Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania State Police troopers help rescue bald eagle that was hit by car

Published

on

Pennsylvania State Police troopers help rescue bald eagle that was hit by car



CBS News Pittsburgh

Live

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — A bald eagle that was hit by a car has been taken in for rehabilitation after State Police troopers helped rescue it.

Advertisement

Pennsylvania State Police shared the story of the rescue on X, formerly known as Twitter.

State Police say that Troopers Ebbert and Rizzo were on duty and were called for a report of a bald eagle that was struck by a vehicle. 

Trooper Ebbert used his jacket to help secure the bald eagle, that was dealing with an injury to its wing.

The eagle was taken to the State Police Newport barracks, just north of Harrisburg.

Advertisement

Troopers handed the injured eagle off to Game Commission wardens, who took the eagle for rehabilitation. 





Source link

Pennsylvania

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania: Sportsbook promo codes, odds, spread, over/under – February 23

Published

on

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania: Sportsbook promo codes, odds, spread, over/under – February 23


The Pennsylvania Quakers (9-15, 1-8 Ivy League) will attempt to break an eight-game losing run when they visit the Dartmouth Big Green (5-17, 1-8 Ivy League) at 7:00 PM ET on Friday, February 23, 2024. The Big Green have lost five games straight.

Find odds, spreads, over/unders and more from multiple sportsbooks in this article for the Pennsylvania vs. Dartmouth matchup.

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania Game Info

  • When: Friday, February 23, 2024 at 7:00 PM ET
  • Where: Edward Leede Arena in Hanover, New Hampshire
  • How to Watch on TV: ESPN+
  • Live Stream: Watch this game on ESPN+

Watch live college basketball games from all over the country, plus ESPN originals and more NCAA hoops content on ESPN+!

Sportsbook Promo Codes

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania Odds, Spread, Over/Under

Check out the odds, spread and over/under for this matchup across multiple sportsbooks.

Advertisement

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania Betting Trends

  • Dartmouth is 7-12-1 ATS this year.
  • The Big Green have been an underdog by 6.5 points or more 10 times this season, and covered the spread in four of those matchups.
  • Pennsylvania has compiled an 8-14-0 ATS record so far this year.
  • Quakers games have gone over the point total 10 out of 22 times this season.

Check out all the futures bets available at BetMGM!

Not all offers available in all states, please visit BetMGM for the latest promotions for your area. Must be 21+ to gamble, please wager responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact 1-800-GAMBLER.

© 2023 Data Skrive. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Colorado-based company forced to pay $25,000 settlement to Pennsylvania for illegally selling consumer information

Published

on

Colorado-based company forced to pay $25,000 settlement to Pennsylvania for illegally selling consumer information



CBS News Pittsburgh

Live

HARRISBURG (KDKA) – Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry on Thursday announced a settlement with a Colorado company accused of selling Pennsylvanians’ information to telemarketers. 

Advertisement

According to Henry’s office, Shopgala LLC, a Colorado-based lead generator, also operates Surveys2cash and they took consumer information from people who registered to get free samples or payment for completing online surveys. 

The company then allegedly failed to disclose to those people that their information could be sold to telemarketers. 

“Do Not Call means just that, and my office will continue to do all we can to aggressively target those who illegally and carelessly cross those boundaries,” Attorney General Henry said. “Thousands of consumers registering for free samples had no idea they were also signing on for invasive and disruptive telemarketing calls.”

The settlement requires Shopgala to pay $25,000 and that money will be used for “public protection and educational purposes,” according to the Attorney General’s Office. 

Also, the company is now enjoined from selling or sharing customer data unless the data was acquired in accordance with the requirements set under the Federal Telemarketing Sales Rule. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Court Rejects Red Book Pricing in Workers' Compensation 

Published

on

Pennsylvania Court Rejects Red Book Pricing in Workers' Compensation 


In the case of Federated Insurance Co. v. Summit Pharmacy, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court challenged the state’s method of calculating pharmaceutical costs in workers’ compensation cases.  

In the case of Federated Insurance Co. v. Summit Pharmacy, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court challenged the state’s method of calculating pharmaceutical costs in workers’ compensation cases.  

The court objected to the use of Red Book values, which are similar to the manufacturer’s suggested retail price of a car, to determine the average wholesale price (AWP) of drugs. 

Federated Insurance Co. sought a review of an order from the Pennsylvania Bureau of Workers’ Compensation that required the insurer to pay Summit Pharmacy approximately $72,500 to reimburse the cost of generic drugs provided to a claimant for her work-related injuries.  

Advertisement

The hearing officer used the Red Book values to calculate this reimbursement amount, a practice adopted by the Bureau for resolving disputes over pharmaceutical costs. 

The insurer argued that the Bureau’s use of Red Book values was inconsistent with Pennsylvania’s Workers’ Compensation Act, which limits the reimbursement of pharmaceuticals to 110% of the AWP. The insurer also contended that the Bureau’s ongoing use of the Red Book represented an improper delegation of legislative authority to a private entity. 

Summit Pharmacy, on the other hand, argued that AWP is a term of art used within the pharmaceutical industry, which regards the Red Book as an accepted source of AWP. According to Pennsylvania precedent, AWP is intended to be an objective estimate of drug acquisition costs derived on a national basis. 

The court sided with the insurer, ruling that Red Book values did not reflect AWP as required by the Workers’ Compensation Act. The court directed the Bureau to identify and publish a different, nationally recognized schedule to determine AWP, reasoning that AWP should be an industry average price, not one charged by a single manufacturer. It noted that the Red Book’s publisher followed a policy under which AWP was reported by manufacturers, calculated based on a markup specified by the manufacturer and suggested wholesale price was reported by the manufacturer. 

Advertisement

Scorecard: The court ruled that the use of Red Book values to calculate prices for pharmaceuticals in workers’ compensation cases is inconsistent with the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act. The Bureau has been directed to identify and publish a different, nationally recognized schedule for determining AWP. 

Takeaway: This ruling underscores the importance of insurers understanding and challenging the methodologies used to calculate reimbursements in workers’ compensation cases. It may prompt a review of similar practices in other jurisdictions, potentially leading to more accurate and fair reimbursement rates. &





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending