Connect with us

Northeast

Rare and mysterious whiskey bottles found washed up on beach

Published

on

Rare and mysterious whiskey bottles found washed up on beach

A whiskey river wasn’t on Austin Contegiacomo’s mind when he found an ocean of it — a Prohibition-era stash, to be exact — washed up on a New Jersey beach while he was walking his dog last month. 

Even for a guy who doesn’t drink, it was a rare find. And it has made an even better story to tell.

“The history behind it is part of the mystery and really adds to the allure,” Contegiacomo, 28, a Coast Guard helicopter rescue swimmer from Northfield, New Jersey, told Fox News Digital.

GRATEFUL DEAD AND NEW BEER CELEBRATE ‘LONG STRANGE TRIP’ TOGETHER

He had just gotten off a 24-hour duty and decided to take his fuzzy sheepadoodle, Koda, for a walk near Margate Pier, south of Atlantic City.

Advertisement

“I take him to the beach to play just about every day,” Contegiacomo said. 

“I was throwing the ball — and my dog tends to rub himself in stuff that smells weird. So there’s this brown bottle in the sand and he starts rubbing on it.” 

A New Jersey resident found nearly a dozen Prohibition-era bottles of whiskey that appear to have been perfectly preserved since the 1930s or so. (Austin Contegiacomo)

Contegiacomo said his dog forgot about playing and became very focused on whatever was in the sand. 

“I thought, ‘Oh man, it looks like a bottle of pee,’” he said. 

Advertisement

“So I was yelling at him to get off it, then maybe five feet ahead was another one. And as soon as he got off that one, he ran up to the next one and started rubbing on that.” 

AMID CANCER CONCERNS, COULD MORE DRINKERS TURN TO NO- AND LOW-ALCOHOL DRINKS?

After Koda discovered a third bottle, Contegiacomo said he began to realize they’d stumbled on something much more interesting than he’d originally thought. 

“They were pretty much at the surface,” he said. “And there were a ton of conches and shells and all types of other debris on the beach that day.”

Austin Contegiacomo’s dog Koda is shown sniffing around, head on the sand, on the beach near Atlantic City, New Jersey — where man and dog found 11 mysterious bottles of whiskey.  (Austin Contegiacomo)

Advertisement

He added, “I think it was from dredging because they’ve been repairing the beaches and they do it in the winter to get ready for the summer. There hadn’t been any storms, but it was a crazy amount of stuff washed up.”

In total, Contegiacomo and his dog found 11 completely full glass bottles of rare, old whiskey, all with the name Lincoln Inn etched on them. 

WHISKEY BRAND ATTRACTS ‘YELLOWSTONE’ ACTRESS AMID INCREASE IN FEMALE BOURBON DRINKERS

Contegiacomo called a friend who did a quick internet search. They learned that Lincoln Inn was produced at a distillery in Montreal in the 1930s and that the company went out of business in the 1970s.

“He said, ‘Dude, there’s really not much info on this, but it looks like it’s old,’” Contegiacomo said. “He said I should definitely keep it and find out more about it.” 

Advertisement

Contegiacomo and a friend did some research into the whiskey bottles that turned up on a New Jersey beach. They learned the distillery was located in Montreal and dated back to the 1930s. (Austin Contegiacomo)

So Contegiacomo took off his jacket. He picked up all the bottles — each positioned not far from the others — and stashed them in his jacket. 

Then he tied it up like a sack.

‘Bottle-digging’ community

After he got them home, Contegiacomo posted about his find on Reddit, where a “bottle-digging” community as well as a group of whiskey aficionados began to weigh in on the discovery. 

WHISKEY VALOR FOUNDATION IS UNITING VETERANS, HERE’S HOW A ‘CRAZY IDEA’ BECAME REALITY

Advertisement

Members of the groups directed Contegiacomo to a diamond shape that was embossed on the bottom of the bottles. It was a mark that was initiated in 1928.

“The bottles have a flask shape,” Contegiacomo said, “and given the type of screw and stuff, most people said it was between 1930s and 1940s.”

The diamond symbol embossed on the bottom of the bottles dates back to 1928, according to some whiskey aficionados who weighed in.  (Austin Contegiacomo)

Some of Contegiacomo’s work buddies went back to the beach the next day and found one more bottle — bringing the discovered treasure to an even dozen. 

Contegiacomo decided to gift a bottle to each of his friends and to his father.

Advertisement

FLORIDA PROFESSOR FINDS EVIDENCE THAT ANCIENT EGYPTIANS DRANK HALLUCINOGENIC COCKTAILS

“A lot of the guys thought it was super cool,” he said. 

“There’s about 10 of us. A lot of the guys are from New Jersey and most people have family around here, so it’s kind of a part of New Jersey’s history – so I ended up giving pretty much all the bottles away to guys I work with.”

A few of the whiskey bottles were clear and others were hazy, which Contegiacomo learned could have to do with filtration.

The shape of the bottles and the screw-top style are among the indicators of the year the whiskey was produced. (Austin Contegiacomo)

Advertisement

“Given the age of it, some people said that could be due to the way it was filtered or the charring, because they used to burn the [whiskey] barrels,” he said. 

“The one that I kept for myself is probably the best quality one.”

Contegiacomo said the fact that the bottles were all still sealed and the whiskey at relatively the same level in each bottle gives him hope the liquor inside is still good.

“The ocean temperatures usually don’t get anywhere near 70 degrees, even at the bottom of the waters in New Jersey,” Contegiacomo said.

Advertisement

At left, Contegiacomo is shown on the beach in New Jersey with his dog, Koda, and his wife, Brooke; at right, one of the bottles he found, cleaned up and gleaming now — but still unopened.  (Austin Contegiacomo)

Exactly how the bottles of whiskey ended up in the water remains a mystery.

“Apparently [bootleggers] used to bring it down to about the Jersey Shore – and then small boats would take off from the Jersey Shore and they would pick the liquor up. I guess the boardwalk was pretty much a hot spot for rum running and stuff during Prohibition.” 

That’s why Contegiacomo said he’s not interested in drinking it or cashing in on his find.

For more Lifestyle articles, visit www.foxnews.com/lifestyle

Advertisement

“If any of us intend to try it, I don’t think it’d be me that opens it,” Contegiacomo said. 

“Opening it and then seeing it empty or even half-empty kind of detracts from it. Even if it’s a great whiskey or something, I don’t think I’d appreciate the whiskey itself nearly as much as I appreciate the story and how it got here.”

Sydney Borchers of Fox News Digital contributed reporting. 

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Another Varsity Maine boys basketball poll, another change at the top

Published

on

Another Varsity Maine boys basketball poll, another change at the top


Windham players celebrate a 3-pointer during a preseason game against Edward Little at South Portland High School game on Nov. 29, 2025. (Brianna Soukup/Staff Photographer)

This is the sixth Varsity Maine boys basketball poll of the season, and the No. 1 ranking has changed each time. Windham is back at No. 1 after a big win over No. 4 South Portland. The Eagles, who have won 12 straight, were previously ranked No. 1 in the winter’s first poll.

Windham and last week’s No. 1, Camden Hills, have both topped the poll twice. Sanford and South Portland have each spent one week in first.

The team responsible for this week’s No. 1 switch, Cony, jumped three spots to No. 6 after dealing Camden Hills its first loss on Saturday and upending No. 8 Gardiner last Tuesday.

Advertisement

Medomak Valley rejoins the poll after a few weeks away, and Hermon is ranked for the first time this season.


The Varsity Maine boys basketball poll is based on games played before Jan. 27, 2026. The top 10 teams are voted on by the Varsity Maine staff, with first-place votes in parentheses, followed by total points.

BOYS BASKETBALL
1. Windham (6) 86
2. Sanford 77
3. Camden Hills (3) 76
4. South Portland 56
5. York 49
6. Cony 43
7. Brunswick 30
8. Gardiner 22
9. Medomak Valley 12
10. Hermon 10

Poll compiled by Assistant Sports Editor Bob Aube.

Advertisement

Lee Horton is the Varsity Maine Editor for the Maine Trust for Local News. He joined the Sun Journal as assistant sports editor in July 2016, then served as sports editor from May 2018 to May 2024. Prior…
More by Lee Horton

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Exodus from Massachusetts continues, as more people moved to other states in 2025 – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Exodus from Massachusetts continues, as more people moved to other states in 2025 – The Boston Globe


That marked a jump from the prior 12-month period, when revised federal figures show the state had a net loss to other states of nearly 19,200 people. That new revision was actually good news for Massachusetts, as previous government data from a year ago showed a loss to other states of 27,500 in the 2023-2024 period.

In the prior two years, Massachusetts experienced even larger outflows — roughly 35,400 and 48,000 — amid a broader acceptance of remote work because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Massachusetts has routinely ranked in the top five states for domestic outmigration in recent years, and last year was no exception: It finished fifth behind California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey in the loss of people to other states. Of the New England states, only Maine and New Hampshire saw positive domestic in-migration.

Still, the Massachusetts population has been growing slightly, hitting an estimated 7.15 million as of July 1 of last year. Massachusetts is still drawing more international immigrants, though at a far slower pace than in previous years when officials said increasing numbers of migrant families were stressing the state’s family shelter system.

The outmigration data has long been a politically valuable tool, depending on which argument you’re trying to make. Governor Maura Healey, who is seeking reelection this year, has regularly touted the importance of keeping residents and businesses in — and drawing new ones to — Massachusetts as part of a pledge to attack the state’s high cost of living and housing. The first-term Democrat went as far as pointing directly to migration data early in her tenure as a measuring stick.

And last year, her administration highlighted the numbers, which showed the losses dwindling from the pandemic-fueled highs, as good news.

This year’s ebb, meanwhile, could complicate her pitch of making Massachusetts a beacon for working families.

Advertisement

Healey and her Republican opponents have differed widely in framing the economic direction of the state, and her early campaign messaging this year has focused largely on promoting her “affordability” agenda and, to an equal degree, attacking Trump as a chaos agent who bears blame for the rising prices residents feel in their day-to-day life.

“I hope it can serve as a catalyzing data point,” Doug Howgate, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said of the latest outmigration number. “It just hopefully shows you like everything in the policy realm, you can’t take your foot off the gas.”

Boston University finance professor Mark Williams found in 2024 that the top driving factors behind domestic outmigration from Massachusetts are taxes, housing costs, and health care expenses.

Immigration from other countries has helped offset the losses, but that could be tougher under the Trump administration’s crackdown. “Now we’re looking at public policy, White House policy, that’s going to restrict immigration flow,” Williams said. “This will create a challenge for Massachusetts.”

Economist Don Klepper-Smith has warned about what he calls the “three T’s” hurting states like Massachusetts: taxes, temperature, and traffic. (The Tax Foundation think tank recently ranked Massachusetts 43rd in terms of tax competitiveness.)

Advertisement

Now, Klepper-Smith says he would add a fourth “T”: the targeting of blue states for federal spending cuts.

“I think that creates a difficult situation and a slippery slope for fiscal health in New England,” said Klepper-Smith, formerly based in New England but now semi-retired in South Carolina. “There’s going to be upside pressure on property taxes. … There’s going to be growing calls for regionalism, growing calls for efficiencies. Every dollar counts in this economy. Every dollar counts.”


Jon Chesto can be reached at jon.chesto@globe.com. Follow him @jonchesto. Matt Stout can be reached at matt.stout@globe.com. Follow him @mattpstout.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

$50 per year bicycle registration fee bill meets heavy opposition in New Hampshire

Published

on

 per year bicycle registration fee bill meets heavy opposition in New Hampshire


A proposal in the New Hampshire Legislature to charge a $50 annual registration fee for bicyclists in order to use state-owned paths, trails and roadways is proving so unpopular that even the bill’s sponsor is backpedaling. 

“All bicycles and electric bicycles, if operated on a public way shall be registered with the division of motor vehicles,” the bill states. It says any bike riders who are not registered could face a fine of $100 per violation.

On the New Hampshire House of Representatives website, nearly 14,000 people have registered their opposition to the measure. Just 39 support it, as of Tuesday evening.

Republican Rep. Tom Walsh from Hooksett, who sponsored the bill, testified Tuesday before the House Transportation Committee.

Advertisement

“I don’t see the bill moving forward,” Walsh said, adding that the $50 amount was supposed to be a “placeholder” until it could be determined what a reasonable fee would be.

Walsh said he brought the “flawed” bill to committee because he wanted to start a conversation about paying for bike infrastructure as lawmakers consider toll hikes and other fee increases for car owners. He noted that ATV and snowmobile owners have to pay a fee to operate their vehicles on state trails.

“This was a genuine attempt at fair funding,” Walsh said. “I still believe that user fees are the best way to do that. If you want to use nice things, help us pay for these nice things.”  

Democratic Rep. Timothy Horgan of Durham called the bill an “extremely bad idea” and said rail trails are used heavily by pedestrians as well.

“Are we going to start handing out stickers on our walking shoes to use the rail trails?” he asked. “Where does this end?”

Advertisement

During public comment, Donna Cusack from Hudson called it a “horrible, horrible bill.” 

“If I have to pay a fee to ride on a rail trail, I’ll put my bike on the back of my car and drive 5 miles across the border and I’ll start driving on the Massachusetts rail trails where I don’t have to pay a fee,” she said.

Craig Rennie, the chief supervisor of the New Hampshire Bureau of Trails who did not take a position on the bill, said there are 320 miles of state-owned rail trails. He said their maintenance is funded with registration fees for snowmobiles and ATVs, as well as some federal grants and donations.

“If we had more funding for rail trail management, that would help with developing future trails,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending