Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Voters in pivotal Pennsylvania county weigh in on Trump, Harris and the issues: ‘This area really counts’

Published

on

Voters in pivotal Pennsylvania county weigh in on Trump, Harris and the issues: ‘This area really counts’


BETHLEHEM, Pa. — Since the sinking of the Titanic more than 100 years ago, one Pennsylvania county has voted for the ultimate winner of a US presidential election all but three times.

The political pulse of Northampton County has predicted 25 of the last 28 elections — dating back to Woodrow Wilson’s victory in 1912, when he bested Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft.

Northampton’s only misses were Richard Nixon in 1968 and George W. Bush in both 2000 and 2004.

Like 2016, Trump looks to win the Keystone state after losing it to Biden in 2020. AP

Located on the Keystone State’s eastern edge and approximately equidistant from New York City and Philadelphia, Northampton County and neighboring Lehigh County make up the Greater Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania’s third-largest metropolitan area. “The Valley” is home to three cities on the post-industrial upswing — Allentown, Bethlehem and Easton — and dotted with rural and suburban municipalities.

Advertisement

Speaking to The Post just two months ahead of the showdown between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, voters from The Valley spilled their thoughts on the race they’re county will once again help decide this November.

Denise Marshall, 72, Nazareth

A lifetime Northampton County resident who spent 35 years teaching middle school, Denise has lived in her home in Nazareth Borough (pop. 6,000) for the last 13 years. She now works part-time for Weight Watchers and enjoys spending time with her grandson.

Denise Marshall, a lifelong Republican, describes herself as a “strong conservative.” Provided

Denise says she’s been a Republican since first registering to vote and describes herself as a strong conservative, her views based on the need to enact what she calls “slow, logical change” and support for a strong national defense.

“Republicans are pro making sure others know we’re a strong nation, that we have power, and we’re not afraid to use that power when needed,” she told The Post, noting that foreign leaders were “skeptical” of challenging America during Trump’s term.

Advertisement

Denise believes Trump’s handling of economic issues and ability to follow through on promises are his greatest strengths, while speaking carelessly and sounding “cringey” at times is a potential drawback.

“I think [Trump] needs to be a little more careful, to concentrate more on what he and his administration can do to help Americans, rather than what the opposition will do to hurt us,” Denise said.

While she does not find Harris to be trustworthy, Denise is impressed with her campaign ads and believes that the veep being nearly two decades younger than Trump could be an ace in the hole.

“Age definitely works in her favor in terms of the next four years,” she told The Post. “I think she’s appealing to younger voters, women voters for sure.”

George Ziegler, 60, Bethlehem

Advertisement

Also an educator, George has spent 25 years in the public school system, including time as a high school English teacher. The father of two adult sons, he now works as a literacy coach.

George Ziegler, a hard Democrat voter, says the Trump administration showed little urgency in addressing gun violence. Provided

As a self-described strong liberal who has voted consistently for Democrats, George says he’s most focused on gun safety and public school funding — issues he says Harris will better address than Trump.

“Kamala Harris has consistently supported increased investment in public education, advocating for higher teacher pay and better resources for schools,” George told The Post.

“On gun safety, she has pushed for stronger gun control measures, including universal background checks and a ban on assault weapons, which I believe are critical steps to reducing gun violence in schools and communities,” he added.

George believes the Trump administration’s education policies unjustly favored private schools, and that he did not act meaningfully on the gun issue.

Advertisement

“[Trump’s] administration… showed little urgency in addressing gun violence, focusing more on arming teachers than on implementing common-sense gun safety laws that could prevent tragedies,” he said.

As a Northampton County voter, George says he feels a “strong responsibility” because of the “significant weight” his ballot will carry nationally.

“There’s a sense of added importance knowing that my vote could help determine the outcome in a state that often swings the entire election,” George concluded.

Eric Zwick, 72, Lower Macungie Township

Eric is a real estate investor who has lived in Pennsylvania for 28 years since moving from New Jersey. He’s consistently voted for Democrats up through the Bill Clinton era, but told The Post that since the turn of the century, he’s become dissatisfied with the Democrats. Unhappy with what he calls “the party of the welfare state,” Eric has since become a Republican.

Advertisement
Eric Zwick, a New Jersey native now in Pennsylvania, calls the Democratic party “the party of the welfare state.” Provided

“Kamala’s position is [to] bring in more people, or get the people on welfare to support the Democratic Party,” Eric said of Harris’ record on illegal immigration.

Eric says the record inflation seen during the Biden-Harris years has forced him to increase the cost of living for his tenants.

“I feel guilty when I raise their rents [by] $50 a month,” he told The Post. “I’m looking for a more stable economic policy, and I think we had that with Trump.”

Though he describes himself as conservative, Eric believes some Republicans “are just way over the top” on issues like abortion.

“The states that have Republicans become ‘no abortion at all costs,’” Eric said of the post-Roe GOP. “No abortions for rape, no abortions for incest, and I totally disagree with that.”

Advertisement

While he will be voting in blue-leaning Lehigh County, Eric still feels the pressure to get his vote right. 

“I feel that, now more than ever, every single vote in this area really counts,” he said.

Sheri Curtin, 59, Bethlehem

A clinical research consultant in the pharmaceutical industry, Sheri says her moderate views on the issues “wouldn’t make either party happy.”

Sheri Curtin from Bethlehem is against the Republican party’s stance on abortion. Provided

Sheri told The Post she’s concerned about ongoing problems with drugs and crime, as well as women’s reproductive rights.

Advertisement

“You don’t give these drug addicts clean works and say ‘have at it,’ you get them into rehab programs,” Sheri said of Democrats’ “safe haven” approach to drug issues. “And if you have to do that through prison systems, then do it.”

Sheri also criticized Harris’ time as a liberal California prosecutor, telling The Post that “Kamala’s prosecution record doesn’t give me a lot of warm and fuzzy that she’s gonna be hard on these criminals that are destroying our society.”

But like the other voters, Sheri strongly rebuked the Republicans’ stance on abortion, calling Trump’s decision to appoint Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade “a gigantic bonehead move.”

“Coming from a medical background… a woman’s right to protect her life or spare an unjust and miserable existence for a child that will probably not survive is not fair,” Sheri said.

“You are forcing a condition on people, and it may not be one that they can comfortably live with,” she added.

Advertisement

Asked about the influence she’ll have as a Northampton County voter, Sheri answered simply: “If you don’t vote, don’t bitch!”

M.T., 23, Bethlehem

An electrical engineer by trade, M.T. spoke with The Post anonymously because he is a government employee with a security clearance. For him, this election will come down to the economy, immigration and abortion. His Catholic faith and desire to have several children are a significant factor in shaping how he views these issues, and his ultimate decision at the ballot box this November.

“The cost of living is just too high for recent college graduates to get started and build and save for things like starting a family and having children,” M.T. told The Post, noting that many grads like himself are burdened with student debt. “We as a country need children and it should be something that [is] promoted more.”

M.T. objects to Harris’ strong pro-choice stance, calling her YouTube ads on the subject “morally disturbing.”

Advertisement

“I think that you can’t kill innocent unborn children simply because you don’t know what their potential is,” he said. “They could be the next Albert Einstein or Tom Brady and have the potential to impact so many other people’s lives in a positive manner.”

However, M.T. is no fan of Trump because of his role in the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. Though he voted for Trump in 2020, he has vowed not to support him this year.

“If Trump were to lose this election, I don’t feel confident that the radical MAGA Republicans would accept Harris’ win, and they could escalate political polarization further to potentially dangerous levels,” he added.

Third party voters’ numbers have shrunk this cycle since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suspended his campaign last month, but M.T. remains among them.

“If Nikki Haley was on the ticket, that would be the easiest decision I’d ever make on the voting ballot,” M.T. told The Post, adding that he is strongly considering “throwing away” his vote to write her in. “But unfortunately, she is not.”

Advertisement

Asked if anything would make him consider voting for the Democrats, M.T. said he’d need to see Harris replaced at the top of the ticket with a more moderate candidate like Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro.



Source link

Pennsylvania

Suspect arrested for shooting near basketball court in Elkins Park, Pa.

Published

on

Suspect arrested for shooting near basketball court in Elkins Park, Pa.


ABINGTON TWP., Pa. (WPVI) — Police have arrested a suspect who they say fired shots at a vehicle near a crowded basketball court in Montgomery County.

Jamell Whitmore, 18, of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, was arrested on Thursday.

The shooting happened on March 22 near a basketball court on the 300 block of Cadwalader Avenue in Elkins Park, Pennsylvania.

Shooting near Elkins Park basketball courts sends stray bullet into home

Advertisement

Police said multiple callers reported hearing gunfire around 8:15 p.m. and witnessed a large group of people run from the area behind the McKinley Firehouse.

As a vehicle drove by, one of the men in the group, identified by police as Whitmore, ran off to the parking lot to retrieve a gun and began firing multiple shots towards the vehicle.

Police say it’s unclear if the vehicle was hit, but one of the bullets struck a nearby home.

No one in the home was injured.

Police said no innocent bystanders or those involved in the shooting were injured.

Advertisement

The motive for the shooting remains unknown.

Copyright © 2026 WPVI-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania-born indie rockers Tigers Jaw return with new album release

Published

on

Pennsylvania-born indie rockers Tigers Jaw return with new album release


The chorus for the song “Primary Colors” was something Walsh wrote years ago, with the song’s outro originally being used as a verse.

“And something just wasn’t quite clicking, and everything that I tried felt kind of forced,” Walsh said. “We were all just like, ‘Yeah, there’s something here, but it’s not quite doing what I think it has the potential to do.’”

The band then started toying with the dynamics between the verses and the chorus.

Advertisement

“It just unlocked something for me in the idea where I was like, ‘Wow, this kind of quiet, loud, quiet, loud format really works well with this song,’” Walsh said. “So yeah, it just transformed it instantly into an idea that felt a lot stronger.”

The album was recorded with Grammy-winning producer Will Yip, a relationship still budding from their 2014 album, “Charmer.” Collins said the new album’s sound is “as true as we could be to playing the record live.”

“I wasn’t as tied to the tones that have classically been Tigers Jaw because I think at this point, I’ve just come to this realization that no matter what, if we’re making it, it is Tigers Jaw,” Collins said.

The new album has a “palpable energy” that shares the same spirit as their earlier records, Walsh said. And while “tastes evolve,” the band followed “what feels good.”

“This is the best representation of the band at the time, and it’s almost like a snapshot of us as artists, as people, as a creative entity over this time in our career,” he said.

Advertisement

“Lost On You” is out now through Hopeless Records and is available on vinyl, CD and various streaming platforms.

“Lost On You” was released on March 27, 2026, through Hopeless Records. The album is available on vinyl, CD and various streaming platforms.

On April 16, Tigers Jaw will perform at Union Transfer at 8 p.m. They will be supported by Hot Flash Heat Wave and Creeks, the solo project of Balance and Composure vocalist and guitarist Jon Simmons, who is from Doylestown, Pennsylvania.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania court upends mandatory use of life-without-parole for second-degree murder

Published

on

Pennsylvania court upends mandatory use of life-without-parole for second-degree murder


What to Know

  • Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court says the state cannot automatically give life without parole for felony murder without weighing each defendant’s culpability in the killing.
  • The high court on Thursday ordered a new sentencing hearing for Derek Lee over a second-degree conviction, but paused it for four months to give state lawmakers time to consider legislation in response.
  • Pennsylvania law has made people liable for second-degree murder if they participated in an eligible felony that led to death. Life with no possibility of parole has been the only possible sentence.
  • The court says the current rule treats a lookout the same as the person who kills.

Pennsylvania’s high court on Thursday overturned the use of automatic life sentences without parole for people convicted of second-degree murder, saying it violates the state’s constitutional ban on cruel punishment when imposed without a closer look at the defendant’s specific role and culpability.

The court majority ordered resentencing in the case of Derek Lee, convicted of a 2014 killing in Pittsburgh, but the decision also has implications for others among the roughly 1,000 other inmates currently serving similar second-degree murder sentences.

The court’s order was put on hold for four months to give the General Assembly time to “consider appropriate remedial measures.” In a footnote, the justices said they were ruling on Lee’s sentence and not addressing “questions of retroactivity.”

Prison reform groups hailed it as a landmark decision, while the Allegheny County district attorney’s office said it will follow the court’s order.

Advertisement

Pennsylvania law has made people liable for second-degree murder if they participated in an eligible felony that led to death, and life without parole has been the only possible sentence.

“The mandatory penalty scheme of life without parole for all offenders convicted of second degree murder fails to assess individual culpability regarding the intent to kill, and mandates the same punishment regardless of that culpability,” wrote Chief Justice Debra Todd in the lead opinion. She characterized it as not distinguishing “between the lookout, and the killer who pulls the trigger.”

The state high court’s decision comes after years of advocacy to undo mandatory life without parole sentences both in Pennsylvania and nationally. Nazgol Ghandnoosh of the Washington-based Sentencing Project said she counts 11 states and the federal system as having such laws for that kind of crime, sometimes called felony murder. Several states — California, Colorado and Minnesota — have moved away from that sentencing framework in recent years, she said.

Justice Kevin Dougherty noted in a separate opinion that unlike those convicted of first-degree murder, defendants serving life without parole for second-degree murder have “never been found by a judge or jury to have harbored the specific intent to kill” and may not have had “any involvement whatsoever with the actual killing. He or she does not even have to expect or foresee that a life may be taken.”

Lee’s lawyers had wanted the court to rule that life without parole sentences are unconstitutional for all second-degree murder convictions in Pennsylvania, said Quinn Cozzens, a staff attorney for the Abolitionist Law Center, which helped represent Lee. Instead, the court ruled that trial judges must examine the individual circumstances of a defendant’s case to decide which sentence is most appropriate, including the potential of life without parole.

Advertisement

The state’s public defenders’ association said the ruling will generate new post-conviction litigation and require them to do more investigation as well as develop “strategic litigation” to get the decision to apply retroactively.

A jury convicted Lee of second-degree murder but acquitted him of first-degree murder in 44-year-old Leonard Butler’s shooting death. Butler was shot in a struggle over a gun with Lee’s codefendant, Paul Durham.

Prosecutors argued it should be up to state lawmakers and the executive branch to address the policy issues surrounding second-degree murder sentences. Todd wrote that while the district attorney’s office “acknowledges that there may be persuasive arguments why a non-slayer should not be held to the same degree of culpability as the slayer, it stresses that these are policy decisions for the General Assembly.”

Cozzens urged lawmakers to “address this constitutional violation, given that the court granted them the opportunity to do so.”

Rep. Tim Briggs, a suburban Philadelphia Democrat who chairs the state House Judiciary Committee, said he planned to engage with Senate Republicans on potential legislation in response.

Advertisement

Briggs said he wanted to have decision apply retroactively, to give people serving life “for being the getaway driver” to “have the opportunity to have their facts looked at again.”

“I think inaction leaves a lot of this up to the courts to decide. I don’t feel comfortable doing that,” Briggs said. “We have a policymaking role here.”

Justice Sallie Mundy wrote that Lee “willingly participated in an armed home invasion and robbery, and purposefully engaged in assaultive behavior in the form of tasing and pistol-whipping the victim.” She said Lee and Durham “arguably kidnapped the victims by forcing them into the basement” and it will be up to the county judge to decide if Lee’s life-without-parole sentence is appropriate.

Todd’s opinion, citing an advocacy group, said 73% of those convicted of felony murder in Pennsylvania were 25 or younger when the killing occurred and almost 70% are Black people.

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro also responded to the ruling on X.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending