Connect with us

Rhode Island

The state will ultimately pay $132m to build a soccer stadium in Pawtucket. How did it get so expensive?

Published

on

The state will ultimately pay 2m to build a soccer stadium in Pawtucket. How did it get so expensive?


play

The Tidewater Landing stadium in Pawtucket is on track to open early next year and, when it does, the 10,500-seat building is expected to be the most expensive minor league soccer stadium in the country.

Advertisement

That’s not a shock given the rising cost of construction, but even the state economic development officials who signed off on the project didn’t know just how steep the price of publicly financing the stadium would climb.

To channel $27 million to stadium developer Fortuitous Partners, Pawtucket earlier this month sold a $54.3 million tax-free bond. Under the terms of the bond, the state is projected to pay $132 million in total debt service over the next 30 years.

Those borrowing costs – which Bloomberg’s municipal bond reporter compared to the price of government debt in Pakistan – have triggered sticker shock in some quarters.

“My concern is how this got to be so expensive and such an enormous waste of taxpayer money,” said Michael McNally, a former member of the state Commerce Corporation Board who voted against the project in 2022.

But Rhode Island Commerce Secretary Liz Tanner, who has overseen the deal for the state for the last two years, on Monday defended the deal over the long term.

Advertisement

“Stadiums are expensive. We know that they’re expensive, and these dollars that we’re putting into it are going to have a nice infrastructure project for us when we’re done,” Tanner told The Journal Monday. “We know we’re going to have a stadium when we’re finished with a soccer team, and that’s good for Rhode Island.”

How did we get here? Shrinking project but expanding cost

The Tidewater Landing stadium plan first launched in December 2019, with the city still stinging from the loss of the Pawtucket Red Sox baseball team.

Initially the stadium was supposed to anchor a $400-million development spanning the Seekonk River and Interstate 95, containing hundreds of apartments plus shops, offices, a hotel and an event center.

Advertisement

The state first approved a $50-million public subsidy package for the development in February 2021 after the segment north of I-95 had been eliminated, slimming the project down to 25 acres.

But before work could begin, inflation spiked and the Federal Reserve hiked interest rates, sending the cost to complete the project soaring. The stadium is now expected to cost $137 million.

In the summer of 2022, Fortuitous shrank the project again, this time asking for the same public investment, but it would go to the stadium alone. On July 25, 2022, Gov. Dan McKee broke a tie on the Commerce Corporation Board to give almost all of the subsidy package to the stadium.

Public funds going to Fortuitous, once they finish the stadium, are made up of:

Advertisement
  • $27 million from the bond
  • $10 million in Pawtucket’s federal pandemic aid
  • $10 million from state tax credits. (The state is issuing $14 million in Rebuild RI tax credits to net $10 million.)

But the cost of the borrowing keeps going up. When the deal was approved, the state planned to provide Fortuitous $27 million for the stadium from a $37-million bond. By October, with higher interest rates prompting investors to demand ever higher yield, the principal on the bond grew to $54 million, including reserves and administrative costs.

The deal allows the state to make interest-only payments on the bonds for the first 10 years. There’s a $5-million reserve in place to make payments in any year the General Assembly were to decide not to appropriate the required funding. And there is an $11-million “capitalized interest fund” that will fund payments in the early years.

Of the $54-million principal borrowed, $6 million is set aside to pay middlemen, lawyers and other administrative expenses, according to a breakdown from Commerce RI.

Why didn’t the state just pay less two years ago?

Why didn’t the state just appropriate $27 million for the stadium two years ago and save the tens of millions required by this exotic financing?

“When this project started a couple of years ago, this was the deal that was made, as far as how it was going to unfold, and all of those conversations were based on far lower interest rates,” Tanner said. “The $27 million, if it had been done upfront, would have to had been General Assembly approved.”

More: Soccer stadium bond adviser cited ‘concerns’ about project before quitting. What we know.

Advertisement

Since authorizing this type of state financing for a proposed new PawSox ballpark, legislative leaders have been cool to the idea of a direct investment into the soccer stadium.

Why not change the deal as economic conditions changed over the years?

“So we had committed to a deal at that point and we were in a contractual relationship to commit to following through with what we had done,” Tanner said. “And if you had changed the course of the transaction, there would’ve been a level of uncertainty without knowing whether the legislature was going to pass those dollars or not. So we continued on the path that we had set up originally.”

Although the Pawtucket Redevelopment Agency issued the stadium bonds, they are to be repaid with state tax revenue generated in Pawtucket, supplemented if need be by appropriations from the Assembly.

Advertisement

Because of the money set aside, state lawmakers won’t have to appropriate any money for the stadium until 2027.

Tanner said if interest rates rise again, the 8.24% rate the state is paying will end up looking like a bargain. If they fall, it is likely the state will be able refinancing after 10 years at a lower rate.

Is this 38 Studios all over again?

The complicated financing structure of the stadium bonds recall the $75-million 38 Studios deal.

Unlike the 38 Studios bonds, which were supposed to “pay for themselves” through revenue from the company that ended up folding, the stadium bonds are intended to be repaid by state tax dollars.

The risk to the state lies in what would happen if Rhode Island FC, the team slated to play in the stadium, folds, something not uncommon in professional soccer.

Advertisement

As it awaits the construction of the soccer stadium, Pawtucket is planning to tear down McCoy Stadium, which assumed negative value once the PawSox left.

More: Pawtucket soccer stadium’s financing is complete. Here’s what’s behind the $137M project

“[Rhode Island FC] did commit to a 30-year relationship with us,” Tanner said. “If they don’t, there’s liquidated damages that they would have to pay.”

Asked what those damages would be worth if the team goes bankrupt, Tanner said the state would get the stadium as an asset.

What would the empty stadium be worth?

Advertisement

“Again, we’re doing speculation on so many ifs,” she said.

To encourage Fortuitous to finish the residential and commercial development that initially attracted the state to the project, Commerce RI is providing the developer $1.5 million to start working on that next phase.

There is still no timeline on when any plans for stadium-adjacent development will be drawn up or cost estimates formulated.

Tanner said, if anything, she is “far more optimistic” about the residential/commercial development happening “because they have their investors all gathered to work on the stadium project and so we know there’s more people who have already committed the stadium that could be potentially partnering with them.”



Source link

Advertisement

Rhode Island

Rhode Island General Assembly Begins 2026 Session With Focus on Affordability – Newport Buzz

Published

on

Rhode Island General Assembly Begins 2026 Session With Focus on Affordability – Newport Buzz


PROVIDENCE — Rhode Island lawmakers opened the 2026 legislative session this week with a focus on health care affordability, housing costs and economic stability, as leaders in both chambers warned of uncertainty tied to federal budget changes.

House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi outlined House priorities centered on expanding access to health care while lowering costs, calling it the chamber’s top agenda item for the year. He also said lawmakers will continue addressing housing shortages and rising home energy costs, emphasizing the need for community input as policy decisions move forward.

In the Senate, President Valarie J. Lawson convened the chamber by urging bipartisan cooperation and announcing plans to introduce legislation supporting education, small businesses and the state’s health care system. Stabilizing hospitals and strengthening the primary care workforce were identified as key goals.

Both chambers paused to honor victims of the Dec. 13 shooting at Brown University, passing resolutions recognizing the victims and commending first responders. Lawmakers also observed a moment of silence.

Advertisement

New legislation introduced by Rep. Joseph M. McNamara would require the Department of Education to adopt a zero-tolerance hazing policy in partnership with the Rhode Island Interscholastic League, mandating clear and consistent discipline statewide.

Meanwhile, Reps. David Morales and Jennifer Stewart called on Gov. Dan McKee to fully fund public libraries in the upcoming state budget.

Speaker Shekarchi also announced several committee leadership changes, appointing Rep. Carol Hagan McEntee as chairwoman of the House Judiciary Committee and Rep. Mary Ann Shallcross Smith as chairwoman of the House Small Business Committee.

The week also marked the first Senate session for Sen. Stefano V. Famiglietti, who received committee assignments following his election to fill a vacant seat.

Legislative leaders capped the week by joining faith leaders at the 18th annual Rhode Island Interfaith Poverty Vigil at the State House, calling attention to legislation aimed at reducing poverty statewide.

Advertisement

 


Temporary erosion protection systems installed at Second Beach in Middletown, Rhode Island



 

 


Like Newport Buzz? We depend on the generosity of readers like you who support us, to help with our mission to keep you informed and entertained with local, independent news and content. We truly appreciate your trust and support!

Advertisement

 




Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

RI Lottery Lucky For Life, Numbers Midday winning numbers for Jan. 8, 2026

Published

on


The Rhode Island Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Jan. 8, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Jan. 8 drawing

05-12-13-39-48, Lucky Ball: 13

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Numbers numbers from Jan. 8 drawing

Midday: 9-9-1-3

Advertisement

Evening: 0-9-6-6

Check Numbers payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Wild Money numbers from Jan. 8 drawing

01-07-12-30-35, Extra: 26

Check Wild Money payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

  • Prizes less than $600 can be claimed at any Rhode Island Lottery Retailer. Prizes of $600 and above must be claimed at Lottery Headquarters, 1425 Pontiac Ave., Cranston, Rhode Island 02920.
  • Mega Millions and Powerball jackpot winners can decide on cash or annuity payment within 60 days after becoming entitled to the prize. The annuitized prize shall be paid in 30 graduated annual installments.
  • Winners of the Lucky for Life top prize of $1,000 a day for life and second prize of $25,000 a year for life can decide to collect the prize for a minimum of 20 years or take a lump sum cash payment.

When are the Rhode Island Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. ET on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:30 p.m. ET daily.
  • Numbers (Midday): 1:30 p.m. ET daily.
  • Numbers (Evening): 7:29 p.m. ET daily.
  • Wild Money: 7:29 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Rhode Island editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

State workers’ unions complain of widespread problems with new payroll system

Published

on

State workers’ unions complain of widespread problems with new payroll system


Union leaders for Rhode Island state employees are publicly airing frustrations with the state’s new payroll system following weeks of complaints, claiming many state workers have had problems receiving their full pay.

Rhode Island Council 94, the largest state workers’ union with more than 4,500 members, and the union representing correctional officers issued press releases Thursday calling on the state to fix the system that rolled out in early December.

The new system is operated by Workday, a company that provides services to more than 10,000 companies and organizations, including other states.

“Simply put, Workday is not working,” Council 94 President Michael McDonald wrote in a statement.

Advertisement

The unions claim problems for state employees include missing pay, partial pay, missing overtime pay, incorrect or no holiday pay, and benefits deductions not sent to accounts.

Council 94 says the state has worked on some solutions, but complaints and calls to a hotline mount.

“The state, in meeting after meeting, urges patience. Our members mortgage payments, grocery bills, childcare, fuel costs and other expenses do not pause for payroll processing errors. The payroll errors have touched every state agency,” Council 94 State Vice President John Monse stated.

The unions say they’ve brought the complaints to state officials, including Gov. Dan McKee.

“While some prior errors were corrected, the continued recurrence demonstrates a systemic payroll breakdown, not isolated mistakes,” the Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers wrote in its statement.

Advertisement

NBC 10 News messaged the governor’s office and the Department of Administration before noon Thursday.

The governor’s office later referred comment to Administration, which has not responded to NBC 10’s messages.

The unions are calling for legislative oversight hearings into the matter and are considering legal action.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending