will embark Saturday on his first marketing campaign journey of the 2024 presidential race, visiting two early main voting states as he seeks to brush again calls from some GOP insiders and voters for a brand new celebration chief.
In Salem, N.H., the previous president is scheduled to talk to tons of of Republicans attending the state celebration’s annual assembly. Within the afternoon, he’ll seem with supporters in Columbia, S.C., a state that’s house to a pair of doable rivals for the nomination.
Advertisement
The journey quantities to the primary check of Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign, which he launched greater than two months in the past—sooner than some Republicans thought was smart—solely to remain largely out of public view since. It additionally comes as a handful of nationwide polls present him recapturing some floor he misplaced in current months, although new polls this week in South Carolina and New Hampshire confirmed a wholesome lead for Florida Gov.
Ron DeSantis.
The governor hasn’t entered the race, however is extensively anticipated to take action after the state legislative session ends in Could.
Mr. Trump can also be set to regain entry to Fb, a potent fundraising and messaging software he harnessed in previous elections, although it stays to be seen how he’ll use the platform this time round. His
Fb
Advertisement
and Instagram accounts had been suspended within the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. He was additionally just lately invited again on Twitter however has but to make use of it, preferring his Reality Social platform.
Many Republican leaders throughout the nation proceed to induce Mr. Trump to step apart, citing the controversies and authorized issues he has confronted and disappointing leads to current elections—together with losses in November by Trump-endorsed candidates in some key Senate and governor races. That sentiment was felt at a Republican Nationwide Committee assembly in California this week, the place
Ronna McDaniel
was re-elected as celebration chair after a race that featured a heated debate over the celebration’s route.
Invoice Palatucci, a longtime RNC member from New Jersey, stated he desires to see the celebration transfer previous Mr. Trump and thinks that’s already within the means of taking place. However he added the celebration must retain the voters Mr. Trump attracted and “persuade the previous president to be constructive, moderately than damaging” because the 2024 presidential subject takes form.
Advertisement
“His affect is fading, nevertheless it’s unclear if it’s fading quick sufficient,” stated Mr. Palatucci, an ally of former New Jersey Gov.
Chris Christie,
who has instructed Mr. Christie might enter the race.
“I feel a number of us need to see him be the nominee,” Carrie Almond, an RNC member from Missouri, stated of Mr. Trump. “However we additionally need to see who else is on the market.”
Advertisement
Rep. Russell Fry (R., S.C.), who final yr defeated an incumbent Republican who had voted to question Mr. Trump over the Capitol riot, stated voters are craving a return of the previous president’s insurance policies. “He’s bought an extremely loyal following,” stated Mr. Fry, recalling a rally Mr. Trump held within the state final March that attracted 1000’s of individuals regardless of inclement climate. “He’s going to proceed to see that stage of enthusiasm.”
Mr. Trump, 76 years outdated, is the one declared candidate however is predicted to get competitors within the coming weeks and months. Mr. DeSantis has come closest in hypothetical matchups and has attracted probably the most celebration leaders and main donors wanting to show the web page.
New Hampshire Gov.
Advertisement
Chris Sununu
is one other potential contender and has been crucial of the previous president. In an interview, he stated Mr. Trump shouldn’t anticipate to dominate his state as he did within the 2016 main, following a loss within the Iowa caucuses, noting different hopefuls have already visited.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
How do you assume Republicans will reply to Donald Trump’s bid for the 2024 nomination? Be part of the dialog beneath.
Advertisement
“They’re coming to New Hampshire as a result of they know the first-in-the-nation main needs to be earned. You’ll be able to’t take something as a right,” Mr. Sununu stated.
A College of New Hampshire ballot launched this week confirmed Mr. DeSantis getting 42% of doubtless GOP main voters, vs. 30% for Mr. Trump. Others lagged properly behind. A South Carolina ballot additionally confirmed Mr. DeSantis with a big benefit.
In South Carolina, Mr. Trump can be obtained by a few of his staunchest backers, together with Gov.
Henry McMaster
Advertisement
and Sen.
Lindsey Graham.
The state’s different Republican senator, Tim Scott, has been mulling a doable presidential bid. So, too, has former Gov. Nikki Haley, who has stated she is shut to creating a choice. Neither is predicted to attend the Trump occasion, held on the State Home with about 500 folks invited.
“President Trump will unveil his management groups, which is able to present the numerous assist he has from grass roots leaders to elected officers,” his spokesman, Steven Cheung, stated. “He has continued to dominate within the polls and there’s no one else who can generate the kind of enthusiasm and pleasure like President Trump.”
On the ballot this election isn’t just who will be the next president or governor. Granite Staters will vote on whether state judges should be allowed to serve until they’re 75 years old.
Currently, judges are required to retire at age 70, according to a limit set by the state constitution in 1792. If a judge retires before age 70, they can serve as senior active judges, which means a judge can serve on the court they retired from but they can’t fully engage in law practice. After age 70, they can also serve as referees, working on cases in a facilitating manner, in the court they retired from.
(Here’s an official explanation of the ballot question from state officials.)
Across the country, age limits for judges vary widely, according to Bloomberg. Seventeen states have no limit. In Arkansas and North Dakota, serving past a certain age can cost a judge their retirement benefits.Eighteen states have a mandatory limit of age 70, and eight states set their age limits to 75. Vermont is a bit of an outlier, with an age limit of 90.
Advertisement
Supporters of the proposed amendment in New Hampshire say the increase in age could allow judges that want to serve continue to hold their positions. Critics counter that it could also keep judges who may not be fit to serve, or those whose ideologies are out of step with modern public opinion, on the court longer.
Two-thirds of voters would need to vote yes on the constitutional amendment in order for it to take effect. When voters receive their ballots, the question about the constitutional amendment also includes language about a retirement age of 70 for sheriffs — but the amendment will have no impact on that, since the retirement age is already 70 years old for that position.
If the measure does pass, it could further solidify Gov. Chris Sununu’s influence on the state’s courts before he wraps up his term in office. Nearly three quarters of the justices currently serving in New Hampshire’s courts have been appointed since Sununu became governor in 2017, including four out of five on the state supreme court.
Many of Sununu’s appointees are on track to serve until at least 2040, even without the change in retirement age. If the retirement age is extended to 75, five circuit court judges could theoretically serve until 2060.
Advertisement
What do retired justices think?
The age limit proposal was co-authored by Rep. Bob Lynn, a retired chief justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court who now represents Windham at the State House. The Legislature, unlike the courts, does not set a mandatory retirement date.
Lynn, a Republican, said he thinks the current age limit is too young. He said life expectancy was much lower when that cutoff was established, in 1792, and is an antiquated cutoff.
“As a result of that,” Lynn said, “we’ve lost talent of a number of really very, very good judges, very qualified judges who would have stayed beyond age 70 if they were able to.” Lynn said a couple of judges come to mind that should have been able to serve a little longer on court, including his former colleague on the New Hampshire Supreme Court, Carol Ann Conboy.
“She was my epitome of a wonderful judge,” Lynn said. “She was smart and hard working and incredibly fair minded and empathetic.”
Lynn said they had plenty of “vigorous disagreements,” but he was sorry to see her leave the bench.
Advertisement
“To see her have to retire when she didn’t want to – I think that was a real, a real tragedy for the citizens of the state,” Lynn said.
Conboy, meanwhile, said she always joked with her colleagues that they’d have to pry her fingers off the door to get her to retire. Now 77 years old, she lives at an independent continuing care community in Manchester. She started her term on the state’s highest court at age 62 and said she would have liked to serve at least a few more years on the bench, ideally retiring around age 73.
“It was very sad to me to pack up my books and my office furniture and say, ‘You’re done. You’re just, you can’t do it anymore,’” she recalled. “I wasn’t fired for incompetence. I was fired because the calendar turned to a certain day and that was the end. It was extremely disconcerting.”
Conboy said she would have been open to a competency test, as a way to ease public concern over judges’ capabilities.
Advertisement
But she also suggested there are other factors, beyond age, that could influence a judge’s capacity to serve. Judges might face marital and familial problems that divide their attention, she said, and that might require them to take a break until things are resolved.
“Let’s say a judge is going through a very traumatic personal experience, a spouse dies or a child is in a terrible accident that may require that that judge take some time to deal with it, just as we would hope that people in other walks of life would be given an opportunity to deal with it,” Conboy said.
Judges also face mental and physical health concerns, she said; some of those could impact their performance in the court, while others are more easily managed.
Conboy said ensuring judges remain connected to their communities, to technology and to social advances is an important factor for justices. She gave the example of how cellphones have introduced new ways of thinking around crimes committed not just in physical spaces, but also digital.
For her part, Conboy said by the time she reached the New Hampshire Supreme Court, she had accumulated a lifetime of experience, not just in the legal field: working in the U.S. Air Force, as a high school teacher, working with the state to address drug and alcohol issues, as well as 13 years as a practicing lawyer and 17 years as a trial judge.
Advertisement
“I handled murder cases all the way down to arguments over where garbage cans were going to be put in a common driveway,” Conboy said. “Those kinds of experiences actually expanded my understanding of the problems of all strata of society – from sophisticated business decisions or problems to very mundane things such as arguments with town officials as to whether you can build a screen porch on your house.”
Some say term limits, evaluations could help
Some others in New Hampshire’s legal field said the constitutional question brings up other questions about how well our justice system is functioning.
Buzz Scherr, a seasoned New Hampshire defense attorney who teaches at the Franklin Pierce School of Law, said the question of age isn’t quite the problem — he can think of some judges who he was sorry to see retire, and others he was glad to see leave the bench.
At age 72 himself, Scherr said he’s found himself paying more attention in general to how people talk about older adults, for good and for bad. He’s allowed to work until he’s 80 as a professor and plans to slowly phase out his work over time. He is also running for a seat at the State House this fall, as a Democrat.
Judges, Scherr said, are in public-facing positions, so it makes sense that people would be interested in whether they are fit to serve.
Advertisement
A better system, in his view, would be to hold evaluations of judges and their work after age 70, but that would be a tall order. A review on a case by case basis of who is fit to serve would take a lot of time, resources and consideration to execute, Scherr said, so a blanket age limit is more practical.
“I think we over rely in society on people who are advanced age and too often credit them for being wise just because they’re older, old, rather than credit them because they are wise,” Scherr said. “I think it’s easier to have an artificial limit when you’re worried about people who are not as wise or capable as they used to be as they age.”
Edward Gordon, a former New Hampshire circuit court judge and former state lawmaker, also questioned if age is the appropriate measure on whether a judge should serve. Gordon retired before he reached the age of 70 and worked in senior judge status until he reached the age limit. He said that he loved his job.
“I sat primarily in Franklin, and I enjoy the community as a circuit court judge,” Gordon said. “You’re close to the community and you set standards for the community.”
Advertisement
Gordon said he knows of other circuit court judges that retired before they reached their 70th birthdays, so he said the increase in age might not propose immediate changes for Granite Staters, at least not in the circuit court.
There are things judges consider when serving and plan on stepping off the bench, Gordon said, like whether they can retire with benefits, which depends on both their age and how long they’ve served.
While Gordon thinks age is less of a concern, he is a believer in term limits.
“The question is, is there some advantage of having turnover as opposed to keeping judges or politicians in place for long periods of time?” Gordon proposed. “It’s good to have new blood at times. I think those are issues I think that I would raise when it comes to the issue of whether we should extend the age.”
Vice President Harris on Wednesday picked up endorsements from three longtime Republican leaders in New Hampshire who supported former President Trump’s rival Nikki Haley in the Republican primary.
Former U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey, former U.S. Congressman and former New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice Chuck Douglas and former New Hampshire Attorney General Thomas Rath condemned Trump as a divisive and unstable candidate in statements declaring their support for Harris. Her campaign said the endorsements reflect growing enthusiasm for the vice president among registered Republicans both in the Granite State and the rest of the nation.
“I voted Republican for fifty years, but I’m voting against Donald Trump and I plead with all Republicans to do the same,” Humphrey said in a statement. “As a father, a grandfather, a veteran, and a former United States Senator, I cannot vote for Trump. He’s dangerous to our democracy.”
Douglas said that Trump “believes in himself over service” and views the election “as the change to jail his political opponents.” Harris would be a “steady hand at the ship of state” in contrast to Trump’s “fragile mental state and anger,” according to the former lawmaker.
Advertisement
BIDEN CALLS FOR TRUMP TO BE ‘POLITICALLY’ LOCKED UP AT NEW HAMPSHIRE EVENT
Harris arrives to speak at a campaign event at the Throwback Brewery, in North Hampton, New Hampshire, on Sept. 4, 2024.(JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)
Rath likewise condemned Trump’s “campaign of division, anger, thinly veiled prejudice, and rejection of our core values as a nation.”
The Harris-Walz campaign welcomed their support and noted that hundreds of current and former Republicans across the country have backed Harris, including former GOP Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.
IT’S A TIGHT RACE IN THE BATTLE TO SUCCEED POPULAR SWING STATE REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR
Advertisement
Harris fields questions during a town hall style campaign event with former U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) on Oct. 21, 2024, in Brookfield, Wisconsin. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
In New Hampshire specifically, the campaign said there has been a 47% increase in registered Republican volunteers compared to 2022 and a 76% increase in the number of GOP voters who have told canvassers they plan to vote for Democrats next week.
“While Vice President Harris has made clear there is a home in her campaign for all Americans – including Republicans and independents – Donald Trump continues to double down on his extreme agenda,” the campaign said in a news release.
NEW HAMPSHIRE MAKES PRIMARY PICKS FOR GOVERNOR AND HOUSE RACES
Harris speaks during a campaign rally at Throwback Brewery in North Hampton, N.H.(Kylie Cooper for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Reached for comment, the Trump campaign noted that Haley is supporting his candidacy, along with former Democrats Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii.
“President Trump is building a historic and diverse movement to make America great again,” Trump national press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. “He’s been endorsed by many respected leaders from Nikki Haley to RFK Jr., and Tulsi Gabbard. We welcome anyone who wants to secure our border, restore law and order, and end inflation to join our team.”
Advertisement
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
New Hampshire has been an important swing state in prior presidential elections, although Harris has held a consistent lead over Trump in public opinion polls this year. Fox News’ Power Rankings rate the state as “Likely D.”
Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.
Chris Pandolfo is a breaking news reporter for Fox News Digital. Send tips to chris.pandolfo@fox.com and follow him on Twitter @ChrisCPandolfo.
Republican Kelly Ayotte’s support for former President Donald Trump was a flash point Wednesday in her final debate with Democrat Joyce Craig in the race to become New Hampshire’s next governor.
As a U.S. senator in 2016, Ayotte initially said she supported Trump as the GOP nominee for president but wouldn’t endorse him. She later withdrew her support and wrote in Mike Pence instead after Trump was caught on videotape making crude comments about grabbing women. Eight years later, her support for Trump this election cycle has been “unwavering,” WMUR-TV debate panelist Steve Bottari said.
“As a former prosecutor and a former attorney general, do his criminal convictions just not matter to you?” Bottari asked.
Advertisement
“It’s not that,” she said. “It’s just that this is the choice that we have in this election. And certainly, I think the country was better off just in terms of costs, what we’re paying, and safety when he was in office.”
Get N.H. Morning Report
A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox.
After Ayotte repeatedly declined to comment on Trump’s criminal convictions specifically, Craig jumped in, using her time on her next question to return to the topic.
“Where do you draw the line, Kelly, with Donald Trump? Is it when he sexually assaults women? Is it when he posts about Hitler? Or is it when he tries to overthrow democracy?” said Craig, the former mayor of Manchester. “There is no line with Kelly Ayotte.”
Advertisement
Ayotte responded with questions of her own.
“Who’s going to fight for New Hampshire no matter what? Who’s going to even stand up to their party when it’s hard?” she said. “I’ve done it. I was the third most bipartisan senator in the United States Senate. I never hesitated to cross the aisle to do the right thing for New Hampshire.”
Ayotte pointed to Craig’s frequent campaigning with Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey as evidence that Craig prioritizes her party and what she characterized as its “higher taxes, less freedom” philosophy.
“Why is she spending so much time with the governor of Massachusetts when she wants to represent the people of New Hampshire?” Ayotte said.
Craig described her commitment to New Hampshire by saying she is a fourth-generation resident who joined the governor’s race to help New Hampshire families. As for Healey, she said part of being governor is working with other governors throughout New England on important topics, such as energy. But neither was willing to stop there, at one point talking over each other.
Advertisement
“You’re never going to stand up because you’re a party line person. I’ve stood up to my party and I’ll do it again,” Ayotte said, as Craig said, “You support a convicted criminal for president. He’s unfit to be president.”
Ayotte and Craig are vying to be the third woman elected governor of New Hampshire, filling the seat being left open by Republican Gov. Chris Sununu, who is not seeking a fifth two-year term.