New Jersey
Traveling throughout NJ? Here are cost-effective destinations
While travel throughout the country is at an all-time high, so are the costs associated with your vacation. Hotel costs, meals out, airline costs and car rentals can get expensive for those on a tight budget.
There is a misnomer that many New Jersey destinations are expensive, when you look at costs a little harder, enjoyable day trips and the costs are reasonable.
The folks at AirportParkingReservations.com put together a list and did research at places around New Jersey to determine what are the most cost-effective destinations in New Jersey. Factors include finding the cost of beer, cappuccino, meal for two, cinema for two, public transportation and most budget friendly destination.
Coming near the bottom of the top ten destinations is Elizabeth, NJ.
It will cost you $100.00 for dinner for two and over $8.00 for a cold beer. Their ranking is not so strong at 30.6.
#8 – Woodbridge, NJ
The cost of a meal for two averaging $80.00, public transportation averaging $6.00 and a hot cappuccino will cost you $5.24. They have a ranking of 37.5
#7 Edison, NJ
Want a beer? Be prepared to pay $7.00 on average, a meal for two will cost you a reasonable $70.00. They have a ranking of 52.8.
#6 – Trenton, NJ
Trenton is a little high with a beer costing $8.00 and a meal for two at $75.00. The good news is that public transportation is only $3.00 on average.
#5 Toms River, NJ
A beer is only $5.00 but a meal will cost you $80.70. Toms River has an overall ranking of 68.4.
#4 is Cherry Hill, NJ
A beer, cappuccino and going to the cinema are all in line with the low average but if you want a meal for two, you will shell out $80.00. Their overall ranking is 69.3.
#3 Jersey City, NJ
You can get a beer on average for $6.50, a meal fortwo at $80.00 but public transportation is under $3.00. Going to the movies will cost $30.00 for two. Jersey City has a ranking of 71.2.
Before you get bent out of shape on our top two choices, keep in mind there are good places to check out in both cost-effective locations. You must be open-minded.
#2 is Newark, NJ
The only factor that kept them out of first place was the average of $6.00 for public transportation. Every other factor in Newark was the lowest in New Jersey. Newark has a ranking of 73.3.
#1 Camden, NJ
Yes Camden. In Camden it will cost you $6.00 for a beer, $4.74 for a cappuccino, $70.00 for a meal for two, you will pay $28.00 to go to the movies and you can get there on public transportation for under $3.00. Camden comes in with an impressive ranking of 93.3.
Enjoy our cost-effective locations here in New Jersey and save some cash.
LOOK: Most common domestic destinations from Trenton Mercer Airport
Gallery Credit: Stacker
The post above reflects the thoughts and observations of New Jersey 101.5 weekend host Big Joe Henry. Any opinions expressed are Big Joe’s own.
Report a correction 👈
New Jersey
Fair Lawn man, NY associate facing civil action by NJ AG for defrauding investor
3-minute read
A Bergen County man and his New York business associate are facing a civil enforcement action filed by the New Jersey Bureau of Securities with the Division of Consumer Affairs for defrauding at least one New Jersey investor in an investment scheme tied to a job recruiting software service that they were allegedly trying to grow, according to the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General.
Michael Lakshin. of Fair Lawn, and Edward Aizman. of Brooklyn, as well as their company Bowmo, Inc. used “fraud and deception,” allegedly convincing one of Lakshin’s childhood friends to liquidate her retirement fund and invest in their start-up business venture, according to a civil complaint filed in Bergen County on Friday. They then allegedly diverted most of the funds for their own personal use including cash advances, hotel stays and purchases at car dealerships and designer stores among other expenditures.
“The defendants in this case shamelessly bankrolled their lavish lifestyles with someone else’s hard-earned retirement savings,” said Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin. “The lawsuit announced today sends a clear message that this kind of blatant exploitation of investors will not go unpunished in New Jersey.”
The complaint alleges, according to the Office of the Attorney General, that from April through August 2020, Lakshin, Aizman and Bowmo (through Lakshin and Aizman), offered and sold at least $84,681.19 of Bowmo’s securities in the form of a convertible note to at least one NJ investor.
They told the investor that the Bowmo note was an investment opportunity which would provide her a “significantly higher return” than her retirement savings. They allegedly told her that Bowmo was successful, bringing in a lot of money through its success and that she could profit by investing her funds into the company.
Lakshin also allegedly leveraged their childhood connection to convince her to invest. After learning about the investor’s retirement account, Lakshin allegedly pressured her to liquidate the account for the purpose of buying the Bowmo note.
Lakshin assured the investor that she would “realistically” be able to earn “A MUCH GREATER return,” through a series of text messages, falsely informed the investor that she should not have any taxes or penalties withheld when withdrawing funds from her account, and assured her that Bowmo would reimburse her for any taxes or penalties that would have to be paid as a result of the liquidation.
On June 25, 2020, the investor liquidated her retirement account. This liquidation included two charges and exposed her to paying taxes on the funds as she was not “rolling them over to another qualified retirement plan,” according to the Office of the Attorney General .
On July 2, 2020, the investor met with Lakshin and Aizman and signed a Bowmo subscription agreement. She wired $84,681.19 from her bank account to a Bowmo bank account controlled by Lakshin and Aizman later that month.
A Bowmo investor package provided to the investor prior to investing said that funds would be used to further develop Bowmo’s software, expand its marketing business, and make strategic hires among other business-related ventures.
Instead, the defendants allegedly transferred the funds to bank accounts held by a seperate and unrelated entity and misused the funds by diverting them for personal and non-business-related purposes.
The lawsuit seeks a court order to permanently ban Bowmo, its president and chairman Lakshin, and its founder and CEO Aizman, from issuing, offering, or selling securities in New Jersey, according to the Office of the Attorney General. It also asks the court to assess civil monetary penalties, restitution plus interest and expenses for the victim, and disgorgement of all funds and profits gained from the scheme.
According to Bureau Chief Elizabeth M. Harris, this case “serves as a sobering example of why it’s vitally important to investigate investment products, even those offered by someone you know and trust.”
She continued, “It’s also an opportunity to remind our residents that while fraudulent investment schemes come in a variety of forms, the pressure to act fast to avoid missing out on a hot investment is a universal red flag of fraud that should not be ignored. In addition to doing their due diligence before investing, we urge New Jerseyans to follow their instincts when a transaction doesn’t pass the smell test.”
Investors can obtain information about any financial professional doing business to or from New Jersey by visiting the Bureau’s website at www.NJSecurities.gov, or calling the Bureau within New Jersey at 1-866-446-8378 or from outside New Jersey at 973-504-3600.
New Jersey
Surprise 7 to 11 inches of snow hit these N.J. towns. Latest forecast.
New Jersey
New Jersey winemaker says drought helps the grapes, but he’s grateful for the rain this week
The much-anticipated rain finally made its way into the Philadelphia region this week.
For many gardens, nurseries and farms, the rain was needed.
But in Hammonton, New Jersey, Sharrott Winery says the drought wasn’t all that bad.
Sprawling on 34 acres, 22 of those under vine, the owner of the South Jersey winery says the drought conditions actually helped their vines.
Owner and winemaker Larry Sharrott said in the spring, the rain helped their vines grow.
Come August, the rain tapered off and the dry weather from there on out was used to their advantage.
“For grapes, if it’s dry starting in August and then running through the entire harvest season, that’s really good,” Sharrott said. “It helps concentrate the juice basically, so especially with red wine it makes a much more robust red wine. They take on much nicer fruit flavors.”
Sharrott said the team was also happy when it finally rained after the long stretch.
He said it was perfect timing because the vines could use a boost of hydration.
“But the fact that we have some rain now is really good for the vines because at this point they really need a good drink so they can begin shutting down for winter. We want them to be nice and hearty by the time we get the cold January and February temperatures,” he said
And if you are looking on the bright side, too, Sharrott say they are looking forward to future wines.
“We are going to have some great wines in a couple years when these come out of barrel,” he said.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business6 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Science3 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics5 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology4 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle5 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs