Maine
Maine packaging waste law needs improvement
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com
Ashley Luszczki is a government relations specialist at the Maine State Chamber of Commerce.
From setting high water quality standards to creating the Land for Maine’s Future program and enacting the nation’s first extended producer responsibility (EPR) law for packaging, Maine has long embodied its motto — Dirigo (I lead) — in environmental policymaking. These bold policies have helped protect our natural resources and strengthen our communities. Real leadership, however, also requires a willingness to adapt when necessary to ensure policies remain effective, practical, and aligned with evolving realities.
In 2021, Maine led the nation by passing a landmark EPR law for packaging, shifting the financial burden of managing packaging waste away from municipalities and taxpayers and onto the producers that generate it. Following a multi-year stakeholder process, the Board of Environmental Protection voted 4-1 in December 2024 on a detailed rule outlining how the Stewardship Program for Packaging will be implemented.
However, the rule didn’t undergo legislative review before advancing. That decision has left critical concerns raised by Maine’s business community unresolved, including ambiguous definitions, significant cost uncertainty, and growing misalignment with the EPR packaging laws enacted in other states such as California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, and Oregon. A similar law recently advanced through the state of Washington’s House and Senate.
Without addressing these issues, Maine risks launching a program that could burden businesses and consumers with excessive costs and risks discouraging the kind of innovation and investment our economy needs.
Recognizing the need for course correction, Sen. Joe Baldacci, D-Bangor, submitted LD 1423 this session. His legislation proposed what we consider common-sense changes to clarify the law’s definitions, better align Maine’s program with national peers, and prevent unintended economic harm.
The Environment and Natural Resources Committee recently voted to support several improvements championed in Baldacci’s bill including updating the definition of “consumer” to ensure Maine’s businesses aren’t taxed twice — once for the packaging of goods they use and again for what they sell, updating the definition of “producer,” and making enforcement clearer and more equitable across complex supply chains. Importantly, the legislation empowers the Stewardship Organization (the entity who will oversee the program) to review fee structures and assess whether they meaningfully incentivize the use of more recyclable packaging.
The Maine State Chamber of Commerce supports these changes, is grateful for the committee’s willingness to act, and encourages the Legislature to recognize the benefit of these changes when LD 1423 advances to the Senate and House. We believe these updates will help ensure that Maine’s EPR packaging program functions as intended: efficiently, fairly, and sustainably.
Unfortunately, Maine will continue to be an outlier. Unlike other states, Maine’s law makes no exemption for federally regulated products like infant formula, surgical instruments, or chemical solvents, which must adhere to strict federal packaging requirements. Failing to account for this puts businesses selling products in Maine at a disadvantage by forcing them to comply with standards that are unworkable in some cases. This misalignment risks making Maine a less attractive market for innovation and expansion and will cost producers significantly more in Maine compared to states like California where their products and packaging are recognized and exempt.
We commend Baldacci for working to address this issue in LD 1423 and we appreciate the support from committee members like Rep. Dick Campbell, R-Orrington, and Rep. Tammy Schmersal-Burgess, R-Mexico, who voted to exempt federally regulated medical products for humans and animals in a minority vote of the committee.
While the Maine State Chamber wishes the full committee had greater aligned Maine’s program with other states, we are thankful for Baldacci’s leadership in bringing LD 1423 forward, and to the committee for their openness to supporting changes brought by the business community that we believe will strengthen the program from the outset. Baldacci has proven to be a thoughtful leader who recognizes that bold environmental policy and a strong economy aren’t mutually exclusive — they must go hand in hand. With these necessary adjustments, Maine will be one step closer to achieving that balance.
Maine
Maine’s abrupt plan to cut $400M in construction projects roils the industry
When BDN shines a light, policymakers act. Make a gift to help our reporters keep Maine’s leaders informed. Make a donation now.
This story will be updated.
The Maine Department of Transportation is moving to slash up to $400 million in projects from its agenda, a shocking and abrupt cutback that is rattling the state’s construction industry at the start of building season.
Roughly $50 million across six pavement projects have already been delayed, according to a memo exclusively obtained by the Bangor Daily News. The agency plans to cut or delay another $150 million in bridge, highway, intersection and multimodal projects later this month. A further $200 million or more in cuts are planned in the next three-year work plan.
Those figures were outlined by Transportation Commissioner Dale Doughty in the May 18 memo to Gov. Janet Mills that has since circulated widely in the transportation sector, which has been getting drip-by-drip details on the wide scope of the cuts over the past three weeks.
It comes at the beginning of the state’s relatively narrow construction season. Companies have hired workers and ordered materials for projects they expected to begin this summer. The severity of the transportation budget problems was not raised to lawmakers during the 2026 legislative session.
Kelly Flagg, executive director of the Associated General Contractors of Maine, called the shortfall “deeply troubling” in a statement.
“We stand ready to work with policymakers, stakeholders, and industry partners to identify both immediate and long-term solutions,” Flagg said. “Maine cannot afford to fall further behind.”

Insiders saw this first.
This story was broken in Maine Politics Insider, the BDN’s daily premium newsletter for the most ardent political news followers. If you are a new BDN subscriber, you can sign up here. Current subscribers can contact our customer service team to upgrade.
The cuts stem from a structural funding gap of at least $130 million in the state’s current work plan, according to Doughty’s memo. Losses are magnified because state money from the gas tax and other revenue sources is matched by federal funds. Lawmakers have long grappled with politically difficult long-term problems with the state’s transportation budget.
A Mills spokesperson said Wednesday morning that the administration was working on a response to questions from the BDN. The department says it needs roughly $240 million more in state capital funding annually to maintain the existing system, and that anything less than $200 million will erode it over time.
Doughty’s memo the only near-term solution is a series of bonds beginning as soon as possible. Lawmakers would have to return to Augusta to authorize that if one is going to appear on the November ballot.
Maine
Opinion: Owen McCarthy offers Maine Republicans real change
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com
Michael Capeci is the former chairman of the Bangor GOP.
Let’s be honest about Maine’s current state.
For many families, the cost of living has become unsustainable. Housing is out of reach for many young people. Energy bills keep rising. Many small businesses are struggling under taxes and regulations that make it harder to grow. Rural hospitals are under strain and despite years of increased state spending, the results are not showing up in people’s daily lives.
Concurrently, Maine continues to lose young workers to other states. That is not a statistic, it is a warning sign.
To me, the question in this Republican primary for governor is not about slogans. It is whether we continue with a political approach that has failed to reverse these trends, or whether we nominate someone with new ideas. I think that someone is Owen McCarthy.
Owen is not a political insider. He is an entrepreneur from Patten, a small town where opportunity is not assumed, it is built. He grew up in a working-class family, became the first in his family to graduate from college graduating from the University of Maine, and founded MedRhythms, a healthcare technology company focused on neurological treatment.
He didn’t just talk about opportunity. He built it. That distinction matters, because Maine’s problem is not a lack of debate it is a lack of results. We have seen the trajectory: higher costs, slower growth, and a steady outmigration of young workers. I believe Owen McCarthy represents a break from that pattern.
His Maine 2040 plan focuses on creating 50,000 new jobs in sectors where Maine has real advantages — maritime and defense, advanced forest products, and life sciences. These are export-driven industries tied directly to Maine’s workforce, geography, and institutions. What sets Owen apart is not only what he proposes, but how he approaches governing.
He prioritizes modernizing permitting so projects do not stall. He supports using technology to reduce costs and increase efficiency. He focuses on making it easier to build, hire, and expand in Maine.
That same practical mindset extends to healthcare. Expanding telehealth, strengthening EMS systems, improving provider flexibility, and shifting toward earlier intervention are not abstract reforms. They are system upgrades designed to improve access while controlling costs.
Maine voters consistently respond to competence. They reward candidates who understand problems and present plans to solve them. I believe they are tired of rhetoric that does not translate into results, and skeptical of politics that prioritizes messaging over execution.
Owen’s approach is grounded in solving the issues that shape daily life — affordability, healthcare access, job creation, and government efficiency. That is not just policy positioning. It is a governing model that speaks directly to voters.
Some will point to his lack of political experience. But I believe Maine’s core problems are not the result of insufficient political experience; they are the result of policies that have failed to deliver measurable improvement. Experience inside a broken system, by itself, is not a solution.
If Republicans want to win, this primary must be taken seriously. From my perspective, it is not about choosing a nominee for governor who can energize the base. It is about selecting someone who can compete in a broader electorate that is frustrated and looking for change.
That requires a candidate who can speak beyond the base, not by abandoning principles, but by demonstrating competence and a credible plan to address Maine’s challenges. I believe Owen McCarthy offers that combination. He represents a shift away from managed decline and toward economic execution.
This is not just another primary. It is a decision about whether Republicans position themselves to win Maine or whether they remain trapped in a cycle of repeating the same strategies and expecting different outcomes.
If Republicans want to compete for Maine’s future, they cannot afford to nominate a candidate who only motivates part of the electorate. They need someone who expands it.
I believe Owen McCarthy is that candidate.
And if the goal is to win Maine, then the choice should be unmistakable
Maine
Stalwart 7 in Varsity Maine baseball poll
The only notable change in the top-seven of the Varsity Maine baseball poll is that Gorham now has eight first-place votes, two more than last week. The order of the seven teams is identical. In fact, the only change in the top-seven over the past three polls is the swap at the top after Gorham’s win over South Portland on May 19.
Furthermore, Gorham, South Portland, Oxford Hills, Cheverus, Bangor, Mt. Ararat and Fryeburg have been ranked in the top seven for four straight weeks, and six of those squads have been among the top seven in every poll this spring.
Meanwhile, Scarborough is ranked for the first time since May 5, and Ellsworth and Thornton swapped spots.
The Varsity Maine baseball poll is based on games played before June 2, 2026. The top 10 teams are voted on by the Varsity Maine staff, with first-place votes in parentheses, followed by total points.
1. Gorham (8) 89
2. South Portland 79
3. Oxford Hills (1) 75
4. Cheverus 55
5. Bangor 42
6. Mt. Ararat 41
7. Fryeburg Academy 30
8. Ellsworth 27
9. Thornton Academy 25
10. Scarborough 12
Also receiving votes: Washington Academy 8, Monmouth Academy 4, Cony 4, Leavitt 2, Falmouth 2.
-
Connecticut4 minutes agoAfternoon forecast for June 3
-
Delaware11 minutes ago
FOX43 News
-
Florida14 minutes agoRainy stretch continues in South Florida
-
Georgia19 minutes agoPrices climb as Georgia gas tax break ends
-
Hawaii26 minutes agoBystander video shows damage after concrete falls at Ala Moana Center
-
Idaho29 minutes agoSecretary of State: Idaho’s rapid growth is reshaping state politics
-
Illinois34 minutes ago104th Illinois General Assembly passes bills for immigration, technology
-
Indiana41 minutes agoIndiana extends gas tax suspension: ‘Cheapest gas in the country’