Connect with us

New Jersey

U.S. Senate sends Biden giant spending package hours before midnight deadline • New Jersey Monitor

Published

on

U.S. Senate sends Biden giant spending package hours before midnight deadline • New Jersey Monitor


WASHINGTON — U.S. senators on Friday cleared a bipartisan spending package for President Joe Biden’s signature, completing work on half of the annual bills that were supposed to become law by Oct. 1.

The $468 billion spending legislation rolls together the Agriculture-FDA, Commerce-Justice-Science, Energy-Water, Interior-Environment, Military Construction-VA and Transportation-HUD spending bills into a so-called “minibus.”

The House voted 339-85 on Wednesday to approve the 1,050-page spending package that was released on Sunday.

The Senate vote of 75-22 followed hours of delay as conservative GOP senators pressed to make changes to the legislation that were ultimately rejected. Any changes to the bill would have required it go back to the House for approval, likely leading to a funding lapse when a stopgap spending law expired at midnight on Friday.

Advertisement

The six bills are just part of the equation Congress must solve before the next funding deadline of March 22, when the other six bills, which are much more challenging and include a higher price tag, come due.

Those include Defense, Financial Services and General Government, Homeland Security, Labor-HHS-Education, Legislative Branch and State-Foreign Operations.

Senate complaints

Senate debate on this spending package was broadly bipartisan, though several conservative GOP senators argued the spending levels were too high and it didn’t do enough to rein in the Biden administration.

They also said the earmarks in the bills should be removed.

Senate Appropriations Chair Patty Murray, a Washington state Democrat, said during floor debate Friday the bill includes important priorities like the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or WIC, housing assistance, environmental protection programs and veterans health care.

Advertisement

“This first package is evidence that we can get things done when everyone is focused on what can actually help folks back at home and what can actually pass in a divided government,” Murray said.

“This isn’t the package I would have written on my own,” Murray added. “But I am proud that we have protected absolutely vital funding that the American people rely on in their daily lives.”

Senate Appropriations ranking member Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, rebuked some of her colleagues for making statements about the process and having the opportunity to amend the legislation that weren’t true.

She reiterated that the spending panel, made up of 29 senators from both parties, debated and approved all dozen of the full-year bills last summer on broadly bipartisan votes. The full Senate then spent nearly two months last fall debating a package that included three of the bills in this final package.

“The Ag and FDA bill, the MilCon-VA bill and the Transportation-HUD bill were brought to the Senate floor,” Collins said. “So to say, as one of my colleagues did, that there was no opportunity for amendments and debate is flat out wrong. Those bills were on the floor for about seven weeks. We had 40 amendments. So I would urge my colleagues to stop playing with fire here.”

Advertisement

Collins added the Senate Appropriations Committee held 50 public hearings on the budget requests from various departments and agencies before it drafted the original dozen government funding bills.

Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee spoke against approving the package, in part, because of all the spending that House and Senate lawmakers were able to direct to projects back home, known as earmarks.

“Just days ago, we saw the text of this legislation in its entirety. We saw that it contained, among other things, more than 600 pages of earmarks totaling over 6,000 earmarks,” Lee said. “It spends a lot of money. It’s significant legislation. Whether you love it or hate it, you can’t dispute the fact that the legislation does a lot of things in government. It funds a lot of things in government.”

FBI, ATF see spending cuts

Advertisement

The bill includes funding for the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Justice, Transportation and Veterans Affairs.

Smaller agencies, — like the Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA, National Science Foundation and military construction projects — are also funded in the package.

Dozens of accounts throughout the six bills will need to account for spending cuts that range from mild to significant.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation as well as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, both of which have been the subject of Republican ire during the Biden administration, are seeing their funding cut.

The FBI will get $32 million less and the ATF will get $47 million less for salaries and expenses.

Advertisement

The Interior-Environment spending bill would see a cut of $1.5 billion to about $38.5 billion for fiscal 2024.

Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski, ranking member on the spending subcommittee, said Friday that negotiating the bill was especially challenging given those constraints.

“When you have cuts of that nature, it really does require some very difficult funding choices,” Murkowski said.

Appropriators, she said, looked to address “the most pressing needs within the bill” to ensure there were “meaningful reductions that are able to help us meet the terms under the Fiscal Responsibility Act.”

The payments in lieu of taxes program or PILT, which provides states with large swaths of federal public lands with funding to make up for taxes they would otherwise receive if that land were private, received full funding, Murkowski said.

Advertisement

“When you don’t have a tax base in your state because so much of your state is occupied as federal land — where do you generate that tax base to provide for the needs of local communities, whether it’s county roads or public safety or schools?” Murkowski said. “Well, PILT helps with that.”

The EPA, funded within that bill, will drop to $9.2 billion after receiving $10.1 billion during the last fiscal year. That represents nearly a 10% cut.

“What we attempted to do within this budget is to prioritize funding for those programs that result in concrete actions to improve the quality of the environment across the country,” Murkowski said of the EPA portion. “And I think we tried to ensure that the mission moved forward in a way that does, again, allow for that protection of the environment, but recognizing that there are many areas within the EPA budget that we could look to reduce.”

Numerous other agencies, including the National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management, would see their annual appropriations cut under the bill.

WIC increase

Programs that generally garner bipartisan support had their budgets increased for fiscal year 2024.

Advertisement

The USDA will see its funding rise by $383 million to a total of $22.3 billion. Several of the accounts within that bill were singled out for specific spending boosts, including the Agriculture Research Service, the Food Safety and Inspection Service and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or WIC.

Numerous other USDA accounts are seeing reductions in their budget authority. The National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and Agricultural Marketing Service will all need to account for millions less in spending than they currently have.

The Energy Department would see a $1.8 billion increase in spending, bringing its total budget to $50.2 billion. That money would go toward its defense activities, like the National Nuclear Security Administration, and its non-defense programs, such as nuclear energy research, development and demonstration.

Military Construction would increase to $18.7 billion, which would go toward housing, child development centers and the NATO Security Investment Program.

Medical care at the Department of Veterans Affairs would receive $121 billion in funding, an increase of $2.3 billion compared to its current funding levels. That money would be divvied up between numerous initiatives, including veterans homelessness programs, mental health, rural health care and women’s health care.

Advertisement

The Federal Aviation Administration would get an increase of more than $1 billion, bringing its total allocation to more than $20 billion.

Senate Democrats wrote in a summary of the bill that funding “will allow the FAA to continue its air traffic controller hiring surge by adding 1,800 new controllers, improving training facilities at the air traffic controller academy, and addressing the reliability of critical IT and telecommunications legacy systems.”

Thousands of earmarks

The package includes more than 6,600 earmarks totaling $12.655 billion, according to two people familiar with the list. All the approved earmarks as well as senators’ original requests for funding can be found here.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, didn’t request any earmarks in these six spending bills, but Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican did.

The Barksdale Air Force Base will receive $7 million for major construction on the 307 Bomb Wing Medical Facility Addition due to an earmark he sponsored alongside Louisiana GOP Sens. Bill Cassidy and John Kennedy.

Advertisement

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, received about 170 earmarks through these six bills, many co-sponsored with fellow New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, of New York, received 15 earmarks for projects.

Murray secured funding for nearly 60 projects, ranging from $11 million for the planning and design of an aircraft regional services facility at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island to $552,000 for a community violence prevention program in Burien, Washington, to $3 million for public safety radio network improvements in Okanogan County.

Several of Murray’s funded projects were requested alongside fellow Washington state Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell.

Collins received more than 165 funded community projects throughout these six spending bills, many of which were co-sponsored with Maine independent Sen. Angus King.

Advertisement

The Collins earmarks include $2.9 billion for the town of Brownfield Public Safety Building, $90,000 for the Maine Coalition Against Sexual Assault for sexual assault expert witness and attorney training, nearly $7.8 million for the Maine Department of Marine Resources for Woodland Dam Fish Passage Replacement and $7.4 million for the National Guard to complete a vehicle maintenance shop in Saco, Maine.



Source link

New Jersey

New Jersey parents say their baby was found with a marijuana vape pen in her mouth at Voorhees day care

Published

on

New Jersey parents say their baby was found with a marijuana vape pen in her mouth at Voorhees day care


How did a baby end up with a marijuana vape pen at day care? That’s what two South Jersey parents are asking after they say their 10-month-old was found with a vape pen in her mouth.

Stephanie and Sean Burns said the vape pen fell out of a staffer’s pocket in the infant room and their daughter was the one to pick it up. They shared their story exclusively with CBS News Philadelphia investigative reporter Liz Crawford.

This past July, Stephanie Burns said she received a shocking phone call from the director at the Malvern School in Voorhees, where two of her children were enrolled. She said the director, who was crying on the phone, told them their daughter was found with a marijuana vape pen.

“She goes, ‘It was in and out of her mouth a few times. We’re not sure which end of the vaper pen it was,’” Stephanie Burns said.

Advertisement

The parents said the director told them the vape pen fell out of one of the staffer’s pockets. 

They said they decided to call their pediatrician, poison control and the police, and they requested to see the video footage of the incident. About a week later, Stephanie and Sean Burns said the day care allowed them to view the video at their location, but the parents were only permitted to view three minutes of footage, which showed their daughter with the vape pen in her mouth, crawling around and pulling up on furniture.

“She crawls over to that (shelf), pushes herself up and is banging her hands on the shelf with the pen wagging in her mouth,” Stephanie Burns said. 

Sean Burns said the vape pen was in her mouth for almost the entire three minutes they were shown. 

The parents said they were not allowed to receive a copy of the video of their child or record the three minutes the day care showed them.

Advertisement

The Burns family never returned to the Malvern School and had to quickly find a new day care for their two children. Stephanie Burns said she asked prospective day cares where teachers keep their belongings and whether they drug test their teachers. 

“Things that I never thought we’d have to ask, because I thought that all this stuff was just taken care of and handled,” she said.

The parents have now filed a lawsuit and said they want others to know about their experience to prevent more incidents like this.

CBS News Philadelphia reached out to the Malvern School in Voorhees to ask about this situation. The person who answered the phone said they have no comment at this time.

The family says their daughter is OK and they are still monitoring her for any long-term issues.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

The Fight Over New Jersey’s Tough Environmental Justice Law Is Now in the Courts – Inside Climate News

Published

on

The Fight Over New Jersey’s Tough Environmental Justice Law Is Now in the Courts – Inside Climate News


When New Jersey’s landmark environmental justice law was enacted in September 2020, there was plenty to celebrate for activists who had fought so hard to prevent more of the unrelenting pollution that has long plagued the Ironbound section of Newark, the state’s largest city.

More than five years later, the fight is still going on—but the stage has shifted largely to the courts. 

 In January, the state’s intermediate appellate court unanimously upheld the rules implemented to enforce the law. The recycling and construction industries that challenged the rules have asked the state Supreme Court to hear an appeal, but the state’s highest court has not yet decided whether to accept the case.

There are other legal skirmishes too—all revolving around the plan to build yet another power plant in the Ironbound. This plant, which would be the fourth in the Ironbound’s expansive industrial zone, has been proposed as a backup source of power at the Passaic Valley sewage treatment plant, the state’s largest waste treatment facility. 

Advertisement

“It’s a very important moment,” said Ana Baptista, a longtime activist in the Ironbound and an associate professor in the Environmental Policy and Sustainability Management program at The New School in New York.  

And it’s all unfolding against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s cutting and gutting of environmental policies and protections. The state’s new governor, Mikie Sherrill, a Democrat, has signaled a willingness to go up against Trump. But her administration, which includes a new head for the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), is just getting under way.

“I think this is going to be a very critical year,” said Baptista. “We’re paying very close attention.”

The new plant was proposed after the giant Passaic Valley sewage treatment plant lost power during Superstorm Sandy in 2012, spewing hundreds of millions of gallons of raw sewage into the streets. The sewage commission said it wanted the new natural-gas backup plant to prevent a repeat incident—and much to the disappointment of environmental activists, the DEP approved a permit for it, saying it was only for backup in case of emergency.

The Ironbound Community Corp., which provides educational, environmental and housing support to residents and advocated for the environmental justice law, is challenging the permit in the state’s Appellate Division. The ICC also has filed suit, along with the city of Newark, against the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission for approving the project in June. Two judges have ordered a halt in construction while the cases play out.

Advertisement

A Landmark Environmental Justice Law

Charles Lee, a former Environmental Protection Agency official who is recognized as one of the pioneers of the environmental justice movement, said New Jersey put considerable thought into how to proceed with what he said is now “an extremely strong law.”

“These are issues that have been crying out … to be addressed for decades,” said Lee, now a visiting scholar at the Howard University School of Law’s Environmental and Climate Justice Center.

Lee said the Ironbound, like Chicago’s South Side and Louisiana’s Cancer Alley, bears the burdens of pollution from an array of industries. “There’s just this incredible concentration of environmental burdens,” said Lee.

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Advertisement

The state’s business community has not embraced the law or the ensuing regulations.

In a statement in January after the appellate court affirmed the rules, the New Jersey Business and Industry Association expressed disappointment. The association’s deputy chief government affairs officer, Ray Cantor, said the rules have had “a chilling effect” on the business community because they go too far. 

In its petition in February to the state Supreme Court, the New Jersey chapter of the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc. called the rules an “existential threat” to the recycling industry and said they go beyond the scope of the environmental justice law. “The importance of this issue to New Jersey businesses cannot be overstated,” lawyers for the institute said.

In a court filing in the ICC lawsuit against the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission, Denis Driscoll, a lawyer for the commission, said the complaint should be dismissed and that the proposed power plant would only be used for emergencies.

Advertisement

Under the 2020 law, the DEP must consider the impact of projects such as power plants on poor and minority communities already disproportionately harmed by pollution. It requires regulators to deny permits for any facility that cannot avoid adding pollution to an overburdened community unless the project will serve a compelling public interest and also requires consideration of the cumulative impact of pollution from an array of industries. It essentially adds another layer of scrutiny on top of existing environmental laws.

A number of states, including California, Connecticut, Minnesota and Massachusetts, have enacted similar laws or require analysis and consideration of similar issues. But the strength of New Jersey’s law is the mandate to deny permits that add pollution to an overburdened community and to require a cumulative impact analysis. New York passed a law in 2023 that some say may ultimately prove even tougher than New Jersey’s. 

While the law protects communities across New Jersey, it is especially significant for the Ironbound, an eclectic neighborhood of homes, shops and restaurants on one side and a hulking industrial zone on the other. There is the giant Passaic Valley sewage treatment plant, the state’s biggest trash incinerator, the contaminated remains of an old Agent Orange factory and more, all in the gritty shadow of the New Jersey Turnpike, the port of Newark and Liberty International Airport. 

The main street—Doremus Avenue—is known as the “Chemical Corridor” for its warehouses and plants. The diesel trucks crawl through as planes from the nearby airport take off or descend in the skies. Traffic seems to go in all directions, and the smells of all that industry waft through the community. 

To the Ironbound Community Corp., the decades of pollution have taken a toll on the health of neighborhood residents, who face high asthma rates and an array of chronic health conditions.

Advertisement

Nicky Sheats, a longtime environmental activist in New Jersey, said it took a long time to get support for the idea of an environmental justice law—but the community’s persistence paid off. 

“We’ve been talking about it for so long, maybe it makes sense … that we would be the first to do innovative things like this,” he said. Now, he said, the activist community will keep up the pressure to ensure that the law is enforced. 

“We’re persistent,” he said.

Sheats and others in the Ironbound have been buoyed, meanwhile, by the appellate decision upholding the rules and by the interim orders halting construction of the new plant.

“It’s something to cheer and something to provide hope,” said Jonathan J. Smith, an attorney with Earthjustice who is representing the Ironbound community.

Advertisement

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Advertisement

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

How windy did it get in NJ? See list of highest gusts by town

Published

on

How windy did it get in NJ? See list of highest gusts by town


play

Overnight wind gusts exceeded 70 mph in some parts of North Jersey on March 17 as part of the recent bout of severe weather throughout the region.

Newark Liberty International Airport led the way with a gust of 71 mph at 12:20 a.m., according to the National Weather Service. Other high readings in the area include 56 mph at the High Point Monument in Sussex County at the same time, and 54 mph in Warren County at 11:15 p.m. on March 16.

Advertisement

The windy conditions came on the heels of a stormy day throughout much of New Jersey. The NWS issued a tornado watch for the majority of the state, along with parts of Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland on March 16.

The weather led to delays and cancellations at many of the tri-state’s airports. The highest gust was recorded at 72 mph at JFK Airport, according to the NWS, while LaGuardia reached 62 mph.

Here are other notable wind gusts recorded in North Jersey towns on March 17.

Bergen County

  • Teterboro Airport: 48 mph
  • Hasbrouck Heights: 43 mph
  • Oakland: 40 mph
  • Bergenfield: 40 mph

Morris County

  • Randolph: 44 mph
  • Morris Plains: 43 mph

Passaic County

South Jersey towns that recorded gusts of at least 60 mph include Avalon (74 mph), Surf City (67 mph), Elsinboro (66 mph), Keyport (64 mph), Ship Bottom (63 mph), Harvey Cedars (62 mph) and Mount Holly (60 mph).

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending