Connect with us

Rhode Island

Should rich Rhode Islanders pay higher taxes? Here’s what’s being proposed, and why

Published

on

Should rich Rhode Islanders pay higher taxes? Here’s what’s being proposed, and why


play

  • Progressives and union leaders say fear that millionaires will flee RI to avoid higher taxes is a “myth.”
  • Massachusetts collected more from its millionaires tax than expected and did not see an exodus of the rich.
  • Business groups say higher taxes would make RI less competitive.

PROVIDENCE − Rhode Island AFL-CIO President Patrick Crowley on Tuesday kicked off this year’s campaign to raise state income taxes on the top 1% of earners wearing an “Eat the Rich” T-shirt.

“You know they say that we have to have the tax policy we have because it benefits job creators,” Crowley told a coalition of groups gathered at the State House in support of the tax hike. “We say we can’t solve tomorrow’s problems with yesterday’s tax policy.”

Advertisement

Raising taxes on the wealthy has been a goal of Rhode Island progressives and unions at least since the state’s top tax rate was lowered in 2010.

But the idea has been a political non-starter for a series of governors and General Assembly leaders, including the current officeholders.

Post-pandemic federal aid and budget surpluses have reduced the impetus for the increased revenue that new higher taxes would bring, but the state’s fiscal picture could change quickly if there is an economic downturn or Republicans in Washington make deep cuts in Medicaid. The federal government splits the cost of Medicaid coverage with the states, and a reduction in federal funding would make states pony up more or cancel health insurance for some portion of residents.

Under those tougher scenarios, the tax plan the Revenue for Rhode Islanders coalition is pushing − a 3% surcharge on income above $625,000 − may become more politically appealing.

Advertisement

Advocates estimate that the tax increase would generate $190 million in annual revenue.

What about Massachusetts?

Rhode Island progressives believe their case for raising taxes on the rich has been bolstered by Massachusetts voters passing the “Fair Share” tax increase − a 4% surcharge on income over $1 million − in 2022.

Massachusetts’ higher income taxes make it less likely that wealthy residents will move across the border for tax reasons and, tax-the-rich advocates say, the Bay State’s experience with a millionaires tax is encouraging.

The Economic Progress Institute releases a policy paper Tuesday arguing that tax data shows millionaires are less likely to move than lower-income residents, and that when they do move, taxes are not usually the reason.

Advertisement

“There’s no evidence we’ve seen of a tax flight from Massachusetts or anywhere else, and the revenue impact is significant,” Economic Progress Institute research director Alan Krinsky said.

Andrew Farnitano, communications director for the group what campaigned for the Massachusetts millionaires tax, called the tax hike a “resounding, unqualified success” and said it had not sent Bay State millionaires and billionaires packing.

He offered as evidence that advocates had advertised that the tax would generate $2 billion per year, and in the first full year of collections Massachusetts took in $2.4 billion.

“They said the money will not show up, because multimillionaires will flee the state en masse rather than pay a new tax. And they were flat-out wrong,” Farnitano said.

Advertisement

In opposing a tax hike on the rich, Rhode Island Gov. Dan McKee last year said he hoped millionaires would move to Rhode Island to get away from the tax hike in Massachusetts.

How many people would pay more?

Revenue for Rhode Islanders estimates that 5,700 of Rhode Island’s 500,000 tax filers would pay more under the surcharge plan the group supports.

The tax increase is spelled out in legislation − H5473 and S329 − from Rep. Karen Alzate, D-Pawtucket, and Sen. Melissa Murray, D-Woonsocket, but would likely be folded into the state budget if passed. It is part of the slate of bills backed by the House progressive bloc and Rhode Island Working Families Party.

Business groups, including the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce, have vehemently opposed an income tax increase for many years and are expected to fight this proposed 3% surcharge.

What would it be used for?

Alzate’s and Murray’s bills don’t specify what the new revenue generated by higher taxes would be used for, but the Revenue for Rhode Islanders coalition has a long wish list, including education, school meals and public transit.

Advertisement

“We could fund housing. We could fund badly needed mental health supports in our schools,” Murray said. “We could fund free school lunch for all, and breakfast. We could fund child care so parents could go back to work. We could help lift children out of poverty and so much more.”



Source link

Rhode Island

As the budget gets closer, it’s getting louder at the RI State House. What advocates want.

Published

on

As the budget gets closer, it’s getting louder at the RI State House. What advocates want.



Volume rising at RI Statehouse as budget demands mount

play

  • Rhode Island advocates are pushing for a 3% tax on high earners to fund social programs and address budget shortfalls.
  • Proposed funds would support RIPTA, Medicaid, education, and healthcare initiatives.
  • Supporters argue the tax would address inequities in the tax system, while opponents fear it could lead to wealthy residents leaving the state.

PROVIDENCE – You can tell the behind-the-scenes budget negotiations are at a critical point when the noise level at the State House reaches a fever pitch.

And that volume rose to its highest point yet on May 29 as megaphone-amplified voices chanted “tax the rich!” to raise a potential $190 million in new state dollars that would be used to, according to advocates:

Save RIPTA by closing the $32 million funding shortfall. Plug whatever cuts Congress makes to SNAP, Head Start and Medicaid. Pour many more millions into multilingual education for non-English speaking students. And fix the state’s health care crisis.

And it’s not just chanting, sign-carrying advocates rallying and making noise.

A day earlier, Attorney General Peter Neronha spelled out his proposal for fixing Rhode Island’s teetering health care system, including a multimillion dollar legislative increase in Medicaid reimbursements to primary care doctors.

Advertisement

A bill to do that was introduced at his behest the same day: H6373.

It would have the Executive Office of Health and Human Services allocate “sufficient state revenue to increase Medicaid payment rates for primary care services to … no less than 100% of Medicare rates … effective beginning July 1, 2025.”

“Let’s do a poll of Rhode Islanders and ask them, what should be at the center of our budget planning?” Neronha asked rhetorically during his press conference. “I guarantee you, health care will be in the top five, maybe in the top three. So that’s where we should start.”

What do RI’s ‘tax the rich’ advocates want?

The advocates leading Thursday’s rally had an even longer list of demands, starting with passage of legislation creating a 3% income tax surcharge on high earners to raise an estimated $190 million in new state revenue.

Advertisement

They included the RI AFL-CIO, Climate Action Rhode Island, the National Education Association of Rhode Island − headed by new Senate President Valarie Lawson – the Economic Progress Institute, the Revenue for Rhode Islanders Coalition, RI Working Families Party, SEIU-1199, Indivisible RI and Reclaim RI.

The focus of the event, according to the media advisory: “To demand leadership make the richest 1% pay their fair share in taxes to protect what’s on the chopping block – Medicaid, hospitals, food stamps, school funding, RIPTA and more.”

Their argument: That the richest 1% of Rhode Islanders pay just 8.6% of their income in taxes, while the lowest income Rhode Islanders pay over 13%.

“In Massachusetts, a similar tax that brought in $2.4 billion in the first year has helped fund free school meals for students and school repairs, free bus service and expanded public transit routes; seven thousand more child care seats, road and bridge improvements in every city and town and more,” the advisory said.

Advertisement

Will it actually pass?

Legislative leaders have made it known that “everything is on the table,” but a tax hike would not be their first choice.

“As we approach the final weeks of the session, there is no shortage of meritorious proposals that affect state resources,” House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi told The Journal.

“The magnitude of the uncertainty of the federal funding picture, and the numerous holes in the governor’s proposed budget, complicate both balancing this year’s budget and planning for the unknown,” he said.

The “holes” include: the McKee administration’s quiet withdrawal of a “cost-saving” proposal to close the minimum security prison that, on closer look, could cost $67 million to $92 million more; a $15 million under-estimate of the cost of his contract settlement with state troopers and prison guards and an unpopular McKee move to divert $26 million from the pension fund.

“I continue to keep many options on the table for this challenging task,” said Shekarchi, who tops the House budget negotiating team.

Advertisement

‘The top 1% are still going to be okay’

The rally was timed the same day the Senate Finance Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing on Sen. Melissa Murray’s version [S329] of the “Tax-The-Rich” bill the House Finance Committee considered earlier this session.

And it’s a fair guess the senators will hear most of the same arguments their counterparts in the House heard early in May for and against the bill to create a new 3% surcharge on income above $625,000 – in practice, $750,000 in pre-tax total income

According to an estimate from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the top 1% of households in the country (starting at $743,000 a year) would get a $61,000 reduction in federal taxes a year if the federal tax cuts adopted during the first Trump Administration are extended. (The estimate comes from a January report from the Department of the Treasury.)

Under the proposed bill, a household making $1 million a year would pay an extra $10,500 in state taxes.

“The top 1% are still going to be okay,” said Rep. Teresa Tanzi.

Advertisement

But there are two buckets of people in the 5,700 estimated Rhode Island taxpayers who would have slightly higher taxes – the very wealthy and small business owners who are incorporated as limited liability companies or corporations.

Might they forgo a new hire or not buy a new piece of equipment? Might they flee the state?The Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council has warned that the wealthiest Rhode Islanders will likely flee the state if the income tax is increased.

In written testimony, Jon Duffy, of the advertising and public relations firm Duffy & Shanley, wrote that one of the partners in his business “has already become a Florida resident” to avoid paying Rhode Island’s state taxes.

But the Economic Progress Institute in March put out a paper that said: “There is simply no evidence – not in Rhode Island and not anywhere in the United States – linking changes in top tax rates with large-scale net migration of higher-income residents or of interstate migration in general.”

At the May 29 rally, the EPI’s police director Nina Harrison said Rhode Island has enough for everyone, but it’s not being shared fairly.

Advertisement

“Right now, people earning less than $23,000 a year are paying a larger portion of their income in state and local taxes than millionaires do in this state,” she said.

“That’s not only backwards, it’s unjust and it’s unacceptable.” Her argument:

  • “Rhode Island has crisis level shortage of child care. Nine out of 10 families cannot afford quality childcare. The time to act is now.”
  • “Rhode Island has a crisis level shortage of primary care doctors. I’m losing mine next month with the closure of Anchor Medical. The time to act is now.”
  • “Public schools are failing too many of our children and they deserve better. The time to act is now and if we don’t act now, not only are we failing our children, we’re going to feel that in our state economy later when we need workers to do the essential jobs in this state.”
  • “People and businesses and essential workers will leave this state. If we don’t have good schools, affordable housing, good public transportation, or enough doctors. The time to act is now.”

“If we want to stop having budget deficits and meet the needs of Rhode Islanders, we need to fix our tax system and have everyone pay their fair share. The time to act is now,” she finished.



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

RI Lottery Powerball, Lucky For Life winning numbers for May 28, 2025

Published

on


The Rhode Island Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at May 28, 2025, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 28 drawing

23-27-32-35-59, Powerball: 11, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from May 28 drawing

03-11-35-43-47, Lucky Ball: 11

Advertisement

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Numbers numbers from May 28 drawing

Midday: 3-3-0-7

Evening: 4-7-5-0

Check Numbers payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Wild Money numbers from May 28 drawing

01-04-05-21-23, Extra: 12

Advertisement

Check Wild Money payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

  • Prizes less than $600 can be claimed at any Rhode Island Lottery Retailer. Prizes of $600 and above must be claimed at Lottery Headquarters, 1425 Pontiac Ave., Cranston, Rhode Island 02920.
  • Mega Millions and Powerball jackpot winners can decide on cash or annuity payment within 60 days after becoming entitled to the prize. The annuitized prize shall be paid in 30 graduated annual installments.
  • Winners of the Lucky for Life top prize of $1,000 a day for life and second prize of $25,000 a year for life can decide to collect the prize for a minimum of 20 years or take a lump sum cash payment.

When are the Rhode Island Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. ET on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:30 p.m. ET daily.
  • Numbers (Midday): 1:30 p.m. ET daily.
  • Numbers (Evening): 7:29 p.m. ET daily.
  • Wild Money: 7:29 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Rhode Island editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Providence poised to raise city tax levy by 7 percent – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Providence poised to raise city tax levy by 7 percent – The Boston Globe


Providence Mayor Brett Smiley’s administration is one step closer to getting legislative approval to raise the city’s tax levy by more than 7 percent, but there are still two state senators who are going to have a major say over how the city’s legislative agenda takes shape over the next month.

The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a bill last night that allows the city to exceed the state’s 4 percent cap on tax levy increases, a proposal Smiley says is largely necessary because of the city’s settlement last year to increase funding for the school department.

That bill still needs Senate approval, and the two senators to watch are newly elected Majority Leader Frank Ciccone and Senator Jake Bissaillon.

Ciccone and Bissaillon are both viewed as supporters of Smiley, but their neighborhoods are poised to see some of the largest property tax increases, which they fear will substantially drive up rents for their constituents.

Advertisement

Start with the obvious: Ciccone is suddenly much more powerful than he was three months ago. As majority leader, he likely has the ability to singlehandedly push through or kill Smiley’s tax bill.

As Channel 12’s Alexandra Leslie reported on Tuesday, the Smiley administration is warning that not passing the tax levy bill could result in massive layoffs and other cuts in the city. With state leaders facing their own budget challenges, the last thing they want is a Providence budget crisis that, in some ways, the Senate would be creating.

Then again, Ciccone doesn’t want to be a one-term majority leader (unless he gets a promotion). A vote for the levy increase could add to the likelihood that he’ll face a challenger in the Democratic primary next year.

Advertisement

Bissaillon’s bet: Bissaillon has been much more direct with the Smiley administration: He maintains that he won’t support a tax levy increase unless it agrees to an obscure tax change related to industrial properties in the city – his argument is that he doesn’t want properties like the Manchester Street Power Station to see a tax decrease when his constituents are going to see large increases.

In some ways, Smiley’s team took Bissaillon for granted. They were dismissive of his proposal, and assumed he’d be a good team player and support their levy increase anyway. But he has made it clear that he isn’t bluffing, and the administration has indicated it will support a version of his bill.

“I won’t support it unless I feel like I’ve done everything I can to help my constituents,” Bissaillon said Tuesday.

What to watch: The tax levy bill isn’t the only one the Smiley administration is seeking. Lawmakers seem poised to support an event parking tax that could help the city, and there appears to be momentum on a new tax breaklargely aimed at the “Superman” building.


This story first appeared in Rhode Map, our free newsletter about Rhode Island that also contains information about local events, links to interesting stories, and more. If you’d like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, you can sign up here.

Advertisement

Dan McGowan can be reached at dan.mcgowan@globe.com. Follow him @danmcgowan.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending