Connect with us

New Jersey

Sarlo’s OPRA stink bomb needs to be defused | Editorial

Published

on

Sarlo’s OPRA stink bomb needs to be defused | Editorial


Just when taxpayers got used to the notion that public records actually belong to the public, our most powerful lawmakers have decided that it’s time to choke off access.

In a state notorious for government corruption and poor transparency, New Jersey’s Legislature will attempt to gut the venerable but dated Open Public Records Act, which is a ludicrous idea if you only consider the treacheries that were revealed by the OPRA law.

It is a cortex-snapping litany: Because of OPRA, reporters were able to shake free internal emails and other documents that exposed the causes of the meltdown of our veterans’ homes during the pandemic. Because of OPRA, law enforcement was fundamentally changed in our state, after records showed major disparities in how police use excessive force. Because of OPRA, inspection records for a group home led to a state investigation of the alleged abuse of a severely disabled woman. Because of OPRA, the Office of the Medical Examiner was found to be a dysfunctional joke — bungling crime investigations, mangling corpses, and misplacing body parts.

These are just a few recent examples of how one news organization – this news organization – uses OPRA. But it is used every day by reporters, activists, and citizens who seek information from various departments and agencies about taxpayer funds, pollution levels, public safety, and countless other government functions that would otherwise never see the light of day.

Advertisement

Now that transparency is imperiled, because a bill that aims to overhaul the 22-year-old OPRA law puts severe constraints on anyone seeking such information, which validates a level of distrust in government that is quintessentially New Jersey.

In other words, if there has ever been a time to share your opinion with your local state representatives, this is it, with hearings scheduled Monday morning for both chambers.

“It’s Sunshine Week, and to schedule a bill of this magnitude on such short notice – in two committees at the same time – is a message to the public that says, ‘Don’t bother us,’” said former Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, whose attempts to reform OPRA in the past fell short. “It’s a disgrace. People need to make calls.”

While no one disputes that OPRA needs an update – particularly to quell data mining by retailers — the bill (S-2930) authored by Sen. Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen) is a contemptible assault on government transparency.

Among its provisions: Access to email and call logs would largely be exempt, as requests for government-related emails would need to include a “specific subject matter” and “discrete and limited time period.” The request would also have to name a specific government employee whose email can be searched, not merely a department.

Advertisement

But the greatest change could be what happens when an OPRA request is denied, which is often. Currently, the government agency has to cover a legal fee if a requester successfully challenges a denial. But Sarlo’s bill leaves this longstanding fee-shifting provision up to the discretion of a judge who hears the case or the Government Records Council (GRC).

So even the government wrongly denies access to a public record, the petitioner might still be stuck with the legal tab. That will have a chilling effect on attorneys willing to take such a case.

Worse, all provisions are retroactive — including the fee shift change, so attorneys already arguing cases on the assumption that they’d be paid after a successful court challenge can still be denied payment.

Sarlo’s bill even allows agencies to deny requests that it believes could lead to “harassment,” and bans metadata, which is the encrypted information on an electronic file that shows its source.

Just like that, the public’s right to know is not American scripture, but a quixotic dream of the past.

Advertisement

Nicole Rodriguez, the president of NJ Policy Perspective, put it this way: “When documents are created by public officials on public salaries with the public’s trust,” she said, “there’s no good reason to restrict public access to that information. Yet that’s exactly what this bill does.”

Sarlo claims he consulted all stakeholders, but there is no evidence he listened to any besides the League of Municipalities, which has long sought to reduce the relentless torrent of commercial requests for records – a legitimate concern that demands a solution, but not one that involves strangling public access. The New Jersey Press Association, for one, said Sarlo didn’t keep his word to share a copy of the bill before it was posted, and called the process “a disservice to the public.”

Sarlo didn’t even bother to consult Marc Pfeiffer of the Rutgers-Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, who ran the GRC when the law was enacted in 2002. Pfeiffer’s take is blunt: “Bludgeons create a mess, and rapiers are surgical. This bill uses a bludgeon to try to deal with outliers that exist within OPRA.”

The reason for this overkill: Our elected officials seek to give government departments and agencies more freedom to stonewall public requests for information, which makes a state with a lousy reputation for transparency even more opaque.

Weinberg calls it “a real gut punch,” adding that “Democrats should be about protecting democracy – or so I’ve been told. Reducing a citizen’s access to their own government is not a way to do that.”

Advertisement

Apparently, our Legislature think it’s New Jersey’s way, but taxpayers don’t have to agree. Make the call.

Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to NJ.com.

Bookmark NJ.com/Opinion. Follow on Twitter @NJ_Opinion and find NJ.com Opinion on Facebook.





Source link

Advertisement

New Jersey

Crime in N.J. keeps dropping, Murphy says. See the new stats on shootings, car thefts.

Published

on

Crime in N.J. keeps dropping, Murphy says. See the new stats on shootings, car thefts.


As he enters his final weeks in office, Gov. Phil Murphy on Tuesday touted a decline in crime across New Jersey.

Speaking at a court and police building in East Rutherford, Murphy said there were 559 shooting victims statewide last year, a 28% decline compared to the previous year.

Of the 559 victims, 107 were fatalities.

At the start of his term, more than 1,300 people were shot annually, Murphy said. The 2025 reduction marks the fourth consecutive year of declines in gun violence injuries.

Advertisement

“That’s not to say we are perfect,” Murphy said. “Because the objective is to get it down to zero.”

Motor vehicle thefts also dropped in 2025 — from 15,041 to 13,693 — according to New Jersey State Police statistics. That was a 9% decrease.

Murphy signed legislation in July 2023 that increased criminal penalties for auto theft offenders, focusing on repeat offenses and large-scale automobile trafficking.

“While there is more work to be done, this moment underscores the strength of the tools, practices and initiatives that have been put in place during the Murphy administration to protect residents and support lasting public safety across our state,” Lt. Gov. Tahesha Way said.

State Attorney General Matthew Platkin attributed the decline in crime to treating gun violence as a public health issue.

Advertisement

“That happened because of a sustained commitment to treating gun violence like the public health crisis it is,” Platkin said.

Platkin also cited drops in shootings in New Jersey’s largest cities, including Paterson, which saw a state police takeover after a corruption scandal. Shootings in the city fell to 42 last year from 127 the year before, he said.

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka said his city also saw historic lows in shootings and murders, with killings dropping to 31 last year, a 19% decrease from the previous year.

“Even as we laud our accomplishments, and we have many to talk about, we still have people who have been victimized in our city,” Baraka said last week.

State officials lauded local gun violence interruption groups as integral to the reduction.

Advertisement

“These groups are doing good and important work,” Platkin said.

Murphy said the coalitions often engage communities in ways law enforcement cannot.

“They’re on the streets, they know the community unlike any of us,” Murphy said. “They know it better than law enforcement. They know it better than elected officials.”

New Jersey’s acting State Police superintendent, Lt. Col. David Sierotowicz, said the reduction in crime was the result of collaboration between multiple government agencies and community partnerships.

“These reductions in crime represent more than statistics — they represent lives saved,” Sierotowicz said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Sources: Police shoot and kill suspect with knife, three others found dead in NJ home

Published

on

Sources: Police shoot and kill suspect with knife, three others found dead in NJ home


Police shot and killed a knife-wielding suspect outside a home in Piscataway, where three people were later found dead, according to the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office.

The incident occurred near the intersection of Mitchell Avenue and River Road. Police responded to the scene after receiving a 911 call from a man reporting that someone was inside the home with a knife. Upon arrival, officers saw the suspect on the porch holding a knife.

The man, whose identity has not been released, fled from the porch, leading to a foot chase that ended when the suspect charged at the officers, according to law enforcement sources. Police attempted to subdue the suspect with Tasers, but they were ineffective, sources told News 4.

After the suspect continued to advance toward the police, the responding officers fatally shot him in the street.

Advertisement

“They told him to stop several times; they gave him commands to stop,” said Jessica Conroy, a resident of the area.

Following the shooting, officers discovered three other deceased individuals inside the home. The Middlesex County Prosecutor’s Office is investigating their deaths.

“This is a really nice neighborhood,” Conroy told NBC New York. “I never saw anything bad at the other house.”

The identities of the civilians and officers involved have not yet been released.

The police investigation is ongoing.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

NJ man finally faces quadruple murder trial, accused of killing brother’s family in Colts Neck fire horror

Published

on

NJ man finally faces quadruple murder trial, accused of killing brother’s family in Colts Neck fire horror


⚖️ Paul Caneiro is finally on trial, years after a brutal quadruple homicide and house fire stunned Monmouth County.

⚖️ Prosecutors say Caneiro murdered his brother, sister-in-law, and their two children in Colts Neck, then set multiple fires to cover it up.

⚖️ Years of delays: Attorney changes, legal motions, COVID disruptions, and appeals pushed one of NJ’s most notorious murder cases to this moment.


A New Jersey man accused of killing his brother and his family before setting their Monmouth County house on fire is finally facing trial.

Paul Caneiro was dealt a string of criminal charges, including four counts of first-degree murder, for the family massacre at a sprawling Colts Neck home more than seven years ago.

Keith Caneiro’s body was discovered on the front lawn by a landscaper two days before Thanksgiving in 2018. The bodies of Caneiro’s 45-year-old wife, Jennifer, and two children, 11-year-old Jesse and 8-year-old Sophia, were recovered from the wreckage.

Paul Caneiro was also accused of setting his own Ocean Township home on fire while his own family was inside.

Advertisement

The trial has been held up for years as Paul Caneiro’s rotating defense attorneys have filed repeated motions. He has maintained his innocence.

Here is a round-up of the harrowing deaths and what we know so far about the case.

Caneiro quadruple murder trial gets underway in 2026

After a Colts Neck house fire in 2018, the Caneiro family was found killed (Screenshot: CBS New York via Youtube)

Gruesome discovery of the Caneiro family, killed in Colts Neck

Keith Caneiro, 50, was shot four times in the head and once in the torso, before his lifeless body was recovered from his front lawn in Colts Neck.

His wife was shot in the head and stabbed in the torso, her body found near the stairs to their basement.

Advertisement

Their 11-year-old son was found in the kitchen, stabbed in the torso and arm, according to a 2019 lawsuit filed by Vlassis Karidis, Jennifer Caneiro’s father.

According to the lawsuit, based on a medical examiner’s findings, the youngest victim, Sophia, was the last to die and was still alive while the house was engulfed in flames, leading to lung damage and smoke inhalation that factored into her death.

She was found on the stairs leading to the second floor with stab wounds. The autopsy suggests that she suffered before she died based on an increase in white blood cells.

“Sophia survived her parents albeit with multiple stab wounds for an unimaginable period of time but demonstrably long enough to experience breathing difficulty and onset of high-degree stress,” the lawsuit says.

Karidis’ suit has been stayed for several years, pending the outcome of this criminal trial.

Advertisement

Read More: Lawsuit says girl, 8, suffered most in Colts Neck family homicide

 

Caneiro quadruple murder trial gets underway in 2026 – FILE photo of accused quadruple killer Paul Caneiro Monmouth County Prosecutors Office

FILE photo shared in 2018 of accused quadruple killer Paul Caneiro (Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office)

Caneiro brothers as business partners, before being accused of fraud

Keith Caneiro started an IT consulting firm in 1989 and brought in his older brother with a 10% ownership interest, according to the 2019 lawsuit filed by Karidis, which also says the brothers took over a pest control company in 2011.

Attributing statements and messages shared with attorneys, the lawsuit said Keith and Jennifer Caneiro had accused Paul Caneiro of stealing tens of thousands of dollars from them and the businesses that the brothers held.

The night before he was killed, Keith Caneiro forwarded a company email stating that Paul Caneiro would no longer be paid his $225,000 salary, citing money missing from the business accounts, according to the lawsuit. The litigation is on hold pending this criminal trial.

Advertisement

In separate emails and messages cited by the lawsuit, Keith had said he was working to sell his companies and pursue a new position in order to be done dealing with his older brother.

About eight months before her brutal death, Jennifer Caneiro told her sister that her brother-in-law, that Caneiro had stolen thousands intended for her children’s trust and education funds, some of which he deposited into his own children’s education funds or used to pay down student loans.

The lawsuit also said that the Caneiros had voiced concerns to other family and friends about Paul Caneiro charging “excessive and improper personal expenses” to credit cards held by the businesses that he worked at with his brother.

attachment-nextdoor-nj1015

Prosecutors say Paul Caneiro set two fires to cover up murders

The Colts Neck fire was reported around 1:30 p.m on Nov. 20, 2018, on Willow Brook Road. Investigators have said they believe Caneiro first killed his relatives and set the fire in Colts Neck before returning to his home about 5 a.m.

Prosecutors said the fire at Caneiro’s own house was both a “ruse” and an effort to destroy evidence that he had taken from the Colts Neck scene.

Advertisement

CBS New York shared helicopter footage of the Colts Neck fire as it was still being put out in 2018, as posted to YouTube.

The once-million-dollar property was cleared of the burned-out wreck by a demolition crew in 2020, Asbury Park Press reported.

Caneiro quadruple murder trial gets underway in 2026 – Paul Caneiro in court in 2018 CBS New York via Youtube

Accused four-time killer, Paul Caneiro in court in 2018 (Screenshot: CBS New York via Youtube)

Why the Caneiro quadruple murder trial took more than seven years

Paul Caneiro started with a public defender before using several prominent defense attorneys in the following years. In February 2025, Monika Mastellone took over as defense attorney.

In December 2018, the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office had already said that a trial might not get underway until 2020. That was before the COVID-19 pandemic wreaked havoc on all court proceedings.

Advertisement

The state Supreme Court agreed in September to hear prosecutors’ appeal on one of Superior Court Judge Marc Lemieux’s rulings on evidence in the case, pushing jury selection to this month.

Last month, the state Supreme Court ruled that prosecutors can use a digital video recorder as evidence in Caneiro’s trial, despite it being taken without a warrant issued, NJ.com reported.

Seven years ago, CBS New York shared video of Caneiro’s first court appearance.

25 True Crime Locations: What Do They Look Like Today?

Below, find out where 25 of the most infamous crimes in history took place — and what the locations are used for today. (If they’ve been left standing.)

Report a correction 👈 | 👉 Contact our newsroom

Advertisement

All 31 convicted killers pardoned by Gov. Murphy

Since December 2024, Gov. Phil Murphy has granted clemency to 283 individuals convicted of various crimes. Of those, 31 have been pardoned and released early from state prison after they were convicted of murder and aggravated manslaughter. After their release, each killer is subject to five years of parole supervision.

Gallery Credit: Rick Rickman





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending