Connect with us

New York

Brooklyn Subway Attack Suspect Is Ordered Held Without Bail

Published

on

Frank R. James was held with out bail on Thursday after prosecutors mentioned he posed a continued risk within the wake of a violent and premeditated assault on New York’s subway. His legal professionals, who mentioned their shopper had known as a tip line to give up, requested a federal decide to make sure Mr. James obtained psychiatric care in jail.

Mr. James’s temporary preliminary court docket look marked a brand new stage in a case that shocked a metropolis already on edge about subway crime. Without delay, the assault turned a morning practice trip right into a scene of chaos, injuring not less than 30 individuals, based on prosecutors. It was the bloodiest crime in New York’s public transit system in almost 4 a long time, and got here as many residents have been wading cautiously again into the routines of prepandemic life.

To some, the capturing underscored challenges dealing with Mayor Eric Adams, who has mentioned that high-profile crimes have elevated public nervousness over security to a few of their highest ranges in recent times — and that addressing these fears is crucial to the town’s restoration. On Thursday, prosecutors mentioned that the assault inflicted vital injury and disruption and that it may have resulted in a bloodbath.

They described every methodical step they are saying Mr. James, 62, took: from setting off a smoke bomb on a crowded subway automotive to unleashing a barrage of bullets and stripping off a disguise as he made his escape.

“The defendant terrifyingly opened hearth on passengers on a crowded subway practice, interrupting their morning commute in a method this metropolis hasn’t seen in additional than 20 years,” Sara Ok. Winik, an assistant U.S. legal professional, mentioned in court docket. “The defendant’s assault was premeditated; it was rigorously deliberate; and it precipitated terror among the many victims and our total metropolis.”

Advertisement

Mr. James, who’s charged with finishing up a terrorist assault on a mass transit system and faces as much as life in jail if convicted, mentioned little on Thursday, typically responding to the federal decide’s questions with a hushed “Sure.” As a result of it was solely his preliminary look, and he has not been indicted, Mr. James has not but entered a plea.

Outdoors the courthouse on Thursday, Mia Eisner-Grynberg, considered one of his court-appointed legal professionals, mentioned that her shopper deserved a good trial, warning that “preliminary experiences” from the police and information retailers “might be inaccurate.”

“We’re all nonetheless studying about what occurred on that practice, and we warning in opposition to a rush to judgment,” she mentioned. “What we do know is that this: Yesterday, Mr. James noticed his {photograph} on the information. He known as Crime Stoppers to assist. He informed them the place he was.”

The court docket look got here as native and state officers have been trying to reassure riders that transit methods stay secure, emphasizing that metropolis life stays far much less harmful than it was a long time in the past and inspiring New Yorkers to proceed taking the trains.

Subway ridership, nonetheless beneath 60 % of its prepandemic averages most of final month, fell within the assault’s quick aftermath. However Wednesday’s preliminary information supplied a hopeful signal: The numbers have been up by about 75,000 clients over Tuesday — for about round 3.1 million complete. They nonetheless remained beneath final week’s figures by about 159,000, a potential indication of lingering considerations.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, it may be difficult to establish a single reason behind fluctuating ridership, and the decrease figures got here on a day with nice climate, when fewer individuals wish to journey underground.

“We’re beginning to see ridership come again,” Janno Lieber, the chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, mentioned at a information convention on Thursday. “Even after the extremely disturbing information that all of us noticed this week.”

Whereas the broad particulars of Tuesday morning’s assault have been well-established, prosecutors haven’t described a possible motive for the violence. It remained unclear why a practice line that cuts by means of immigrant-heavy neighborhoods in Brooklyn, like Sundown Park, a house to many individuals from Asian and Latin American international locations, turned the goal of a brutal capturing.

However federal prosecutors wrote of their court docket submitting Thursday that whereas Mr. James’s prolonged arrest document — almost a dozen low-level offenses, together with reckless endangerment, larceny and trespassing — may appear “unremarkable,” it paints “an image of an individual with a penchant for defying authority and who’s unable or unwilling to evolve his conduct to legislation.”

Of their submitting, prosecutors mentioned Mr. James entered the subway system Tuesday morning in disguise, sporting a yellow onerous hat and an orange workman’s jacket with reflective tape.

Advertisement

On the practice, because it neared the thirty sixth Road station in Sundown Park, he fired “roughly 33 rounds in chilly blood at terrified passengers who had nowhere to run and nowhere to cover,” federal prosecutors wrote.

Particulars about Mr. James’s life have been nonetheless being pieced collectively: He had labored at Amazon for six months earlier than his position ended a couple of yr in the past, based on an organization spokeswoman, who declined to element how or why.

Regulation enforcement companies are scrutinizing hours of clues to his way of thinking that he supplied in disturbing movies posted for months on a YouTube channel and different social media accounts.

The movies depicted a troubled recluse, typically annoyed by problems with race, present occasions and world affairs, issues on which he typically delivered prolonged tirades. Additionally they revealed a person who may typically turn into fascinated by violent concepts, as soon as providing viewers directions for making a Molotov cocktail, based on federal prosecutors.

He mused not less than as soon as about mayhem in New York’s subway system. Different occasions, he questioned whether or not Mr. Adams may stop lawbreaking there. “He can’t cease no crime in no subways,” Mr. James mentioned. “He could gradual it down, however he ain’t stopping it.”

Advertisement

Federal prosecutors requested Thursday that Mr. James be detained till his trial, arguing that his “mere presence outdoors federal custody presents a severe threat of hazard to the neighborhood.”

After the capturing, the police found ammunition and different weapons in a storage unit and residence rented by Mr. James, prosecutors famous. The authorities additionally recovered an array of belongings from the practice, together with a Glock 9-millimeter handgun, three ammunition magazines and a bank card with Mr. James’s title on it.

Among the many assortment was a key to a U-Haul van that he had rented, which investigators later discovered about 5 miles from the station with a propane tank inside, prosecutors mentioned.

Mr. James was finally captured by the authorities on Wednesday afternoon, close to a McDonald’s within the East Village, about 29 hours into an expansive manhunt that featured a number of federal and state companies and a whole bunch of officers.

On Thursday, Mr. James’s legal professionals mentioned they didn’t object to his detention, however requested the Justice of the Peace decide to make sure that he obtained a psychiatric analysis and different medical care at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Middle, the place he’s being held, about seven blocks from the practice station in Sundown Park the place the assault came about.

Advertisement

Michael Gold, Sean Piccoli and Ashley Southall contributed reporting.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Published

on

We Counted 22,252 Cars to See How Much Congestion Pricing Might Have Made This Morning

Today would have been the first Monday of New York City’s congestion pricing plan. Before it was halted by Gov. Kathy Hochul, the plan was designed to rein in some of the nation’s worst traffic while raising a billion dollars for the subway every year, one toll at a time.

A year’s worth of tolls is hard to picture. But what about a day’s worth? What about an hour’s?

To understand how the plan could have worked, we went to the edges of the tolling zone during the first rush hour that the fees would have kicked in.

Advertisement

Here’s what we saw:

Video by Noah Throop/The New York Times; animation by Ruru Kuo/The New York Times

You probably wouldn’t have seen every one of those cars if the program had been allowed to proceed. That’s because officials said the fees would have discouraged some drivers from crossing into the tolled zone, leading to an estimated 17 percent reduction in traffic. (It’s also Monday on a holiday week.)

The above video was just at one crossing point, on Lexington Avenue. We sent 27 people to count vehicles manually at four bridges, four tunnels and nine streets where cars entered the business district. In total, we counted 22,252 cars, trucks, motorcycles and buses between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. on Monday.

Advertisement

We wanted to see how the dense flow of traffic into the central business district would have generated money in real time.

Though we can’t know that dollar amount precisely, we can hazard a guess. Congestion pricing was commonly referred to as a $15-per-car toll, but it wasn’t so simple. There were going to be smaller fees for taxi trips, credits for the tunnels, heftier charges for trucks and buses, and a number of exemptions.

To try to account for all that fee variance, we used estimates from the firm Replica, which models traffic data, on who enters the business district, as well as records from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and city agencies. We also made a few assumptions where data wasn’t available. We then came up with a ballpark figure for how much the city might have generated in an hour at those toll points.

The total? About $200,000 in tolls for that hour.

Note: The Trinity Place exit from the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, which would have been tolled, is closed at this hour.

Advertisement

It’s far from a perfect guess. Our vehicle total is definitely an undercount: We counted only the major entrances — bridges, tunnels and 60th Street — which means we missed all the cars that entered the zone by exiting the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive or the West Side Highway.

And our translation into a dollar number is rough. Among many other choices we had to make, we assumed all drivers had E-ZPass — saving them a big surcharge — and we couldn’t distinguish between transit buses and charter buses, so we gave all buses an exemption.

But it does give you a rough sense of scale: It’s a lot of cars, and a lot of money. Over the course of a typical day, hundreds of thousands of vehicles stream into the Manhattan central business district through various crossings.

Trips into tolling district, per Replica estimates

Advertisement
Queens-Midtown Tunnel 50,600
Lincoln Tunnel 49,200
Williamsburg Bridge 27,900
Manhattan Bridge 24,000
Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel 23,100
Queensboro Bridge 21,700
Brooklyn Bridge 17,100
Holland Tunnel 15,400
All other entrances 118,000
Total 347,000

Note: Data counts estimated entrances on a weekday in spring 2023. Source: Replica.

The tolling infrastructure that was installed for the program cost roughly half a billion dollars.

The M.T.A. had planned to use the congestion pricing revenue estimates to secure $15 billion in financing for subway upgrades. Many of those improvement plans have now been suspended.

Methodology

Advertisement

We stationed as many as five counters at some bridges and tunnels to ensure that we counted only cars that directly entered the tolling zone, not those that would have continued onto non-tolled routes.

Our count also excluded certain exempt vehicles like emergency vehicles.

We used estimates of the traffic into the district to make a best guess at how many of each kind of vehicle entered the zone. Most of our estimates came from the traffic data firm Replica, which uses a variety of data sources, including phone location, credit card and census data, to model transportation patterns. Replica estimated that around 58 percent of trips into the central business district on a weekday in spring 2023 were made by private vehicles, 35 percent by taxis or other for-hire vehicles (Uber and Lyft) and the remainder by commercial vehicles.

We also used data on trucks, buses, for-hire vehicles and motorcycles from the M.T.A., the Taxi and Limousine Commission and the Department of Transportation.

For simplicity, we assumed all vehicles would be equally likely to enter the zone from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. as they would be in any other hour. We could not account for the other trips that a for-hire vehicle might make once within the tolled zone, only the initial crossing. And we did not include the discount to drivers who make under $50,000, because it would kick in only after 10 trips in a calendar month.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

Trending