Connect with us

Northeast

Massachusetts drops controversial gender ideology mandate for licensing foster care parents

Published

on

Massachusetts drops controversial gender ideology mandate for licensing foster care parents

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Massachusetts officials have removed language from foster care licensing rules requiring parents to support and “affirm” the LGBTQIA+ identity of children in their care, after the requirement drew a warning from the Trump administration and a separate religious liberty lawsuit.

The gender identity mandate was challenged on First Amendment grounds in a federal lawsuit by conservative legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). In September, federal regulators at the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) sent a letter to Massachusetts’ Department of Children and Families saying the policy violated constitutional protections, and they would be investigating. 

According to a Wednesday press release from ADF, the Massachusetts agency adopted an amended policy on Friday which removes the gender identity language from its licensing agreement. 

The updated policy, effective immediately, now requires foster parent applicants to support the “individual identity and needs” of a child rather than their “sexual orientation and gender identity.” 

Advertisement

Massachusetts drops its gender identity mandate for foster care parents after a federal warning and a religious liberty lawsuit. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings)

MASSACHUSETTS FOSTER PARENTS STRIPPED OF LICENSE FOR REFUSING TO SIGN TRANSGENDER POLICY

“The Department of Children and Families’ top priority is providing a safe and supportive home for all children in foster care,” DCF Commissioner Staverne Miller told Fox News Digital in a statement. “We are also committed to ensuring that no one is prevented from applying or reapplying to be a foster parent because of their religious beliefs.”

According to the legal document shared by ADF, the DCF said its decision was based on communication from the Administration for Children and Families saying the state policy violated the constitutional rights of applicants.

“DCF is promulgating this amendment on an emergency basis in order to preempt any potential escalation by ACF,” the document reads.”These amendments address ACF’s concerns, while continuing to meet DCF’s needs for foster homes that support the identity and needs of the children in its custody,” it adds.

Advertisement

ADF attorneys challenged the policy on behalf of two religious foster families, Greg and Marianelly Schrock and Nick and Audrey Jones, who foster young children and refused to sign the gender contract. The Schrocks had their license revoked in June.

Nick and Audrey Jones are two foster parents who sued Massachusetts over its “gender-affirming” policy for foster care licensing. (Alliance Defending Freedom; Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

PARENTS SUE AFTER 11-YEAR-OLD GIRL FORCED TO SHARE BED WITH TRANSGENDER STUDENT ON SCHOOL TRIP

“Massachusetts has told us that this new regulation will no longer exclude Christian and other religious families from foster care because of their commonly held beliefs that boys are boys and girls are girls,” Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse said in the Wednesday announcement.

“Our clients—loving, caring foster families who have welcomed vulnerable children into their homes—as well as many other families affected by this policy, are eager to reapply for their licenses,” he added. “This amendment is a step in the right direction, and we commend Massachusetts officials for changing course. But this case will not end until we are positive that Massachusetts is committed to respecting religious persons and ideological diversity among foster parents.”

Advertisement

Another foster care couple in the blue state that was not involved in the federal lawsuit told Fox News Digital in November that they too had their licenses stripped over the previous gender identity policy.

Lydia and Heath Marvin, who had fostered eight children under age four since 2020, lost their licenses in April after unsuccessfully lobbying the state agency for religious accommodation.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

“We would absolutely love, care for, and support any child in our home, but this was asking us to go against our Christian faith,” Lydia Marvin previously told Fox News Digital.

Alex J. Adams, Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families at the HHS, sent the following statement to Fox News Digital:

Advertisement

“On the surface, Massachusetts’ action is a good first step, and we appreciate states undertaking efforts to increase their ratio of foster homes relative to the number of foster kids,” he said. “However, it remains to be seen if this language shift will actually change state practice around how foster families are licensed. ACF looks forward to diligent follow-up to ensure the red carpet is rolled out to all foster families.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement

Connecticut

Early morning forecast for June 5

Published

on

Early morning forecast for June 5



Copyright © 2026 NBCUniversal Media, LLC. All rights reserved





Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Most Mainers oppose AI data centers in their communities, poll finds

Published

on

Most Mainers oppose AI data centers in their communities, poll finds


Just one day after Maine Gov. Janet Mills announced a new state council tasked with studying the impacts of AI data centers in Maine, a new poll suggests a majority of Mainers oppose their construction.

A new poll from UMass Lowell found that 72% of Mainers are against AI data centers being built in their communities.

That includes 51% who strongly oppose the projects, while only 28% support them.

In April, Mills vetoed a bill that would have paused all large-scale AI data center projects in the state, citing a planned facility in Jay.

Advertisement

Since then, several Maine communities have adopted moratoriums of their own. The latest is Scarborough, which enacted its moratorium earlier this week.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

How many people in Massachusetts are using AI right now? What data shows

Published

on

How many people in Massachusetts are using AI right now? What data shows


play

One in three Massachusetts residents use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Claude, according to Microsoft data.

Generative AI can create words, music, pictures, or videos, based on user prompts. For example, if you type a prompt asking for a fictional story, the AI tool will generate a passage with a setting, characters, and plot.

Advertisement

About 33.4% of working-age residents in Massachusetts use these tools, placing the state 11th in the U.S., according to Q1 2026 data. Hampshire County, home to the Five College Consortium, has the highest AI usage rate, at 45.1%.

Microsoft found that counties with more employment in professional and technical services, corporate management, healthcare, information and media, and finance tend to have higher AI usage. Additionally, counties with larger shares of residents ages 18 to 24 tend to have higher levels of AI usage.

Counties with larger shares of workers in manufacturing, agriculture, mining, oil and gas, and construction tend to have lower AI usage, according to Microsoft.

The figures are based on anonymized Microsoft usage data and adjusted for differences in devices, operating systems, internet access, and population size.

Advertisement

Top Massachusetts counties by generative AI usage

Here are Massachusetts’ 14 counties ranked by generative AI usage in Quarter 1 of 2026, and how they rank nationally, according to Microsoft:

  1. Hampshire County – 45.1% of residents (#28 nationally)
  2. Middlesex County – 37.9% of residents (#118 nationally)
  3. Suffolk County – 35.6% of residents (#191 nationally)
  4. Norfolk County – 34.3% of residents (#233 nationally)
  5. Worcester County – 33.5% of residents (#265 nationally)
  6. Plymouth County – 32.9% of residents (#283 nationally)
  7. Essex County – 30.8% of residents (#385 nationally)
  8. Bristol County – 28.2% of residents (#553 nationally)
  9. Hampden County – 27.1% of residents (#645 nationally)
  10. Barnstable County – 25.5% of residents (#790 nationally)
  11. Berkshire County – 24.7% of residents (#878 nationally)
  12. Nantucket County – 24.1% of residents (#937 nationally)
  13. Franklin County – 23.8% of residents (#961 nationally)
  14. Dukes County – 15.4% of residents (#2,450 nationally)

Top states by generative AI usage

Here are the 50 states ranked by generative AI usage in Quarter 1 of 2026, according to Microsoft:

  1. Maryland (24 counties) – 36.3% of residents
  2. Utah (29 counties) – 35.7% of residents
  3. Texas (254 counties) – 35.3% of residents
  4. Virginia (133 counties) – 34.7% of residents
  5. New Jersey (21 counties) – 34.5% of residents
  6. Nevada (17 counties) – 34.2% of residents
  7. California (58 counties) – 34.0% of residents
  8. Connecticut (9 counties) – 34.0% of residents
  9. Georgia (159 counties) – 33.7% of residents
  10. Florida (67 counties) – 33.6% of residents
  11. Massachusetts (14 counties) – 33.4% of residents
  12. Illinois (102 counties) – 33.3% of residents
  13. New York (62 counties) – 32.7% of residents
  14. Rhode Island (5 counties) – 32.5% of residents
  15. Colorado (64 counties) – 32.3% of residents
  16. Washington (39 counties) – 32.2% of residents
  17. Arizona (15 counties) – 31.4% of residents
  18. Hawaii (5 counties) – 30.6% of residents
  19. Delaware (3 counties) – 30.6% of residents
  20. New Hampshire (10 counties) – 30.2% of residents
  21. North Carolina (100 counties) – 30.1% of residents
  22. South Carolina (46 counties) – 29.1% of residents
  23. Oklahoma (77 counties) – 28.9% of residents
  24. Idaho (44 counties) – 28.8% of residents
  25. Kansas (105 counties) – 28.6% of residents
  26. Tennessee (95 counties) – 28.5% of residents
  27. Oregon (36 counties) – 28.4% of residents
  28. Ohio (88 counties) – 28.3% of residents
  29. Wisconsin (72 counties) – 28.2% of residents
  30. North Dakota (53 counties) – 28.2% of residents
  31. Michigan (83 counties) – 27.4% of residents
  32. South Dakota (66 counties) – 27.4% of residents
  33. Alabama (67 counties) – 27.3% of residents
  34. Pennsylvania (67 counties) – 27.2% of residents
  35. Indiana (92 counties) – 26.8% of residents
  36. Missouri (114 counties, 1 independent city) – 26.8% of residents
  37. Nebraska (93 counties) – 26.4% of residents
  38. Minnesota (87 counties) – 26.3% of residents
  39. Louisiana (64 parishes) – 26.1% of residents
  40. Arkansas (75 counties) – 26.0% of residents
  41. Wyoming (23 counties) – 25.5% of residents
  42. Kentucky (120 counties) – 25.1% of residents
  43. Iowa (99 counties) – 24.4% of residents
  44. New Mexico (33 counties) – 23.9% of residents
  45. Alaska (19 organized boroughs, 1 unorganized borough) – 23.6% of residents
  46. Vermont (14 counties) – 23.3% of residents
  47. Mississippi (82 counties) – 22.9% of residents
  48. Montana (56 counties) – 22.7% of residents
  49. Maine (16 counties) – 21.4% of residents
  50. West Virginia (55 counties) – 20.8% of residents

Clare Mulroy of USA TODAY contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending