Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Harrisburg is broken. The Pa. House has a chance to fix it. | Opinion

Published

on

Harrisburg is broken. The Pa. House has a chance to fix it. | Opinion


Think about if one NFL group might rewrite the foundations at first of every season. They hand them to the opposite groups as they’re heading out to the sphere simply earlier than the primary recreation begins. The one privileged group decides the place the strains are drawn, hires and fires the referees, decides what performs are authorized. At any level within the season — mid-game, mid-playoff, mid-Tremendous Bowl — that one group can bench gamers on the opposite group, flip again the clock, no matter they need, as a result of, proper now, they’re in cost.

The poisonous chaos wouldn’t final lengthy. Gamers would stop; viewers would flip away in disgust. However someway, in our state authorities, that sort of conduct is allowed.

Within the Pennsylvania Senate, the vote on legislative guidelines passed off rapidly on the primary day of session, lengthy earlier than the senators had an opportunity to learn the 43 pages of working guidelines, 11 pages of moral conduct, and 16 pages of economic working guidelines launched earlier that very same day.

As in previous years, these guidelines say the president professional tempore of the Senate can appoint the chairs to every committee, so chairs belong to the Senate speaker’s (the bulk) occasion. These chairs then resolve which payments shall be put ahead for a vote, which supplies committee chairs near-dictatorial energy and renders minority occasion members irrelevant.

Advertisement

The identical has been true within the Pennsylvania Home till this yr, when a razor’s edge majority upended the established order. The group that held full sway for a dozen years hoped to carry management at the least a number of months longer, however particular elections on Tuesday and an sudden speaker controversy have known as that into query.

Now, with all eyes on the Pennsylvania Home, our representatives face the identical questions the founders of our commonwealth and of our nation wrestled with: What ought to illustration seem like? Is it doable to guard the rights of the minority whereas affirming the desire of the bulk? How can the legislative course of replicate altering public sentiments whereas sustaining stability and guaranteeing the widespread good?

“What ought to illustration seem like?”

These questions ought to be a part of any legislative course of, however for many years in Pennsylvania, the foundations have given increasingly energy to at least one occasion whereas shutting the opposite out virtually utterly. In 2021-2022, an evaluation by my colleagues and me at Truthful Districts PA discovered that simply two payments launched by Senate Democrats, and one launched by a Home Democrat, made it to the governor’s desk. All the remaining have been launched by Republicans. That is appalling, particularly in a state the place registered Ds outnumber Rs, and a rising variety of independents see their issues ignored utterly.

Past that, for years the foundations have been drafted to permit solely the privileged few full management by inserting a lot energy within the arms of committee chairs.

In previous classes, public dialogue and votes on legislative guidelines have taken little time — generally, we’ve been advised, lower than the size of a median soccer recreation. This yr, the Home deliberation is taking longer. Legislators from each events could have a say — and even voters have had an opportunity to weigh in — because the Audio system Workgroup to Transfer Pennsylvania Ahead has collected written feedback and held public hearings in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, State Faculty, and Wilkes-Barre. Speaker Mark Rozzi has introduced his intention to include strategies into the revised Home guidelines, with negotiations underway in preparation for the subsequent Home session day later this month.

Advertisement

» READ MORE: Pennsylvanians have been requested what they wish to change concerning the state Home. Their reply: much less partisan impasse.

Volunteers with Truthful Districts PA have been finding out legislative guidelines since we noticed the way in which bipartisan redistricting reform efforts have been upended in each the Pennsylvania Home and Senate in 2018. With the League of Ladies Voters, we launched the Repair Harrisburg marketing campaign within the spring of 2022, calling for consideration to legislative guidelines. Final fall, we revealed a report that highlights the hurt executed when legislative guidelines block wanted bipartisan options.

Pennsylvania’s full-time, two-year legislative classes usually accomplish far lower than neighboring states with part-time classes. Legal guidelines to deal with problems with long-standing public concern are ignored for years. Based on our evaluation, half the payments handed in a single chamber go nowhere within the different. In the meantime, amendments like Senate Invoice 1 — three constitutional amendments shoehorned into one invoice — velocity by with no public hearings or pretense of deliberation.

Earlier than that listening tour started, we wrote to legislative leaders with our personal suggestions for higher guidelines. Many Pennsylvania residents who spoke or provided feedback pointed towards these proposals and added their very own requests for higher transparency, extra public enter, and collaboration for finest options.

We encourage all Pennsylvania representatives to take their time and get this proper. Higher guidelines can be a win for all of us.

Advertisement

Carol Kuniholm is the chair of Truthful Districts PA.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

David McCormick claims he created ‘hundreds of jobs’ in Pa. Records say otherwise

Published

on

David McCormick claims he created ‘hundreds of jobs’ in Pa. Records say otherwise


The merger

In June 2003, McCormick initiated discussions with Robert Calderoni, chairman and CEO of Ariba, a Palo Alto-based FreeMarkets competitor, about the possibility of a “strategic relationship of some form” and potentially a “business combination.” After more discussions, McCormick approached his board about the idea in September.

From the beginning, the company made clear its intent was to save money by reducing “redundancies,” including those resulting from duplicative jobs. According to SEC filings, FreeMarkets told its shareholders that a benefit of the merger would lead to “at least $25 million in annual potential cost savings, through the consolidation of redundant facilities, personnel and overhead.” Jim Frankola, chief financial officer for Ariba at the time, told analysts on a January 2004 conference call, “Of those savings, we anticipate approximately one-third to come from duplicative G&A functions, plus the one-half from redundant R&D efforts, and the remainder from other functions.”

Later that month, Michael Schmitt, Ariba’s executive vice president and chief marketing officer, told San Jose Mercury News that FreeMarkets would consolidate its headquarters into Ariba’s, with the companies trying to “eliminate redundant jobs.” That same day, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette quoted an analyst saying it was likely “a lot of people in Pittsburgh will lose their jobs,” adding “that’s certainly what typically happens” with a merger.

McCormick told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, “There will certainly be redundant functions and consolidation of those functions.” In a July 2004 deposition regarding the merger, he told the court that job losses were expected “particularly in our technology development organization where our plan as part of the merged company is to eliminate that completely.” The next month, McCormick told Ariba shareholders what they “accomplished” leading up to the merger: “We have already eliminated 150 positions and have plans to eliminate another 100 positions over the next two quarters.”

Advertisement

Indeed, by the time the merger was complete, in July 2004, FreeMarkets had laid off or eliminated 150 positions. By December 2005, the combined company had reduced its workforce by an additional 100 employees, for a grand total of 250 lost jobs. At least 100 of those jobs were in Pittsburgh.

Calderoni defended McCormick in an interview with the New York Post, saying, “When we bought FreeMarkets, Dave insisted on keeping jobs in Pittsburgh. It really mattered to him as part of the transaction. In fact, he pushed for us to move jobs from California to Pittsburgh.”

It was a difficult time to run a startup tech company. The early aughts saw the bursting of a tech bubble that had grown during the late 1990s thanks to easy access to capital but started to pop in the early 2000s. As the Pittsburgh Gazette reported, the merger married “two unprofitable online business-to-business software and service firms that made names for themselves at the height of the dot-com boom, only to see their fortunes turn sour with the industry, forcing them to struggle to grow.”

McCormick wrote in his book that “creative destruction along with the bursting of the tech bubble eventually found its way to our sector as well.” However, he also admitted, “We didn’t move fast enough to become one of the true ‘software as a service’ companies that would eventually dominate the landscape. As CEO, I hadn’t built a team around me capable of evolving our business model quickly enough,” leading to the decision to merge with Ariba.

The merger, however, profited McCormick quite well. He became president of Ariba and a member of its board of directors, drawing $500,000 in annual salary, compared to the $350,000 he made at FreeMarkets, and was eligible for an annual bonus targeted at $300,000. He was also awarded 83,333 shares in Ariba, valued at $921,663, and 500,000 shares of stock options that had a potential realizable value between $3.4 million and $8.8 million. In September 2005, McCormick resigned as president of Ariba to work in the George H.W. Bush administration and received another $1,701,699 in severance.

Advertisement

McCormick spokesperson Elizabeth Gregory told WHYY News in a statement, “Dave is proud to have helped create hundreds of jobs in Western Pennsylvania during his time at FreeMarkets.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

While Biden campaigns in Pennsylvania, some Democratic leaders in the House say he should step aside

Published

on

While Biden campaigns in Pennsylvania, some Democratic leaders in the House say he should step aside





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Biden makes campaign stop at Northwest Philly church

Published

on

Biden makes campaign stop at Northwest Philly church


‘We thank God’

Morris founded Mt. Airy Church of God in Christ in 1966. It has since grown in size and influence, becoming an important and iconic place of worship for the region. Fenton, who watched Martin Luther King Jr. give his famous “Mountaintop” speech when he was 11 years old, now runs the congregation and often invokes King in his sermons, including Sunday’s.

Parishioner Handsome Newton called the event “an amazing experience.”

“It’s something that’s surreal and something that some people have never gotten to experience in their lifetime,” he told WHYY News. “This is something I’m going to tell my grandkids and great-grandkids about one day.”

Newton downplayed Biden’s age, adding, “I don’t care what people said about the debate. He actually spoke extremely well today and I was blessed to be here.”

Advertisement

Zetta Butler, another parishioner, called Biden’s visit “God’s given gift to the church.”

“We’re seeing so much evil that goes on in the world,” she said. “This is a man of integrity and we are so proud to have him here with us today of all days, any day. I know the election is coming up and we’re going to vote for him. He’s going to be a second-term president, and so we thank God for him and everyone.”

Down in Pennsylvania

While Biden has made Pennsylvania a regular stop in his drive for a second term, this was his first visit since the debate for which his performance has given many Democrats — including prominent elected officials — cause for concern about his ability to win the election.

Earlier in the day, Rep. Adam Schiff of California, a Democrat, told MSNBC that Biden’s TV appearance did not assuage those concerns.

The first major post-debate poll, by Bloomberg, shows Biden moved up in every swing state except Pennsylvania, where he is now down seven points — well outside the margin of polling error. With 19 electoral votes, the Keystone State may be essential to any hope for victory.

Advertisement

In particular, polling suggests Biden is down among Black voters in Pennsylvania and around the country. Whereas he received 92% of the Black vote in 2020, only 50% of Black voters in Pennsylvania say they would vote for him today.

Therefore, the trip to the Church of God in Christ appears to be a strategy to try to win some of those votes back.

“Black history is American history,” the president said at the church.

Fenton noted that Biden’s visit would be reported as such an attempt, saying, “I know the media says President Biden is visiting a Black church. There’s nothing on our program that says a Black church.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending