Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Some Republicans worry Trump’s debate performance could hurt his chances of winning Pa.

Published

on

Some Republicans worry Trump’s debate performance could hurt his chances of winning Pa.


It wasn’t a train wreck, but it was a missed opportunity.

Supporters of former President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania left the highly anticipated debate Tuesday night miffed by moderators — who they thought provided an uneven playing field — but also frustrated with their own candidate, who some acknowledged was less effective than Vice President Kamala Harris at reaching out to undecided voters.

“The fear for Republicans last night in Delaware County is that she did talk to a lot of those undecided folks more effectively,” said Frank Agovino, GOP chair in the Philadelphia suburban county.

Despite all the watch parties that gathering like-minded voters to see the big showdown, the real target audience was the roughly 3% of voters sprinkled across swing states like Pennsylvania who tuned in from home or caught the clips on their phones.

Advertisement

While it’s unclear whether the debate will shift a stubbornly deadlocked electorate, Harris made a focused play for the center and avoided much scrutiny of her career or issues she’s flip-flopped on. The former president, meanwhile, was goaded into a night filled with his own Trumpian outbursts instead of moments defining Harris.

“She had him on his heels and he was just defending his record,” Agovino said. “He missed an opportunity because she’s the incumbent.”

In the suburbs, he argued, Republican women are turning against the party — and Trump’s debate performance didn’t help convince them to stay.

“I’m afraid sometimes that the Trump campaign looks at the collar counties like we’re Elk County or some other county where it’s 80% Republican,” he said.

GOP strategist Charlie Gerow said Trump’s best moment of the night was his closing, when he asked Harris why she hadn’t implemented some of the plans she outlined on stage given that she’s been in office three and a half years. The problem with your best moment coming last, though, is that fewer people see it. And debates hinge on repetition.

Advertisement

“It’s like an opening statement to a jury — you lay out the case and then you reinforce it. And he seemed to be hitting on too many points rather than singularly going after the fact she has flip flopped on nearly every single position,” Gerow said.

The performance confused some Trump allies, who noted the Harris campaign had signaled she would try to bait the former president on topics that might unleash the more pugnacious Trump. And the Trump campaign had indicated its strategy would be for Trump to be restrained and stick to issues like the economy and immigration.

“By his handlers telling him he had to be so nice and he couldn’t be so sharp-edged, he didn’t force her to explain her positions either,” Gerow said.

Agovinocalled Trump’s pivots to topics like student loans and false claims that immigrants were eating pets “cringing,” but typical of the former president’s style.

“He didn’t know what he was talking about,” he said, noting that he hoped Trump supporters could see past the “warts” of the debate to his strength on issues like the economy and foreign policy.

Advertisement

Guy Ciarrocchi, a Chester County-based conservative commentator, said the opening question focused on inflation packed more punch than the back and forths that followed, given polls show how crucial the economy is to voters.

“Inflation is out of control and the economy is weak. Trump acknowledged it and reminded everyone of his economy. Harris missed the chance to explain what she had done wrong or how she’s going to fix it,” Ciarrocchi said. “That seems to have made the most impact.”

Christian Nascimento, chair of the Montgomery County Republican Party, said he felt Trump largely stayed on message, though he wished he would have been more aggressive about Harris’ past positions.

“The key takeaway was I don’t think that the vice president really moved the needle on defining herself and separating herself from the Biden policies,” he said.

But whether the debate shifts a race that has been stubbornly stuck in a deadlock is unclear. And even Republicans criticizing Trump’s performance Wednesday morning said they were skeptical it would move the needle.

Advertisement

“I don’t think it changed any minds,” Gerow said. ” Donald Trump is someone voters know a lot about. They don’t know much about Kamala Harris and last night was her opportunity to say, ‘Here I am and this is what I’m about and I don’t think she did particularly well in defining that.”

Despite a rocky night, some Pennsylvania Republicans want Trump to debate Harris again. Harris’ campaign has already issued the invitation, which Trump has not yet accepted.

Montgomery County Commissioner Tom DiBello was highly critical of the ABC moderators for fact checking Trump and asking about issues like Jan. 6 and the Affordable Care Act. He suggested a future debate featuring moderators from several networks, including Fox News and CNN.

“I think Trump will come back and he’ll focus more on her past policies or positions on policies,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Sen. John Fetterman receives no support for re-election from Pennsylvania House Democrats: report

Published

on

Sen. John Fetterman receives no support for re-election from Pennsylvania House Democrats: report


Pennsylvania Democrats are reluctant to support Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., for re-election, according to a new report.

Punchbowl News spoke to several Pennsylvania congressional members on Monday about whether they’d be willing to endorse Fetterman for another term in 2028 despite the backlash he’s been facing for opposing the Democratic Party.

“Want a sense of how tenuous Sen. John Fetterman’s (D-Pa.) position is with Pennsylvania Democrats? Not a single Pennsylvania House Democrat in the delegation will say Fetterman should run for re-election as a Democrat,” the report said.

Though the House members did not explicitly reject the idea of Fetterman running again, they avoided answering whether they believed Fetterman should seek a second term as a Democrat, often focusing instead on the 2026 midterm elections.

Advertisement

“My focus right now is on 2026, but I would just say I’d be very surprised if he ran in the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate,” Rep. Brendan Boyle said.

Rep. Chris Deluzio also answered that he would see what happens after 2026, though Punchbowl News acknowledged both he and Boyle are rumored to be launching their own Senate bids in 2028.

Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon added that she was interested in “getting through 2026 first.”

“I’ll hold my tongue so I don’t get in trouble,” Scanlon said.

Rep. Summer Lee told Punchbowl News the decision was “up to him” whether Fetterman should run, though she added that he would do so “at his own peril.”

Advertisement
Sen. John Fetterman has received no support from Pennsylvania Democrats for his re-election bid. WILL OLIVER/EPA/Shutterstock

Others were more vocal about their disagreements with Fetterman, though they stopped short of rejecting the idea of Fetterman running again.

“My concern is entirely about him and his health, and I’ll let 2028 take care of itself,” Rep. Madeleine Dean said.

“I disagree with many of his votes.”


Senator John Fetterman, wearing a black hoodie, speaks to reporters who are holding up cell phones to record him.
Several House members didn’t directly comment on whether Fetterman should seek a second term and instead turned their attention to the 2026 midterm elections. AP

“It’s no secret that I’ve been disappointed with some of his votes and that I’m confused by it,” Rep. Chrissy Houlahan added.

“But I’m not responsible for deciding whether he runs again.”

Fox News Digital reached out to Fetterman’s office and the other Pennsylvania Democrats mentioned in the report for comment.

Advertisement

Fetterman has publicly spoken out against his party on several issues, particularly its growing hostility against Israel.

The Pennsylvania senator has also supported President Donald Trump in his ongoing war against Iran and strict border policies.

Though strategists have suggested Fetterman could switch parties because of his bipartisan stance, he previously ruled out leaving the Democratic Party last year.

“I’m not going to switch. I’m just going to be an independent voice in the Democratic Party. I’m not going to be afraid of people,” Fetterman said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Leon Smith of Pennsylvania named 2026 National Teacher of the Year:

Published

on

Leon Smith of Pennsylvania named 2026 National Teacher of the Year:


“CBS Mornings” exclusively revealed Pennsylvania high school teacher Leon Smith as the 2026 National Teacher of the Year, which is selected by the Council of Chief State School Officers’ National Teacher of the Year program.

Smith, a social studies teacher at Haverford High School in Havertown, Pennsylvania, said the honor “just means everything.”

“It’s just such an honor to be able to represent teachers all over the country and really stand on the shoulders of so many others that have come before me that have done just such great work,” Smith said in an interview with “CBS Mornings” on Tuesday.

Smith, who teaches AP U.S. history and AP African American studies, was previously named the 2025 Pennsylvania Teacher of the Year.

Advertisement

In a video, students at Haverford High School and colleagues described Smith as passionate, caring, charismatic and engaging.

“He is everything you want in a teacher,” principal Pete Donaghy said in the video. “He relates African American studies or U.S. history to his students.”

Smith reflected on the difference teachers can make in the lives of their students. For him, his favorite teacher was his first grade teacher, Ms. Mason.

“Just how she made me feel,” Smith said. “So I just think that’s the power of a teacher, that it’s not always the content but it’s how you make the students feel is what they remember.” 

Smith said he thinks it’s crucial to let students “know that you care.”

Advertisement

“And also just being able to see things in students that they cannot see in themselves.”

Smith is also a longtime basketball coach, coaching the freshman team at Haverford High School.

“I was one of his players and he made sure that I felt seen,” a former player told “CBS Mornings.” “He made me feel like I actually had a purpose.”

Smith’s love for basketball started when he was young. His favorite player ever is Julius Erving, known as Dr. J., who Smith said made him “fall in love” with the game.

Erving surprised Smith on “CBS Mornings” by congratulating him in person on being named the National Teacher of the Year.

Advertisement

“When I got the notification about Leon, I realized that his school Haverford is literally right around the corner from a house that I lived in for 11 years,” Erving said. “So there was a connection … I said, ‘Well, let’s go and be on the show. Go see some people. Spread some joy. Spread some love.’”

Erving recalled a teacher who had an impact on his life.

“The most significant was Mr. Ray Wilson, who actually taught special ed in my high school, but he was also my basketball coach,” Erving said, describing Wilson as a lifelong mentor.

“He lived until he was in his 80s, and he was always there. He was always my first call anytime anything came up. Big or small, I could always call him, anytime, day or night. That was special.”

Smith called meeting Erving an honor and said he’s thankful for a moment that he’ll never forget.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Officials react to Pennsylvania abortion ruling, Medicaid ban struck down

Published

on

Officials react to Pennsylvania abortion ruling, Medicaid ban struck down


A Pennsylvania court ruling is reshaping abortion access in the state, striking down a decades-old ban on using Medicaid to pay for abortions and declaring that the Pennsylvania Constitution guarantees a right to abortion.

The decision came Monday from the state’s Commonwealth Court. In a 4-3 vote, judges ruled in favor of abortion rights in Pennsylvania and invalidated the state’s restriction on Medicaid-funded abortions.

Local abortion-rights advocates praised the ruling as a major step toward protecting access for low-income residents. Adrienne Daily, co-founder of Johnstown for Choice, said, “Everybody should have the right to that. If you restrict the coverage, you’re obviously discriminating against those that have lower income.”

Opponents of abortion rights called the decision a dramatic expansion of the court’s power and warned it will force taxpayers to pay for procedures they oppose. Michael Geer, president of the Pennsylvania Family Institute, said, “Taxpayers now in Pennsylvania will have no choice under this court ruling to fund abortions. And there are many, many millions of Pennsylvanians who think abortion is wrong. It’s the taking of an innocent human life and to force taxpayers who conscientiously object to abortion to then fund it is just plain wrong.”

Advertisement

Abortion-rights advocates pushed back, arguing abortion access is healthcare and a personal decision. Daily said, “This is a family issue. This is a personal issue. This is a bodily autonomy issue.”

Pro-life leaders also warned the ruling could have broader implications for other abortion-related laws. Geer said, “It is sweeping and there’s no question it’s judicial overreach.” He added, “If this ruling stands, it will invite attacks on every remaining pro-life safeguard that has been put into law by lawmakers at the behest to the people of Pennsylvania over decades.”

The case could still be appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. That decision lies with Republican Attorney General Dave Sunday. His office has not provided a response, but the Associated Press reported a spokesperson said the office is reviewing the decision and did not say whether it will appeal.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending