Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Lobbyist says she was harassed by current PA lawmaker

Published

on

Lobbyist says she was harassed by current PA lawmaker


Highlight PA is an unbiased, nonpartisan newsroom powered by The Philadelphia Inquirer in partnership with PennLive/The Patriot-Information, TribLIVE/Pittsburgh Tribune-Evaluate, and WITF Public Media. Join our free newsletters.

HARRISBURG — A lobbyist for one in all Pennsylvania’s most influential unions says a sitting state Home lawmaker sexually harassed her, and he or she is urging the legislature to develop inside guidelines that govern who can deliver misconduct complaints.

Andi Perez, who advocates on behalf of Service Workers Worldwide Union 32BJ in Harrisburg, plans to make the allegation Friday night in Philadelphia throughout a listening session organized by new state Houser Speaker Mark Rozzi (D., Berks).

Rozzi has scheduled a sequence of public conferences to solicit suggestions concerning the state Home’s working procedures amid partisan impasse over which political occasion controls the chamber. The periods supply a uncommon alternative for Pennsylvanians to straight weigh in on the foundations, which in most years are rapidly adopted at first of every new legislative session.

Advertisement

Perez stated she was harassed by a male lawmaker whereas discussing a invoice outdoors of the Capitol constructing, in accordance with ready testimony reviewed by Highlight PA. She didn’t present the lawmaker’s identify, his occasion affiliation, or further particulars.

The lawmaker “determined to caress my leg whereas I used to be sporting a skirt all of the whereas telling me he was impressed by my ardour and information of the problems we have been discussing,” Perez plans to say. “I moved away from him hoping he would cease — he didn’t.”

“I might sit right here for hours telling you the vary of feelings I felt after this,” she wrote within the remarks. “After all I used to be filled with rage on the disrespect and conceitedness it requires to so openly sexually harass me in a public place the place I’m simply attempting to do my job for the employees in my union.”

Perez tried to file a grievance with the state Home Ethics Committee, in accordance with her testimony, however was informed “sorry, the foundations don’t will let you file a grievance since you aren’t an worker of the Home. There was nothing within the Home Guidelines that allowed management to formally take any additional motion.”

A spokesperson for state Home Democrats didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. A spokesperson for the chamber’s GOP caucus stated it had “not been made conscious of the referenced allegation.”

Advertisement

In 2019, state Home management added office protections to the chamber’s guidelines for the primary time, banning “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors or different verbal or bodily conduct of a sexual nature.”

The change was made after two girls accused a male lawmaker of bodily and sexual abuse, however he continued to serve within the legislature till the top of his time period. One of many girls was additionally a state lawmaker and obtained a restraining order towards him.

As Highlight PA beforehand reported, the coverage solely covers state Home staff. That has meant people who repeatedly work together with lawmakers — akin to different authorities staff, lobbyists, constituents, and journalists — have been unable to report an allegation to the committee.

Perez needs the legislature to undertake sexual abuse and harassment insurance policies that cowl extra individuals who work together with lawmakers in the middle of their official duties, in accordance with her testimony.

“Nobody is above the regulation,” Perez wrote in her ready remarks. “A lawmaker who harasses somebody needs to be held accountable by their very own friends by an Ethics course of.”

Advertisement

The state Home and Senate usually undertake guidelines on the primary day of a brand new two-year legislative session after leaders hammer out the small print behind closed doorways.

The higher chamber did so on Jan. 3, however the guidelines stay unfinished within the decrease chamber. Democrats are awaiting the outcomes of particular elections anticipated to provide them a one-vote majority — which might permit the occasion to set the foundations with out compromise — whereas Republicans, dealing with inside divisions, have unsuccessfully tried to drive the chamber again in session.

Rozzi has canceled future periods of the state Home and convened a bipartisan committee to barter the foundations. In accordance with his workplace, he scheduled the listening tour to “yield options to partisan gridlock” and to determine a path to advancing a proposed constitutional modification that may give survivors of childhood sexual abuse an opportunity to sue their perpetrators.

The latter is a private trigger for Rozzi, who himself is a survivor.

The hearings present an uncommon alternative for public dialogue of the foundations, which dictate how simple or laborious it’s for payments to change into regulation and, importantly for Perez and different advocates, disciplinary procedures for lawmakers.

Advertisement

In accordance with her testimony, Perez’s expertise has already prompted a response contained in the legislature. State Rep. Kate Klunk (R., York) final 12 months proposed a rule change to explicitly ban state Home lawmakers from participating “in sexual harassment whereas performing Home-related providers or duties or in or on any Home-owned or leased property or services.”

Perez stated Klunk’s proposal, which was not adopted, can be a “step towards altering the tradition of Harrisburg.”

As within the state Home, state Senate guidelines solely permit the chamber’s lawmakers and staff to deliver inside sexual harassment complaints.

In early January, state Sens. Katie Muth (D., Chester) and Lindsey Williams (D., Allegheny) pressed the chamber to undertake guidelines that may cowl non-employees, an effort rebuffed by Republicans.

“Sen. Muth and I need to guarantee that each particular person in that constructing is protected and has a secure place to report misconduct,” Williams informed Highlight PA.

Advertisement

Whereas chamber-wide efforts failed, Senate Democrats are within the strategy of amending an inside ethics coverage so as to add sexual harassment protections for non-employees, Williams stated.

Each pushes have been backed by SEIU, in addition to various different labor unions and progressive advocacy teams.

In letters despatched to lawmakers in each chambers earlier this month, the coalition referred to as for expanded guidelines.

“How the Home chooses to control itself is a message to each office and employer within the state. It units a normal to which the commonwealth ought to maintain itself,” the letter stated. “Passing [Klunk’s] decision would inform anybody who involves advocate earlier than the Home that they are going to be shielded from harassment, and that their security is of the very best concern.”

WHILE YOU’RE HERE… In the event you discovered one thing from this story, pay it ahead and change into a member of Highlight PA so another person can sooner or later at spotlightpa.org/donate. Highlight PA is funded by foundations and readers such as you who’re dedicated to accountability journalism that will get outcomes.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

As gun violence drops sharply in Pa., focus is on what’s working – WHYY

Published

on

As gun violence drops sharply in Pa., focus is on what’s working – WHYY


Continuing problems

Even as gun violence rates decline, gun reform advocates say there is much more work to be done.

Gun deaths and injuries cost Pennsylvanians $1,692 on average per person in 2019, according to data from EveryTown. More than 1,900 Pennsylvanians died by gun violence in 2021, with 181 being children and teenagers.

State Rep. Patty Kim (D-Dauphin/Cumberland) said lawmakers should have acted on gun reform a long time ago.

“We cannot see another life go away because we can’t get it together,” she said.

Advertisement

Gun reform bills have stalled in the State Legislature this session. A Senate billintroduced by Sen. Vincent Hughes (D-Philadelphia/Montgomery) that would create a state research center for gun violence has awaited movement since January 2023.

A House bill establishing a gun violence task force in counties that surpass a firearm-related death threshold has not moved since March 2023. The ACLU opposes the task force bill due to the potential for Pennsylvania to prosecute more gun violence cases, even though more firearm deaths in the state are a result of suicide than homicide.

Two House bills, one aiming to track firearms sales and the other banning multi-burst gun modifiers, failed to pass by one vote in May.

State Sen. Vincent Hughes (D-Philadelphia/Montgomery) said as the State Legislature keeps gun reform “bottled up,” the state must fund organizations doing work locally.

“With the resources that this Commonwealth has, we need to be investing in organizations like yours and all the others that are around here that are doing the hard work but are doing it for nothing,” he said to Mariah Lewis, a gun violence survivor.

Advertisement

Lewis, now a med tech at a personal care facility in Palmyra, was shot in the face by her son’s father in 2021. She lost her left eye and now uses a prosthetic. Her attacker was spiraling after experiencing difficulty finding employment with a felony.

Kia Hansard, co-founder of nonprofit Concerned About the Children of Harrisburg, said that her organization helps provide immediate employment to people coming home from state correctional institutions regardless of conviction. Since opening in 2017, CATCH has found 544 people permanent employment.

Lewis founded Eye Choose Me, a nonprofit focused on domestic violence and gun reform, in 2022. Two years after its first meeting, she is still helping to fund the organization from her own pockets.

Money is not the only thing that can buy safe communities, according to Lewis. She emphasized the importance of outreach strategies and speaking to vulnerable people on the ground.

“Conversations are free,” Lewis said. “You going out into the community is free.”

Advertisement

CATCH co-founder Charla Plains said funding social services, including counseling services in schools, is integral to steering children away from gun violence. 

Shapiro’s budget would put $11.5 million toward after-school learning opportunities for children and $11 million toward building parks and improving shared spaces.

Carter acknowledged the importance of local organizations pushing for community connection because the Harrisburg police “just don’t have that trust.”

Philadelphia’s Citizens Police Oversight Commission reports 3 people killed by police from January to May 2024.

“When we are talking about gun violence, we cannot ignore the fact that gun violence also includes law enforcement violence,” Kia Hansard said.

Advertisement

Shapiro’s budget would invest $16 million to create four new Pennsylvania State Police cadet classes in an effort to aid understaffed local police departments.

Former Gov. Tom Wolf approved the Gun Violence Investigation and Prosecution Grant Program, which funds the investigation and prosecution of firearm-related violence. The program was funded by $50 million in federal American Rescue Plan Act money.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

More funding could be coming to a Pa. affordable housing program

Published

on

More funding could be coming to a Pa. affordable housing program


Shapiro’s proposal would not increase PHARE funding to $100 million overnight, instead adding $10 million to the ceiling each year until 2028. He also proposed adding $50 million to the Whole-Home Repairs Program, a separate grant for low-income homeowners to address problems like leaking roofs, unsafe electrical wiring, and broken furnaces.

Shapiro also pitched scrapping PHARE’s current funding formula in favor of what his budget proposal calls a “guaranteed” transfer. Bonder noted, the current formula sometimes results in PHARE receiving less money than its cap allows. The guaranteed transfer would mean funds reliably hit the cap every year.

This higher sum would be overwhelmingly funded via the state’s realty transfer tax, one of several funding sources for PHARE, along with natural gas impact fees and money from the National Housing Trust Fund. Money from the transfer tax goes to several areas of the budget, including the general fund, and Bonder said the state’s current surplus means there is spending flexibility.

State House Democrats back Shapiro’s proposal as written, according to their spokesperson, Beth Rementer. But state Senate Republicans would need to be won over in budget negotiations.

Advertisement

The state budget was due June 30, but lawmakers are still haggling over the final package.

Asked for comment, a spokesperson for state Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Scott Martin (R., Lancaster) responded, “We do not have an update to share on that issue at this time.”

State Sen. Elder Vogel Jr. (R., Beaver), who sponsored the legislation over the past two sessions, is somewhat optimistic.

“We’re hopeful that we’re going to see a cap increase,” Vogel’s communications director, Abby Chiumento, said. “With negotiations ongoing, we don’t know what’s going to be in the final budget.”

PHARE was signed into law in 2010. The legislation that led to the program’s establishment received near-unanimous support in both chambers.

Advertisement

The Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, which is affiliated with but not run by the state, chooses the recipients of PHARE grants. The recipients range from nonprofits to county governments.

The program “allows municipalities and localities and counties to figure out how they can best use the dollars,” said Allegheny County Executive and former Democratic state representative Sara Innamorato. “For us, it’s addressing homelessness, but if there’s a community that wants to create more first-time home buyers, they can design a program around that.”

Innamorato, who sponsored the PHARE cap increase bill in the state House when she served there, argues more funding is overdue.

“There’s many projects that are worthy that go unfunded every year,” she said. “We could always use more money to invest in addressing housing needs.”

Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan, and nonprofit newsroom producing investigative and public-service journalism that holds the powerful to account and drives positive change in Pennsylvania.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey stands by Biden, says voters will decide on issues, not bad debate

Published

on

Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey stands by Biden, says voters will decide on issues, not bad debate


PHILADELPHIA, PA – SEPTEMBER 21: Senator Bob Casey (D- PA) addresses supporters before former President Barack Obama speaks during a campaign rally for statewide Democratic candidates on September 21, 2018 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Midterm elect

Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey said Monday that President Joe Biden is able to run a strong race and serve a second term in the Oval Office, standing by his close ally in the critical battleground state following a disastrous debate performance that’s prompting some national Democrats to question his candidacy.

Advertisement

Casey had stayed quiet about Biden’s performance before making his first public appearances since Thursday night’s debate, including a campaign stop in Scranton, Pennsylvania, the blue-collar hometown that he shares with Biden and that the president name-checked in the debate.

Casey, who is also seeking reelection in November, acknowledged that Biden had a bad debate, but also suggested that voters have bigger concerns.

“He had a bad night and debate, but I think people know what’s at stake,” Casey told reporters, arguing that voters are more concerned about issues like abortion, labor and voting rights and the fate of democracy.

Advertisement

“I’ve been at this a while, and I know his work,” Casey said. “And I also know that the American people and the people of Pennsylvania are going to focus on these races in the way that I just outlined.”

Casey would not elaborate on why he thinks Biden is fit and said he doesn’t worry that Biden’s debate performance would affect his own race for Senate.

Advertisement

They lead the ticket together in a battleground state that is critical to the Democrats’ fortunes in holding the White House and Senate. No Democrat has won the White House without Pennsylvania’s support since Harry S. Truman in 1948.

Casey’s opponent, former hedge fund executive David McCormick — like other down-ballot Republicans — has seized on Biden’s performance, accusing Casey of lying about Biden’s fitness to be president and suggesting that Biden’s Cabinet should consider forcing him out of office, using the 25th Amendment.

The president’s debate performance last week left many donors, party strategists and rank-and-file DNC members publicly and privately saying they want the 81-year-old Biden to step aside to allow the party to select a younger replacement at the Democratic National Convention in August.

Advertisement

Biden spent the weekend trying to stabilize his campaign, then gathering with family as previously planned at Camp David, where they discussed the path forward.

The president and his team characterized his debate performance as an outlier, arguing one bad night shouldn’t define him or jeopardize the election.

Advertisement

Biden told a Saturday fundraiser on Long Island that he didn’t have a “great night” at the debate, but that former President Donald Trump’s falsehoods and reminders about the January 6, 2021, insurrection had resonated more with undecided voters.

McCormick, for his part, hasn’t commented on a blatant falsehood Trump told during the debate about the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by his supporters. Trump falsely claimed the attackers were “a relatively small number of people that went to the Capitol and in many cases were ushered in by the police.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending