Connect with us

Massachusetts

5-day stay limit among major changes set to impact migrants in Massachusetts shelter system

Published

on

5-day stay limit among major changes set to impact migrants in Massachusetts shelter system


BOSTON – Gov. Maura Healey on Tuesday said Massachusetts is “out of shelter space” and announced changes that will have a big impact on migrants entering the emergency assistance system, including a new prioritization policy and a five-day stay limit at overflow safety-net sites. 

Prioritizing some evicted residents and veterans

Starting Aug. 1, Healey said Massachusetts will prioritize families for shelter system placement if they became homeless because of a no-fault eviction or other sudden circumstance beyond their control like a flood or fire. Families with at least one veteran will also be prioritized, as will those with significant medical issues, newborn babies, or people who are at risk of domestic violence.

New 5-day stay limit 

Those who are not prioritized for placement will be able to stay at the overflow safety-net sites that are currently in Lexington, Cambridge, the former Chelsea Soldiers Home and an old prison in Norfolk. But those sites will be recategorized as as “temporary respite centers” on Aug. 1, and they will have a five-day stay limit.

Currently, families staying at temporary shelter sites are required to show every month that they are taking steps to find their own housing.

Advertisement

“Families who have been in temporary respite centers prior to the policy change on August 1 will retain their prioritization for placement into EA shelter, and the state will begin helping them leave these sites according to the date in which they entered,” the Healey administration said.  

What happens to migrants in Massachusetts without a place to stay?

Healey said in a statement that the five-day limit is “in line with the policies of other cities facing similar challenges as Massachusetts and will help give families some relief for a few days while they access the diversion services we can provide, such as reticketing.”

Families who decide to stay at a temporary respite center “will be required to wait six months or more for placement in the state’s emergency family shelter system,” the state said.

The Boston Globe reports that the state has offered to pay for plane tickets and other travel expenses for families if they have a place to stay outside of Massachusetts. WBZ-TV cameras recently found that migrants who have nowhere to go were being dropped off by bus at the Wollaston MBTA stop in Quincy.

Healey’s administration on Tuesday touted work authorization clinics that they said have helped 1,300 people in emergency shelters get jobs. It also said the HomeBASE program that offers eligible families up to $30,000 over two years for housing has been expanded. 

Advertisement

Current shelter system “not sustainable”

Healey declared last fall that Massachusetts hit its emergency shelter system capacity of 7,500 families. Earlier in July, the state said migrant families would no longer be allowed to sleep at Boston’s Logan Airport overnight. 

The governor sent a migrant crisis team to the southern border in Texas last month to spread the word that shelters in Massachusetts are full.

“We have been saying for months now that the rapid growth of our Emergency Assistance shelter system is not sustainable. Massachusetts is out of shelter space, and we simply cannot afford the current size of this system,” Healey said. “Our administration has taken significant action over the past year to make the system more sustainable and help families leave shelter for stable housing. But with Congress continuing to fail to act on immigration reform, we need to make more changes.”

Advertisement



Source link

Massachusetts

Reed: Fight for tax relief is far from over

Published

on

Reed: Fight for tax relief is far from over


When the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) denied voters the ability to support a popular tax cut this November, it was more than a temporary loss for residents of one of America’s most overtaxed states. Barely a generation removed from its “Taxachusetts” moniker, the Commonwealth’s competitiveness suffered a setback with long-lasting implications.

That is why even if this battle is over, the broader fight must go on.

Recent polling from the Mass Opportunity Alliance (MOA), a nonprofit advocating for state competitiveness, found that 82% of voters supported lowering the state income tax rate from 5% to 4%. Even a poll from the Boston Globe/Suffolk University released days before the SJC decision showed 66% supporting the tax cut.

Terrified by the threat to the status quo, entrenched special interests spearheaded a legal challenge not based on the merits of the tax cut or fiscal policy whatsoever. The issue was a technicality in summary of the question written by the Attorney General. As a retired SJC justice explained, “neither logic nor law” supported removing the tax cut from the ballot.

Advertisement

The Court’s ruling does not change the underlying issue. The same Suffolk survey showed a majority (54%) of respondents had considered leaving the state in the last year. Nearly six in ten cited taxes and high cost of living.

This trend is well underway. Following the Commonwealth’s last tax hike in 2022, roughly 30,000 more people exited Massachusetts than arrived the following year — one of the country’s highest population exoduses. The outflow took $4.2 billion dollars’ worth of taxable income with them.

It’s no mystery as to why we’re losing residents. Survey research from MOA showed high taxes were a key driver. Not coincidentally, the top two states welcoming Massachusetts expatriates, Florida and New Hampshire, both have no income tax.

By contrast, Massachusetts has the second highest effective tax rate in the country. The Commonwealth is ranked in the bottom 10 for competitiveness.

The impact of this tax burden extends far and wide.  Businesses are choosing to leave or relocate elsewhere. Iconic brands like Cape Cod Potato Chips have had enough, announcing the closing of their Hyannis facility earlier this year. Even international soccer players are not safe, learning that 90 minutes of participation in this year’s World Cup can subject them to crushing Beacon Hill tax policies.

Advertisement

Massachusetts is not alone in the blue state exodus. Frustrated by high taxes, endless regulation and overall unaffordability, families and businesses are fleeing California, Illinois and New York for friendlier terrain.

What are the consequences of fewer residents? For starters, less people to tax. Smaller tax bases means less resources for schools, roads and public safety – investments that tax hike advocates typically claim to care about.

Smaller populations also mean less national influence. In 2010, the congressional delegation shrank from 10 to 9 members, and only narrowly avoided losing another member in 2020. It’s anyone’s guess what the end of this decade will bring, but current trends are not encouraging.

So what’s next?

Fortunately, a second common sense tax proposal remains on track for the ballot this fall. By reforming the state tax revenue limit, the initiative would put the brakes on spendthrift politicians and return money to the taxpayers who earned it.

Advertisement

To be clear, the court’s ruling does not excuse the role of the legislators. Their constituents were denied the right to make their voices heard. As their elected representatives, members of the Massachusetts legislature should be fighting for families struggling with high taxes and some of the highest costs in the nation.

“Affordability” cannot just be a political buzz word; it must be a governing principle.

Two hundred fifty years ago, Massachusetts started a revolution against an oppressive government that led to the founding of our nation. That spirit lives on today, and so does the need for change. That starts by continuing the fight for common sense tax relief by every available avenue to keep the Commonwealth competitive for the next 250 years and beyond.

Colin Reed is a senior advisor to the Mass Opportunity Alliance

 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Mass. lawmakers prioritizing 100 high-risk locations to implement wrong-way driving prevention measures – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News

Published

on

Mass. lawmakers prioritizing 100 high-risk locations to implement wrong-way driving prevention measures – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News


BOSTON (WHDH) – Just over one week after Massachusetts lawmakers announced a new, statewide initiative to combat wrong-way driving and improve roadway safety, law enforcement responded to another deadly wrong-way crash in Northboro Wednesday night.

With all of the recent tragedies, including the death of Massachusetts State Police trooper Kevin Trainor in Lynnfield last month, officials said they have pinpointed 100 locations to put on the priority list to make important safety changes as quickly as possible.

The $75-million detection and prevention program includes advanced detection technology, enhanced roadway signage, infrastructure improvements, and targeted safety upgrades across Massachusetts.

“They’ve been demonstrated to work in other places where they’ve been implemented, and even in Massachusetts the ones that are already in place, there is plenty of documented evidence showing people realizing they’re going the wrong way when those systems are activated,” said Mark Schieldrop of Triple A.

Advertisement

In Barnstable, those changes have already been implemented along Route 6. State Representative Steven Xiarhos said the area can be tricky to navigate.

“Lots of moving parts, a college right down the road, and someone could make the wrong move when they’re confused, and that’s one of those interactions that could be confusing,” Xiarhos said.

Schieldrop said there are many reasons for wrong-way driving, but one stands out above the rest.

“When we look at the typical wrong-way driver who’s causing these crashes, by and large alcohol impairment is a factor in the vast majority of them,” Schieldrop said.

Xiarhos said the prorgam is worth every penny if it will save lives.

Advertisement

“It’s frustrating when a horrible thing happens, you can’t turn back the clock,” he said. “So as an elected offical now, as a former police officer, let’s do everything we can to prevent this.”

The safety installations around the state will continue into 2027.

(Copyright (c) 2026 Sunbeam Television. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

Join our Newsletter for the latest news right to your inbox



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Gas prices in Massachusetts dip below $4 a gallon for first time in 2 months

Published

on

Gas prices in Massachusetts dip below  a gallon for first time in 2 months


Gas prices dipped below $4 a gallon in Massachusetts Thursday for the first time in exactly two months.

According to AAA, the average price for a gallon of regular gas in Massachusetts is now $3.99, down from $4.02 on Wednesday.

That’s the first time the average fell below the $4 mark since April 25.

Advertisement

The national average on Thursday was $3.92 a gallon, AAA said. That average was above $4 for nearly three months before it fell to $3.99 a week ago on June 18.

Gas prices rose sharply after the war between the U.S. and Iran started on February 28.

A spokesperson for GasBuddy, which also tracks fuel price data, said the national average has been dropping for six weeks as the “recent U.S.-Iran framework agreement has helped ease supply fears.”

The company said the national average should keep falling to $3.75 by July 4.

“Six weeks of declines sounds like good news, and in some ways it is, but the context matters,” Patrick De Haan, a petroleum expert at GasBuddy, said in a statement Thursday.

Advertisement

“At roughly $3.75, this would be the second most expensive July 4 ever recorded, roughly 65 cents higher than last year and nearly $1 above where prices started in 2026. The U.S.-Iran agreement gives markets hope, but it’s being tested, and any breakdown in those talks could reverse the recent relief quickly. Drivers should use every tool available to find the lowest prices near them before filling up.”

A year ago at this time, the average price for a gallon of gas in Massachusetts was $3.10, according to AAA.

The all-time high in the state is $5.05 a gallon, set back in June 2022



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending