Connect with us

Vermont

30 years ago, downtown Rutland decided its future. Today, it’s back to the drawing board. – VTDigger

Published

on

30 years ago, downtown Rutland decided its future. Today, it’s back to the drawing board. – VTDigger


Downtown Rutland features a series of murals, including “Beginner’s Mind by artist Lmnopi. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

Thirty years ago, in the fall of 1994, Rutland City leaders eagerly awaited news of final plans for the cornerstone of their long-germinating downtown revitalization efforts: A new $20 million corporate headquarters for the state’s then-largest electric utility, Central Vermont Public Service Corp.

They didn’t anticipate the bombshell headlines about to hit.

The utility would drop what it determined to be a prohibitively expensive project that November, the Rutland Herald went on to report. That led municipal officials to turn to a surprising Plan B: Walmart, the big-box chain the National Trust for Historic Preservation had tagged “Sprawl Mart” the year before when it listed Vermont as one of its 1993 “Most Endangered Historic Places.”

The country’s biggest retailer had stores in every other state when Rutland City leaders offered what few other Vermonters would: An invitation to operate — but only in an existing, soon-to-be empty downtown anchor space instead of the new Diamond Run Mall under construction two miles south in neighboring Rutland Town.

Advertisement

The smaller-than-average Walmart would open and thrive in the city’s center in 1997. The Goliath of a mall, six times larger yet plagued like its peers nationally by financial problems, would eventually shrivel and shut down by 2019.

Then this fall, local leaders were jolted by another explosive headline.

Walmart is planning to leave its Rutland Plaza anchor location, it announced in September, and build a threefold-bigger “supercenter” with a grocery store and pharmacy at the site of the former mall.

The chain anticipates it will need at least two years to complete the local and state permit process and construct a new store for a projected move in 2027. That’s both bad and good news for Rutland City leaders eyeing the change — and the chance to develop their next Plan B.

“Rutland is a city that is built for 30,000 people and it’s currently being sustained by about 15,000,” Mayor Mike Doenges said in an interview. “I have a growth mindset right now, so when we hear Walmart say, ‘We’re going to move out,’ although it may put us on our heels, I think we have a real opportunity. My inclination is to lean forward and say, ‘OK, what do we need to do next?’”

Advertisement
Walmart has operated its downtown Rutland store since 1997. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘Rutland hasn’t been cutesified’

When Vermont Life magazine profiled Rutland in 1988, it began by opining, “Although it has many historically important buildings and has always figured prominently in Vermont’s colorful past, Rutland is not a quaint and comely town with a picturesque center.”

“Rutland hasn’t been cutesified,” the late Herald reporter and longtime resident Yvonne Daley wrote in the piece. “Rather it’s a working-class community with a strong and diversified ethnic heritage.” 

Shut off from interstate highways and seemingly forever in the shadow of Vermont’s largest city of Burlington, Rutland nonetheless can boast a history as the state’s capital from 1784 to 1804 and, rising as a rail crossroads after the Civil War, its most populous municipality for one brief shining moment in 1880.

Rutland returned to second place on the state census by 1890 and remained there for a century. The city was about to dip to third place (it’s currently fifth after Burlington, Essex, South Burlington and Colchester, but still the biggest community outside of Chittenden County) when Walmart opened in 1997.

That year, Oprah Winfrey named the Rutland-inspired novel “Songs in Ordinary Time” — penned by Mary McGarry Morris, a 1960 graduate of the city’s Mount St. Joseph Academy — as her latest Book Club selection. Soon, the television host’s nearly 20 million viewers were reading a gritty drama, set in 1960, that painted a less-than-flattering picture of a hardscrabble community past its prime.

Advertisement

Local leaders, wincing at that depiction, hoped a revitalized downtown would help people turn the page.

The Diamond Run Mall, gathering weeds and graffiti, has been closed since 2019. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘The nature of retail has shifted’

Walmart’s 1997 debut capped a decade-long effort that also ushered in a new adjacent supermarket and nine-screen cinema, the nearby Asa Bloomer state office building and Amtrak train service to New York. It also introduced the Rutland Redevelopment Authority and Downtown Rutland Partnership management and marketing organization.

“We have to be bold enough,” then-Mayor Jeff Wennberg told Vermont Life, “to plan our future.”

But three decades later, much of that progress is now in the past.

Lyle Jepson, executive director of the recently combined Rutland Region Chamber of Commerce and Rutland Economic Development Corporation — the new entity is called the Chamber & Economic Development of the Rutland Region — is based in The Hub CoWorks building that once housed stores.

Advertisement

“The nature of retail has shifted,” Jepson said in an interview. “What we expect has changed.”

People who once shopped downtown now can find greater selection online, he noted, leading to not only the closure of smaller businesses but also Walmart’s desire to relocate from its current 76,000-square-foot space to a coming 170,995-square-foot one.

“For Walmart to be successful,” Jepson said, “they need to offer a complete experience, including a grocery store and pharmacy.”

Hal Issente, executive director of the Downtown Rutland Partnership, spoke to local business upon business upon the announcement of Walmart’s coming move. None have felt threatened by the big-box store, he said, as they specialize in merchandise — men’s suits at the three-generation family-owned McNeil and Reedy, for example, or classic and current literature at the local independent Phoenix Books — not sold by the discounter.

Instead, several expressed worry about the loss of what they consider to be downtown’s largest customer magnet.

Advertisement

“There are mixed feelings,” Issente said. “Businesses do see people go to Walmart and then come to them to shop.”

A recycled-metal locomotive by artist Guohua Xu stands near downtown Rutland’s train station. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘Everybody has their ideas’

Some locals want to replace the downtown Walmart with a similar chain such as Target.

“Everybody has their ideas,” Doenges said. “I’ve heard everything from ‘Make it an Amazon distribution center’ to ‘Move the library there.’”

That’s why the mayor is forming a task force of residents and government representatives to collect and consider suggestions.

“We want to be thoughtful about what comes next,” Doenges said of the larger picture. “What’s the next 30 years look like, and what do we want to try that can sustain the city?”

Advertisement

At the same time, developers are working on several other projects on nearby Center Street, which Rutland is aiming to redesign into a pedestrian-friendly counterpart to Burlington’s Church Street Marketplace.

The largest proposal is a $35 million, seven-story hotel building on the corner of Center and Wales streets, site of the Berwick Hotel from 1868 until a 1973 fire leveled it into a current parking lot known as “The Pit.”

Developer upon developer over the past half-century has proposed new construction there, only to be stymied by the prospect of brownfield cleanup estimated at $500,000 a decade ago and $5 million today, according to city figures.

This time, the local Belden Company has received a $700,000 state Community Recovery and Revitalization Program award for the 99-room hotel, which also would include 26 “market-rate” apartments.

Although Belden has just applied for a building permit for what the mayor will only say is a “major brand” hospitality chain (an artist concept includes a sign for Cambria), it’s aiming to open the property by 2027.

Advertisement

“If things continue the way they’re going,” Doenges said, “we’ll see a hotel within the next few years.”

“The Pit” parking lot on Center and Wales streets is the proposed site of a new downtown Rutland hotel. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘It’s about expanding and enhancing’

Across the street, the Paramount Theatre is undergoing a $6 million renovation and expansion to a playhouse that opened in 1914, moved to “talking pictures” in 1931 and returned after a 25-year closure and floor-to-ceiling restoration in 2000. 

The 838-seat facility now offers more than 150 performances and programs annually. Its 60,000 yearly patrons, in turn, generate between $2.5 million to $3 million in economic impact, its management reported as part of the most recent Americans for the Arts’ national Arts & Economic Prosperity study.

With crews now adding more lobby, restroom and conference space, “the numbers will only grow,” Eric Mallette, the Paramount’s executive director, said of a project set for completion by the end of 2026.

Doenges,meanwhile, is searching for a cinema to replace the downtown Movieplex that closed during the Covid-19 pandemic. Municipal leaders also are set to hold public meetings this winter on a plan to relocate their offices and the Rutland Free Library to vacant space at the partially occupied Asa Bloomer state office building on Merchants Row.

Advertisement

Both City Hall, built around 1900, and the library, originally constructed as a post office and courthouse in 1858, are in need of repairs, but a series of past renovation or relocation plans have fallen through.

“It’s very exploratory right now,” the mayor said of the latest proposal, “but we think to have the city, state and library all in one building, to have kind of a service-oriented civic center, would be really beneficial.”

The merger also would allow the current City Hall and library buildings to be renovated into apartments.

“As much as I want to look at developing commercial entities throughout the city, without people here, it’s not going to work,” Doenges said. “We need to develop housing, too.”

A sign at downtown Rutland’s Depot Park directs visitors to area attractions. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘Headed in a growth direction’

To make all the proposals more attainable, Rutland City is applying for state approval to form a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district so it can improve public infrastructure to draw private development that, in turn, would boost the municipal tax base and pay off the work.

Advertisement

Under the plan, for example, the city would help with the brownfield cleanup at “The Pit” parking lot that would allow construction of the hotel.

Local leaders hope to formalize the TIF district early next year and start infrastructure projects in 2026. They estimate that could spur the creation of 385 housing units and other private development totaling $63 million in increased property value and $3 million of additional general fund revenue over 20 years.

“But for the city putting in this effort,” advisor Stephanie Clarke told the Rutland Board of Aldermen at a recent meeting, “this development isn’t happening.”

In the meantime, A2Z Real Estate Inc. of Pennsylvania, owner of the Diamond Run Mall, is seeking permits for the new Walmart “supercenter.” A2Z didn’t respond to VTDigger’s request for comment, but Joe Anthony, its chief executive officer, told the Rutland Town Select Board at a recent meeting: “We’ve been trying to get to this point for more years than I care to count.” 

For its part, the Brixmor Property Group, operator of the downtown Rutland Plaza, is searching for a new anchor tenant.

Advertisement

“While we don’t have any new updates to share at this time, Brixmor is committed to attracting best-in-class retailers that will meet the needs of the Rutland community,” spokesperson Maria Pace said in a statement.

Walmart will continue to operate in its current location until the move. Rutland City leaders hope to make the most of that time.

“I look at it from an investment standpoint,” Doenges said. “You don’t want to invest in a company when it’s at its peak and maxed out. Rutland is headed in a growth direction. That’s when you want to invest because it’s less expensive now and you get to reap the benefits for the next 15, 20 years. My hope is that we can pitch Rutland on its potential and the opportunity that’s here.”





Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

Commentary | Vermont Chamber: Vermont is in trouble

Published

on

Commentary | Vermont Chamber: Vermont is in trouble


Not someday in some distant future. Now.

We are aging, shrinking, and pricing out our own children, workers, and entrepreneurs. Schools face consolidation, taxes are climbing, and employers struggle to fill jobs. We’re too dependent on federal funding to support state spending. A housing shortage is driving up prices, slowing economic growth, and leaves young people feeling forced out.

Staying the course is not a viable option. It only gets worse from here if nothing changes.

Advertisement

The cost of scarcity

For decades, Vermont has treated growth as a threat to mitigate. We are living through the consequences of that mindset, and it hits marginalized communities hardest. True equity requires expanding supply rather than fighting over the crumbs of a shrinking economy. Otherwise, people lose hope and leave. This is already happening: Vermont experienced the nation’s largest percent decrease in population last year, becoming the only state losing population to both natural change and net migration.

The data are clear: Over the next decade, Vermont must add roughly 13,500 workers annually just to maintain economic stability. We need 7,500 new homes each year, yet we only permit about 2,500. When we fail to build, we aren’t “preserving” Vermont. We are pricing out multi-generational families, working-class neighbors, and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color Vermonters who represent our state’s fastest-growing demographic. Saying no to growth denies depopulated rural areas the chance to revitalize their communities. A shrinking tax base concentrates economic pressure on fewer people, creating a vicious cycle that erodes even the most resilient communities.

Most Vermonters support more housing and population growth, and policymakers keep saying they intend to follow the will of the people. However, intentions do not house families, fill classrooms, staff hospitals, or make life more affordable. Outcomes do. Right now, tangible outcomes are coming far too slowly or not at all.

It doesn’t have to be this way. We can choose a different path forward.

From roadmap to results

The planning is done. Between the Vermont Futures Project’s Economic Action Plan and the Vermont Business Roundtable’s Systems Innovation Framework, we have the data-informed roadmaps. We know where the hurdles are: a regulatory system that prizes “no” over “how,” and a fiscal trajectory where spending outpaces tax base growth, both exacerbated by unfunded mandates adding layers to an already inefficient system.

Advertisement

Process continues to overshadow results. It is time for outcomes. Future policymakers should focus on these four immediate shifts:

Regulatory Modernization: Move from a culture of “permission” to a culture of “production.” If a project meets established goals, it should be approved in months, not years. Start with “yes” as the default.

Fiscal Stewardship: Align our budget with economic reality. Vermont cannot tax its way out of a shrinking population and a constrained economy. Families and businesses need a predictable environment that allows them to plan, invest, stay, and grow.

Intentional Growth: Actively recruit and retain a diverse, working-age population. Growth funds our schools, supports our healthcare system and sustains our communities, benefiting the people already here.

Accountability: Ensure enacted policies achieve their goals. If the goal is housing, did we build the homes? If it is affordability, did we bring costs down sustainably? Revisit system design and policies if they fail to produce tangible results.

Advertisement

What comes next

Data is not destiny. Vermont’s future is a choice. Let’s choose abundance because Vermonters can no longer afford to choose scarcity. Here’s how you can help.

To the business community: Step forward to share your experiences with the downstream impacts of public policy. Your insights are crucial to modernizing our rules, regulations, and system design, and restoring Vermont’s competitiveness to build an economy where everyone can thrive.

To policymakers: We stand ready to be your partners. The data is clear, our organizations are aligned, and the roadmap is ready. We don’t need endless studies; we need your help to produce results. As the election cycle approaches, remember that accountability is measured by tangible outcomes for Vermonters, not intentions.

To our fellow Vermonters: Say “yes” to the possibilities in your own communities. Welcome new housing, support the local businesses, and champion a growing tax base over rising tax rates. But wanting change is not enough; you must participate to make it happen. Engage with your elected officials, serve on a local board, and turn out to vote for the future you want to see.

Finally, we must all reshape the narrative about Vermont. Share stories about why you love living and working here and why others should consider Vermont too. Your voice can help break the vicious cycle of scarcity. Speak openly about how growth can improve well-being and why you support it.

Advertisement

Growth is not a threat to Vermont; growth is what will save it.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

VT Lottery Powerball, Gimme 5 results for June 22, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at June 22, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from June 22 drawing

17-19-21-45-48, Powerball: 13, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Gimme 5 numbers from June 22 drawing

05-09-18-35-39

Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from June 22 drawing

Day: 8-0-1

Evening: 2-1-6

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 4 numbers from June 22 drawing

Day: 2-8-4-6

Evening: 0-2-1-8

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks Plus numbers from June 22 drawing

12-26-29-34-38, Megaball: 03

Check Megabucks Plus payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from June 22 drawing

07-08-20-24-42, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

Advertisement

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

05641

Advertisement

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Police identify victims in Chelsea house fire – Valley News

Published

on

Vermont Police identify victims in Chelsea house fire – Valley News


CHELSEA — Vermont State Police have identified the victims of a June 17 fatal house fire as the home’s residents, Karen Snyder, 71, and Max Quayle, 57.

The investigation into the cause and origin of the fire that broke out just after 3 a.m. last Wednesday is ongoing, according to the police news release.

Investigators found Snyder, the owner of the home where the fire started, and Quayle in the wreckage after extinguishing the blaze at 7 North Common.

The fire also severely damaged a neighboring house to the west, 5 North Common, that Fire Chief Ed Coburn said has not had occupants for years, and caused minor damage to a house to the east, 9 North Common including scorching a wall and cracking some windows.

Advertisement

Both 5 and 7 North Common will likely have to be torn down because they are unsafe, Coburn said, but the final decision will be up to property owners and the town.

Anyone with information that might aid investigators should call VSP’s Royalton Barracks at 802-234-9933 or submit information anonymously online at https://vsp.vermont.gov/tipsubmit.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending