Connect with us

Pennsylvania

5 ways Pa.’s marijuana laws could change in 2023

Published

on

5 ways Pa.’s marijuana laws could change in 2023


Highlight PA is an unbiased, nonpartisan newsroom powered by The Philadelphia Inquirer in partnership with PennLive/The Patriot-Information, TribLIVE/Pittsburgh Tribune-Assessment, and WITF Public Media. Join our free newsletters.

HARRISBURG — Because the legislative session picks up, Pennsylvania lawmakers are contemplating a number of modifications to the state’s hashish legal guidelines that may develop who’s eligible for a medical marijuana card and improve protections in opposition to DUI expenses for sufferers, amongst different proposals.

And the brand new Democratic majority within the state Home is bringing contemporary hope to advocates who wish to see Pennsylvania be part of dozens of different states the place possessing a small quantity of hashish is authorized or decriminalized.

Amending marijuana legal guidelines might open up debate over a number of different points — a number of of which had been highlighted in a collection of investigative tales from Highlight PA that uncovered severe flaws within the medical program, together with questionable well being claims, weak oversight, and unfair guidelines. Listed below are the 5 marijuana proposals to look at this legislative session.

Advertisement

 

Overhauling the medical program

Two state senators — a Republican and Democrat — are pushing for main modifications that may broaden who’s eligible for a medical marijuana card.

At the moment, the regulation limits which sufferers and docs can take part. Medical doctors should register with the state and full a four-hour coaching course in an effort to approve sufferers. And sufferers can solely qualify for a card if they’ve one in all 23 accepted circumstances.

The proposal from state Sens. Mike Regan, R-York, and James Brewster, D-Allegheny, states “elected officers and bureaucratic staffers shouldn’t be deciding what ailment qualifies a person to make use of medical marijuana.” Their proposal would permit any physician who is permitted to prescribe managed substances to resolve whether or not a affected person can use hashish.

Advertisement

Their proposal would additionally remove the necessity to renew medical marijuana playing cards — that are issued by the state. The annual price is $50, though the division says it has eradicated the charge for folks in sure monetary hardship applications, corresponding to Medicaid.

Regan and Brewster haven’t launched their laws but, and Brewster stated there are a variety of points which can be nonetheless up for dialogue. For instance, the senators didn’t make clear of their memo whether or not sufferers would nonetheless have to renew their certification at the very least every year. Some affected person advocates have urged the state to permit lifetime certifications for sufferers with terminal or persistent medical circumstances.

Individually, state Sen. Dan Laughlin, R-Erie, needs to permit sufferers to purchase hashish in edible varieties. Final session, he and state Sen. Sharif Road, D-Philadelphia, additionally proposed permitting sufferers to develop a restricted variety of hashish crops at house — a change that a number of hashish advocates advised Highlight PA would scale back the associated fee burden on sufferers.

Judith Cassel, a Harrisburg lawyer specializing in hashish points, needs to see lawmakers remove an unequal promoting system.

State regulation bans docs from promoting that they will approve sufferers for this system — which supplies a bonus to third-party companies that supply to attach sufferers to docs. These companies function with little to no oversight.

Advertisement

“Brokers who don’t have any medical expertise by any means are out promoting and getting sufferers to enroll with them,” Cassel advised Highlight PA.

She stated the uneven enjoying area deprives docs of earnings, whereas the charges that go to those corporations drive up prices for sufferers.

Decriminalization

Throughout the nation, 21 states have legalized adult-use hashish and 10 extra have “decriminalized” easy possession in a roundabout way, in response to the Marijuana Coverage Venture.

“Many of the decriminalization states impose a civil tremendous, which avoids the life-altering collateral penalties a felony file carries,” in response to the group.

However Pennsylvania residents can nonetheless face felony expenses for possessing small quantities of marijuana. Beneath state regulation, somebody who possesses 30 grams of marijuana or much less could be convicted of a misdemeanor and withstand 30 days in jail and as much as a $500 tremendous.

Advertisement

“I’d prefer to see the arrests cease first,” stated Chris Goldstein, a regional organizer for the Nationwide Group for the Reform of Marijuana Legal guidelines. “They’ve stopped all around the nation. However Pennsylvania is continuing ahead with felony prohibition virtually unabated.”

Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and another municipalities have diminished possession penalties on their very own. However decriminalization payments haven’t progressed within the state legislature in recent times, Goldstein stated.

One bipartisan invoice within the Senate final session would have diminished the penalty for possessing a small quantity of marijuana to a abstract offense, reduce the utmost tremendous for possession to $25, and eradicated jail time for that cost. Smoking a small quantity of marijuana in a public house would have a most tremendous of $100. The invoice didn’t obtain votes in committee. Decriminalization laws is predicted to be launched once more this session.

DUI protections

Pennsylvania is one in all 12 states that has a zero-tolerance regulation that prohibits driving with any quantity of marijuana within the physique, in response to the Nationwide Convention of State Legislatures. Drivers in Pennsylvania can face felony expenses if they’ve “any quantity” of marijuana or its metabolites of their blood — even when they’re registered medical marijuana sufferers.

“Due to this, unimpaired sufferers at present face the danger of being arrested, prosecuted and convicted for utilizing medicinal marijuana that has no bearing on their potential to drive a automobile,” state Sen. Digital camera Bartolotta, R-Washington, wrote in a memo to her colleagues.

Advertisement

Bartolotta’s proposal would require proof of precise impairment as the premise for a DUI conviction in these instances. Final session, the measure handed out of committee with out opposition however didn’t obtain a vote within the full Senate.”There simply wasn’t time to get it on the ground,” Bartolotta advised Highlight PA. “However I’m optimistic that we can transfer ahead.”

Employment guidelines

An investigation final yr from Highlight PA confirmed how grey areas within the state’s medical marijuana regulation create pointless confusion and pressure staff to decide on between their job and a doctor-approved drug. Neighboring states corresponding to Delaware, New Jersey, and New York supply higher protections to staff.

A proposal final session would have positioned particular restrictions on folks working in a number of newly outlined safety-sensitive positions, together with firefighters, pharmacists, and individuals who instantly look after sufferers or kids. The measure handed out of a Senate committee with all Republicans in favor and all Democrats in opposition to. The invoice then died within the full chamber.

A brand new model of the invoice has not been launched but, however the challenge remains to be a precedence for the Pennsylvania Chamber of Enterprise and Trade.

“The considerations nonetheless stay,” Alex Halper, the chamber’s vp for presidency affairs, advised Highlight PA. “The present medical marijuana regulation is ambiguous. It’s unclear and places employers, and staff, and job candidates in a tough place.”

Advertisement

Legalization

New York and New Jersey permit adults 21 and over to make use of marijuana. Within the fall, Maryland voters accepted adult-use legalization with a poll query and now lawmakers are rolling out deliberate modifications.

Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro campaigned on legalizing hashish for adults. Two Republican state senators have come out in assist of legalization. However Senate President Professional Tempore Kim Ward, R-Westmoreland, in November stated the federal authorities would wish to take away its prohibition earlier than she would wish to discuss legalizing leisure hashish right here.

There was little motion within the legislature for the reason that new session started as Republicans and Democrats have wrestled for management of the state Home. Democrats received a slim majority within the state Home with three particular election victories on Tuesday.

Extra Democrats than Republicans assist legalizing hashish. However it isn’t clear if there are sufficient votes to cross adult-use legalization. Nicole Reigelman, a spokesperson for state Home Democrats, advised Highlight PA the caucus helps enhancing the “medical marijuana regulation to make sure employment protections for medical marijuana cardholders and to handle DUI penalties, as long as an individual isn’t impaired.”

“Any enlargement of the marijuana trade for grownup use would wish to emphasise well being and security, social justice, and fairness, in addition to supporting the trade’s workforce,” Reigelman stated in an e mail.

Advertisement

Patrick Nightingale, an lawyer and government director of the Pittsburgh chapter of the Nationwide Group for the Reform of Marijuana Legal guidelines, hopes the change in energy will end in hashish payments at the very least receiving committee hearings in Harrisburg.”When the Republicans had been within the majority … they appointed the committee chairs, and if their management didn’t need one thing shifting by means of committee, it didn’t,” Nightingale advised Highlight PA. “That barrier not stays.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Nov. 5 election too close to decide mail-in ballot issues, Pennsylvania Supreme Court says • Pennsylvania Capital-Star

Published

on

Nov. 5 election too close to decide mail-in ballot issues, Pennsylvania Supreme Court says • Pennsylvania Capital-Star


In a pair of decisions published Saturday evening the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied requests to resolve questions about the commonwealth’s vote-by-mail law in the final few weeks before the Nov. 5 presidential election.

Dismissing a request by the voting rights groups to block the enforcement of a rule requiring mail-in ballots to bear a handwritten date on the return envelope, the Supreme Court said the risk of confusing voters with a change in voting rules was too great.

“This Court will neither impose nor countenance substantial alterations to existing laws and procedures during the pendency of an ongoing election,” the unsigned order said.

Chief Justice Debra Todd filed a dissenting statement in which she argued that voters and election officials need guidance in the upcoming election.

Advertisement

“We ought to resolve this important constitutional question now, before ballots may be improperly rejected and voters disenfranchised,” Todd said.

The court also rejected a request by the Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of Pennsylvania to stop county election officials from allowing voters to remedy mistakes on their mail-in ballots that would cause them to be disqualified. 

The flurry of weekend rulings exactly a month before Election Day leaves the rules in place during the April 23 primary unchanged.

That means voters casting ballots by mail in this election must complete the voter declaration on the outside of the return envelope by signing and dating it for their ballot to be counted. 

Voters using mail-in ballots should also be certain to place the ballot in the unmarked secrecy envelope before placing it in the return envelope, as that is an error that can lead to a ballot being disqualified.

Advertisement

Counties where the boards of elections have adopted so-called “notice and cure” policies may notify voters of errors and allow them to fix their mistakes before polls close on Election Day. The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania this week published a guide to such policies in all 67 counties.

The court said the RNC and Pennsylvania GOP had demonstrated a lack of due diligence by failing to pursue the challenge to “notice and cure” policies earlier.  The Republican organizations had asked the court to exercise its King’s Bench authority to hear the case without first litigating it in the lower courts, a power generally reserved for exceptionally urgent cases.

“King’s Bench jurisdiction will not be exercised where, as here, the alleged need for timely intervention is created by Petitioners’ own failure to proceed expeditiously and thus, the need for timely intervention has not been demonstrated,” the order said.  

In a footnote, the court said the Republican parties had also raised the issue before the 2022 midterm election but the Commonwealth Court dismissed the case for a lack of jurisdiction.

“Three election cycles have since passed, and the Petitioners have not challenged any of the county notice and cure policies in a court of common pleas,” the order said.

Advertisement

Justice Kevin Brobson said in a separate statement that he agrees that it is too close to the election for the court to decide the question

“Deciding these questions at this point would, in my view, be highly disruptive to county election administration,” Brobson wrote, adding that it would be difficult for the court to hear evidence and testimony in such a short timeframe.

Earlier Saturday, the court granted an appeal by the RNC and the RPP challenging a Commonwealth Court ruling last month requiring election officials in Washington County to notify voters when their mail-in ballots are rejected and allow them to vote provisionally at their polling places on Election Day.

The Washington County board of elections had adopted a policy days before last April’s primary of marking ballots as “received” in the state ballot tracking system when they had actually been segregated due to a disqualifying error.

Act 77 of 2019 introduced changes to the Election Code, including allow voters to cast ballots by mail without an excuse for not going to the polls. Mistakes by voters completing their ballot packets have been the subject of challenges in every election since. A study estimated that more than 10,000 voters were disenfranchised in the primary election because of such errors.

Advertisement

Proceedings in several courts since 2020, when no-excuse mail voting was first an option, have established that the date on the outside of the envelopes serves no official purpose. 

The Commonwealth Court ruled last month that the dating requirement violates the Pennsylvania Constitution because it serves no compelling reason for the government to infringe upon the charter’s guarantee of the right to vote.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Photos: A visual look at Trump’s return to Pennsylvania for a rally at site of assassination attempt – WTOP News

Published

on

Photos: A visual look at Trump’s return to Pennsylvania for a rally at site of assassination attempt – WTOP News


BUTLER, Pa. (AP) — Thousands of supporters returned to Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday to rally around Donald Trump at the…

BUTLER, Pa. (AP) — Thousands of supporters returned to Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday to rally around Donald Trump at the same site where a gunman tried to assassinate him in July.

Trump’s campaign predicted that tens of thousands would attend the event, billed as a “tribute to the American spirit,” and hundreds were lining up as the sun rose. Speakers who took the stage ahead of the GOP nominee — who has characterized his return as a fulfillment of “an obligation” to Butler — recalled the details of the July 13 shooting, praised the former president’s courage and said God protected him that day, something Trump has also suggested about his surviving the attempt.

There were numerous references and tributes to Corey Comperatore, who died at the July rally as he shielded family members from gunfire. His fireman’s jacket was set up on display surrounded by flowers, an artist created a patriotic rendering of the former fire chief live on stage, and Comperatore’s sisters wiped tears from their eyes as their brother was honored from the stage.

Advertisement

A visibly heightened security presence surrounded the site, with men in camouflage uniforms stationed on roofs with large guns. The building from which shots were fired in July was completely obscured by tractor-trailers, a large grassy perimeter and a fence, featuring Trump’s image from the previous rally. Other tweaks included most bleacher seats being arranged at the sides, rather behind the stage.

Copyright
© 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania school boards up window openings that allowed views into its gender-neutral bathrooms

Published

on

Pennsylvania school boards up window openings that allowed views into its gender-neutral bathrooms


What to Know

  • A Pennsylvania school district has reversed course and boarded up window openings it recently installed that allowed people in a middle school hallway to peer into two gender-neutral-designated bathrooms.
  • South Western School District Superintendent Jay Burkhart said Friday that the two windows were installed in recent weeks following an August vote by the district’s conservative-majority school board.
  • The board president said the move was designed to monitor and prevent misbehavior.
  • Such openings weren’t installed in any of the school’s non-gender-neutral bathrooms. Burkhart says the openings were covered by plywood on Thursday on the advice of lawyers from the Harrisburg-based Independence Law Center, a conservative legal group the board consulted before ordering the windows installed.

A Pennsylvania school district has reversed course and boarded up window openings it recently installed that allowed people in a middle school hallway to peer into two gender-neutral-designated bathrooms, the superintendent said Friday.

The two windows were installed in recent weeks following a vote in August of the South Western School District’s conservative-majority school board, a move the board president said was designed to monitor and prevent misbehavior. Such openings weren’t installed in any of the school’s non-gender-neutral bathrooms.

The openings were covered by plywood on Thursday on the advice of lawyers from the Harrisburg-based Independence Law Center, a conservative legal group the board consulted before ordering the windows installed, Superintendent Jay Burkhart said.

“I believe that we have to protect all of our students,” Burkhart said in a phone interview. “Students are entitled to privacy and I don’t want to violate that.”

The board “has been targeting transgender students and stripping away their rights for a while,” said Kristina Moon, a lawyer with the Philadelphia-based Education Law Center, which has asked affected students to reach out to it. She said the “multiple tiers and assignments” of bathrooms “overcomplicated a nonissue,” stigmatizing students.

Advertisement

“Now they’ve cut actual holes for windows into the student bathrooms — but only the bathrooms they expect trans and nonbinary children to use. This is a horrifying violation of children’s privacy and cruel discrimination targeted against trans and nonbinary kids,” Moon said in an emailed statement.

The mother of an eighth-grader at Emory H. Markle Middle School in Hanover said Friday that she considered the decision to cover up the windows “a small victory.”

Jennifer Holahan, who drew attention to the bathroom window openings by posting a photo on social media, said she’s “nervous to see” what happens at a meeting next week of the conservative-majority school board.

“This has been a continuing agenda that they’ve had,” Holahan said in a phone interview. “They’ve proved this more than once. I think this is the first time that the school board president has been shut down. And I just wonder what’s to come from that.”

School board president Matthew A. Gelazela, elected as a Libertarian in 2021, told a reporter seeking comment Friday that he considered the call to be criminal harassment and abruptly hung up.

Advertisement

Earlier this week, Gelazela issued a statement defending the bathroom windows as a safety improvement — that “in making the area outside of stalls more viewable, we are better able to monitor for a multitude of prohibited activities such as any possible vaping, drug use, bullying or absenteeism,” the Evening Sun of Hanover reported.

Gelazela’s statement also warned students that they should not consider the bathroom areas outside of the toilet stalls to be private.

Markle Middle School Principal Wes Winters directed questions about the bathroom windows to Gelazela. Board member Justin Lighty declined to discuss the matter, while several other board members and the board’s lawyer didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

In an emailed statement, the ACLU of Pennsylvania described the school board’s policy as discriminatory and one that makes children less safe. The South Western School District has about 4,400 students.

The York Dispatch reported this week that the board has been looking into LGBTQ+ students and bathrooms for more than a year, acting on concerns from unspecified people to establish five bathroom categories: male and female based on sex assigned at birth, male and female based on gender identity, and single-user facilities that are deemed gender neutral.

Advertisement

Gelazela said during an Aug. 14 board meeting that the windows were part of bathroom changes meant to bolster privacy, the Dispatch reported. The vote was 6-3 in favor of adding the windows, though the Evening Sun reported that work had already begun when the vote was taken.

Holahan said the window openings not only allowed people in the hallway to peer into the bathrooms, they also let noises from the bathrooms be heard. Burkhart, the superintendent, said the two gender neutral bathrooms have not been a particular problem for the type of misbehavior Gelazela cited. The renovations cost $8,700, Burkhart said.

At least 11 states have adopted laws barring transgender girls and women from using girls and women’s bathrooms at public schools, and in some cases other government facilities.

As for Pennsylvania, the Education Law Center wrote in a January analysis that federal appeals courts have ruled students have a right to use bathrooms and locker rooms aligned with their gender identity. Moon, a senior lawyer for the center, said all children have the right to use an easily accessible bathroom convenient to their classes that affords them true privacy and does not discriminate based on sex and gender identity.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending