Connect with us

New York

A Battle Over Banning Gas and Oil Hookups in New Buildings

Published

on

Good morning. It’s Tuesday. Right now we’ll discover a brewing battle over Gov. Kathy Hochul’s proposal to ban gasoline and oil hookups in new buildings. And we’ll discover out why New York Metropolis’s change to electrical automobiles from gas-burning ones is off to a sluggish begin.

It would shock you — given the share of each day angst that New Yorkers, whether or not they drive or not, dedicate to site visitors and parking — that automobiles and vans usually are not the state’s largest contribution to local weather change and its civilization-threatening dangers. Buildings are.

Sure, the risk is coming from inside the home. Or to be precise, from our homes, flats, workplaces, factories and retailers. Throughout the state, 32 % of planet-warming gases within the ambiance comes from heating buildings and cooking in them.

How one can scale back these emissions is shaping as much as be one of many yr’s hardest political battles, beginning with Gov. Hochul’s proposed state funds. One in all its most aggressive, and most contested, local weather planks is a plan to ban gasoline and oil hookups in new buildings beginning in 2027.

The transfer would make New York the primary U.S. state, and the world’s largest jurisdiction, to cease including fossil-fuel burning stoves and heaters and require new buildings to make use of solely electrical energy, which, underneath state regulation, is meant to come back totally from emissions-free sources by 2040. Such a step by a real-estate and monetary capital might be pivotal to the nation’s vitality future, consultants say, as different states debate comparable measures. (New York Metropolis, the place buildings produce 40 % of emissions, enacted an analogous measure final yr.)

Advertisement

So the stakes are excessive, with a fierce lobbying and public-relations battle between local weather advocacy teams, which help the proposal, and the gasoline and oil industries, which oppose it. There have been surprising political twists — chief amongst them that, in response to lawmakers, the present impediment to Ms. Hochul’s proposal is the State Meeting, the identical physique whose takeover by Democrats in 2019 ushered within the state’s bold local weather regulation.

For that purpose, a number of the gasoline ban’s proponents are annoyed with the Meeting management. The speaker, Carl Heastie, has been tight-lipped in regards to the measure however has typically stated the funds debate ought to be reserved for fiscal selections, not different coverage issues.

Local weather teams like Meals and Water Watch argue that his place doesn’t align along with his district within the Bronx, an space that has lengthy been hit laborious by environmental inequality. The borough has one of many nation’s highest childhood bronchial asthma charges and a number of the state’s dirtiest buildings.

In one other funds debate, each the Meeting and Senate are pushing the governor to earmark billions of {dollars} extra to struggle local weather change — together with no less than $1 billion a yr simply to assist lower- and moderate-income households retrofit their properties to keep away from burning fossil fuels. With out that spending degree, they are saying, the state might be unable to scale back greenhouse emissions to internet zero by 2050. That aim was enshrined within the local weather regulation greater than two years in the past.

If the gas-hookup measure doesn’t make it into the funds, the controversy will proceed over a brand new model in a separate invoice. The factors of controversy are myriad: Opponents say the state dangers getting forward of its capacity to make sufficient renewable electrical energy to warmth its properties and that electrical warmth pumps will price shoppers extra. Proponents say the pumps are cheaper in the long term.

Advertisement

Climate

Put together for an opportunity of showers within the late afternoon, with regular temps within the mid-50s. Showers proceed within the night.

alternate-side parking

In impact till April 14 (Holy Thursday).


Amazon employees at a warehouse in Staten Island introduced off the most important union battle upset in latest reminiscence final weekend. They out-organized the corporate’s multimillion-dollar consulting staff — in a homegrown effort led by a just lately fired employee, not nationwide union workers — and succeeded in profitable a vote to create the mail-order big’s first union in the USA.

Advertisement

That’s an enormous flex, so we’re questioning: How does it have an effect on the temper of Amazon’s public face? By that we imply, after all, the parents who ship greater than 2.4 million packages a day in New York Metropolis. (Per. Day. That’s a couple of bundle for each 4 residents. Folks: What’s these things, and do we actually want all of it? However we digress.)

Do the folks bearing Amazon presents (or, say, particularly formed insoles like those I ordered just lately) really feel empowered, or detached, or impressed — or jealous? The brand new union doesn’t cowl them — they work for what Amazon calls “supply service companions” or as impartial contractors. (Nor does the vote have an effect on employees at greater than 50 different warehouses within the metropolis and suburbs.)

However might drivers be subsequent? The Teamsters hope so.

Within the flush of final week’s victory, that union’s new nationwide president, Sean O’Brien, instructed my colleague Noam Scheiber that the Worldwide Brotherhood of Teamsters was able to spend lots of of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} to unionize Amazon — maybe beginning in “massive metropolitan cities with sturdy labor connections and robust help politically.”

“Amazon is so deviant and so disrespectful to their employees, there’s a big turnover ratio there,” he stated. “However I believe we are able to put as a lot strain on the corporate whether or not it’s politically, in the neighborhood, and as a transportation union. I believe we’re going to have super success.”

Advertisement

Amazon, in a press release, repeated its view on unionization: “We consider having a direct relationship with the corporate is greatest for our workers.”



Talking of bold however challenged local weather objectives, New York Metropolis has pledged to impress its whole municipal fleet — practically 30,000 automobiles — by 2035.

Proper now, as my colleagues Winnie Hu, Nadav Gavrielov and Jack Ewing report, out of town’s 5,900 buses, simply 15 are electrical. Lower than 1 % of town’s 1.9 million registered private automobiles are totally electrical. The police have only one electrical patrol automobile, and the Sanitation Division has only one electrical rubbish truck.

The obstacles, in some ways, replicate the identical chicken-and-egg drawback that the state has with renewable vitality.

Advertisement

The mantra for decreasing greenhouse-gas emissions is: Electrify all the things. However simply because the state nonetheless has an extended technique to go earlier than it could generate sufficient renewable electrical energy to energy, effectively, all the things, town additionally struggles with technological and useful resource limitations.

There are simply 86 public curbside chargers, a drop within the bucket in a metropolis the place loads of residents have the cash and the inclination to purchase electrical automobiles, however only a few have a storage or a driveway that may permit them to plug in a automobile.

One other type of drawback: There is no such thing as a electrical hearth truck produced that meets town’s requirements.

Many of those issues await options that require two issues in brief provide. The primary is federal {dollars} to construct infrastructure, practice employees and educate shoppers. The second is concentrated bandwidth, in a chaotic time, for the general public to resolve what it needs in the way in which of local weather motion and for state, metropolis and native authorities to work collectively on that.



METROPOLITAN diary

Advertisement

Expensive Diary:

I used to be working as a fourth-grade trainer at a personal college on the East Aspect. As a year-end reward, the dad and mom had their daughters scratch their names right into a silverish image body, which was given to me wrapped in yards of tissue paper inside a Tiffany field.

I put a gracious look on my face as I unwrapped it. I held up the body and smiled at every of the 15 ladies who had “signed” it.

After college, I sneaked right into a pawnshop on Lexington Avenue. The person on the counter regarded approvingly on the Tiffany field.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Published

on

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Violent confrontations at a pro-Palestinian rally in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, on Saturday reflected what some local officials and protest organizers called an unexpectedly aggressive Police Department response, with officers flooding the neighborhood and using force against protesters.

At the rally, which drew hundreds of demonstrators, at least two officers wearing the white shirts of commanders were filmed punching three protesters who were prone in the middle of a crosswalk. One officer had pinned a man to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the ribs, a 50-second video clip shows. Another officer punched the left side of a man’s face as he held his head to the asphalt.

The police arrested around 40 people who were “unlawfully blocking roadways,” Kaz Daughtry, the department’s deputy commissioner of operations, said on social media on Sunday.

Mr. Daughtry shared drone footage of one person who climbed on a city bus, “putting himself and others in danger.” The Police Department, he wrote, “proudly protects everyone’s right to protest, but lawlessness will never be tolerated.”

Neither Mr. Daughtry nor the police commented on the use of force by officers. A spokeswoman for Mayor Eric Adams did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the police response. The Police Department’s patrol guide states that officers must use “only the reasonable force necessary to gain control or custody of a subject.”

Advertisement

Bay Ridge has a significant Arab American population and hosts demonstrations in mid-May every year to commemorate what Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe” — when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were forced from their homes during the war that led to Israel’s founding in 1948.

Andrew Gounardes, a state senator and a Democrat who represents the area, said local politicians had been in touch with the commanding officer of the 68th police precinct before the preplanned protest and said there had been no indication that there would be such a heavy police response. He called the videos he saw of the events “deeply concerning.”

“It certainly seems like the police came ready for a much more aggressive and a much more confrontational demonstration than perhaps they had gotten,” he added.

Justin Brannan, a Democrat who is the city councilman for the area, said the protest was smaller than last year’s but that officers had come from all over the city to police it. He said their approach appeared to be directed by 1 Police Plaza, the department headquarters in Manhattan.

“These were not our local cops. Clearly, there was a zero-tolerance edict sent down from 1PP, which escalated everything and made it worse,” Mr. Brannan said.

Advertisement

“I’m still waiting on information and details about the arrests that were made,” he added, “but from my vantage point, the response appeared pre-emptive, retaliatory and cumulatively aggressive.”

The Republican state assemblyman whose district includes parts of Bay Ridge, Alec Brook-Krasny, had a different perspective. He said an investigation would determine whether the officers’ actions were warranted, but he said some protesters were “breaking the law” by refusing to clear the street.

“I think that those bad apples are really hurting the ability of the other people to express their opinions,” Mr. Brook-Krasny said.

Some local residents supported the police and said they were tired of the protests’ disruptive impact. “Enough is enough,” said Peter Cheris, 52, a 40-year resident of Bay Ridge, who said he had viewed the videos of the protest. “If you’re going to break the law, you deserve it,” he said.

Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, singled out the presence of the Police Department’s Strategic Response Group, a unit that is sometimes deployed to protests and has been the subject of several lawsuits brought by the civil liberties union and other groups.

Advertisement

The police unit’s handling of the demonstration “was a violation of New Yorkers’ right to speak out and risks chilling political expression,” Ms. Lieberman said in a statement. “N.Y.C.L.U. protest monitors witnessed violent arrests, protester injuries, and even arrests of credentialed members of the press.”

She added: “The continual pattern of N.Y.P.D. aggression against pro-Palestine demonstrators raises important questions about the city’s disparate treatment of speakers based on their message.”

Abdullah Akl, an organizer with Within Our Lifetime, the pro-Palestinian group that organized the protests, said the response took organizers aback, particularly for a demonstration that occurs every year in Bay Ridge and is known to be frequented by families with children.

“It was really an unusual and unprecedented response,” Mr. Akl said.

He said he witnessed two men being pushed to the ground. One of them can be seen in a video with blood streaming down the side of his face. Nerdeen Kiswani, chair of Within Our Lifetime, said three protesters — including the two who can be seen being punched — were treated for their injuries at hospitals.

Advertisement

The Police Department has arrested hundreds of demonstrators since street protests began shortly after the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7 and Israel’s subsequent invasion of Gaza. The protests have been largely peaceful, with few injuries or violent clashes.

In a turning point, on April 30 officers cleared Hamilton Hall at Columbia University, which had been occupied by protesters for 17 hours. Many officers showed restraint during the arrests, though a handful were filmed pushing and dragging students as they removed them from the building.

On Sunday, Ms. Lieberman said police response to the protests in Bay Ridge underscored the importance of implementing the terms of a $512,000 settlement the civil liberties union and the Legal Aid Society reached with the city this month. The settlement set new terms for how the Police Department manages protests, creating a tiered system that dictates how many officers can be sent to demonstrations and limits the use of the Strategic Response Group. It will take years to put into practice.

The settlement is one of several that stemmed from the George Floyd racial justice protests in 2020. Last year, the city agreed to pay $13.7 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that claimed unlawful police tactics had violated the rights of demonstrators in Manhattan and Brooklyn. In March, the city agreed to pay $21,500 to each of roughly 300 people who attended another Black Lives Matter protest in 2020 in the Bronx. Those people were penned in by the police, then charged at or beaten with batons, according to a legal settlement.

Andy Newman and Camille Baker contributed reporting.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending