make the little ones in both families happier for avoiding having to fidget and sit through 90 minutes of politics.” 

Advertisement

Sanders would join Leahy in the Senate in 2007. But in 1975, the onetime fringe candidate (bagging just 4% of the vote the year before) explored legal action against WCAX for not granting his party airtime to rebut Democratic and Republican messages.

“Bernard Sanders,” the Bennington Banner reported that Sept. 25, “called the denial ‘grossly unfair,’ and said he has asked the Federal Communications Commission for clarification of the so-called ‘fairness doctrine’ governing equal time on controversial issues.”

Unable to respond on television, Sanders turned to letters to the editor.

“According to the latest study done by the Federal Reserve Board,” he wrote in one published by the Banner that Dec. 9, “90% of all state and local tax-exempt bonds are held by the wealthiest 1% of the population. This statistic should not be surprising in light of the fact that 2% of the American population owns one-third of the nation’s wealth and 80% of all publicly held stock.”

Sound familiar? Not all thoughts of a half-century ago have aged so well. The University of Vermont released a report in 1975 that called the nearly completed interstate “overbuilt and underused,” researcher Benjamin Huffman wrote in “Getting Around Vermont.”

Advertisement

“The volume of traffic per mile of Vermont interstate highway,” Huffman continued in a Herald and Times Argus commentary that Oct. 12, “was only one-third the national average and one-fourth the New England regional average.”

Since then, the state’s population has risen 35% from a 1975 count of 479,713 to a current estimate of 648,493, according to the U.S. census — an increase second only to the 242% leap Vermont saw in the five decades after its founding in 1791.

“When I look back at this half-century, what stands out for me is the surge of development — and the state’s response,” Graff said. “Throughout this 50-year period, we’ve seen governors grapple with this tension between economic development and environmental protection, really trying to find that point of how much development can we handle?”

The question, he said, still awaits an answer.

Three men in suits converse in a room; one sits drinking from a cup, while the other two stand, engaged in discussion. A Coca-Cola machine is visible in the background.
Patrick Leahy (center) campaigns for the U.S. Senate in November 1974 with then Gov. Thomas Salmon (left) and Brattleboro state Rep. Timothy O’Connor (right). Photo by J. M. Soper/Brattleboro Reformer

‘What the solutions would be’

Finally, there’s the story of the former seventh-grader forced to go to the bureaucratic bore of Montpelier at the start of 1975 to see his father elected Vermont’s first Democratic speaker of the House.

Back then, I wasn’t interested in the significance of Timothy O’Connor winning in a chamber with a shrinking Republican majority, or the selection of my dad’s fellow legislators (and future governors) Richard Snelling as GOP leader, James Douglas as his assistant and Madeleine Kunin as Democratic whip.

Advertisement

As a reporter 50 years later, I’m now witnessing the once-new infrastructure of my youth overwhelmed by an unprecedented flood of demands, be it for state education funding, health care, stormwater drainage or safety nets for people struggling with poverty, mental health, alcohol or drugs.

Plainfield Town Clerk Bram Towbin summed up the situation after record rain in 2024 destroyed an estimated $1 million in local property — or about 10% of the town’s grand list: “The system is not designed for this.”

Graff, now retired, acknowledges the deluge of challenges.

“There’s a reason all of this hasn’t really been solved,” he said in an interview. “It is incredibly difficult.”

Many residents are looking to the Legislature, set to convene this month, for some sort of fix. But Graff notes that advances such as Vermont’s first-in-the-nation civil unions (the 2000 precursor to same-sex marriage) came only after the state Supreme Court ruled that everyone was entitled to the same rights and protections and ordered lawmakers to make it happen.

Advertisement

“Throughout Vermont history, there have been a number of issues that have been so controversial that action only came when the courts stepped in and forced it,” he said.

The state’s relatively small number of residents adds to the complications, as Graff notes the count is about the same as that of Portland, Oregon.

“We have a population that’s equal to a city and yet we’re required to do everything a state does,” he said. “How do you do all this when you don’t have the financial base to do it?”

Graff cites a quote from life coach Tony Robbins: “Change happens when the pain of staying the same is greater than the pain of change.”

“I think there are answers,” Graff said, “and the answers are painful. You reach that tipping point when seeing the homelessness, the school inequities and the infrastructure problems that are out there becomes more painful than what the solutions would be — which, in many cases, are going to be additional taxes.”

Advertisement

Even so, Graff holds out hope. The journalist remembers covering his first Vermont gubernatorial inauguration a half-century ago when he spotted the chief executive set to take office, Thomas Salmon, walking to the Statehouse.

“What surprised me,” Graff recalled, “was there was no entourage.”

This month, newly reelected Gov. Phil Scott is set to follow suit in exactly the same way. For all its growth and change, Graff said, Vermont remains “of human scale.”

“I think that’s the greatest thing we have going for us,” he concluded. “We have neighborhoods. We have communities. We have a better chance than anywhere in the country to still forge solutions.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont state police seek help locating 60-year-old Enosburg man – Newport Dispatch

Published

on

Vermont state police seek help locating 60-year-old Enosburg man – Newport Dispatch


ENOSBURG — Vermont State Police are seeking assistance in locating John Reynolds, 60, who has not been seen since Nov. 13.

Reynolds is believed to be in the Enosburg/Berkshire area.

While there are no signs that he is in immediate danger or that his absence is under suspicious circumstances, concerns have been raised regarding his welfare.

Advertisement

Authorities are urging anyone who might have information about Reynolds’ whereabouts to reach out to the VSP St. Albans at (802) 524-5993.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage

Published

on

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”

“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

Advertisement

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

With major changes to Act 250 underway, a new board takes the reins

Published

on

With major changes to Act 250 underway, a new board takes the reins


This story, by Report for America corps member Carly Berlin, was produced through a partnership between VTDigger and Vermont Public.

Gov. Phil Scott has appointed the members of a new board that will administer Act 250, Vermont’s statewide development review law.

The new Land Use Review Board replaces the old Natural Resources Board, a shift mandated under Act 181, a major land-use reform law passed last year. That law takes steps to relax Act 250’s reach in existing downtowns and village centers across the state, and also lays the groundwork for extending Act 250’s protections in areas deemed ecologically sensitive.

But the new law also changes how Act 250 is administered. The Land Use Review Board is made up of five full-time members with relevant professional experience — a significant change from the former citizen-board structure. The new members have backgrounds in municipal and regional planning, environmental law, and civil engineering. The review board will also play a key role in overseeing a years-long mapping process that will cement Act 250’s jurisdiction in the future. (Regional district offices still make permitting decisions on individual projects, however).

Advertisement

“Vermont faces a significant housing crisis and the work of this board will play a very important role in helping us address it, while protecting our beautiful landscape and environment,” Scott said in a statement announcing the appointments earlier this week. “I’m confident this board has the diverse expertise, work ethic, and passion to tackle the work that’s required in Act 181 while also forwarding common sense improvements to the law to further our shared goals.”

The new board chair, Janet Hurley, currently serves as the assistant director and planning program manager for the Bennington County Regional Commission. Before that, she worked as a local planner throughout the state, in Manchester, South Burlington, Milton, and Westford, according to a press release from Scott’s office.

Since Act 250 was enacted in 1970, “it can certainly be credited with saving Vermont from rampant development,” Hurley said in an interview. “But it can also certainly be responsible for the depth of our housing crisis, because the burden of Act 250 permitting — often duplicative, especially in our town and village centers — just made housing development that’s affordable much more difficult to achieve for so many years.”

In the past, new housing projects would trigger Act 250 review based on how large they were, and how many homes a developer had already built in a given area during a given timeframe. That system could in fact lead to the sprawl it was trying to prevent, prompting developers to avoid bumping up against Act 250 permitting by building “smaller scale, single family home development dispersed around our towns and villages,” Hurley said.

Act 181 shifts the permitting program toward “location-based jurisdiction,” meaning some areas of the state that already have robust local zoning review and water and wastewater infrastructure could be exempt from Act 250 altogether. That new system will take years to implement, though, and the transition will be one of the board’s primary tasks.

Advertisement

As that longer process plays out, lawmakers made temporary exemptions to Act 250 last year. They were designed to encourage dense housing in already-developed areas, and so far, the carve-outs appear to be working as intended. Hurley thinks loosening Act 250’s rules around housing will make a big difference.

“The market just can’t bear the cost of construction at this point, and so any relief to the financing of new housing development is going to be meaningful,” Hurley said.

More from Vermont Public: Vermont loosened Act 250 rules for housing. Here’s where developers are responding

Still, members of the board think Act 250 will continue to play an important role in years to come.

“The housing crisis requires us to act swiftly, and that means a lot more housing, period,” said Alex Weinhagen, current director of planning and zoning in Hinesburg and another new board member. “But larger projects have impacts, and the whole point of having a development review process is to make sure that we acknowledge those and that the projects, you know, do what they can to minimize them.”

Advertisement

To Weinhagen, Act 181’s goals were to reform statewide development review so that “it’s smarter, it works better, it’s applied consistently across the state, and it’s only used when it’s needed — and not used in places where there’s adequate local level development review happening,” he said.

The board will study whether appeals of Act 250 permits should be heard by the board itself — or continue to be heard in state environmental court. Legislators and administration officials hotly debated the issue last session, arguing over which option would in fact speed up lengthy appeal timelines, and ultimately directed the new board to assess it further.

The other members of the new board include L. Brooke Dingledine, an environmental attorney in Randolph; Kirsten Sultan, an Act 250 district coordinator in the Northeast Kingdom with a background in engineering; and Sarah Hadd, a former local planner and current town manager for Fairfax, according to the press release.

The new board appointments took effect on Jan. 1, and the board will begin its work on Jan. 27.

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending