Connect with us

Vermont

Dying on Lynda’s terms – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Dying on Lynda’s terms – The Boston Globe


A man emerged from the farmhouse and placed a seat cushion on the frozen ground for her bare, swollen feet and helped her into a wheelchair. Paul took the handles of the chair and gently rolled her toward the farmhouse, the place she had carefully selected to end her life.

Lynda Bluestein reached out and greeted fellow congregants after taking part in a conversation at The Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Westport, Conn., about her terminal illness and her advocacy for medical aid in dying as well as her quest to spread wind phones across the state of Connecticut. Lynda did not want a funeral or memorial service after her death, and in a way these appearances became a living send-off, a way to say goodbye to a church she had gone to for more than 30 years and the friends she had made there.
Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

She would have preferred to die at her home of more than 20 years in Bridgeport, surrounded by the memories she forged with her husband, her two children, and two grandchildren. Lynda had lingered there, in her house near the ocean, reluctant to leave, even as her condition rapidly deteriorated. But her most urgent wish, the one she had argued and fought for, was to decide for herself when and how she died.

She believed it is a right anyone with a terminal illness should have, akin in importance to a woman’s right to choose whether to end a pregnancy. But medical aid in dying is illegal in her state, as it is in Massachusetts and all but 10 states across the country. In the three years since doctors diagnosed her with terminal ovarian cancer, she had waged a campaign to call public attention to the issue and excoriate policy makers she saw as squeamish about death.

Advertisement

She gave countless interviews and, hoping her story would change policy in Connecticut and elsewhere, allowed a documentary film crew and two Boston Globe journalists to chronicle the last months of her life. She was the face behind a 2022 lawsuit arguing that a Vermont law allowing medical aid in dying only for state residents violated the US Constitution. She prevailed, and the state last spring granted her permission to die there legally.

Two months later, lawmakers went even further, extending the right to all terminally ill patients who wished to end life on their own terms. The change made Vermont the only state besides Oregon to allow medical aid in dying for nonresidents. It was celebrated by proponents as a landmark victory, one that might even persuade other states to shift.

Following a conversation at The Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Westport, Lynda paused to check on her husband, Paul, who had broken his leg prior to the engagement. Earlier Lynda had joked with the crowd, “I probably don’t look like the hospice patient you have in mind but here I am. I’ll do better next time.”Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

But as the Bluesteins arrived at the farmhouse, a new worry surfaced. Lynda was so weak that she sank deeply in the wheelchair as her husband backed the chair up a ramp to the porch and into the house.

To carry through with her plan, she had to be physically able and mentally competent to take the fatal dose of medication herself, according to Vermont’s law. She needed to be able to drink a cocktail of medications and hold it down long enough for it to work. Lynda was sick now, throwing up constantly, and it was unclear whether she could take the final steps of her journey.

Paul and the man who had come from the house to help him, a hospice specialist named Bill Kilgour, gave her morphine and helped her into a bed, where she soon fell into a deep slumber.

Advertisement

It was dusk. Gray light shown softly in the windows. Paul slept on a couch at the foot of his wife’s bed. Lynda was scheduled to give herself the fatal medication the next morning. Kilgour, who was there to assist in the final hours and moments, sat in the next room.

“I don’t think this is going to happen,” he said, shaking his head. “I hope I’m wrong.”

Lynda made the first call on the newly installed wind phone at Ridgebury Congregational Church. Lynda placed a call on the rotary phone connected only to the wind in a quiet grove beside the church. At an earlier wind phone dedication Lynda had explained that after her diagnosis she realized that she was going to have to find a way to deal with her own grief, “How can I not be among this family anymore? How can I not be a presence in this world anymore and how are my children gonna stay connected to me when I can’t be here in this body?” She told a crowd, “This was a symbol to me of how I am going to stay connected by love to my family, if I had a place to put a wind phone where Paul could go and I could remind him you’ve got to make the bed every day.”
Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

Lynda Shannon Bluestein and her husband supported the concept of medical aid in dying long before cancer struck her. They attended a Unitarian church, and, unlike many religions that oppose the concept, the Unitarians were a driving force to pass a bill in Oregon, the first state to legalize medical aid in dying in 1997.

Indeed, Lynda had been advocating for causes that bucked convention most of her life, a fact that may have grown out of the independent streak that made her question most everything around her. During her childhood years on a Texas cattle ranch in the empty rangeland south of San Antonio, she couldn’t accept the prevailing fundamentalist Christian beliefs that her mother held.

She discovered in herself a passion for social activism and an impulse to right things she believed to be wrong. After her family moved from rural Texas to the sprawling city of Anaheim near Los Angeles, she went to college, volunteered to work with poor people in Appalachia, and as a nurse dove into a movement in California advocating that women have more control over the deliveries of their babies. She endured physical and verbal abuse while escorting women seeking abortions at clinics stalked by hostile opponents of abortion. Years later, she got a vanity license plate: ACTVST.

Advertisement

Paul Bluestein was an obstetrics and gynecological doctor in Orange County. When Lynda first met him, she immediately began lobbying him to start allowing fathers into the delivery rooms where their children were born — a radical notion in those days. “She was a force of nature,” Paul recalled of that meeting. He yielded to her demand, and his practice became the first in Orange County to do so.

Lynda (left) embraced Diana Barnard, a doctor of palliative care at Porter Medical Center, after her first of two required in-state, in-person visits with Barnard that Vermont requires in order to obtain a prescription for medical aid in dying. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

Lynda and Paul became a couple and married in 1982. And when Paul got a job in New York in 1991, they moved to Connecticut, bringing with them Jacob and Aimee, Lynda’s then young children from a previous marriage. As soon as she arrived in Connecticut, Lynda took up gun control as a cause and cofounded a group that successfully lobbied for an assault-rifle ban in the state in 1993.

For some three decades, a bill to legalize medical aid in dying in Connecticut languished in committee year after year, never emerging for a vote. It infuriated Paul, who vehemently believed that terminal patients should have control over their own destinies. His beliefs ran counter to the stances of many physicians organizations at the time. Ten years ago, he volunteered to testify on behalf of a bill to legalize medical aid in dying.

Lynda felt equal passion, but hers was fueled by the searing experience of her mother’s death in 1994. In the sparsely populated part of Texas where Lynda first lived, people died in their homes, not hospitals, she said, and she didn’t like the idea of anyone having to die in a hospital. And then she learned that her mother was dying in one.

She rushed to her mother’s side and was horrified by what she found. Her mother, riddled with cancer, had kept her terminal illness a secret until she was on her death bed, so delirious with pain that she had to be heavily medicated.

Advertisement

“By the time I got there, she was so far gone she was unable to talk,” Lynda said. “We were unable to have the conversations we needed to have. Why put it off? Waiting for what?”

It so horrified her that Lynda resolved in that moment she would not die like her mother.

“Unfortunately,” she said, “when it came to cancer, I had my mother’s DNA.”

Exhausted after a meeting with VITAS hospice social worker Janet Moran (right) who had come to check in on Lynda and her family at their home, Lynda got up to to go lie down. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

Cancer first struck in 2018, when Lynda was diagnosed with breast cancer. Then, the following year, while she was still undergoing treatment, came another diagnosis, this time melanoma. She endured three surgeries in 2019.

When the doctors told her she was cancer-free, she triumphantly declared to Paul, “I’m done. We’re gonna live again.”

Advertisement

They loved music, having sung in their church choir for decades, and they embarked on a tour of destinations across the country to take in musical shows. They went to New Orleans, Nashville, Memphis, and Charlotte.

But then, in March 2021, calamity struck. Lynda went to see her doctor. Her gut had been bothering her. She underwent an MRI. When the results came back, Lynda’s doctor, a close friend and colleague of Paul’s, called their home and Paul answered the phone. The news was shattering.

“It’s not your gut,” Paul told Lynda. “It’s your ovaries.”

The cancer was advanced. It had metastasized. The diagnosis was terminal.

“We stood there in the bedroom for I don’t know how long, holding onto each other, crying, sobbing,” Lynda recalled. “The picture in my mind was of a clock, ticking.”

Advertisement

After a 270-mile journey from her home, Lynda arrived at Bill Kilgour’s home hospice. With her terminal cancer at such a late stage, edema had caused her feet to swell so badly that she could no longer stand without being in severe pain so Kilgour went to the car to help lift her. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

She started chemo in April 2021. She also started thinking about how she would die.

The seed of an idea had already been planted, by a woman she had met two years earlier in an exercise class for cancer patients. At the time, Lynda was being treated for breast cancer and melanoma and her prognosis was good. The woman, Cathey April, had terminal lung cancer. The two clicked.

“We talked for hours,” Lynda recalled.

April told Lynda she planned to move to Vermont in order to take advantage of the state’s medical aid in dying law.

That meant taking up residence there for at least six months before ending her life. So, with her illness worsening, she found an apartment in a small town in Vermont’s Northeast Kingdom.

Advertisement

April succeeded in establishing residence and finding a doctor to help her proceed under Vermont’s law. When she decided she had suffered enough, she moved into the hospice home here that Bill Kilgour runs and, a week later, on Feb. 3, 2022, with her husband, son and daughter by her side, contacted Lynda in Connecticut, asking her to light a candle at 10 a.m., the time she would take the fatal dose.

“I’m taking flight,” April told Lynda.

Now with her own fatal diagnosis, Lynda wanted to follow the same path. But she chafed at the idea of having to move to Vermont to make it happen.

Lynda spread her arms wide to greet her daughter, Aimee, as she arrived to the home hospice where she would say goodbye to her mom for the last time. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

Luckily for Lynda, Compassion & Choices, an advocacy group that champions the rights of terminally ill people, shared her frustration over the residency requirement. In his lobbying for changing the law in Connecticut, Paul had become friendly with the staff at Compassion & Choices, including president and CEO Kim Callinan. After Lynda’s terminal diagnosis, Paul called Callinan for advice.

Callinan called Lynda, asking if she’d be a plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging Vermont’s residency requirement.

Advertisement

“I said yes, immediately,” Lynda recalled.

Callinan told Lynda there was another plaintiff, Dr. Diana Barnard, a hospice and palliative care physician in Middlebury, Vt., who was frustrated that she could not offer medical aid in dying to her patients from neighboring New York.

It was the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Lynda and Barnard forged a formidable team. In August 2022, they sued the state of Vermont, arguing the residency requirement in Vermont’s 2013 medical aid in dying law violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause, among others.

Seven months later, lawyers on both sides had hammered out a settlement, allowing Lynda to take advantage of Vermont’s medical aid in dying process without establishing residency. Two months later, prompted by Lynda’s case, Vermont legislators passed, and Governor Phil Scott signed, a new law ending the residency requirement.

Advertisement
As a hospice nurse admitted Lynda into her care, Bill Kilgour, who runs the home hospice where Lynda had chosen to die sat in his living room and waited. Lynda had waited so long to come to Vermont that now he feared it may have been too late. If she was not able to swallow the medication that would end her life, or keep it down they would have to resort to a hospice death, which was what she had not wanted.

Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

Lynda was now free to carry out her plan, under the care of Barnard. But the law still presented a host of legalistic and bureaucratic hoops Lynda had to jump through.

She had to meet with Barnard on two separate occasions, for hours, to explain her condition and why she wanted to end her life. She had to submit a separate written request to Barnard, stating the same thing that she had said in the face-to-face meetings. Then she had to consult with a second physician, as if Barnard’s counsel was not enough.

The law also required her to find two people who would witness her written request, affirming that she appeared to understand what she was signing and was not under duress.

It was a requirement that infuriated Lynda, particularly when she recalled what Cathey April had told her she endured to fulfill it three years earlier.

Already quite sick after moving to Vermont, and having no connections in the state, April had gone to a nearby coffee shop in search of people who might sign. The first person she approached refused. She then asked a man working on a trash truck on the street outside, who had the same reaction: No. April walked into another cafe. One person agreed to sign the form; everyone else shook their heads.

Advertisement
Bill Kilgour measured out apple juice to add to the medication that would cause Lynda’s heart to stop before mixing it and handing it to her so that she could end her life and the suffering that had come with her terminal cancer.Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

April was distraught. By the time she made it inside a bookstore, she was out of breath and in tears. The owner took pity on her and signed the form.

“The law treats people like they are children, or incompetent, with no agency,” Lynda said, after her second meeting with Barnard at Porter Medical Center in Middlebury in August. “These are not safeguards. They are arbitrary hurdles that make people who are already suffering suffer even more.”

At one of the meetings in July with Barnard, Lynda asked a Globe columnist [see editor’s note] and also a member of the documentary team following her story to sign the form saying she knew what she was doing and wasn’t under duress.

Lynda checked the signatures, slipped the forms into a folder, and later said, “I wish it had been that easy for Cathey.”


“I’m afraid,” Paul Bluestein said.

Advertisement

Labor Day weekend was upon them. The family had gathered in the Bluesteins’ living room, Lynda and her husband and two children, Jake and Aimee. A social worker from a Connecticut hospice practice had come to talk to them. Paul was trying to explain how he felt about Lynda’s increasingly imminent death, and how he would feel when she was gone.

“Even now,” he said, “I find it hard to focus to get things done.”

The social worker nodded and said that feeling was likely to come and go, that he would “come in and out of grief.”

The social worker turned to Lynda and asked about her grief.

“Mine is I’m not going to see things,” Lynda said. “I won’t see my granddaughters grow up.”

Advertisement
Lynda’s family members, (from left) Husband Paul, son Jake, granddaughter Abigail, daughter Aimee, and granddaughter Josie, gathered around her to tell her how much they loved her before she took the medication that would end her life. Months earlier while speaking to a crowd at her church in her home state of Connecticut Lynda said, “I love my children and I’m going to love you always, we’re connected by love.”

Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

The social worker talked of memories and how each of them would find their own way to remember Lynda, always.

Aimee was in tears. Lynda asked her daughter what she remembered about her grandmother, dead for nearly 30 years.

“Her mac and cheese,” Aimee said.

“You don’t cry when you have mac and cheese now,” Lynda said. “It makes you smile. We no longer cry when we think of our dogs who have died. Memories are going to get us through this. We’re just lucky that we have time to talk about this stuff. People don’t talk about dying.

Advertisement

“A good death is what I want. I don’t want to get so sick and not know who you are. I don’t want you to look at me and I’m in so much pain we can’t talk. I’m always going to be there. My voice will come. When I was 6 or 7 years old, I knew what heaven would be. I told a nun that God was going to serve mashed potatoes with every meal. Heaven was getting your favorite food. But now I realize heaven is what I have now.”


Lynda did not want a funeral or a memorial service. But she did have certain requests. She told Paul he had to make the bed. Every day.

A funeral home worker removed Lynda’s body from the Vermont home hospice that she had traveled to from Connecticut so that she could access medical aid in dying to end her life. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

And she wanted to leave something tangible behind. Something that would help those who grieve. She settled on wind phones, a tradition started in Japan that encourages people to maintain spiritual contact with dead loved ones by speaking to them on old, disconnected phones installed in peaceful settings.

Lynda began collecting old phones. She asked her son, a general contractor, to install them in various places in Connecticut: her back garden, a church in Ridgefield, a library in Westport. She created a nonprofit to install wind phones across the country for anyone to use.

For almost all of her 76 years, Lynda was a vibrant, vivacious woman. But as fall crept toward winter, each day seemed to take something away. The things she loved to do — gardening, baking, cooking, writing — she began to do less of.

Advertisement

The mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine, shook her. As her days dwindled, the drumbeat of shootings, the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the state of the nation in general, weighed on her.

“I now look back on so much of my advocacy as a lot of sound and fury that changed nothing,” she said in November.

For all her frustration, she was determined to follow through on her final cause, her most intensely personal advocacy.

On Thanksgiving, she took a bite of stuffing and got violently ill, her body failing.

She made her last preparations. She picked the house where she would die. It had to be Bill Kilgour’s house, where her friend Cathey April died. Lynda set a date when she would pass, Feb. 2.

Advertisement
Lynda’s granddaughter Abigail turned to check on her aunt as the family walked back from the post office where they mailed the letters that they had written on Lynda’s behalf to her closest friends to let them know that she had passed away. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

“My final joke,” she said. “Groundhog Day.”

There were other things she imagined happening during those last few days at Kilgour’s house. A pizza party, an a cappella group serenading her, Zoom calls to friends and family. But suddenly there was no time. On the morning of Jan. 3, Jake helped her into the red Honda, and Paul sped off to Vermont, all of them worrying that they had waited too long.


As dawn broke on the morning of Jan. 4, the worry fell away. Lynda woke refreshed.

“What’s the plan?” she asked Kilgour, her eyes bright and focused, her expression determined.

The difference in Lynda’s demeanor and energy was stunning. A good night’s sleep, and knowing she had made it here, changed everything.

Advertisement

It was gray outside, the dawn providing a dull daylight.

Paul stood by Lynda’s side, smiling. Forty-two years of marriage, all down to this.

“I’ll make the bed,” he promised.

“Every day,” Lynda commanded.

Paul rested his forehead on Lynda’s, moving back and forth, gently.

Advertisement

“I’ll call you on the wind phone,” he promised.

“Every day,” Lynda commanded.

Aimee, Jake, and Jake’s 17-year-old twin daughters, Josie and Abby, had been staying at a hotel in another town and when Lynda heard they had just parked in Kilgour’s driveway, she thrust her arm triumphantly into the air and chirped, “Yeah!”

Paul wept as the funeral home worker arrived to remove Lynda’s body.

Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

One by one, her children and grandchildren approached, and Lynda threw her arms open wide.

Advertisement

Outside, big snowflakes began to drift from the sky.

Kilgour, the hospice specialist, came to her bedside with medication that would reduce her nausea and a sedative that would relax her.

“Are you good?” he asked.

She looked at him and said, drily, “I didn’t promise to be good.”

Twenty-five minutes later, Kilgour handed her the fatal cocktail of drugs, its bitter taste diluted with apple juice.

Advertisement

Lynda drank it, on her own.

“I’m so happy I don’t have to do this anymore,” she said to Paul.

And then, surrounded by her family and a sense of accomplishment, she drifted away.


Just minutes after his mother died, Jake led his daughters and Aimee to Bill Kilgour’s kitchen table. Jake handed them a stack of cards and envelopes. Lynda had wanted to write to a score of people before she died, but she’d run out of time. Aimee and the girls wrote in each card: “Lynda wants you to know you are special.”

The snow was falling hard and fast as Jake led the girls down the hill, to the small post office, to mail the 21 letters.

Advertisement

Back at the farmhouse, Jake made a snowball in the driveway and fired it toward his daughters. They wailed in delight and fired some back at him. Aimee smiled.

In the stillness that had befallen the room after his mother had passed, Jake felt dazed by the sudden reality of loss, but he felt happy, too — happy that his mother had died as she wished, on her own terms, knowing that her story might lead others to change the way they think about death, that it might give some the faith to seize the personal agency she believed in so fiercely.

But something else nagged him as he and his family waited for the undertaker who would take his mother’s body to be cremated. As important and meaningful as his mother’s quest had been, as peaceful as the end was, there still seemed to him a terrible injustice in the laws that forced his mother to launch her fight to begin with.

“She shouldn’t have had to do this,” he said. “She should have been able to die in her own home, in her own bed. She shouldn’t have had to do this.”


Advertisement

Kevin Cullen is a Globe reporter and columnist who roams New England. He can be reached at kevin.cullen@globe.com.





Source link

Vermont

New poll on healthcare: Vermonters want to extend ACA subsidies

Published

on

New poll on healthcare: Vermonters want to extend ACA subsidies


Health care premiums set to rise as ACA subsidy deal collapses

Obamacare subsidies are set to expire after Congress failed to reach a deal, leaving millions facing higher health care costs.

  • 74% of residents support the extension of the ACA subsidies, while 19% oppose.
  • Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said that resurrecting the Affordable Care Act subsidies could depend on President Donald Trump in an interview with NPR Jan. 1.
  • 92%, including majorities of all parties, disapprove of Congress’s handling of healthcare.

Most Vermont residents support extending the recently expired Obamacare subsidies, which were at the center of the government shutdown fight last year and continue to cause tension on Capitol Hill, according to a new poll from the University of New Hampshire Survey Center.

Democrats in Congress had refused to support a government funding bill that didn’t extend COVID-era subsidies for lower income Americans under the Affordable Care Act, leading to longest-ever government shutdown in October and November as GOP lawmakers would not extend the subsidies, citing reports of fraud and criticisms of Obamacare more broadly. The two sides ultimately came to a deal to reopen the government, and the subsidies expired at the end of 2025.

Advertisement

While the House voted to extend the subsidies in early January, the legislation is less likely to pass the Senate, which has previously voted against it. Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said that resurrecting the Affordable Care Act subsidies could depend on President Donald Trump in an interview with NPR Jan. 1.

In Vermont, 74% of residents support the extension of the subsidies, while 19% oppose. This is divided along party lines, with 99% of Democrats in support and 62% of Republicans in opposition.

When asked about Obamacare in general, 55% of Vermont residents said they wanted to expand the law, including 79% of Democrats. 21% want to repeal the law entirely, including 72% of Republicans.

73% disapprove of how President Donald Trump has handled healthcare, but more disapprove of how Congress has handled the issue. 92%, including majorities of all parties, disapprove of Congress’s handling of healthcare.

Advertisement

The Green Mountain State Poll, a States of Opinion Project conducted by UNH Survey Center and released Jan. 26, surveyed 765 Vermont residents online from Jan. 15 – 19. It has a margin of error of +/- 3.5%.

Do Vermonters support a “single-payer” health care plan?

A plurality (70%) of Vermont residents would support a national single-payer health care plan, the poll revealed.

A single-payer system is where all Americans would get insurance from a single government plan. It’s often championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who calls his plan “Medicare for all.”

Advertisement

Support for the plan is divided by party: 92% of Democrats support, while 61% of Republicans oppose. Those with a higher household income are also more likely to support the idea.

How healthy are Vermonters?

In the poll, most Vermonters said they were in either good (50%) or very good (34%) health.

However, nearly half (47%) of Vermont residents say that it is difficult to pay for their overall medical care expenses, and 67% said that overall medical costs have gone up in the past 12 months. Just 1% said they have declined.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Win up to $1K for making a video on distracted driving in Vermont

Published

on

Win up to K for making a video on distracted driving in Vermont


Vermont high schoolers can use their creativity to promote safe driving through a video contest, according to a community announcement.

The announcement, from the Vermont Highway Safety Alliance, describes how this year’s contest challenges teens to create public service announcements that discourage distracted driving. The theme is “Focus Drives Your Future.”

The contest is open to students in grades 9-12, either individually or in teams of two. More than $2,500 in cash prizes will be awarded, and winning videos will be shared statewide through media and educational outreach, according to the announcement.

Advertisement

“Distracted driving continues to be one of the most dangerous behaviors on our roads, especially for young drivers,” said Diana Gugliotta, executive director of the Vermont Highway Safety Alliance. “This contest empowers teens to speak directly to their peers, using their own voices and creativity to influence real change and help prevent crashes, injuries and deaths.”

Students are encouraged to address distractions such as using phones to text, check social media or adjust music or GPS maps, along with distractions from passengers, eating or drinking, grooming, pets or heightened emotions.

The videos must be 30, 45 or 60 seconds long and comply with Vermont traffic laws. Videos may not depict distracted driving, include brand logos or use copyrighted material without permission. Participants must reside in Vermont or be enrolled in a Vermont public or private high school, homeschool program or eligible New Hampshire cross-border school.

Thanks to sponsorship from AAA Northern New England, Co-operative Insurance Companies, the Vermont Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association, Yankee Driving School, Westside Driving and the Vermont Construction Association, prizes include:

Advertisement
  • 1st Place: $1,000
  • 2nd Place: $750
  • 3rd Place: $500
  • Educational Support Prize: $250

The Educational Support Prize will be awarded to the teacher whose students submit the most entries.

Students are encouraged to visit VermontHighwaySafety.org to review the distracted driving lesson and the 2026 rules and guidelines before creating their video. Videos can be submitted using the online entry form.

The submission deadline is 11:59 p.m. March 20. Winners will be announced April 10, and prizes will be awarded in a ceremony at the Statehouse on April 15.

This story was created by reporter Beth McDermott, bmcdermott1@usatodayco.com, with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Here are the snowfall totals in Vermont so far. Is it safe to drive?

Published

on

Here are the snowfall totals in Vermont so far. Is it safe to drive?


Winter Storm Fern forces thousands of US flight cancellations

Winter Storm Fern slams multiple states, causing more than 10,000 flight cancellations across the nation.

The snowstorm isn’t over in Vermont quite yet: the National Weather Service of Burlington has a winter storm warning in effect for Vermont until 1 a.m. ET on Tuesday, Jan. 27.

With about a foot of snow already on the ground across Vermont, the NWS expects another few inches to accumulate on Jan. 26

Advertisement

NWS Meteorologist Adrianna Kremer said that travel should not be taken lightly, as the snow showers could affect visibility.

“If you’re on the roads, definitely just use caution,” Kremer said.

The winter storm warning said that roads, particularly bridges and overpasses, will be slick and hazardous to drive on in Vermont, affecting morning and evening commutes.

Here is how much snow Vermont has accumulated so far and will accumulate today.

Advertisement

Snowfall totals: How much snow did Burlington, VT get?

About a foot of snow has accumulated across Vermont so far overall, Kremer said, with the amount varying in different areas of the state.

She said that the Burlington Airport has about 9.8 inches of snow as of 7 a.m. Monday, Jan. 26.

Kremer said that they are expecting possibly two to six inches of additional snow accumulation today, but that it should begin tapering off later this evening.

Total snowfall accumulation could be 10 inches to 16 inches depending on the area. Southern Vermont has the potential to see 18 inches, according to the winter storm warning.

Advertisement

And more could be coming this week.

“There could be a few light snow showers throughout the week,” Kremer said. “The snow should be mostly over by the end of today.”

If you’d like to see informal reports of snowfall on the National Weather Service website, you can visit their spotter reports in Vermont here.

Search VT snow totals by address

Just type your address into the box below to see your snowfall total and a map of nearby measurements.

USA TODAY’s snowfall map shows accumulation over the past 24, 48, and 72 hours, as well as seasonal totals dating back to Oct. 1. Updated multiple times a day, the map lets you toggle between timeframes to see how snow is adding up in your area.

Advertisement

Can’t see the embed? View the file on a separate browser page here.

Vermont weather watches and warnings

Rin Velasco is a trending reporter. She can be reached at rvelasco@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending