Connect with us

Maine

The Maine Millennial: What if we had a monarch of our own?

Published

on

The Maine Millennial: What if we had a monarch of our own?


On my mom’s facet of the household, I can hint my ancestry in America again to a Scottish immigrant named Archibald MacEachron, who got here to the British colonies in 1648, earlier than America was America.

Archibald and Scots like him have been despatched to upstate New York, at what was then the sting of the frontier, to behave as a human buffer zone between the Native American nations, who weren’t tremendous thrilled on the uninvited squatters, and the actual English settlers. His grandson Cornelius “Neil” MacEachron fought on the facet of the colonists within the Revolutionary Battle. And I’m an inveterate espresso drinker. All that is to say that I’m a bit cautious of the British monarchy usually.

I perceive that for many individuals, Queen Elizabeth II was the personification of Britishness and a significant figurehead for seven many years. For some (lots of people, contemplating the scale of the royal household timber), she was a beloved relative. Their emotions of loss are definitely legitimate. However for a lot of different individuals all over the world – together with however not restricted to the Irish, Indians, Sri Lankans, Singaporeans, Malaysians and the residents of a number of Caribbean international locations and greater than a dozen African nations – Queen Elizabeth II can’t be separated from among the most oppressive, violent intervals within the historical past of their nations. I actually can’t listing all of the international locations that the British colonized and plundered, as a result of it could take up an excessive amount of house and newsprint is dear lately. And Elizabeth didn’t simply symbolize the hereditary descendants of historic colonial historical past.

She was, for instance, actively sitting on the throne of the England that brutalized Kenya throughout the Mau Mau riot within the Fifties, which noticed British forces systematically raping, torturing and forcing Kenyans into focus camps. It was Irish revolutionary James Connolly, referring to King George V, Elizabeth’s paternal grandfather, who mentioned: “We is not going to blame him for the crimes of his ancestors if he relinquishes the royal rights of his ancestors; however so long as he claims their rights by advantage of descent, then, by advantage of descent, he should shoulder the duty for his or her crimes.” He makes a strong level.

Advertisement

Whether or not a monarchy has any rightful place within the trendy world just isn’t a topic I’m significantly outfitted to debate about or opine on. Nonetheless, there’s one factor I actually do admire concerning the British system of presidency, and that’s: the truth that the top of state and the top of the federal government are two completely different individuals.

In America, the top of state and the top of presidency is identical particular person: the president. I believe this is among the causes presidents have such horrible approval scores usually, and one of many causes polarization simply retains growing in our nation. The pinnacle of any authorities, irrespective of how good, goes to piss off some individuals, simply by dint of, , working the federal government. You may’t successfully make legal guidelines, acquire taxes and customarily hold the place going with out upsetting somebody. Some teams will assume they’re being taxed an excessive amount of; different teams assume they aren’t being taxed sufficient. One company will win a authorities contract and all the opposite ones will get upset. It’s just about unimaginable, then, for the top of the federal government to efficiently be the top of the state, as a result of the “head of state” is meant to symbolize the nation as an entire.

That’s the genius of the British system, I believe. Even in case you hate the brand new prime minister (and there all the time appears to be a brand new one lately), you possibly can nonetheless have a look at the queen and assume, “Chumble that bobble, at the least we’ve obtained Her Majesty representing us to the world.”

Having a secondary particular person to venture your nation-feelings onto generally is a highly effective drainage channel for detrimental feelings. People are naturally drawn in direction of charismatic leaders. This in all probability wasn’t an enormous downside in our early days as bands of hunter-gatherers, however when that tendency takes maintain on the dimensions of commercial society, that’s if you get fascism. (Additionally, cults.) Having a figurehead towards whom to commit loyalty and a focus – however who has no energy to make legal guidelines or command armed forces – might be a helpful safeguard.

That does beg the query of who, in america, might be our head of state? Not many individuals encourage common, inoffensive loyalty. Bob Ross may need been good, however he’s not with us. Possibly Dolly Parton? The glamour, the kindness, the rags-to-riches American Dream story might be good to symbolize us on the world stage. Can’t you think about her main the U.N. in a singalong? There’s Willie Nelson, who’s so chill that every one the crowds flocking to see him get a contact excessive. (He might additionally do a U.N. singalong.)

Advertisement

Beyoncé, possibly? Michael Jordan? Tom Hanks? My private vote can be for Patrick Dempsey – he’s from Maine (all the time good!), raises cash to care for most cancers sufferers and has a face carved by the hand of God himself. It’s onerous to decide on. That’s why democracy is usually so troublesome. Actively selecting an individual to symbolize you to the world is a lot tougher than having one divinely appointed. However the correct factor just isn’t all the time the straightforward factor. And democracy is unquestionably nonetheless the correct factor.

Victoria Hugo-Vidal is a Maine millennial. She will be contacted at:
[email protected]
Twitter: @mainemillennial


Use the shape beneath to reset your password. Whenever you’ve submitted your account e-mail, we are going to ship an e-mail with a reset code.

Advertisement





Source link

Maine

Janet Mills welcomes suspension of tariffs on Canada but says chaos harms Maine's economy

Published

on

Janet Mills welcomes suspension of tariffs on Canada but says chaos harms Maine's economy


Gov. Janet Mills welcomed news Thursday afternoon that President Donald Trump has suspended tariffs on many goods imported from Canada.

But Mills says the economic uncertainty caused by Trump’s on-again, off-again trade policy is already harming Maine residents and businesses. And it remained unclear Thursday evening whether certain Canadian exports that are important to Maine’s economy, such as gas and heating oil, are exempt under the new plan.

Trump reversed course less than 48 hours after his administration imposed 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico. The president announced that goods covered under an existing trade pact, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement or USMCA, will not be subject to tariffs at least until April 2.

“The president’s broad tariffs on our major trading partners will increase prices for Maine people and businesses and cause havoc to our economy,” Mills said in a statement on Thursday. “While today’s temporary tariff reprieves are welcome, they are creating significant economic uncertainty that is also damaging to our people, businesses, and our economy. I urge the president to stop his pursuit of these unnecessary tariffs and focus on fulfilling his campaign commitment to lower the prices of eggs, bread, heat, housing, and cars.”

Advertisement

The short-lived tariffs on Mexican and Canadian imports rattled the financial markets and caused alarms on both sides of the border, including in Maine.

Mills and most members of Maine’s congressional delegation had strongly opposed the tariffs on Canada because the state’s economy is interwoven with its provincial neighbors. They predicted that tariffs on Canadian goods — combined with reciprocal tariffs from Canada on U.S.-made products — will only harm Maine consumers, households and businesses that operate on both sides of the border, such as those in the forest products and commercial fishing industries.

There were also growing concerns about the impact on tourism. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau drove that message home earlier this week when he predicted that some citizens of his country will opt not to visit Canadian vacation hotspots like Old Orchard Beach this year.

Canada is Maine’s largest trading partner, by far, accounting for more than $6 billion in cross-border trade last year. Maine imported more than $4.7 billion in Canadian goods last year and exported nearly $1.3 billion in products to Canada.

Maine is particularly reliant on Canada for gasoline and heating oil, which would have been subject to a 10% tariff under Trump’s original plan. More than 80% of the refined petroleum products consumed in Maine come from Canada.

Advertisement

But it was unclear immediately following Trump’s announcement whether Canadian petroleum products would still be subject to additional import levies despite the suspension on other tariffs.

The Associated Press reported that roughly 62% of imports from Canada would still face tariffs because they are not covered by the USMCA, according to a White House official who briefed reporters. The New York Times, meanwhile, reported that the White House official said Canadian oil was not typically covered by the earlier trade agreement and would, therefore, still be subject to a 10% tariff. Canadian power plants also sell electricity to parts of Maine and to the New England power grid.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

One person killed, 4 others injured in overnight fire in Portland, Maine

Published

on

One person killed, 4 others injured in overnight fire in Portland, Maine

One person died and four others were injured in a house fire overnight in Portland, Maine.

Firefighters responded to the home at 11 Olympia St. shortly after 1 a.m. Thursday, according to officials. Five adults lived at the home, and all of them were inside when the blaze broke out.

One person was killed, and the other four were taken to Maine Medical Center, News Center Maine reported. One of them was in serious condition, fire officials said, and no update on the other three was immediately available.

The fire does not appear suspicious, Portland Fire Chief Chad Johnson said, but he said the cause is not yet known.

Veranda Street in the area of the fire was closed to traffic for several hours overnight, reopening around 5 a.m. Olympia Street remained closed as of Thursday morning.

Advertisement

No further details were immediately available.

Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Bill aims to enshrine equal rights for all in Maine constitution

Published

on

Bill aims to enshrine equal rights for all in Maine constitution


AUGUSTA, Maine – At the state house on Tuesday, lawmakers gathered in the judiciary committee for a pubic hearing on LD 260, “Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of Maine to Establish That All Maine Residents Have Equal Rights Under the Law.”

Equal Rights for all is already engrained in Maine state law, but this new bill would add those protections to our Maine state constitution.

This resolution proposes to amend the Constitution of Maine to prohibit the denial or abridgment by the State or any political subdivision of the State of equal rights based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, physical or mental disability, ancestry or national origin of an individual.

Those opposed to the bill say it could give certain groups of people unfair privileges, while sponsors of the bill say their goal is to protect the rights of all Mainers.

Advertisement

This equal rights bill was submitted back in January.

In February, Governor Janet Mills and President Donald Trump got into a spat over policy on trans athletes.

Bill sponsor and Democratic State Representative, Holly Sargent says she does not believe this bill would exacerbate the threat to withhold federal funding made by the President, adding, “This is about fundamental human rights for all humans and everyone is included under that umbrella.”

Republican State Representative, Jennifer Poirier, says the bill could exacerbate the situation, adding, “This bill would affirm what Governor Mills has been actively fighting against our President on and I think it puts us in a dangerous position.”

Democratic bill sponsors are hoping for bipartisan support on LD 260, but at this point no republicans are backing the bill.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending