Connect with us

New York

New Yorkers With Marijuana Convictions Will Get First Retail Licenses

Published

on

ALBANY, N.Y. — New York State will quickly announce plans to usher in its first shops for retail gross sales of marijuana by the tip of the 12 months, giving candidates entry to stockpiles of the drug grown by native farmers and providing sweeteners like new storefronts leased by the state.

The one catch? To be one of many state’s first licensed retailers, you or a member of your loved ones will need to have been convicted of a marijuana-related offense.

The coverage, to be introduced by Gov. Kathy Hochul on Thursday, is a part of a concerted push to guarantee that early enterprise homeowners within the state’s projected billion-dollar marijuana business might be members of communities which have been affected by the nation’s decades-long battle on medicine.

In favoring these with marijuana convictions and prepping their companies for turnkey gross sales, New York seems to be making an attempt to keep away from pitfalls encountered in another states, which have seen designated “social fairness” candidates and different mom-and-pop marijuana companies wrestle with points like lack of capital or competitors from deep-pocketed company operations.

Chris Alexander, the manager director of the state’s Workplace of Hashish Administration, stated that by focusing early on “those that in any other case would have been left behind,” New York was in a “place to do one thing that has not been accomplished earlier than.”

Advertisement

To that finish, Ms. Hochul has proposed — and the Legislature appears more likely to move — together with $200 million on this 12 months’s finances to assist the fledging companies, cash that will be spent on discovering, securing and renovating storefronts for retailers. That want for state help is especially acute in New York Metropolis, the place actual property costs have rebounded because the worst of the Covid pandemic has receded.

Below the regulation handed final March that permitted the possession and leisure use of marijuana in restricted quantities by adults, half of all marijuana-related licensestogether with these for growers and different components of the provision chainare earmarked for girls, minorities, distressed farmers, veterans and “people who’ve lived in communities disproportionally impacted” by the drug battle.

In New York, Black and Latino residents have for years been way more more likely to be arrested on marijuana expenses than white, non-Hispanic individuals.

Mr. Alexander stated he anticipated between 100 and 200 licenses to go to individuals who have been convicted of a marijuana-related offense earlier than the drug was legalized, or those that have “a mother or father, guardian, baby, partner, or dependent” with a marijuana conviction.

Mr. Alexander additionally stated his workplace would consider candidates on their enterprise plans and expertise in retail.

Advertisement

The ensuing dispensaries would be the first to open within the state by the tip of the 12 months, Mr. Alexander stated, although some others could open shortly after, maybe in early 2023. The state has not set a restrict on the variety of retail licenses it plans to challenge; state officers stated it should rely on market demand.

The proposed rules have been revealed on Wednesday afternoon on the hashish administration workplace’s web site; the state’s Hashish Management Board is predicted to fulfill on Thursday to contemplate them, with approval anticipated.

The primary wave of candidates will seemingly embrace individuals like Baron Fajardo, a Harlem resident who plans to use for a retail license. He was 16 when the police discovered him smoking marijuana in his hallway and arrested him. A half dozen different pot arrests adopted as he moved from smoker to supplier.

He stated it was a blessing that New York was planning to provide individuals like him the prospect to construct on their experiences in a authorized means that will enable them to supply for his or her households and begin to construct generational wealth.

“As an individual you’re feeling down, a little bit bit defeated, like ‘Oh, I acquired a stain on my identify,’” stated Mr. Fajardo, now 34. “Now, that stain is definitely the identical factor that may assist you to.”

Advertisement

Mr. Alexander stated that he thought giving so-called “fairness entrepreneurs” an opportunity to woo prospects earlier than extra established hashish corporations — together with these presently operating medical marijuana services — start to compete with them would assist them succeed.

“I might press the inexperienced button proper now and have 40 dispensaries on-line,” stated Mr. Alexander, talking of the state’s extant medical dispensaries. “However as a substitute we’ve determined that the oldsters who’ve been most impacted even have the area and the true runway to take part in a significant means.”

The state additionally hopes that some within the present unlawful marijuana market — typically often known as “legacy” candidates — could also be persuaded to use for licenses as a substitute as a result of some might be thought of fairness candidates.

The early opinions of the plan appeared constructive, significantly amongst those that have been dismayed by the state’s comparatively languorous method to each legalizing the drug and establishing a retail business.

Kassandra Frederique, the manager director of the Drug Coverage Alliance, a nationwide group that lobbies for extra liberal drug legal guidelines, stated that New York gave the impression to be studying classes from different states the place guarantees of social fairness are “not at all times panning out within the methods individuals wished.”

Advertisement

“I feel they’re making an attempt to resolve for the exhausting issues first, and I feel that’s admirable,” she stated, noting new companies’ want for capital. “Should you have been the primary to get to harm, you need to be the primary to profit.”

State Senator Liz Krueger, a Democrat from the Higher East Aspect, stated that she anticipated the $200 million to be included within the finances, due in April.

“We would like them to achieve success, which implies we have to assist a few of them,” she stated, including that signing of leases might be a difficult proposition for sellers who “have been promoting illegally behind a constructing till not too long ago.”

“They may not have all that checking account and paperwork and attorneys that an actual property individual would wish to cope with,” Ms. Krueger stated.

Preparation for New York ’s plunge into leisure marijuana will start subsequent week, because the state plans to open its software course of for cultivators, who will develop the drug at farms across the state and supply their merchandise to the brand new retailers, guaranteeing that farmers can have consumers because the market opens.

Advertisement

Whereas leisure marijuana was legalized in New York final 12 months, in a transfer that included the expungement of many earlier convictions, the rollout of retail gross sales has been sluggish — permitting some entrepreneurs on tribal lands close to the Canadian border to arrange unlicensed dispensaries. Neighboring states like Massachusetts, which started promoting marijuana in 2018, started drawing keen prospects from New York within the meantime.

Along with the conviction-based standards, Mr. Alexander stated his workplace would weigh candidates’ probability of operating profitable companies — a reminder that the state has each ideological and income objectives to fulfill. Forty p.c of tax income from the brand new dispensaries is earmarked for communities affected by medicine.

Nonetheless, he was assured that there have been loads of eligible candidates in New York, noting that heavy policing of marijuana had ensnared a whole bunch of hundreds of residents.

“We’re assured that these individuals exist,” Mr. Alexander stated. “We all know that a variety of people have gone on to do nice issues,” regardless of previous drug expenses.

Different states have tried to emphasise fairness of their markets. However in California, for instance, such efforts have been difficult by strict regulation, excessive taxes and substantial obstacles to entry which have left the state struggling, years later, to quell a thriving black market of untested, untaxed weed.

Advertisement

And in New Jersey, social fairness candidates who hope to benefit from a regulation just like New York’s have struggled to seek out capital and safe leases — a part of the impetus behind New York’s $200 million expenditure.

The information of the governor’s plan drew a pointy rebuke from State Senator Rob Ortt, the minority chief, who criticized the Democrats who management Albany for handing out “a whole bunch of hundreds of thousands in taxpayer {dollars} to those that have damaged the regulation.”

“That is simply one other reminder that Albany is out of contact with the wants of law-abiding New Yorkers, who pay their taxes, and do the appropriate factor,” Mr. Ortt stated in an announcement.

Mr. Alexander dismissed criticism over the choice to favor these with prior felony data, saying that the Legislature had made clear its intentions in passing the regulation final 12 months, and noting that the state often funds financial improvement in a variety of industries.

State Assemblywoman Crystal Peoples-Stokes, the Meeting’s majority chief, stated that the transfer to prioritize these with marijuana convictions was essential in making certain that the business wasn’t dominated by out-of-state conglomerates.

Advertisement

“We’re making an attempt to do what no different state has accomplished, and that’s concentrate on their individuals,” stated Ms. Peoples-Stokes, an architect of the regulation. “It’s important as a result of it’s an enormous business that’s going to develop our economic system so much, and I feel it is sensible to let that progress start with New Yorkers.”

Even individuals with out marijuana-related convictions appear to assist the state’s plan. Lulu Tsui plans to use for a license to open a dispensary in Brooklyn. Ms. Tsui expects to qualify as a social fairness candidate as a result of she is a girl and she or he is Chinese language American, although she’s going to come behind these with such convictions.

However that’s the way it needs to be, she stated.

“They need to be given reparations,” she stated. “Their blood, sweat, sacrifice, time precedes anyone else.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Published

on

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Today would have been the first Monday of New York City’s congestion pricing plan. Before it was halted by Gov. Kathy Hochul, the plan was designed to rein in some of the nation’s worst traffic while raising a billion dollars for the subway every year, one toll at a time.

A year’s worth of tolls is hard to picture. But what about a day’s worth? What about an hour’s?

To understand how the plan could have worked, we went to the edges of the tolling zone during the first rush hour that the fees would have kicked in.

Advertisement

Here’s what we saw:

Video by Noah Throop/The New York Times; animation by Ruru Kuo/The New York Times

You probably wouldn’t have seen every one of those cars if the program had been allowed to proceed. That’s because officials said the fees would have discouraged some drivers from crossing into the tolled zone, leading to an estimated 17 percent reduction in traffic. (It’s also Monday on a holiday week.)

The above video was just at one crossing point, on Lexington Avenue. We sent 27 people to count vehicles manually at four bridges, four tunnels and nine streets where cars entered the business district. In total, we counted 22,252 cars, trucks, motorcycles and buses between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. on Monday.

Advertisement

We wanted to see how the dense flow of traffic into the central business district would have generated money in real time.

Though we can’t know that dollar amount precisely, we can hazard a guess. Congestion pricing was commonly referred to as a $15-per-car toll, but it wasn’t so simple. There were going to be smaller fees for taxi trips, credits for the tunnels, heftier charges for trucks and buses, and a number of exemptions.

To try to account for all that fee variance, we used estimates from the firm Replica, which models traffic data, on who enters the business district, as well as records from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and city agencies. We also made a few assumptions where data wasn’t available. We then came up with a ballpark figure for how much the city might have generated in an hour at those toll points.

The total? About $200,000 in tolls for that hour.

Note: The Trinity Place exit from the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, which would have been tolled, is closed at this hour.

Advertisement

It’s far from a perfect guess. Our vehicle total is definitely an undercount: We counted only the major entrances — bridges, tunnels and 60th Street — which means we missed all the cars that entered the zone by exiting the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive or the West Side Highway.

And our translation into a dollar number is rough. Among many other choices we had to make, we assumed all drivers had E-ZPass — saving them a big surcharge — and we couldn’t distinguish between transit buses and charter buses, so we gave all buses an exemption.

But it does give you a rough sense of scale: It’s a lot of cars, and a lot of money. Over the course of a typical day, hundreds of thousands of vehicles stream into the Manhattan central business district through various crossings.

Trips into tolling district, per Replica estimates

Advertisement
Queens-Midtown Tunnel 50,600
Lincoln Tunnel 49,200
Williamsburg Bridge 27,900
Manhattan Bridge 24,000
Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel 23,100
Queensboro Bridge 21,700
Brooklyn Bridge 17,100
Holland Tunnel 15,400
All other entrances 118,000
Total 347,000

Note: Data counts estimated entrances on a weekday in spring 2023. Source: Replica.

The tolling infrastructure that was installed for the program cost roughly half a billion dollars.

The M.T.A. had planned to use the congestion pricing revenue estimates to secure $15 billion in financing for subway upgrades. Many of those improvement plans have now been suspended.

Methodology

Advertisement

We stationed as many as five counters at some bridges and tunnels to ensure that we counted only cars that directly entered the tolling zone, not those that would have continued onto non-tolled routes.

Our count also excluded certain exempt vehicles like emergency vehicles.

We used estimates of the traffic into the district to make a best guess at how many of each kind of vehicle entered the zone. Most of our estimates came from the traffic data firm Replica, which uses a variety of data sources, including phone location, credit card and census data, to model transportation patterns. Replica estimated that around 58 percent of trips into the central business district on a weekday in spring 2023 were made by private vehicles, 35 percent by taxis or other for-hire vehicles (Uber and Lyft) and the remainder by commercial vehicles.

We also used data on trucks, buses, for-hire vehicles and motorcycles from the M.T.A., the Taxi and Limousine Commission and the Department of Transportation.

For simplicity, we assumed all vehicles would be equally likely to enter the zone from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. as they would be in any other hour. We could not account for the other trips that a for-hire vehicle might make once within the tolled zone, only the initial crossing. And we did not include the discount to drivers who make under $50,000, because it would kick in only after 10 trips in a calendar month.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

Trending