Connect with us

Massachusetts

‘It's Taxachusetts': Belichick fuels debate over Massachusetts millionaires tax

Published

on

‘It's Taxachusetts': Belichick fuels debate over Massachusetts millionaires tax


Sports and politics, they’re never really that far apart in Massachusetts.

Supporters of the new surtax on wealthier Massachusetts households have been cheering the investments in education and transportation that it’s triggered.

But this week, fiscal conservatives are applauding fresh comments from former New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick, who said the tax is influencing pro sports rosters, with player agents using it as a “sledgehammer” in negotiations.

“It’s Taxachusetts,” Belichick said, drawing laughs Monday from Pat McAfee and A.J. Hawk during an appearance on The Pat McAfee Show. “They take more from you.”

Advertisement

Barreling into his new life as an out-of-work coach and commentator, Belichick was opining Monday on the variables that players and teams face when weighing career moves, trades, signings, and the off-the-field factors than can play a role in decision-making.

It was at that point in the interview that Belichick brought up “the millionaire’s tax,” as he called it, referring to the new 4% tax on household income above $1 million per year that Massachusetts voters approved after Democrats pushed it to the ballot in 2022.

The surtax, which comes on top of the state’s flat 5% tax on all income above $8,000, generated $2.2 billion in fiscal 2024. It drove most of the 8.6% growth in tax receipts for the year, pulling more money from CEOs and other big earners like Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum of the Boston Celtics, but also from a slew of lower-profile wealthy families.

Belichick surfaced the tax issue when talking about CeeDee Lamb, who this week signed a four-year $136 million contract extension that will enable him to stay with the Dallas Cowboys and become one of the highest-paid wide receivers in the NFL.

“Dallas is a pretty good situation,” Belichick said. “Got a great quarterback, got a good team, got a lot going for you. Does he want as much money as possible? Yeah, of course. But is it really worth it to go out of town to wherever and not be playing in the environment and the opportunity that he has there in Dallas? A decision you have to make as a player, like … you want to try to get as much as you can from the team you want to be with. If you’re already on that team, then how much is it really worth by the time you move, you know, pay your 50 percent tax, or your millionaire’s tax in New England, you got that one too. You know, what’s really a differential?”

Advertisement

Hawk picked up on Belichick’s comment, asking, “What’s that millionaire’s tax about. Is it strictly New England or what?”

The Hall of Fame-bound Belichick noted that even some of the lowest-paid NFL players have to weigh income surtax impacts.

“Once you hit that million-dollar threshold, then you pay more state tax in Massachusetts,” he said. “It’s just another thing you’ve got to contend with in negotiations up there. It’s not like Tennessee or Florida or Nevada, or some of these teams have no state income tax. So you get hit pretty hard on that with the agents. They’ll come and sledgehammer you down about the taxes they’re paying.”

McAfee responded, saying, “That’s good business … for Massachusetts and from the agents. But you’re right. That was why when these destination teams start popping up, it’s like if you’re in Florida or Texas or Tennessee … that’s good bartering. That’s couple hundred thousand. Hey, that’s a lot of money here. Now we all want to pay our fair share. Where’s it going? I would like to learn that.”

The $57.8 billion fiscal 2025 state budget that Gov. Maura Healey signed in July appropriated about $1.3 billion from the income surtax, with $761 million allocated for education $539 million for transportation. Surplus fiscal 2024 surtax funds still need to be allocated.

Advertisement

In addition to making community college free for anyone to attend, the planned fiscal 2025 surtax spending included $170 million to make school meals free for all K-12 students, $80 million for higher education scholarships, and $278 million for early education and care — an attempt to enable more families to afford the costs of child care and more parents to be able to work.

The transportation investments made using surtax dollars include funds to allow low-income individuals to pay half-price MBTA fares, to make rides free on regional transit systems, and to leverage infrastructure investments, municipal road repairs and MBTA hiring.

Many of the investments are designed to make it more affordable for people to live in Massachusetts or address the state’s transportation problems, including congestion and unreliable public transit. The state’s high costs are repeatedly cited as a reason for people moving, which could pose a threat to the state’s financial picture.

The dynamics have created a policy tightrope for state officials to walk. High costs and tax rates loom as dangers to the competitiveness, but glaring affordability problems and infrastructure issues also cry out for a strong and often costly response from government.

While the surtax was passed by voters at the ballot, Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance spokesman Paul Craney said “there’s no defense” for it.

Advertisement

“This is just another concrete example of how the income surtax amendment punishes excellence and makes it difficult for the state to recruit top tier talent,” Craney said. “In this case it’s the New England Patriots, but it could apply equally to any other highly productive professional field. Massachusetts businesses and industries now start off with a 9% deficit when looking to recruit top talent versus no income tax states.”

He suggested that people might get Beacon Hill’s attention if they “start blaming them for the Patriots losses.”

Andrew Farnitano, a spokesman for the Raise Up Massachusetts coalition, responded to Craney’s points by saying that “multimillionaire athletes and CEOs can easily afford the extra 4 percent tax.”

“Any real Boston sports fan could tell you that the Pats were failing to sign top-tier players for years before 2023, when the Fair Share Amendment took effect,” Farnitano said in a statement to the News Service on Wednesday. “The millionaires tax certainly didn’t prevent the Celtics from putting together the best team in the NBA last year, and resigning nearly the entire roster to record contracts.”

Noting the investments in free community college and regional bus service, school meals, child care, and road and bridge repairs, Farnitano said the new tax “is making a real difference with the biggest competitive challenge Massachusetts faces: the high cost of living for low-income and middle-class families.”

Advertisement



Source link

Massachusetts

Mass. unveils $250 million in subsidies to protect residents from premium hikes – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Mass. unveils 0 million in subsidies to protect residents from premium hikes – The Boston Globe


Audrey Morse Gasteier, executive director of the Massachusetts Health Connector, said the financial bulwark that benefited 270,000 residents is “part of the reason that we’re hanging in there in terms of enrollment and keeping people covered.”

But Thursday’s announcement won’t translate into any additional help.

Healey’s news conference coincided with the beginning of an election year in which three Republicans are vying for her job and voters are expected to be particularly focused on the state’s high cost of living. One survey last year found Massachusetts had the second highest cost of living in the country. People who saw their insurance premiums increase this year said it was one pricey bill amid an onslaught of growing expenses.

“I can’t believe how much it is when we go to the grocery store. Our electricity has gone up,“ said Judith O’Gara, whose family was hit with a $400 increase a month in insurance premiums for their ACA plan in January. ”We were just bracing ourselves to try to stretch the paycheck further.”

Advertisement

O’Gara, of Millis, is a part-time editor at community newspapers, and her husband is a self-employed computer animator and mural artist. She has added hours at work, she said, but it still wasn’t enough to qualify for health coverage through her employer, leaving the couple to buy insurance through the connector.

Healey also used the news conference to weigh in on a high-profile effort in Congress to revive the federal subsidies. Also on Thursday, the US House, with help from 17 Republican defectors facing competitive reelection races, passed a bill that would extend the subsidies for another three years. A small group of senators is considering proposing their own extension of the subsidies.

“We need to see people in Congress step up and take action and fight the president on this and get him to focus on the domestic agenda and how to make life more affordable for people,” Healey said.

The governor said she didn’t announce the influx of funds earlier because she had hoped Congress would act before the end of 2025.

“We gave up until the deadline to see if they take action,” she said.

Advertisement

ACA open enrollment extends through Jan. 23.

The infusion of funds from the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund brings the state’s total commitment to the insurance marketplace to $600 million, which Healey said is the largest support from any state in the country.

Federally subsidized insurance policies were first made available to people making less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level, or about $128,600 for a family of four, in 2009 under President Barack Obama’s ACA, also known as Obamacare. In 2021, Congress made those subsidies more generous for many recipients and extended them to people earning up to 500 percent of the federal poverty level. The expanded tax credits doubled participation in the ACA exchanges over the past four years, and by last year 337,000 people in Massachusetts received subsidized insurance through ConnectorCare.

The increases were slated to expire after four years, and without congressional action to preserve them, premiums reverted to pre-2021 levels for this year. People earning more than 400 percent of the poverty level became ineligible to receive subsidized insurance. State officials have estimated roughly 300,000 people could become uninsured statewide over the next decade, in part due to the expiration of the tax credits.

Democrats staged a 43-day shutdown last fall, the longest in US history, in an unsuccessful effort to preserve the expanded subsidies.

Advertisement

The Commonwealth Care Trust Fund predates the 2021 coverage expansion, said Doug Howgate, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, a nonprofit budget watchdog, and was established to support ConnectorCare programs. Massachusetts has long had a robust public insurance program, and the 2021 expansion essentially allowed the state to shift the cost of subsidies it had been paying to the federal government. Tapping the trust fund now essentially returns Massachusetts to the support levels it provided prior to 2021, Howgate said.

Regardless of the timing of Healey’s announcement, it is a reality that Massachusetts has a uniquely robust commitment to health insurance access, Howgate said.

“I do think that the idea that the state is able to offset some of those impacts is an important message to get out there,” he said. “This is real money.”

According to Healey’s office, a 45-year-old couple with two kids making $75,000 in Fall River previously paid $166 per month for the lowest-cost coverage. Without state action, their premium would have more than doubled. But with the infusion from the trust fund, they will pay $206 per month.

There’s only so much the state can do to mitigate the impacts of the expired subsidies, though. Because Congress didn’t extend them, people between 400 and 500 percent of the federal poverty level simply are ineligible to sign up for subsidized policies through the ACA marketplace. There are roughly 27,000 people statewide who cannot benefit from the state’s effort to compensate for the lost federal money, and those people are among those facing the biggest new insurance expenses.

Advertisement

Christa, 56, a hair dresser, and her husband, Gary, 69, a truck driver, earn less than $105,750 annually combined, just shy of 500 percent of the poverty level. The couple, who asked not to be named to protect their privacy, went from paying $282-a-month for Christa’s insurance with no deductible, to a private plan costing $725 a month with a $2000 deductible.

Gary, who is enrolled in Medicare, is still counting on Congress for a reprieve.

“I believe the Senate will be forced to do something, and we’re hoping,” he said.


Jason Laughlin can be reached at jason.laughlin@globe.com. Follow him @jasmlaughlin.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Healey shares plan to limit health insurance cost increases for Massachusetts residents

Published

on

Healey shares plan to limit health insurance cost increases for Massachusetts residents



Gov. Maura Healey said Thursday that the state is spending an additional $250 million to limit premium increases for residents who have insurance through the Massachusetts Health Connector.

After Congress let Affordable Care Act tax credits expire at the end of last year, more than 300,000 people in Massachusetts have been facing a potentially steep increase in their health care bills. 

The governor’s office said those enrolled in ConnectorCare who make below 400% of the of the federal poverty level, which is $62,600 for an individual or $128,600 for a family of four, will see “little to no premium increases.”

Advertisement

Under the plan, Healey’s office said a 45-year-old couple with two kids in Fall River will see their monthly health insurance costs rise from $166 to $206. Without the new funding, the governor says they would be paying $452 a month.

“While President Trump continues to increase health care costs, we are taking the strongest action in the nation to address them and keep costs as low as possible for families,” Healey said in a statement. “Despite this increased state investment, far too many people will still see their premiums increase because of the White House.”  

The U.S. House of Representatives is set to approve a three-year extension of the health care tax credits. While it appears unlikely to pass the Senate, senators have talked about a compromise plan that could include a two-year extension with added reforms. President Trump hasn’t offered a specific health care plan, but said subsidies going to insurance companies should “go to the people” instead. 

The $250 million is coming from the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund, which gets its money from employer medical assistance contributions and financial penalties from residents who violate the state’s health care insurance mandate. 

Massachusetts residents can sign up for health insurance coverage or switch their Health Connector plans until Jan. 23 if they want to be covered by Feb. 1. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Minnesota childcare fraud allegations spark audit request in Massachusetts: ‘Serious risks’

Published

on

Minnesota childcare fraud allegations spark audit request in Massachusetts: ‘Serious risks’


Fraud allegations in Minnesota’s childcare system are prompting two Massachusetts Republican lawmakers to ask the Healey administration to conduct a “top-to-bottom audit” of a Bay State voucher program.

State Reps. Marc Lombardo, R-Billerica, and Nicholas Boldyga, R-Southwick, say they’re alarmed after seeing national reports of fraud in childcare subsidy programs, pointing specifically to widespread allegations in Minnesota.

Their concerns have prompted them to ask Gov. Maura Healey to direct Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler to “urgently conduct” an audit and review of the Massachusetts Child Care Financial Assistance program to identify any potential fraud and vulnerabilities here.

Child Care Financial Assistance helps low-income families pay for childcare in Massachusetts.

Advertisement

“While Massachusetts has not yet been directly implicated in the same manner, the similarities in program structure, relying on voucher reimbursements to providers for low-income families, raise legitimate questions about whether comparable fraud or waste could be occurring here undetected,” Lombardo and Boldyga wrote in a joint letter to Healey on Wednesday.

“Our Commonwealth invests hundreds of millions of dollars annually in this critical program to support working families and early education,” they added. “We owe it to Massachusetts taxpayers and the families who genuinely need this assistance to ensure every dollar is spent appropriately and reaches its intended purpose.”

The governor’s office did not immediately respond to a Herald request for comment on the letter.

Early Education and Care Commissioner Amy Kershaw has said that Massachusetts is not facing disruption to its $293 million share of federal childcare payments amid a nationwide freeze in response to the Minnesota fraud allegations.

Kershaw has also added that Child Care Financial Assistance is not being impacted, either. The state appropriates funds for the voucher program at the beginning of the fiscal year and then seeks federal reimbursement.

Advertisement

This fiscal year’s funding totals about $1.087 billion for the program, which covered more than 66,000 children in fiscal year 2025, according to a December report from the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation.

“Obviously, we are incredibly concerned about families across the country and in Minnesota who may lose access to Child Care Financial Assistance based on acts by the federal government,” Kershaw told Bay State childcare stakeholders on Monday.

Before the new year, the federal Administration for Children and Families froze all funding to Minnesota. All 50 states must now provide additional verification before receiving more funds.

Minnesota Democrats accuse the Trump administration of playing politics and hurting families and children as a result.

This all comes after a video surfaced on YouTube alleging fraud in childcare in Somali communities in Minnesota, to which Kershaw has said none of the allegations have been proven.

Advertisement

The Massachusetts early education and care commissioner noted how there have been similar videos posted in Massachusetts and other states like Ohio, California and Washington.

In their letter to Healey, Lombardo and Boldyga also highlighted how the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has responded to the Minnesota allegations by closing loopholes that allowed payments without verifying attendance.

“These developments highlight serious risks in subsidized child care systems across the country,” the Republican lawmakers wrote, “including the potential for misappropriation of taxpayer funds on a massive scale.”

Lawmakers across the country are seeking similar reviews as Lombardo and Boldyga. In Michigan, State Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt, a Republican, has asked for an audit of a state program that aims to help low-income families afford childcare there.

The Massachusetts audit would zero in on verifying that voucher payments to providers are based on documented child attendance records; cross-checking to detect potential “ghost children” or overbilling; and on-site inspections of voucher-receiving providers to confirm they are operating legitimate childcare programs, among other objectives.

Advertisement

“Such a thorough review would not only safeguard public funds,” Lombardo and Boldyga wrote, “but also strengthen confidence in a program that is vital to thousands of Massachusetts families.”

The Associated Press and Herald wire services contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending