Connect with us

New York

Judge Holds Trump in Contempt Over Documents in New York A.G.’s Inquiry

Published

on

Judge Holds Trump in Contempt Over Documents in New York A.G.’s Inquiry

A New York decide on Monday held Donald J. Trump in contempt of courtroom for failing to show over paperwork to the state’s legal professional normal, a unprecedented rebuke of the previous president.

The decide, Arthur F. Engoron, ordered Mr. Trump to adjust to a subpoena in search of information and assessed a wonderful of $10,000 per day till he satisfies the courtroom’s necessities. In essence, the decide concluded that Mr. Trump had did not cooperate with the legal professional normal, Letitia James, and comply with the courtroom’s orders.

“Mr. Trump: I do know you’re taking what you are promoting critically, and I take mine critically,” Justice Engoron remarked, earlier than holding Mr. Trump in contempt and banging his gavel.

The ruling represents a big victory for Ms. James, whose workplace is conducting a civil investigation into whether or not Mr. Trump falsely inflated the worth of his belongings in annual monetary statements.

In January, Ms. James, a Democrat, stated her workplace had concluded that the Trump Group had engaged in “fraudulent or deceptive” practices involving the statements. However she stated she would proceed to analyze earlier than deciding whether or not to sue Mr. Trump or his firm.

Advertisement

Though Ms. James doesn’t have the authority to file prison expenses, her civil inquiry is operating parallel to a prison investigation led by the Manhattan district legal professional, Alvin Bragg, who’s inspecting a few of the similar conduct.

Ms. James’s workplace is collaborating in that separate investigation, which had gave the impression to be nearing an indictment of Mr. Trump earlier this 12 months, earlier than Mr. Bragg raised issues about prosecutors’ skill to show their case. Mr. Bragg, additionally a Democrat, inherited the inquiry from his predecessor after taking workplace on Jan. 1.

The ruling on Monday presents a roadblock for Mr. Trump as he continues to battle the legal professional normal’s investigation. Ms. James has sought to query the previous president and two of his kids, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr., as a part of her inquiry and legal professionals for the Trump household are in search of to dam the questioning. (Within the fall of 2020, Ms. James questioned one other of Mr. Trump’s kids, Eric Trump, as a part of her investigation.)

In March, Justice Engoron sided with Ms. James, ordering Mr. Trump and his kids to be deposed. The Trumps have appealed that ruling.

This month, legal professionals from Ms. James’s workplace referred to as for Mr. Trump to be held in contempt and assessed a day by day wonderful of $10,000 so long as he continued to not cooperate. They stated that Mr. Trump had declined to show over paperwork in response to eight separate requests. Mr. Trump’s legal professionals had stated the requests had been “grossly overbroad,” and didn’t “adequately” describe the requested supplies.

Advertisement

Final week, one in every of Mr. Trump’s legal professionals, Alina Habba, stated in a doc filed with the courtroom that Mr. Trump didn’t have any of the paperwork that Ms. James had requested. Any such paperwork, in the event that they existed, could be within the possession of the Trump Group, she stated.

She added that Ms. James had filed the movement for contempt with out warning, “seemingly in an effort to show this matter right into a public spectacle.”

However Ms. James has stated that at the least a few of Mr. Trump’s paperwork have but to be turned over. In a single submitting, her legal professionals talked about a file cupboard that had been held on the firm and contained the previous president’s recordsdata, and famous that he used Submit-it notes to cross messages to staff.

Based on Ms. James, Mr. Trump’s lawyer stated {that a} file of Mr. Trump’s correspondence had not been searched, partly as a result of the enterprise had decided that Mr. Trump was not concerned in getting ready his personal monetary statements.

Ms. James referred to as that assertion unbelievable, and referred to an announcement affixed to the monetary statements that claims: “Donald J. Trump is answerable for the preparation and honest presentation” of the valuations.

Advertisement

In a separate case in federal courtroom, Mr. Trump sued Ms. James, in search of to halt her civil inquiry and have her faraway from the Manhattan district legal professional’s prison investigation. That case is ongoing.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Published

on

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Today would have been the first Monday of New York City’s congestion pricing plan. Before it was halted by Gov. Kathy Hochul, the plan was designed to rein in some of the nation’s worst traffic while raising a billion dollars for the subway every year, one toll at a time.

A year’s worth of tolls is hard to picture. But what about a day’s worth? What about an hour’s?

To understand how the plan could have worked, we went to the edges of the tolling zone during the first rush hour that the fees would have kicked in.

Advertisement

Here’s what we saw:

Video by Noah Throop/The New York Times; animation by Ruru Kuo/The New York Times

You probably wouldn’t have seen every one of those cars if the program had been allowed to proceed. That’s because officials said the fees would have discouraged some drivers from crossing into the tolled zone, leading to an estimated 17 percent reduction in traffic. (It’s also Monday on a holiday week.)

The above video was just at one crossing point, on Lexington Avenue. We sent 27 people to count vehicles manually at four bridges, four tunnels and nine streets where cars entered the business district. In total, we counted 22,252 cars, trucks, motorcycles and buses between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. on Monday.

Advertisement

We wanted to see how the dense flow of traffic into the central business district would have generated money in real time.

Though we can’t know that dollar amount precisely, we can hazard a guess. Congestion pricing was commonly referred to as a $15-per-car toll, but it wasn’t so simple. There were going to be smaller fees for taxi trips, credits for the tunnels, heftier charges for trucks and buses, and a number of exemptions.

To try to account for all that fee variance, we used estimates from the firm Replica, which models traffic data, on who enters the business district, as well as records from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and city agencies. We also made a few assumptions where data wasn’t available. We then came up with a ballpark figure for how much the city might have generated in an hour at those toll points.

The total? About $200,000 in tolls for that hour.

Note: The Trinity Place exit from the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, which would have been tolled, is closed at this hour.

Advertisement

It’s far from a perfect guess. Our vehicle total is definitely an undercount: We counted only the major entrances — bridges, tunnels and 60th Street — which means we missed all the cars that entered the zone by exiting the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive or the West Side Highway.

And our translation into a dollar number is rough. Among many other choices we had to make, we assumed all drivers had E-ZPass — saving them a big surcharge — and we couldn’t distinguish between transit buses and charter buses, so we gave all buses an exemption.

But it does give you a rough sense of scale: It’s a lot of cars, and a lot of money. Over the course of a typical day, hundreds of thousands of vehicles stream into the Manhattan central business district through various crossings.

Trips into tolling district, per Replica estimates

Advertisement
Queens-Midtown Tunnel 50,600
Lincoln Tunnel 49,200
Williamsburg Bridge 27,900
Manhattan Bridge 24,000
Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel 23,100
Queensboro Bridge 21,700
Brooklyn Bridge 17,100
Holland Tunnel 15,400
All other entrances 118,000
Total 347,000

Note: Data counts estimated entrances on a weekday in spring 2023. Source: Replica.

The tolling infrastructure that was installed for the program cost roughly half a billion dollars.

The M.T.A. had planned to use the congestion pricing revenue estimates to secure $15 billion in financing for subway upgrades. Many of those improvement plans have now been suspended.

Methodology

Advertisement

We stationed as many as five counters at some bridges and tunnels to ensure that we counted only cars that directly entered the tolling zone, not those that would have continued onto non-tolled routes.

Our count also excluded certain exempt vehicles like emergency vehicles.

We used estimates of the traffic into the district to make a best guess at how many of each kind of vehicle entered the zone. Most of our estimates came from the traffic data firm Replica, which uses a variety of data sources, including phone location, credit card and census data, to model transportation patterns. Replica estimated that around 58 percent of trips into the central business district on a weekday in spring 2023 were made by private vehicles, 35 percent by taxis or other for-hire vehicles (Uber and Lyft) and the remainder by commercial vehicles.

We also used data on trucks, buses, for-hire vehicles and motorcycles from the M.T.A., the Taxi and Limousine Commission and the Department of Transportation.

For simplicity, we assumed all vehicles would be equally likely to enter the zone from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. as they would be in any other hour. We could not account for the other trips that a for-hire vehicle might make once within the tolled zone, only the initial crossing. And we did not include the discount to drivers who make under $50,000, because it would kick in only after 10 trips in a calendar month.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

Trending