Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Top Pennsylvania Lawmaker Says Democrats Are Ready To Pass Marijuana Legalization Bill, But ‘We Will Need Republican Support’

Published

on

Top Pennsylvania Lawmaker Says Democrats Are Ready To Pass Marijuana Legalization Bill, But ‘We Will Need Republican Support’


A top Pennsylvania House lawmaker says Democrats are ready to pass a marijuana legalization bill this session, but that the party “will need Republican support” to get the job done—adding that it will be a “heavy lift.”

At an event organized by the progressive non-profit Represent PA on Tuesday, House Speaker Joanna McClinton (D) said that legalizing and regulating cannabis sales is one way the state can raise revenue, as well as imposing a tax on certain gambling games.

“Most House Democrats support [marijuana legalization], though we will need Republican support for passing a bill this massive,” she said. “It’s going to be a heavy lift.”

She added that the reform “could be a new economic opportunity—from farmers to [dispensaries] and those who put together edibles.”

Advertisement

While Democrats narrowly control the Pennsylvania House, there’s a GOP majority in the Senate, so McClinton stressed that there’s an open question about whether that chamber will go along with the reform, which Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) also included in his latest budget proposal.

“Nearly half of U.S. states have already legalized recreational marijuana, including nearly all of our neighbors,” McClinton separately told The Daily Pennsylvanian. “Right now, many Pennsylvanians are simply driving to New Jersey or Maryland to purchase marijuana legally.”

While polls have shown bipartisan support for legalization among voters, the policy change has consistently stalled in the legislature, owing in large part to GOP opposition. But not all Republican members are against the reform—and one recently said she felt her party should seize the “opportunity to snatch” the issue from Democrats.

Rep. Rick Krajewski (D)—who announced in December his intent to file a legalization measure alongside House Health Committee Chair Dan Frankel (D)—said the policy would provide for “more responsible usage” of cannabis, compared to the status quo that’s left adults either buying from the illicit market or traveling across state lines to get regulated products.

“In terms of public health, when people buy stuff on the street or from smoke shops, they don’t know what else is in the product or the potency amount,” he said. “Legalization allows us to have protections over products.”

Advertisement

Krajewski also defended his and Frankel’s proposal to enact legalization through a state-run retailers—a novel regulatory model for marijuana that departs from what other lawmakers and the governor have called for in the past.

“With the model of state stores, we would get hundreds of millions of dollars more in state revenue because we would have proceeds from tax revenue and sales revenue,” he said.

“This is a clearly polarized issue and Pennsylvania is currently a purple state,” he added. “Getting any kind of legislative process moving has been difficult because some people aren’t even willing to engage on it.”

Rep. Jordan Harris (D) separately made the case in an interview with The Daily Pennsylvanian that legalization would benefit the states farmers, arguing that Pennsylvania’s agriculture community “should be growing and processing and reaping the benefits here within the state.”

“If we get this to the governor’s desk, I think surrounding states will see a decrease in their revenue because that money will be staying in Pennsylvania,” he said.

Advertisement

“What folks need to understand is that we have had medical marijuana in Pennsylvania for quite some time now and we have not seen a steep increase in the need for police or anything like that,” he added said. “So people’s mindset shouldn’t be ‘We’re flipping a switch from a dry state to a legalized state.’”

Frankel, for his part, said recently that he feels it’s feasible that the legislature could advance a legalization bill as part of the budget reconciliation process that must wrap up by the end of June.

The governor has similarly indicated that the reform could advance on that timeline. But there are still open questions about what, if any, cannabis legislation could garner the necessary consensus for enactment.

Meanwhile last month, the Pennsylvania House approved a separate bill sponsored by Frankel that’s meant to strengthen safety standards and oversight of the state’s medical marijuana program as lawmakers work to advance adult-use legalization.

While Pennsylvania’s medical cannabis program was enacted nearly a decade ago, lawmakers say the new measure, which now heads to the Senate, is necessary to improve testing compliance, product audits and lab inspections, among other aspects of the industry.

Advertisement


Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.

Separately, in a video interview released last month, the governor emphasized that the state is “losing out” to others that have already enacted adult-use legalization, while maintaining a policy that’s enriched the illicit market.

“I think it’s an issue of freedom and liberty. I mean, if folks want to smoke, they should be able to do so in a safe and legal way,” he said. “We should shut down the black market—and, by the way, every state around us is doing it. Pennsylvanians are driving to those other states and paying taxes in those other states.”

Pennsylvania’s Republican attorney general recently said he wants to be a “voice for potential public safety risks” of enacting the governor’s proposal—though he said his office would be ready to enforce the new law if lawmakers did vote to pass it.

Advertisement

The state’s agriculture secretary separately told lawmakers that he’s fully confident that his department is in a “really good” position to oversee an adult-use marijuana program if lawmakers act.

Meanwhile, in February, top Pennsylvania police and health officials told lawmakers they are prepared to implement marijuana legalization if the legislature moves forward with the reform—and that they stand ready to work together as the details of legislation to achieve it are crafted.

Amid the growing calls for marijuana legalization in Pennsylvania, a GOP state senator said prohibition has been a “disaster,” and a regulated sales model for cannabis—similar to how alcohol and tobacco are handled—could serve as an effective alternative.

Voters are ready to see that policy change, according to a poll released last month.

The survey, commissioned by the advocacy group ResponsiblePA, found that nearly 7 in 10 voters in the state support the reform—including a majority of Republicans. And 63 percent want to see the legislature enact the reform this year, rather than delaying it.

Advertisement

A Republican Pennsylvania senator also recently defended the push to legalize and regulate marijuana, calling it “the most conservative stance” on the issue.

Maryland Bill To Let Adults Make Marijuana Edibles And Concentrates At Home Heads To The Governor

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron at Patreon!





Source link

Advertisement

Pennsylvania

Bethlehem man sentenced under Pennsylvania’s new AI child porn law

Published

on

Bethlehem man sentenced under Pennsylvania’s new AI child porn law


A Bethlehem man is among the first to be sentenced under a Pennsylvania law passed last year, making it a crime to possess AI-generated child sex abuse material.

On Monday, Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas Judge Kristie M. Marks sentenced 35-year-old Adam Erdman to two years, four months to 10 years.

Erdman in September pleaded guilty to felony possessing child sex abuse material. He faced a possible sentence of 5 to 10 years in prison.

Lehigh County District Attorney Gavin Holihan announced the sentencing in a news conference Monday afternoon. The DA credited U.S. Rep. Ryan Mackenzie, who introduced the new legislation and state Sen. Tracy Pennycuick, who championed the final version of the law last year.

Advertisement

“Before this law was passed, the use of AI to generate child sexual abuse materials went unpunished,” Holihan said. “Prosecutors like me need legislation like this to arrest and convict the criminals who use evolving technology to victimize others.”

Macungie-based attorney Michael Ira Stump, representing Erdman, couldn’t immediately be reached for comment Tuesday morning.

Bethlehem police on March 31 were called by Erdman’s estranged wife, who reported finding three AI-generated nude images of juvenile girls on his personal computer.

Prosecutors said Erdman downloaded photos of the children on vacation from their parent’s social media account, and then used artificial intelligence photo-editing software to make the children appear naked.

Erdman was charged on April 17.

Advertisement

The case was investigated by Bethlehem Police Det. Stephen Ewald and was prosecuted by Lehigh County Senior Deputy District Attorney Sarah K. Heimbach.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Central Pennsylvania awarded over $1M for Chesapeake Bay Watershed conservation

Published

on

Central Pennsylvania awarded over M for Chesapeake Bay Watershed conservation


PENNSYLVANIA (WTAJ) — Over $17 million has been awarded to county teams across the Commonwealth for projects in reducing nutrient and sediment pollution in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

Grants were awarded to counties with projects taking place over the next 12 to 24 months. Many different human activities cause nutrient pollution and eroded sediment to enter streams, rivers, and lakes. This pollution can come from fertilizer, plowing and tilling farm fields and can cause stripping away of trees and vegetation, and increasing paved surfaces. 

Here are the grants awarded in our area:

  • Blair County Conservation District: $308,095
  • Cambria County Conservation District: $200,000
  • Centre County Government: $566,399
  • Clearfield County Conservation District: $368,209
  • Huntingdon County Conservation District: $409,134

“Pennsylvania’s clean water successes are rooted in collaboration—state, local, federal, legislative, and non-governmental partners, and of course landowners,” Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Secretary Jessica Shirley said. “The work will continue to evolve, and our focus will remain on setting our collaborative partnerships up for success well beyond 2025. The momentum is real, and you can see it in our improved water quality.”

Get the latest news, weather forecasts and sports stories delivered straight to your inbox! Sign up for our newsletters.

In total, 222 projects were approved, and it’s estimated to reduce nitrogen by 113,493 pounds/year, phosphorus by 28,816 pounds/year, and sediment delivered to the Chesapeake Bay by 1.8 million pounds/year.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Inside the legislative effort to expel cellphones from Pa.’s K-12 schools

Published

on

Inside the legislative effort to expel cellphones from Pa.’s K-12 schools


The case against a complete ban

There’s limited research available to date regarding the efficacy of school cellphone bans. Some studies, like one from 2024 at Auburn University, suggest such a policy could improve student engagement and social interactions with some limitations.

However, researchers at the University of Birmingham could not find much of a difference in academic and social outcomes between students who attended schools with cellphone bans and those who attended schools that did not.

School District of Philadelphia Superintendent Dr. Tony Watlington said in an interview with Philadelphia Magazine in August that he believes the decision is best made by each school.

“There are parents who feel very strongly that they need to be able to reach their children at all times, and there are others who feel the complete opposite,” Watlington told the magazine. “Cellphones can certainly be a distraction, but they can also be a walking library in the classroom.”

Advertisement

Some parents critical of legislative-level cellphone bans also highlight the need to reach their children in an era of school shootings and mass violence.

Santarsiero argued that cellphones, in those instances, may do more harm than good. Some school safety experts might agree.

Santarsiero recalled a time when he was a teacher where an armed robbery several blocks away prompted a lockdown at the school. Unaware of the robbery, he locked the classroom door, gathered his students to the corner of the room, away from the windows, and waited for instructions.

“We did that, and for the next hour and a half, before the incident was resolved, the kids started going on their phones, and they were texting home and really spreading a lot of rumors that turned out not to be true: that there was an armed shooter roaming the halls, that we were in imminent danger. And this was now filtering out to parents,” he said. “It was filtering out to other students, and it was creating a level of anxiety that was not helpful to trying to manage the situation.”

Pennsylvania School Boards Association, or PSBA, opposes Senate Bill 1014.

Advertisement

“While PSBA supports the goal of fostering learning-focused environments, the proposed legislation imposes a statewide, mandatory bell-to-bell ban on student cell phone use—stripping locally elected school boards of the ability to make decisions that best serve their communities,” the association wrote in a statement. “PSBA believes that locally elected school directors are in the best position to make decisions for their school communities concerning the use and possession of cell phones and other electronic devices in schools.”

According to PSBA, the bill “usurps local control.”

“PSBA also has some concerns with the wording of SB 1014, specifically the language regarding restriction of device possession and with the language regarding public comment,” PSBA wrote. “The bill would require schools to establish the manner in which a student’s possession of a device is to be restricted. It is unclear whether this language would require schools to take some sort of action to separate a student from their phone at the start of each school day (such as by purchasing and using lockable cell phone bags).”

Hughes said that officials must acknowledge the “good” that comes with the advancements in communication technology. However, he said the harm cannot be ignored.

“We need to have thoughtful conversations to come up with thoughtful policies that advantages the best of this technology, and minimizes the pain and the hurt that the technology can have on people — especially our children,” Hughes said.

Advertisement

The Senate is scheduled to return to session in January.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending