A rabbi in Ocean County is being sued by a woman who claims he sexually assaulted her when she came to him for financial help, then defamed her on a website and in fliers he posted near her children’s school.
New Jersey
Where is it going to snow? One model says part of New Jersey could still get a foot
February frenzy to close with major snowstorm
It’s been an active month of wintry weather with one more major snowstorm bringing snow and ice to the Midwest and eastern U.S.
A massive winter storm has its sights set on New Jersey this week, and while its impact could be a mere nuisance, one weather model shows it could drop significant snowfall for some.
The storm system, which has triggered winter storm warnings across the nation as far south as Nashville, Tennessee — likely the biggest snow event there since 2021 — will reach New Jersey heading into Thursday.
While anywhere from a few inches to a trace are predicted across portions of the Garden State, any wiggle north and west, and residents may need to break out the snow blowers.
What area could see more than a foot of snow? Are some areas in New Jersey not getting any snow? Find out the latest predictions below.
Is it going to snow in New Jersey this week?
Yes, snow is expected to fall over a portion of the state, mainly to the south, late Wednesday night and into Thursday. The greatest impact will be in extreme southeast New Jersey.
On Tuesday, the storm system was wreaking havoc in the Central Plains, with winter storm warnings popping up from Kansas toward North Carolina. A Winter Storm Watch for portions of Delaware were issued by NOAA early Tuesday morning.
How much snow will New Jersey get on Thursday?
Areas in the southeastern portion of New Jersey — from Atlantic City south to Cape May — are expected to see the greatest snowfall totals, although a lot is still unknown.
“How much snow falls on the mid-Atlantic and southeastern New England will depend on the track and strength of the storm,” AccuWeather said on Tuesday.
In its latest weather briefing on Tuesday, multiple models continued to indicate “a slightly southern shift” in the storm, meaning a bulk of the snow will fall further south, with minimal snow accumulations for the majority of New Jersey.
Cape May was expected to see the most snow with anywhere between an inch and three inches, although the range shows the potential of up to five inches. Areas to the north along the coast, such as Atlantic City, may see up to three inches — although an inch is probable.
An inch or less is expected to fall across the rest of the state, including Central Jersey and far north into Sussex County, according to NOAA.
The lone exception to the predicted reduced snow totals? The North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM), according to NOAA.
A foot of snow in NJ? NAM model predicts snow storm totals
The North American Mesoscale Forecast System, or NAM, is one of several regional weather forecast models that cover the United States and was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Meteorologists looks at several weather model systems, with the forecast data from the NAM higher resolution than the American (GFS) and European model (ECMWF) and are shorter-term.
At 7 a.m. on Tuesday, the latest update available, the NAM model showed the potential of up to 12.5 inches of snow in areas of southern New Jersey through Friday, the maps on Pivotal Weather showed. Areas from Central Jersey and south were showing widespread accumulations anywhere from six to nine inches, with North Jersey seeing anywhere from an inch to just over three inches.
All other models show the storm trending south and east of New Jersey, with minor impact on the Garden State.
Lori Comstock is a New Jersey-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team.
From Camden and Cherry Hill to Trenton and the Jersey Shore, what about life in New Jersey do you want WHYY News to cover? Let us know.
The borough of Lawnside in Camden County will be honored with a historical marker from the New Jersey Historical Commission as part of the state’s Black Heritage Trail.
A ceremony unveiling the marker will take place at 10 a.m. Friday at Lawnside Borough Hall on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Road.
Marsharee Wright, aide to Lawnside Mayor Mary Ann Wardlow and long-time resident, said everyone is thrilled about the marker unveiling.
“We’ve invited the entire community and neighboring towns to come share the celebration with us,” Wright said.
Linda Shockley, president of the Lawnside Historical Society, said it’s “an extreme honor” for the borough to be included in the state’s program, especially as Lawnside is amid a year-long celebration of its centennial.
“It really lifts our profile and hopefully more people will understand and know what Lawnside is about and what it means in the nation,” Shockley said.
Lawnside was one of six sites selected in Camden County in 2024, including “The Point,” a historic Black neighborhood in Haddonfield. Its marker was unveiled last June.
During the ceremony, the borough’s history will be showcased, along with the original documents signed by Gov. A. Harry Moore in 1926, which made way for the borough’s creation.
Though there are many Black enclaves in South Jersey, the borough is the state’s only incorporated antebellum Black community. First known as Free Haven, and later Snow Hill, it was a stop on the Underground Railroad. Peter Mott built a three-floor dwelling in 1844 that was once part of sprawling farmland where he helped slaves escape.
Mott’s house, now owned by the Lawnside Historical Society, serves as an Underground Railroad museum.
See the Roxbury warehouse scouted by ICE as possible deportation site
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were in Roxbury recently apparently scouting a Rt. 46 warehouse as a possible migrant deportation facility.
Federal officials are considering abandoning plans for a controversial immigration detention facility in Roxbury, New Jersey, according to a June 18 report by The New York Times, prompting local leaders and state officials to declare a victory after months of legal and political opposition.
The proposed facility, a warehouse property purchased to serve as an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center, faced intense criticism from local residents, environmental advocates and elected officials who argued the site was unsuitable for housing detainees.
In a joint statement issued Thursday, Gov. Mikie Sherrill and Attorney General Jennifer Davenport said the Department of Homeland Security appeared to be backing away from the project following legal challenges that halted development.
“Today the New York Times is reporting that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is backing down on its mass detention center in Roxbury,” the statement said. “That is a big win for public safety, for the township of Roxbury, and for New Jersey.”
According to the Times report, the Roxbury facility is one of seven ICE is planning to dispense with by transferring ownership to other federal agencies or selling them.
Opponents argued the warehouse was designed as a logistics facility and lacked the infrastructure necessary to support a large detention center. They also raised concerns about the potential strain on local water and sewage systems and the impact on environmentally sensitive land surrounding the site.
State officials said they joined Roxbury Township in court to challenge the project, contending that federal plans violated local regulations and posed risks to the community.
“DHS’s plans were always illegal,” the statement said. “The Roxbury warehouse is a logistics center fit for packages, not thousands of people.”
Rep. Rob Menendez said in a statement on Thursday: “We are working to confirm reporting that ICE is abandoning its Roxbury warehouse plans, but if true, this would be big news. From day one, we have fought to stop this facility, bringing together thousands of New Jerseyans in opposition. Now we are on the cusp of an important win for our state.”
The detention center was expected to become part of the federal government’s broader immigration enforcement and detention network. However, the project became a flashpoint in New Jersey, drawing opposition from both local officials and residents concerned about public safety, environmental impacts and the facility’s compatibility with surrounding land uses.
Federal officials have not publicly confirmed whether the property will be sold or formally removed from consideration. The Department of Homeland Security has not commented on the reported change in plans.
Opponents vowed to continue monitoring the situation until the project is officially terminated.
“This isn’t a partisan issue,” the statement said. “We’re grateful for our partnership with the Roxbury community as we keep DHS’s feet to the fire to ensure this facility is never opened.”
New Jersey
NJ rabbi faces lawsuit for sexual assault after giving financial aid | The Jerusalem Post
Avraham Appel, of Jackson, abused his position as a trusted community leader to sexually assault and exploit the woman, an Israeli immigrant who came to him as a single mother struggling to pay bills, according to the lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of Ocean County.
Appel is a prominent rabbi and Rosh Kollel, or head of a Jewish institute for advanced Talmudic study, who is based in Lakewood and Jackson, according to court papers filed January 5.
Appel did not respond to calls to his home and cellphone seeking comment on the lawsuit.
The woman claims she confided in one of her children’s schoolteachers in early 2020 that she was in significant financial distress and having trouble paying for daycare.
The teacher suggested she contact Appel, according to the suit.
In February 2020, Appel arranged to meet with the woman at a local Starbucks.
“During that meeting, Appel presented himself to (the woman) as a rabbi, mentor, advisor, and friend whom (the woman) could trust, confide in, and depend on,” the lawsuit states.
Appel, who had experience in real estate, allegedly offered the woman an opportunity to solicit investments on his behalf and to “draw,” or advance, money against future commissions.
Rabbi issues payments to woman after alleged sexual assault
In June and July 2022, Appel issued six payments to the woman, totaling $20,000 and characterized as advances or loans. He also provided the woman with “financial assistance” so she could buy groceries and pay medical expenses and water bills, according to the suit.
The lawsuit claims most of the money was meant to buy the woman’s silence after he attacked her on June 1, 2022.
The suit alleges Appel visited the woman while she was alone at home and sexually assaulted her as she pleaded for him to stop.
“Appel was abusive and unrelenting. The more (the woman) pled for mercy, the more aggressive Appel became,” the suit alleges.
Before leaving her home, he allegedly ordered her to delete Ring camera footage that showed him arriving.
In the months after the assault, Appel “forced himself upon” the woman and took sexual advantage of her on other occasions, the suit claims.
Appel also allegedly bombarded the woman with demands for sexual acts and sent her a barrage of text and WhatsApp messages containing crude and graphic sexual content.
“I want to squeeze your breasts,” one text allegedly said. In another, he sent the woman a photo of his penis, the suit alleges.
In July 2024, the woman met with another rabbi and shared evidence of the sexual assault and “other incidents involving Appel,” the suit claims.
Woman offered $50,000 for therapy after sexual assault
Appel later contacted his attorney and the two offered the woman $50,000 to cover her future therapy expenses.
The money would be available only if the woman signed a release of any claims related to the assault and agreed to keep all incidents between them confidential, according to the suit.
The woman refused to accept the money or sign the agreement, the suit says.
Appel then launched a campaign to destroy the woman “personally and professionally,” according to the lawsuit.
On December 15, 2025, the woman became aware of a website with her photos that claimed she was “a danger to all Jews,” and warned the public to stay away from her, according to the complaint.
The website disclosed the woman’s address, claimed she stole money, and characterized her as a “thief.”
Moreover, Appel and possibly others posted signs smearing the woman. The signs were posted at public locations throughout the community, including the school her two children attended, the suit alleges.
The lawsuit claims sexual assault, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and conspiracy.
The complaint also alleges Appel breached his duty as a rabbi to conduct himself with loyalty and in good faith.
-
Maryland48 seconds agoEarly voting ends with light turnout at polls, thousands of mail-in ballots so far
-
Michigan4 minutes agoWest Michigan celebrates Juneteenth with parades, more
-
Massachusetts9 minutes agoHere’s how to enter for a chance at a low-number Mass. license plate
-
Minnesota16 minutes agoMinnesota contributes two items to the America250 time capsule
-
Mississippi19 minutes agoKohen Wiley: Police shooting of a 1-year-old Mississippi boy ignites tension between police and Black residents | CNN
-
Missouri24 minutes agoWhat’s closed on Juneteenth in Missouri? Check trash, libraries, banks
-
Montana31 minutes agoYour guide to local sports events, plus what’s on TV for June 19
-
Nebraska34 minutes agoNebraska’s governor doesn’t carry a state-issued phone. Critics call it an abuse of state disclosure laws. – Flatwater Free Press
