Pittsburg, PA
Steelers Might Shock Us With This QB Pick
PHOENIX, AZ — The Pittsburgh Steelers believe Aaron Rodgers is returning for another season. At least that’s what you can pick up from what they’re saying at the 2026 NFL League Meetings. And if not, they have their backup plans ready. Maybe they have another plan ready to put into place as well.
One thing became very clear speaking with head coach Mike McCarthy and general manager Omar Khan in Phoenix, Arizona – the Steelers are open to anything in the 2026 NFL Draft. And when they say anything, they mean anything.
Follow
McCarthy admitted to local media that he didn’t get to watch much of the college football season during the year because he was removed from the game. He believes that gave him “blinders” to be more open to the class than most who view it as weak.
At the beginning of the season, the 2026 class was looking pretty good. Today, many believe it has evaporated. For the Steelers, they aren’t looking at it that way and instead viewing it as finding the right prospect that fits what they want in a QB.
“To be honest, I think it’s what you want,” McCarthy said when asked about the class being viewed as weak. “I had to change a little bit, going from Green Bay, Wisconsin to Dallas, Texas, on the expectations of how I think I can play with a quarterback, as opposed how I know I can play. Granted, Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers are Hall of Fame quarterbacks. They both have long arms. They both have 10-inch hands. To win playoff games and to win games in December, Ben Roethlisberger has to play in the cold weather. Your guys got tothrow better than the other guy in the big games. You got to try to put them in a positions to. So, when you go from that to Dallas, you can play more wide open at home.
“Now back to Pittsburgh. So now a lot of my beliefs and how I look at how I want to train the team and want the team look like, it’s very similar to my time in Green Bay. So, that directly reflects how I do the quarterbacks. It’s really how I’ve always used quarterbacks. I just think quarterbacks, it’s what are you into because you got a lot of guys in the League that are six foot that probably in the old days, would be late picks, going in the first or second round. So that’s part of the game. The rules of the game have changed. So, I think it’s really high-level play. What do you look for in a quarterback? I’m hopeful there will be a quarterback at the right time there for us to possibly add to our to our roster. Twelve picks, we want have a hell of class.”
That Quarterback Might Be Ty Simpson
The Steelers have spent time evaluating a few quarterbacks, including Ty Simpson out of Alabama. The only other expected first-round pick besides Fernando Mendoza could be sitting there at No. 21, and could fit into the team’s philosophy.
They’re ready to take best player available at a position of need. Teaming Simpson up with Rodgers means he would learn from a Hall of Fame quarterback and McCarthy in his first year. Then get an opportunity to prove his ability at the NFL level in his second season.
Simpson is viewed as the most pro-ready quarterback who spent the last few years learning in a pro style offense with the Crimson Tide.
While a little below average in size, standing 6-foot-1, 211 pounds with over 30-inch arms, Simpson doesn’t fit McCarthy’s long arm theory. But he does fit that belief that the NFL is changing, and that McCarthy is open to it.
Simpson has been a name mentioned within the Steelers organization since the NFL season ended. At the League Meetings, the biggest takeaway is that Rodgers is probably coming back, and that the team is open to all options with their 12 picks.
That includes a quarterback, which they plan to draft at some point. If Simpson is there at 21, he may be their choice.
Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter for the latest news and updates on the Pittsburgh Steelers
Pittsburg, PA
Parent group claims Pittsburgh Public Schools’ closure plan violates children’s civil rights
The Pittsburgh Public Schools board of education has been under intense scrutiny since its “Future Ready Plan” was first introduced — and then eventually approved — in late May. But a group of parents has filed a complaint with the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission in an effort to prevent it from being carried out.
Advancement Project, a national civil rights organization, along with 412 Justice and the Education Rights Network, have filed a complaint against the school board on behalf of five PPS students, claiming the plan, which will close or repurpose several district buildings across the city, violates those students’ civil rights.
Those students represented in the complaint attend Miller Pre K-5 in the Hill District, Manchester Pre K-8 on the North Side and Woolslair Pre K-5 in Bloomfield, all of which would close under the plan, with the students relocating.
“This is part of what we’ve seen across the country, this national school closure crisis,” said Adaku Onyeka-Crawford, a staff attorney and director of education justice for Advancement Project. “We’ve seen it play out in urban, suburban and rural communities, affecting Black and brown children, and it has come to Pittsburgh.”
The complaint is calling for an investigation into the plan and for the district and school board to act in good faith during that investigation. They hope it will lead to a preliminary injunction, allowing the commission to get a court order for the district to stop the implementation of the plan.
One of the main claims in the complaint is that the school board “based school closure decisions on utilization (enrollment divided by building capacity), despite being notified that doing so would disproportionately close schools in Black neighborhoods. Black students make up 62% of students that will lose their schools, but only 49% of students district-wide.”
“Utilization has no ties to education quality at all,” said Onyeka-Crawford. “In fact, smaller class sizes are tied to better outcomes for students. Community members had flagged that relying on this metric would disproportionately harm Black students.”
Onyeka-Crawford said alternatives were presented to the school board, some that have had success in other cities, but the district went forward with their own plan instead.
“We need to ask: who is Pittsburgh Public Schools and the board accountable to?” she said. “It’s the parents and families, and if this is what parents and families are asking for, it’s up to them to be accountable to those communities, and give parents and students the education and resources that they need.”
KDKA reached out to the district, but it said it will not comment on pending litigation.
Pittsburg, PA
Another stretch of high temperatures in the 90s hitting the Pittsburgh area this week
It’s going to be another hot week in the Pittsburgh area with high temperatures back into the 90s.
Any Alert Days Ahead? I have us hitting 90 degrees starting on Tuesday through Friday, so that stretch of 4 days are First Alert Weather Days. A severe storm setup looks to be in place for Saturday, so we may also see a FAWD issued for Saturday.
Aware: So far this year, we have seen five 90° days. Tuesday may be our 6th of the year.
Heat index values today are expected to be in the mid-90s, near 100 degrees.
The hottest days of the week will be on Wednesday & Thursday. I have both days seeing highs at 92°.
Rain chances start to tick back up on Friday, late in the afternoon. I have Friday highs still hitting 90, with highs in just the mid-80s on Saturday and Sunday.
There still remains a concern for severe weather on Saturday, with all the ingredients in place. Right now, the chance looks low due to morning rain keeping instability numbers low.
Congress again considering making Daylight Saving Time year-round
I am not surprised that the U.S. Congress is taking up making Daylight Saving Time standard year-round again. The Sunshine Protection Act is the latest attempt by Congress to solve the issue of time and daylight. It’s a plan that you may not realize has been attempted before, and people disliked it so much that it didn’t even last a year.
Let’s start with a brief history of changes to the clock and what we will call Daylight Saving Time. Before World War 1, there was very little in the way of guidelines for states to follow when it came to time. WWI changed things, as the government dictated that Daylight Saving Time be in effect until the war was over in the hopes of conserving energy. Farmers were glad after the war to see the changes come to an end because the later sunrise in the winter meant less time to get out in the fields and get produce to market. Overall, the move to permanent DST was seen as unpopular.
The next big push for DST came during World War 2, and again, the reason for the change was the conservation of energy. Franklin Roosevelt, the president, called year-round DST ‘war-time.’ Once again, after the war, states were allowed to do their own thing. There remained no real federal policy on DST through 1966. That all changed in 1966 with the passing of the Uniform Time Act, signed into law by Lyndon Johnson. This put into effect a mix of daylight saving time and standard time, similar to what we have today; standard time lasted around 3 months longer than what we have today.
Our next energy crisis came in 1967 with the worldwide oil embargo by the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Nations (OAPEC). Our Congress decided to try out a year-round DST across the country. They put the trial period beginning at the start of 1974 and going through the spring of 1975. What could go wrong, right? Well, everything. The public hated the changes, and even worse, nearly 10 kids were killed in early morning hours that first winter period due to low visibility. A program that was supposed to last just two winter seasons was cancelled before we even got to the second winter.
It appears to be a big push again to get Congress to push for permanent Daylight Saving Time hours. I hope they are considering the impact on everyone. For Pittsburgh, that would mean sunrise on some days in the winter around 9 a.m. Sunsets during that time would still be before 6 p.m. The issue is that during the wintertime, Pittsburgh only has around nine and a half hours of ‘daylight.’ We have to figure out the best way to align our clocks to that time. I think what we are doing right now is pretty close to perfect. What do you think?
Pittsburg, PA
Pittsburgh files lawsuit against fire truck companies over alleged anticompetitive schemes
-
Science35 minutes ago
New Winged Robot Can Fly and Swim Like a Puffin
-
Lifestyle59 minutes ago‘The Trojan Teddy Bear’: The promise and peril of childhood in the age of AI
-
Technology1 hour agoGoogle and Epic give up fighting — third-party Android app stores are coming next week
-
World1 hour agoFBI snares an American heir indicted for allegedly bankrolling anti-cop, pro-Hamas communist revolution
-
Politics1 hour agoBiden special counsel’s ‘runaway train’ scooped up sensitive lawmaker info: ‘Abuse of power’
-
Health1 hour ago‘Miracle on the Hudson’ hero Captain ‘Sully’ Sullenberger reveals Alzheimer’s diagnosis
-
Sports2 hours agoAmerican League stars outshine National League in 96th MLB All-Star game
-
Technology2 hours agoBefore you connect another smart TV, tablet or phone, lock it down