Connect with us

Massachusetts

Women must continue to raise voices for reproductive freedoms, writer says

Published

on

Women must continue to raise voices for reproductive freedoms, writer says


As we celebrate Independence Day, it is chilling to consider that our fundamental rights are at greater risk than they have been in the history of our organization. Health Imperatives has been providing safe, affordable reproductive health care and other critical services in Southeastern Massachusetts for nearly 50 years. We work in partnership with the people we serve, other community-based organizations, and state agencies to identify and address gaps in service delivery.

To this end, one year ago, on July 5, we began offering medication abortion in our seven clinics in Hyannis, Brockton, New Bedford, Wareham, Plymouth, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket. Until then, southeastern Massachusetts was considered an “abortion desert” due to the lack of service providers in the area. The nearest abortion clinic was over 100 miles away, a prohibitively far distance for anyone let alone most of the people we serve who are disproportionately impacted by poverty, discrimination, and trauma. For them, traveling over 100 miles to receive an abortion was not always feasible due to the inability to take time off from work, a lack of transportation and childcare, language barriers and financial difficulties. As a result of these barriers, many women sacrificed necessary healthcare, including abortion.

We are grateful to the Healey/Driscoll Administration, the Massachusetts Legislature, and our congressional delegation for their unwavering commitment to protecting the rights, health, and economic security of all Massachusetts residents. A few weeks ago, Gov. Healey signed an Executive Order on the two-year anniversary of the overturning of Roe v. Wade, clarifying Massachusetts law and reaffirming the state’s commitment to ensuring that anyone who needs abortion care in Massachusetts will be able to access it.

During a challenging time in our country, they have taken bold, necessary action to preserve our rights and health. They have enacted laws to protect patients and health care providers and have allocated state funding for critical care. And they have sounded the alarm. As many other states continue to control women’s fundamental rights and jeopardize their health and economic security by restricting access, Massachusetts is leading the way for reproductive justice in America by expanding access to abortion care.

Advertisement

Earlier this month, the state launched a first-in-the-nation campaign to combat anti-abortion centers, also known as “crisis pregnancy centers,” which pose a significant risk to reproductive freedom in Massachusetts. Outnumbering comprehensive reproductive health clinics by more than two to one, these centers purport to offer the full spectrum of reproductive healthcare. Yet the reality is that the majority often mislead pregnant people about their options to prevent them from accessing abortion care. All too often patients come to us in crisis after getting misleading or incorrect information from one of these centers. Massachusetts’ groundbreaking campaign to combat these facilities takes a crucial step towards health equity by ensuring that people know where to get the health care they need and deserve.

Still, rising costs and unprecedented need threaten Massachusetts’ ability to provide comprehensive, high quality health care for all. Approximately 50% of the people Health Imperatives services are uninsured or underinsured, and therefore not covered for preventive health care. Most of our patients struggle to meet their basic needs and as the cost of living in Massachusetts continues to rise, health and economic disparities are worsening. Health Imperatives is committed to doing everything we can to ensure people in our communities have the education and resources they need to be healthy, safe, strong, and empowered. Massachusetts can reduce growing health and wealth disparities by continuing to champion health equity by investing in comprehensive health care for all.

In the meantime, as women nationwide are witnessing their fundamental rights diminish, we must continue raising our voices to advocate for accessible, affordable sexual and reproductive health care for people across the country. As the larger political landscape is increasingly volatile and abortion rights and reproductive freedoms are at risk across the country, including here in Massachusetts, Health Imperatives is proud to play a role in ensuring Massachusetts remains a haven for reproductive freedom. We stand ready to help women seeking abortion from states that have restricted or criminalized these rights – and we are proud to do it alongside our public officials who make Massachusetts the best place in the country to do this work.

Julia Kehoe is President & CEO of Health Imperatives, a nonprofit organization that improves the health, safety and economic security of low-income and vulnerable individuals and families in communities throughout southeastern Massachusetts including Brockton, Hyannis, Martha’s Vineyard, Nantucket, New Bedford, Plymouth, and Wareham. www.healthimperatives.org

Advertisement

Thanks to our subscribers, who help make this coverage possible. If you are not a subscriber, please consider supporting quality local journalism with a Cape Cod Times subscription. Here are our subscription plans.   



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Obituary for Peter J. Grudzien at Daniel T. Morrill Funeral Home

Published

on

Obituary for Peter J. Grudzien at Daniel T. Morrill Funeral Home


North Brookfield / Sturbridge Peter J. Grudzien, 85, formerly a longtime resident of Sturbridge, passed away on Friday, Sept. 19th, in the UMass Memorial Health Harrington, Southbridge, after a long illness. He leaves his wife of 66 years, Willa A. Power Grudzien his son, Bill Grudzien and his wife Denise



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

N.H. leads 25 states in seeking Supreme Court review of ‘unconstitutional’ Mass. gun law

Published

on

N.H. leads 25 states in seeking Supreme Court review of ‘unconstitutional’ Mass. gun law


Local News

The effort calls into question whether or not Massachusetts’ firearm regulations for out-of-state visitors are unconstitutional.

The attorneys general of 25 Republican-led states say that Massachusetts’ gun regulations pose a constitutional problem. Joe Raedle/Getty Images

New Hampshire is leading an effort from 25 states to challenge a Massachusetts gun law, and this month, they’re taking it to the Supreme Court.

The centerpiece of the argument is the Pheasant Lane Mall in Nashua, N.H., which reaches across state lines into Tyngsborough. If shoppers park on the south side of the mall’s parking lot, they might end up crossing state lines during a visit.

Advertisement

The attorneys general of New Hampshire and 24 other Republican-led states say this poses a potential problem for firearm holders. A New Hampshire resident who is legally carrying a firearm on their home state’s side of the parking lot may inadvertently be breaking the law when they cross the lot into Massachusetts, where it is illegal to carry without a permit.

Joining New Hampshire are the attorneys general of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming, who are calling the arrangement unconstitutional. The states have rallied behind Phillip Marquis of Rochester, N.H., to ask the Supreme Court to protect out-of-state residents from Massachusetts’ firearms regulations.

“The geography of the mall is such that a New Hampshire resident might find themselves in Massachusetts if she parks on the south side of the parking lot or visits Buffalo Wild Wings,” reads a brief from the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office to the Supreme Court. “If that person is carrying a firearm without a Massachusetts license — which would be constitutionally protected activity in most of the mall—that person risks being charged as a felon and facing mandatory incarceration in Massachusetts.”

The trouble began for Marquis in 2022 when he was in a car accident in Massachusetts, according to the brief. When police arrived, he informed them that he had a pistol on him and was subsequently charged with carrying a firearm without a license.

Marquis previously sued the Commonwealth for the burdens that Massachusetts’ firearms permit law creates on out-of-state visitors, but the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied his claims. They ruled in March that the state’s nonresident firearms licensing laws were constitutional, according to court documents.

Advertisement

Claiming that the Massachusetts court denied him his Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights, Marquis has petitioned the Supreme Court to federally overrule that court’s decision. In his petition, Marquis invoked New York State Rifle & Police Association, Inc. v. Bruen, where the court established that state firearms restrictions must be covered by the Second Amendment or adhere to historical firearms regulations.

Using Bruen, Marquis and the Republican attorneys general supporting him are aiming to prove that there is no justification for applying Massachusetts’ firearms restrictions to out-of-state residents and that to do so would be unconstitutional. However, the state’s Supreme Judicial Court found the law constitutional even under Bruen because it intends to prevent dangerous people from obtaining firearms, just as historical regulations have done.

“To the extent that the Commonwealth restricts the ability of law-abiding citizens to carry firearms within its borders, the justification for so doing is credible, individualized evidence that the person in question would pose a danger if armed,” the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision read. “Both case law and the historical record unequivocally indicate that this justification is consistent with ‘the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.’”

It’s not immediately clear if the Supreme Court will respond to Marquis’ appeal or when it will make any kind of decision, but lower courts are at something of a crossroads with how and when to apply Bruen to gun possession cases. As such, they are looking to the Supreme Court for a more definitive answer.

Since the proof of historical context that Bruen requires has led to some uncertainty, any ruling that these lower courts make is likely to amount to a partisan decision. However, if the Supreme Court provides more substantive clarity in a response to Marquis, these lower courts just might find the answer they are seeking.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Mass. State Lottery winner: 2 $100,000 Mass Cash prizes won Friday

Published

on

Mass. State Lottery winner: 2 0,000 Mass Cash prizes won Friday


Massachusetts State Lottery players won two $100,000 prizes Friday from the day’s “Mass Cash” drawings.

The winning tickets were sold at the Roslindale Food Mart on Washington Street and McSheffrey’s of the South End convenience store (with Mobil gas) on Main Street in Woburn.

Mass Cash drawings happen twice daily, at 2 p.m. and at 9 p.m. It costs just $1 to play.

Overall, at least 625 prizes worth $600 or more were won or claimed in Massachusetts on Monday, including 6 in Springfield, 22 in Worcester and 14 in Boston.

Advertisement

The Massachusetts State Lottery releases a full list of winning tickets every day. The list only includes winning tickets worth more than $600.

The two largest lottery prizes won so far in 2025 were each worth $15 million. One of the prizes was from a winning “Diamond Deluxe” scratch ticket sold in Holyoke, and the other was from a “300X” scratch ticket sold on Cape Cod.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending