Connect with us

New York

Federal Officials May Shut Down Overdose Prevention Centers in Manhattan

Published

on

Federal Officials May Shut Down Overdose Prevention Centers in Manhattan

As street drugs have become ever more powerful and deadly, a small nonprofit in Manhattan dedicated to preventing overdoses has drawn politicians and health officials from around the country searching for possible solutions to the opioid epidemic.

But now, Manhattan’s top federal prosecutor is warning that the group’s methods are illegal, and is suggesting that his office could crack down — and perhaps even end the effort.

The group’s strategy — known as supervised consumption — is simple, but radical: Let people use illicit drugs at special centers, under the watchful eye of nonprofit workers who can intervene if something goes wrong. The group, OnPoint NYC, said on Tuesday that its two overdose prevention centers have reversed 1,000 overdoses since they opened more than a year and a half ago, at a time when the drug supply contains the dangerous opioid fentanyl in growing concentrations.

The centers, in East Harlem and Washington Heights, were authorized by City Hall in 2021, and are the only such sites operating openly in the nation. Research on more than 100 such sites in other countries, where some have operated for decades, has found they reduce public drug use and lower mortality rates.

But on Monday night, in response to a request for comment, the U.S. attorney responsible for Manhattan issued an apparent warning that came in stark contrast to the more tolerant approach the Biden administration had been signaling toward the centers.

Advertisement

“I have repeatedly said that the opioid epidemic is a law enforcement crisis and a public health crisis,” Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, said in a statement to The New York Times. “But I am an enforcer, not a policymaker.” Until New York policymakers take action to authorize the supervised consumption sites, he said, they are operating in violation of federal, state and local law.

“That is unacceptable,” he added. “My office is prepared to exercise all options — including enforcement — if this situation does not change in short order.”

The centers are considered illegal because the fentanyl, crack and other drugs consumed there are controlled substances, and because a federal law known as the “crack house statute” bars individuals from maintaining property where controlled substances are consumed.

In 2019, the Trump administration took legal action to block a similar center in Philadelphia from opening. The case remains in litigation. But OnPoint’s supervised consumption sites have functioned for 21 months without disruption by law enforcement and with the knowledge of local, state and federal authorities.

The U.S. attorney’s office did not immediately clarify what options it was considering, including whether it might move to shutter the centers if lawmakers did not act. A spokeswoman for the Department of Justice in Washington said that supervised consumption sites were being evaluated on a district by district basis, in discussion with local leaders, to determine “appropriate regulatory guardrails.”

Advertisement

There is visible drug activity on the block around OnPoint’s East 126th Street site, and detractors have criticized such centers generally, suggesting that they condone rather than deter drug use, potentially making the problem worse.

Sam Rivera, the executive director of OnPoint NYC, rejects those arguments. The area has been a “hot block” for drug dealing for years, he said, not because he brought it there, but because it made sense to open where drug users already are.

“It is really frustrating that a health issue has become a political issue,” he said in an interview at the center. “What we know is no one ever has to die again of an overdose, ever. They’re preventable.”

In response to the U.S. attorney’s comments, Mr. Rivera said he welcomed a conversation with officials and pointed to his organization’s relationship with the city police, which he said “highlights the effectiveness of responding to this crisis with love and care, rather than enforcement.”

The main cause of the current overdose crisis is fentanyl — an opioid 50 to 100 times stronger than morphine — which has been detected in more than 80 percent of accidental drug overdose deaths in New York City. The city had 2,668 fatal drug overdoses in 2021, and 2022 is expected to be even worse once the official numbers are tallied. Statewide in 2021, 5,841 people died.

Advertisement

Gov. Kathy Hochul has declared the situation a public health emergency. The state has won $2.6 billion in settlements from opioid makers and distributors, and last fall, an advisory board recommended that she use some of the money to fund supervised consumption centers like OnPoint.

She declined, citing the legal barriers. Instead, this summer she announced plans to channel the funds into other harm reduction efforts, including fentanyl test-strip distribution, syringe exchange programs, drug treatment programs and an educational podcast about drug abuse called “Addiction: The Next Step.”

“Governor Hochul is committed to aggressively tackling the opioid crisis and has invested a historic $2.8 billion in addiction services since taking office,” said Avi Small, her spokesman.

Former Mayor Bill de Blasio authorized the supervised drug use centers through an executive action shortly before leaving office, and Mayor Eric Adams has continued to indicate his support and called for more centers to be established. But the supervised consumption component of their work is funded by private donors, often people who lost a loved one to an overdose, and not public funds, Mr. Rivera said.

Far from being in the shadows, the center hosts a steady stream of officials from other states and communities that are considering establishing their own sites. Four of the five local district attorneys in New York City — all but Staten Island’s — have said they back the centers.

Advertisement

The centers have street teams that clean up needles and encourage users to come inside, where they are also offered medical care, food, acupuncture, and case workers who can arrange for detox upon request. They would like to be would be open 24 hours a day, instead of roughly 12 hours a day on weekdays, Mr. Rivera said.

Other organizations that work to help drug users are seeking to open similar centers in the Bronx and other boroughs.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse, a federal entity, announced in May that it is funding a five-year study to assess the impact of OnPoint on drug users and the communities in which it operates. Rhode Island is the only state to have authorized such centers through legislative action, though none have yet opened there.

Among those who have had their overdoses reversed at OnPoint is Eddie M., 69, a former typesetter who travels almost every day to East Harlem from Brooklyn so he can inject his drugs under supervision. Because he uses illegal drugs, he asked that only the first initial of his last name be used.

Last Tuesday afternoon, he sat in a mirrored booth, so that staff members could monitor him, and prepared a speedball — a mixture of crack cocaine and street opioids — before loading it into a needle. A staff member tied off his upper arm with a blue tourniquet to help him find a vein.

Advertisement

Before discovering OnPoint, Eddie would use in hallways or parks. At OnPoint, there is a crash cart filled with equipment ready to go if he loses consciousness, which has happened to him there at least three times.

It’s been months since he overdosed, though, and he said the staff at the center have taught him to be more careful about how he uses. “The people are just wonderful,” he said. “I mean, I have never experienced anything like it.”

The centers have been used about 84,000 times by about 3,700 registered participants since opening, OnPoint said.

Participants bring in their own drugs, sign in and write down what they will be using, and can smoke or inject. Outside the supervised injection area, they can relax and watch television, or get other services.

It is impossible to know how many of the 1,000 overdoses OnPoint says it has reversed would have been fatal without intervention. Because they intervene so quickly, staff members are able to handle most overdoses simply by administering oxygen. When they do use naloxone, a drug that reverses the effect of opioids, they typically inject a small dose. They have called for an ambulance only about 20 times, said Rayce Samuelson, an OnPoint overdose prevention specialist.

Advertisement

In Albany, legislation has been introduced to more explicitly permit the centers and grant some legal immunity to those who operate them, but it has not passed. The City Council has also not passed legislation authorizing the centers.

Gustavo Rivera, a state senator from the Bronx who sponsored the Senate bill, has argued that Governor Hochul could expand state support to the centers through executive action alone. There are precedents, he said, such as her creation of a state agency to regulate marijuana despite its being illegal under federal law.

Ms. Hochul’s office noted that marijuana was legalized in the state before she funded that agency. In March, she said it was the city’s “prerogative” to experiment with the centers and even expand them, “but as far as a statewide policy, it’s something that we are exploring.”

“I would encourage us to be brave about this,” Senator Rivera said. He has been taking other lawmakers to tour the centers to try to convince them to vote yes. “As we do nothing, more and more people die in every corner of our state.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Published

on

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Today would have been the first Monday of New York City’s congestion pricing plan. Before it was halted by Gov. Kathy Hochul, the plan was designed to rein in some of the nation’s worst traffic while raising a billion dollars for the subway every year, one toll at a time.

A year’s worth of tolls is hard to picture. But what about a day’s worth? What about an hour’s?

To understand how the plan could have worked, we went to the edges of the tolling zone during the first rush hour that the fees would have kicked in.

Advertisement

Here’s what we saw:

Video by Noah Throop/The New York Times; animation by Ruru Kuo/The New York Times

You probably wouldn’t have seen every one of those cars if the program had been allowed to proceed. That’s because officials said the fees would have discouraged some drivers from crossing into the tolled zone, leading to an estimated 17 percent reduction in traffic. (It’s also Monday on a holiday week.)

The above video was just at one crossing point, on Lexington Avenue. We sent 27 people to count vehicles manually at four bridges, four tunnels and nine streets where cars entered the business district. In total, we counted 22,252 cars, trucks, motorcycles and buses between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. on Monday.

Advertisement

We wanted to see how the dense flow of traffic into the central business district would have generated money in real time.

Though we can’t know that dollar amount precisely, we can hazard a guess. Congestion pricing was commonly referred to as a $15-per-car toll, but it wasn’t so simple. There were going to be smaller fees for taxi trips, credits for the tunnels, heftier charges for trucks and buses, and a number of exemptions.

To try to account for all that fee variance, we used estimates from the firm Replica, which models traffic data, on who enters the business district, as well as records from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and city agencies. We also made a few assumptions where data wasn’t available. We then came up with a ballpark figure for how much the city might have generated in an hour at those toll points.

The total? About $200,000 in tolls for that hour.

Note: The Trinity Place exit from the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, which would have been tolled, is closed at this hour.

Advertisement

It’s far from a perfect guess. Our vehicle total is definitely an undercount: We counted only the major entrances — bridges, tunnels and 60th Street — which means we missed all the cars that entered the zone by exiting the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive or the West Side Highway.

And our translation into a dollar number is rough. Among many other choices we had to make, we assumed all drivers had E-ZPass — saving them a big surcharge — and we couldn’t distinguish between transit buses and charter buses, so we gave all buses an exemption.

But it does give you a rough sense of scale: It’s a lot of cars, and a lot of money. Over the course of a typical day, hundreds of thousands of vehicles stream into the Manhattan central business district through various crossings.

Trips into tolling district, per Replica estimates

Advertisement
Queens-Midtown Tunnel 50,600
Lincoln Tunnel 49,200
Williamsburg Bridge 27,900
Manhattan Bridge 24,000
Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel 23,100
Queensboro Bridge 21,700
Brooklyn Bridge 17,100
Holland Tunnel 15,400
All other entrances 118,000
Total 347,000

Note: Data counts estimated entrances on a weekday in spring 2023. Source: Replica.

The tolling infrastructure that was installed for the program cost roughly half a billion dollars.

The M.T.A. had planned to use the congestion pricing revenue estimates to secure $15 billion in financing for subway upgrades. Many of those improvement plans have now been suspended.

Methodology

Advertisement

We stationed as many as five counters at some bridges and tunnels to ensure that we counted only cars that directly entered the tolling zone, not those that would have continued onto non-tolled routes.

Our count also excluded certain exempt vehicles like emergency vehicles.

We used estimates of the traffic into the district to make a best guess at how many of each kind of vehicle entered the zone. Most of our estimates came from the traffic data firm Replica, which uses a variety of data sources, including phone location, credit card and census data, to model transportation patterns. Replica estimated that around 58 percent of trips into the central business district on a weekday in spring 2023 were made by private vehicles, 35 percent by taxis or other for-hire vehicles (Uber and Lyft) and the remainder by commercial vehicles.

We also used data on trucks, buses, for-hire vehicles and motorcycles from the M.T.A., the Taxi and Limousine Commission and the Department of Transportation.

For simplicity, we assumed all vehicles would be equally likely to enter the zone from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. as they would be in any other hour. We could not account for the other trips that a for-hire vehicle might make once within the tolled zone, only the initial crossing. And we did not include the discount to drivers who make under $50,000, because it would kick in only after 10 trips in a calendar month.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

Trending